Abstract
Metabolomics aims to identify and quantify metabolites in biological samples to understand better biological changes resulting from lifestyle, environment, or disease. This is challenging due to the structural diversity of the metabolites and the complexity of samples of interest, such as blood and urine, useful in population studies to study biological changes in large cohorts. The limited number of commercially available standards and incomplete metabolite spectral databases impedes the identification of many metabolites. Furthermore, the need for more standardization in sample preparation, analysis, and interpretation of data is an important issue that can influence results in large cohort studies. Variations or errors occurring during the pre-analytical stage can highly affect levels of metabolites. In this mini-review, we outline the challenges associated with population metabolomic studies and show an overview of current practices in the field with some case studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- APCI:
-
Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization
- ASQ:
-
Age and stage questionnaire
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CI:
-
Chemical ionization
- COMETS:
-
COnsortium of METabolomic Studies
- CV:
-
Coefficient of variation
- DNA:
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- EDIH:
-
Empirical dietary index of hyperinsulinemia
- EDTA:
-
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- EI:
-
Electron ionization (electron impact)
- ESI:
-
Electrospray ionization
- FDR:
-
False discovery rate
- GC-MS:
-
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
- HDL:
-
High-density lipoprotein
- HMDB:
-
Human metabolome database
- IS:
-
Internal standard
- LC-MS:
-
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
- LOD:
-
Limit of detection
- LTR:
-
Long-term reference
- MALDI:
-
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
- MAR:
-
Missing at random
- MCAR:
-
Missing completely at random
- MNAR:
-
Missing not at random
- MS:
-
Mass spectrometry
- NIST:
-
National Institute of Standards and Technology
- NMR:
-
Nuclear magnetic resonance
- OPLS-DA:
-
Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
- QA:
-
Quality assurance
- QC:
-
Quality control
- QqQ:
-
Triple quadrupole
- QqTOF:
-
Quadrupole time of flight
- QRILC:
-
Quantile regression imputation of left-censored data
- RNA:
-
Ribonucleic acid
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic curve
- SRM:
-
Standard reference material
- VLDL:
-
Very-low-density lipoprotein
- WGCNA:
-
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis
References
Vailati-Riboni M, Palombo V, Loor JJ. What are omics sciences? In: Periparturient diseases of dairy cows; 2017. p. 1–7.
Aderemi AV, et al. Metabolomics: a scoping review of its role as a tool for disease biomarker discovery in selected non-communicable diseases. Meta. 2021;11(7):418.
Gika HG, et al. Current practice of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in metabolomics and metabonomics. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;87:12–25.
Playdon MC, et al. Metabolomics analytics workflow for epidemiological research: perspectives from the consortium of metabolomics studies (COMETS). Meta. 2019;9(7):145.
Cui L, Lu H, Lee YH. Challenges and emergent solutions for LC-MS/MS-based untargeted metabolomics in diseases. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2018;37(6):772–92.
Villas-Boas SG, et al. Mass spectrometry in metabolome analysis. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2005;24(5):613–46.
Kirwan JA, et al. Preanalytical processing and biobanking procedures of biological samples for metabolomics research: a white paper, community perspective (for “precision medicine and pharmacometabolomics task group”-the metabolomics society initiative). Clin Chem. 2018;64(8):1158–82.
Bouatra S, et al. The human urine metabolome. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73076.
Psychogios N, et al. The human serum metabolome. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16957.
Chen Y, et al. Methods used to increase the comprehensive coverage of urinary and plasma metabolomes by MS. Bioanalysis. 2016;8(9):981–97.
Lippi G, et al. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(4):358–65.
Szecsi PB, Odum L. Error tracking in a clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(10):1253–7.
Stevens VL, et al. Pre-analytical factors that affect metabolite stability in human urine, plasma, and serum: a review. Metabolites. 2019;9(8):156.
Denery JR, Nunes AA, Dickerson TJ. Characterization of differences between blood sample matrices in untargeted metabolomics. Anal Chem. 2011;83(3):1040–7.
Wu J, Gao Y. Physiological conditions can be reflected in human urine proteome and metabolome. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2015;12(6):623–36.
Bernini P, et al. Standard operating procedures for pre-analytical handling of blood and urine for metabolomic studies and biobanks. J Biomol NMR. 2011;49(3–4):231–43.
Wu Y, Li L. Sample normalization methods in quantitative metabolomics. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1430:80–95.
Evans AM, et al. Dissemination and analysis of the quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) practices of LC-MS based untargeted metabolomics practitioners. Metabolomics. 2020;16(10):113.
Long NP, et al. Toward a standardized strategy of clinical metabolomics for the advancement of precision medicine. Meta. 2020;10(2):51.
Beger RD, et al. Towards quality assurance and quality control in untargeted metabolomics studies. Metabolomics. 2019;15(1):4.
Blazenovic I, et al. Software tools and approaches for compound identification of LC-MS/MS data in metabolomics. Meta. 2018;8(2):31.
Spicer R, et al. Navigating freely-available software tools for metabolomics analysis. Metabolomics. 2017;13(9):106.
Vinaixa M, et al. Mass spectral databases for LC/MS- and GC/MS-based metabolomics: state of the field and future prospects. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2016;78:23–35.
Misra BB. New software tools, databases, and resources in metabolomics: updates from 2020. Metabolomics. 2021;17(5):49.
Wishart DS, et al. HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D608–17.
Kind T, et al. Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2018;37(4):513–32.
Cajka T, Fiehn O. Toward merging untargeted and targeted methods in mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and lipidomics. Anal Chem. 2016;88(1):524–45.
Tautenhahn R, et al. XCMS online: a web-based platform to process untargeted metabolomic data. Anal Chem. 2012;84(11):5035–9.
Pluskal T, et al. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11(1):1–11.
Tsugawa H, et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat Methods. 2015;12(6):523–6.
Gurdeniz G, et al. The effect of LC-MS data preprocessing methods on the selection of plasma biomarkers in fed vs. fasted rats. Metabolites. 2012;2(1):77–99.
Chen Y, et al. Assessment of data pre-processing methods for LC-MS/MS-based metabolomics of uterine cervix cancer. Analyst. 2013;138(9):2669–77.
Hohrenk LL, et al. Comparison of software tools for liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry data processing in nontarget screening of environmental samples. Anal Chem. 2020;92(2):1898–907.
Coble JB, Fraga CG. Comparative evaluation of preprocessing freeware on chromatography/mass spectrometry data for signature discovery. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1358:155–64.
Thevenot EA, et al. Analysis of the human adult urinary metabolome variations with age, body mass index, and gender by implementing a comprehensive workflow for univariate and OPLS statistical analyses. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(8):3322–35.
Lawton KA, et al. Analysis of the adult human plasma metabolome. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9(4):383–97.
Perng W, et al. Urate and nonanoate mark the relationship between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and blood pressure in adolescent girls: a metabolomics analysis in the ELEMENT cohort. Meta. 2019;9(5):100.
Tabung FK, et al. Identifying metabolomic profiles of Insulinemic dietary patterns. Meta. 2019;9(6):120.
Ose J, et al. Multiplatform urinary metabolomics profiling to discriminate cachectic from non-cachectic colorectal cancer patients: pilot results from the ColoCare study. Meta. 2019;9(9):178.
Taylor K, et al. Differences in pregnancy metabolic profiles and their determinants between white European and South Asian women: findings from the born in Bradford cohort. Meta. 2019;9(9):190.
Santos Ferreira DL, et al. Associations between blood metabolic profile at 7 years old and eating disorders in adolescence: findings from the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Meta. 2019;9(9):191.
Ellul S, et al. Metabolomics: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian children aged 11-12 years and their parents. BMJ Open. 2019;9(Suppl 3):106–17.
Karpievitch YV, Dabney AR, Smith RD. Normalization and missing value imputation for label-free LC-MS analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2012;13(16):1–9.
Lazar C, et al. Accounting for the multiple natures of missing values in label-free quantitative proteomics data sets to compare imputation strategies. J Proteome Res. 2016;15(4):1116–25.
Wei R, et al. Missing value imputation approach for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):663.
Antonelli J, et al. Statistical workflow for feature selection in human metabolomics data. Meta. 2019;9(7):143.
Andrade C. Multiple testing and protection against a type 1 (false positive) error using the Bonferroni and Hochberg corrections. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41(1):99–100.
Pang Z, et al. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W388–96.
Xia J, et al. MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W652–60.
Oliver SG, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16(9):373–8.
Bendinelli B, et al. Prediagnostic circulating metabolites in female breast cancer cases with low and high mammographic breast density. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13025.
Qi J, et al. Metabolomics and cancer preventive behaviors in the BC generations project. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12094.
Larkin JR, et al. Metabolomic biomarkers in blood samples identify cancers in a mixed population of patients with nonspecific symptoms. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:1651.
Li L, et al. Metabolomics-based discovery of molecular signatures for triple negative breast cancer in Asian female population. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):370.
Seow WJ, et al. Association of untargeted urinary metabolomics and lung cancer risk among never-smoking women in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9):e1911970.
Kelly RS, et al. Metabolomics and communication skills development in children; evidence from the ages and stages questionnaire. Meta. 2019;9(3):42.
Titan SM, et al. Metabolomics biomarkers and the risk of overall mortality and ESRD in CKD: results from the Progredir cohort. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213764.
Bot M, et al. Metabolomics profile in depression: a pooled analysis of 230 metabolic markers in 5283 cases with depression and 10,145 controls. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87(5):409–18.
Wang J, et al. Discovery of potential biomarkers for osteoporosis using LC-MS/MS metabolomic methods. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(7):1491–9.
Surowiec I, et al. Metabolomic and lipidomic assessment of the metabolic syndrome in Dutch middle-aged individuals reveals novel biological signatures separating health and disease. Metabolomics. 2019;15(2):23.
Al Rashid K, et al. Association of the functional ovarian reserve with serum metabolomic profiling by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a cross-sectional study of ~ 400 women. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):247.
Hellmuth C, et al. An individual participant data meta-analysis on metabolomics profiles for obesity and insulin resistance in European children. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5053.
Wang Y, et al. Identification and reproducibility of plasma metabolomic biomarkers of habitual food intake in a US diet validation study. Meta. 2020;10(10):382.
Wang Y, et al. Identification and reproducibility of urinary Metabolomic biomarkers of habitual food intake in a cross-sectional analysis of the cancer prevention Study-3 diet assessment sub-study. Meta. 2021;11(4):1.
Darst BF, et al. Longitudinal plasma metabolomics of aging and sex. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(4):1262.
Lau CE, et al. Determinants of the urinary and serum metabolome in children from six European populations. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):202.
Brachem C, et al, Oluwagbemigun K. Associations of BMI and body fat with urine metabolome in adolescents are sex-specific: a cross-sectional study. Metabolites. 2020;10(8).
McClain KM, et al. Body composition and metabolomics in the Alberta physical activity and breast cancer prevention trial. J Nutr. 2022;152(2):419–28.
Zanetti KA. The future of metabolomic profiling in population-based research: opportunities and challenges. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2014;5(4):2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mireault, M., Sleno, L. (2023). LC-MS-Based Population Metabolomics: A Mini-Review of Recent Studies and Challenges from Sample Collection to Data Processing. In: Abdel Rahman, A.M. (eds) Clinical Metabolomics Applications in Genetic Diseases. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5162-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5162-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5161-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5162-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)