Skip to main content

Freezing and Tonic Immobility: Their Definitions and Naming

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Death-Feigning in Insects

Part of the book series: Entomology Monographs ((ENTMON))

Abstract

Defensive immobility behaviors, the so-called freezing and tonic immobility (death-feigning), are discussed. Freezing occurs when the prey encounters a predator, while tonic immobility occurs at the time of the predator’s attack. Since these two immobility reactions have some similarity in appearance, they have sometimes been used incorrectly in reports. To clarify the difference between these two immobility reactions, their characteristics, definitions, mechanisms, and functions are summarized. As for the naming of the two immobility reactions, the term “freezing” has no obvious problem for usage because what it indicates is easily understood. On the other hand, “tonic immobility (TI)” is a bit complicated because many different terms including TI have been used to indicate the same or a similar immobility reaction. In this book, the most appropriate naming is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson DJ, Adolphs R (2014) A framework for studying emotions across species. Cell 157:187–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bässler U (1983) Neural basis of elementary behavior in stick insects. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard RJ, Flannelly KJ, Blanchard DC (1986) Defensive behaviors of laboratory and wild Rattus norvegicus. J Comp Psychol 100-2:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich O (1928) Thanatose und Hyonose bei Coleopteren. Z Morph u Ökol Tiere 10:1–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolles RC (1970) Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychol Rev 77(1):32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows M (1996) The neurobiology of an insect brain. Oxford Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Card GM (2012) Escape behaviors in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:180–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chertok L (1968) Animal hypnosis. In: Fox MW (ed) Abnormal behavior in animals. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 129–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne JA (2016) Animal “hypnosis” and waking nightmares biological and experiential origins of malevolent spirits. Zeitschrift für Anomalistik, Band 16:307–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier W (1923) Reflex immobility and the central nervous system. Proc Soc Exp Biol 21:55–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dambach M (1989) Vibrational responses. In: Huber F, Moor TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1872) The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1900) A posthumous essay on instinct. In: Romanes GJ (ed) Mental evolution in animals. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesang RB, Büschges A (1993) The neural basis of catalepsy in the stick insects. IV. Properties of nonspiking interneurons. J Comp Physiol A 173:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgren RA, Edgren MK (1955) Experiments on buffing and death-feigning in the hognose snake Heterodon platyrhinos. Copeia 1:2–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonston WE Jr (1967) Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In: Gordon JE (ed) Handbook of clinical and experimental hypnosis. Macmillan, New York, pp 345–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds M (1974) Defense in animals. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D (2005) Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense—implications for the control of defensive behavior. Neurosoci Behav Rev 29:1181–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre JH (1900) Souvenirs entomologiques. Delagrave, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley JP (1938) Tonic immobility in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) induced by manipulation, immobilization, and experimental inversion of the visual field. J Comp Psychol 26:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedel T (1999) The vibrational startle response of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. J Exp Biol 202:2151–2159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup GG Jr (1974) Animal hypnosis: factual status of a fictional concept. Psychol Bull 81:836–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson WT, Gonzalez CR, Fernandez C, Ramasmy L, Tabachnik T, Du RR, Felsen PD, Maire MR, Perna P, Anderson DJ (2015) Behavioral responses to a repetitive visual threat stimulus express a persistent state of defensive arousal in Drosophila. Curr Biol 25:1401–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman TT, Marcuse FL (1949) Animal hypnosis. Psychol Bull 46:141–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godden DH (1972) The motor innervation of the leg musculature and motor output during thanatosis in the stick insect Carusius morosus Br. J Comp Physiol 80:201–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars MA, Oitzl M, Roelfs K (2014) Updating freeze: aligning animal and human research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 47:165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland H (1928) The mechanism of tonic mobility (“animal hypnosis”). J Gen Psychol 1:426–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes SJ (1906) Death-feigning in Ranatra. J Comp Neurol 16:200–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkanen A, Adden A, Fruetas JS, Heinze S (2019) The insect central complex and the neural basis of navigational strategies. J Exp Biol 222:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber F, Moor TE, Loher W (1989) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpherys RK, Ruxton GD (2018) A review of thanatosis (death feigning) as an anti-predator behavior. Behav Ecol Sciobiol 72:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm WR (1971) Neurophysiologic studies of the immobility reflex (‘animal hypnosis’). In: Ehrenpreis S, Solnitzky OC (eds) Neuroscience research, vol 4. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm WR (1977) Identity of sensory and motor systems that are critical to the immobility reflex (“animal hypnosis”). Psychol Rec 1:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm WR (2001) Behavioral arrest: in search of the neural control system. Prog Neurobiol 65:453–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux JE (2000) Emotion circuits in the brain. Ann Rev Neurosci 23:155–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold E (1920) Die Tierische Hypse (einschliesslich tonische, tetanische und Totestell-Reflexe, Reaktions-Akinese der Protisten). Ergebn Physiol 18:79–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx BP, Forsyth JP, Gallup GG, Fusé T, Lexington JM (2008) Tonic immobility as an evoked predator defense: implication for sexual assault survivors. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 15:74–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser JD, Gallup GG Jr (1977) Tonic immobility and related phenomena: a partially annotated, tricentennial bibliography, 1636-1976. Psychol Rec 1:177–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LA (1983) How insects detect and avoid bats. In: Huber F, Masaki H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 251–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LA, Olesen J (1979) Avoidance behavior in green lacewings. I. Behavior of free flying green lacewing to hunting bats and ultrasound. J Comp Physiol A 131:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misslin R (2003) The defense system of fear: behavior and neurocircuitry. Neurophysiol Clin 33:55–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieh JC (1993) The stop signal of honey bees: reconsidering its message. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishino H, Sakai M (1996) Behaviorally significant immobile state of so-called thanatosis in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: its characterization, sensory mechanism and function. J Comp Physiol A 179:613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiumi N, Mori A (2015) Distance-dependent switching of anti-predator behavior of frogs from immobility to fleeing. J Ethol 33:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada J, Toh Y (1998) Shade response in the escape behavior of the cockroach, Periplaneta Americana. Zoolog Sci 15:831–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preyer W (1881) Die Entdeckung des Hypnotismus. Gebrüder Pastell, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabaud E (1919) L’immobilisation réflexe et l’activite normale des arthropods. Bull Biol France Belg 53:1–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner SC (1967) Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In: Gordon JE (ed) Handbook of clinical and experimental hypnosis. Macmillan, New York, pp 550–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson TB (1904) On the “sham-death” reflex in spiders. J Physiol 31:410–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder KD (1962) The behavior of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pluses. Anim Behav 10:300–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs K (2017) Freeze for action: neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Allen WL, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2018) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent AB, Eberhardt LE (1975) Death feigning by ducks in response to predation by red foxes (Vulpes fulva). Am Midl Nat 94:108–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiniger F (1936) Die Biologie der sog. “tierischen Hypnose”. Ergeb Biol 13:348–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez SD, Gallup GG Jr (1979) Tonic immobility as a response to rape in humans: a theoretical note. Psychol Rec 29:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volchan E, Rocha-Rego V, Bastes AF, Oliveira JM, Franklin C, Gleiser S, Berget W, Souza GGL, Oliveira L, David IA, Erthal FS, Pereira MG, Figueira I (2017) Immobility reactions under threat: a contribution to human defensive cascade and PTSD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 76:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Völgyesi FA (1966) Hypnosis of man and animals, 2nd edn. Baillière, Tindall & Cassell, London. Its original book (1938) Menschen--und Tierhypnose, Fissli, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidron WS (1954) A new experimental animal for psychiatric research: the opossum Didelhis Virginiana. Science 119:360–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff ML (1977) Limbic modulation of contact defensive immobility (“animal hypnosis”). Psychol Rep 1:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto D, Koganezawa M (2013) Genes and circuits courtship behavior in Drosophila males. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:681–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would thank Dr. M. Mizunami for his careful reading of the manuscript and critical comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaki Sakai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sakai, M. (2021). Freezing and Tonic Immobility: Their Definitions and Naming. In: Sakai, M. (eds) Death-Feigning in Insects. Entomology Monographs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6598-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics