Abstract
Education is associated with the political responsibility of specialized institutions, whose representative, as a research advisor, is assigned the function of mediating positive and negative aspects of the use of artificial intelligence by appreciating the values at stake. Artificial intelligence, AI, is associated with the debate about its effects on volition: While, in research, human choice is aided by a creative mind that appreciates the context of reality, AI offers ‘ready-to-use’ elements, large volume and sometimes out of context, favoring bias in interpretation and enhancing the practice of plagiarism. These are negative aspects that ‘petrify’ the research content. We explain that the advisor has a mediating role when examining situations that require efficiency and productivity as opposed to the need for experience and creativity in scientific research. This role of mediator makes the advisor fit perfectly into the concept of education as a dynamic process, keeping the research activity from inattentive ‘consumption’ of the information provided by AI, which can hinder creativity in research or make it converge to idealized preferences (bias). In this way, the advisor combines research and artificial intelligence, weighing principles and values at stake that cannot be forgotten in education and stimulating opportunities for science and innovation to be socially sustainable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althusser, L. (2012). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, 80.
Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Verso Trade.
Belgacem, F. B. M., Monte-Serrat, D. M., Cattani, C., & Cabella, D. M. S. (2019). Qualitative analysis of the academic work. Educação&Realidade, 44(4).
Bengio, Y., Delalleau, O., & Le Roux, N. (2006). The curse of highly variable functions for local kernel machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 18, 107.
Bindeman, S. (1988). Echoes of silence: A phenomenological study of the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 11(1), 69–77.
Brazil. (2015). Law No. 13,140, June 26, 2015. Provides for mediation between private individuals as a way of resolving disputes and the self-composition of conflicts within the scope of public administration. Retrieved from https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13140.htm. Accessed on April 25, 2021.
Campos, R., & Furtado, J. (2011). Desafios da avaliação de programas e serviçosemsaúde, Ed. Unicamp.
CAPES, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2011). (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel). Orientações de combateaoplágio (Guidelines for combating plagiarism). Retrieved from http://www2.ufac.br/ppgsc/documentos/orientacoes-capes-combate-ao-plagio. Accessed on April 20, 2021
CNPq, Conselho Nacional de DesenvolvimentoCientífico e Tecnológico. (2011). (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). Relatório da Comissão de Integridade de Pesquisa (Research Integrity Committee Report). Retrieved from https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br/composicao/comissao-de-integridade/relatorio-comissao--integridade-do-cnpq.pdf. Accessed on April 20, 2021
Costa, C., & Frankema, K. (2007). Trust and control interrelations: New perspectives on the trust—Control nexus. Group & Organization Management, 32(4), 392–406.
Courtland, R. (2018). The bias detectives as machine learning infiltrates society, scientists grapple with how to make algorithms fair. Nature, 558(7710), 357–360.
The Economist 2021. The world in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/the-world-in-2021. Accessed on April 23, 2021
FAPESP, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. (2014). (São Paulo Research Foundation). Código de boas práticascientíficas (Code of good scientific practice). Retrieved from https://fapesp.br/boaspraticas/. Accessed on April 20, 2021
Findlay, C., & Lumsden, C. (1988). The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11(1), 3–55.
Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Gallimard.
Frankema, W., Raybeck, N., & Burbules, N. (2002). Philosophy of education. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education.
Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In C&C 02 Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pp. 126–133.
Galanter, M. (1989). Introduction: Compared to what? Assessing the quality of dispute resolution. Denver University Law Review, 66(3), 13–14.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
Haroche, C. (1984). Faire dire, vouloir dire: La détermination et la désambiguïsation dans la grammaire (Vol. 17). Presses Univ.
Henry, P. (1977). Le mauvaisoutil Langue, sujet et discours.
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29.
Kelly, J. E. (2015). Computing, cognition, and the future of knowing. Whitepaper, IBM Research, 2.
Lemos, C. (2002). Das vicissitudes da fala da criança e de suainvestigação (The vicissitudes of the child’s speech and its investigation). In Cadernos de EstudosLinguísticos, 42, IEL-UNICAMP.
Levitt, N. (1996). Mathematics as stepchild of contemporary culture. In P. Gross, N. Levitt & M. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Lloyd, A. (1907). The will to doubt: An essay in philosophy for the general thinker. S. Sonnenschein & Co.
Magrani, E. (2019). Entre dados e robôs: ética e privacidadena era da hiperconectividade (Vol. 5). Arquipélago Editorial.
Maldonato, M., & Dell’orco, S. (2010). Toward an evolutionary theory of rationality. World Futures, 66: 2, 103–123.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception: And other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics. Northwestern University Press.
Monte-Serrat, D. (2017). Neurolinguistics, language, and time: Investigating the verbal art in its amplitude. International Journal of Perceptions in Public Health, IJPPH, 1(3).
Monte-Serrat, D., Belgacem, F., & Maldonato, M. (2017). Decision making: The complexity of choice processes. International Journal of Research & Methodology in Social Science, 3(4).
Monte-Serrat, D. M., & Cattani, C. (2020). Teaching in Online Classes: Social Presence from the Perspective of Michel Foucault and René Magritte. People, 7, 94.
Monte-Serrat, D. M., Cabella, B. C. T., & Cattani, C. (2020). The schrödinger’s cat paradox in the mind creative process. Information Sciences Letters, 9, 1–10.
Monte-Serrat, D. M., & Cattani, C. (2021). Interpretability in neural networks towards universal consistency. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 2, 30–39.
Monte-Serrat, D. M., Khan, H. T., Kabir, R., Soares, D. W., & Silva, S. S. D. (2019). Reality and myth about legal healthcare support and quality of life in the Brazilian elderly. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 23, e190146.
Ostrower, F. (2013). Acasos e criaçãoartística (Randomness and artistic creation), Ed. Unicamp.
Packard, H. (2018). Augmented intelligence: Helping humans make smarter decisions.
Padilha, A. (2000). Bianca. O ser simbólico (The symbolic being): Para além dos limites da deficiência mental. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Education, UNICAMP, Brazil.
Patton, M. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Pêcheux, M. (1975). Les vérités de La Palice. Linguistique, sémantique, philosophie (Théorie). Maspero.
Pêcheux, M. (1988). Discourse: Structure or event. Illinois University Press.
Peirce, C. (1877). The fixation of belief.
Peirce, C. (1908). A neglected argument for the reality of god.
Pithan, L. H. (2013). Ética e integrida de napesquisa: o plágion as publicaçõe scientíficas. Revista AMRIGS.
Rafi, M., Jian Ming, Z., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Evaluating the impact of digital library database resources on the productivity of academic research. Information discovery and delivery.
Ricoeur, P. (1980) Narrative Time. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1086/448093.
Silva, R., & Brandão, D. (2011), Nas rodas da avaliação educadora. In R. Campos & J. Furtado (Eds.), Desafios da avaliação de programas e serviços em saúde, Ed. Unicamp.
Takahashi, B. (2019). Manual de mediação e conciliaçãonajustiça federal. Conselho da Justiça Federal, Centro de Estudos Judiciários.
Vasconcelos, S. M. (2007). O plágionacomunidadecientífica: Questõesculturais e linguístcas. Ciência e Cultura, 59(3), 4–5.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1929). 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. Tutunik, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Wang, R., Purshouse, R., Giagkiozis, I., & Fleming, P. (2015). The iPICEA-g: A new hybrid evolutionary multi-criteria decision-making approach using the brushing technique. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2), 442–453.
Warr, A., & O’Neill, E. (2005). Understanding design as a social creative process. In C&C 05, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity and Cognition. pp. 118–127.
Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, MIT Press.
Williams, T. (2014). The psychology of interpersonal trust. How do people feel when it comes to trusting someone?. McKendree University, 22, 1–17.
Yuste, R., Goering, S., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., Fins, J. J., et al. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature News, 551(7679), 159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monte-Serrat, D.M., Cattani, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Research: Values at Stake in Education. In: Roumate, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education and Scientific Research. Bridging Human and Machine: Future Education with Intelligence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8641-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8641-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8640-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8641-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)