Skip to main content

Towards a Tripartite Research Agenda: A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education: Emerging Technologies, Models and Applications (AIET 2021)

Abstract

This paper reports on a scoping review of research studies on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) published over the last two decades (2001–2021). A wide range of manuscripts were yielded from the education and educational research category of the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) database, and papers from an AIED-specialised journal were also included. 135 of those meeting the selection criteria were analysed with content analysis and categorical meta-trends analysis. Three distinctive and superordinate AIED research agenda were identified: Learning from AI, Learning about AI, and Learning with AI. By portraying the current status of AIED research and depicting its tripartite research agenda, gaps and possible directions were discussed. This paper serves as a blueprint for AIED researchers to position their up-and-coming AIED studies for the next decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amigud A, Arnedo-Moreno J, Daradoumis T, Guerrero-Roldan A-E (2017) Using learning analytics for preserving academic integrity. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 18(5):192–210

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker T, Smith L, Anissa N (2019) Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Retrieved 21 July, 2020, from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf

  4. Bessen J (2019) Automation and jobs: when technology boosts employment. Econ Policy 34(100):589–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown S (2005) Assessment for learning. Learn Teach High Educ 1(1):81–89

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CM, Wang JY, Hsu LC (2021) An interactive test dashboard with diagnosis and feedback mechanisms to facilitate learning performance. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheuk T (2021) Can AI be racist? Color‐evasiveness in the application of machine learning to science assessments. Sci Educ

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiu TK, Chai CS (2020) Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: a self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability 12(14):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen PR (2005) If not Turing’s test, then what? AI Mag 26(4):61

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cope B, Kalantzis M, Searsmith D (2020) Artificial intelligence for education: knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educ Philos Theory 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fjelland R (2020) Why general artificial intelligence will not be realised. Hum Soc Sci Commun 7(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goolsbee A, Hubbard G, Ganz A (2019) A policy agenda to develop human capital for the modern economy. The Aspen Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grand View Research (2021) Artificial intelligence market size, share & trends analysis report by solution, by technology (deep learning, machine learning), by end use, by region, and segment forecasts, 2021–2028. Grand View Research, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hao K (2019) China has started a grand experiment in AI education. It could reshape how the world learns. MIT Technol Rev 123(1)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoeschl MB, Bueno TC, Hoeschl HC (2017) Fourth industrial revolution and the future of engineering: could robots replace human jobs? How ethical recommendations can help engineers rule on artificial intelligence. In: 2017 7th world engineering education forum (WEEF), November. IEEE, pp 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kitto K, Knight S (2019) Practical ethics for building learning analytics. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2855–2870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knox J (2020) Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learn Media Technol 45(3):298–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krippendorff K (2019) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 4th edn. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Long D, Magerko B (2020) What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lykourentzou I, Giannoukos I, Nikolopoulos V, Mpardis G, Loumos V (2009) Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Comput Educ 53(3):950–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, Shannon CE (2006) A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Mag 27(4):12–12

    Google Scholar 

  24. Monett D, Lewis CWP (2018) Getting clarity by defining artificial intelligence—A survey. In: Müller VC (ed) Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence 2017. Springer, Cham, pp 212–214

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nilsson NJ (2009) The quest for artificial intelligence: a history of ideas and achievements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Noviyanti SD (2020) Artificial intelligence (AI)-based pronunciation checker: an alternative for independent learning in pandemic situation. ELT Echo: J Engl Lang Teach Foreign Lang Context 5(2):162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Okoye K, Nganji J, Hosseini S (2020) Learning analytics for educational innovation: a systematic mapping study of early indicators and success factors. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manag Appl 12:138–154

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pelletier K, Brown M, Brooks DC, McCormack M, Reeves J, Arbino N, Bozkurt A, Crawford S, Czerniewicz L, Gibson R, Linder K, Mason J, Mondelli, V (2021) 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon report teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phillips C, Colton JS (2021) A new normal in inclusive, usable online learning experiences. In: Thurston TN, Lundstrom K, González C (eds) Resilient pedagogy: practical teaching strategies to overcome distance, disruption, and distraction. Utah State University, pp 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  31. Russel S, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence - a modern approach. Pearson Education, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schmidt A (2016) Cloud-based AI for pervasive applications. IEEE Comput Arch Lett 15(01):14–18

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steinbauer G, Kandlhofer M, Chklovski T, Heintz F, Koenig S (2021) A differentiated discussion about AI education K-12. KI-Künstliche Intell 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tegmark M (2018) Life 3.0: being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tomlinson CA (2014) The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners, 2nd edn. ASCD, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  36. Touretzky D, Gardner-McCune C, Martin F, Seehorn D (2019) Envisioning AI for K-12: what should every child know about AI? In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 33, no 01, pp 9795–9799

    Google Scholar 

  37. Turing AM (2009) Computing machinery and intelligence. In: Epstein R, Roberts G, Beber G (eds) Parsing the Turing test. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 23–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. UNESCO (2019) Beijing consensus on artificial intelligence and education. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang P (2019) On defining artificial intelligence. J Artif Gen Intell 10(2):1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang T, Cheng ECK (2021) An investigation of barriers to Hong Kong K-12 schools incorporating artificial intelligence in education. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wong GK, Ma X, Dillenbourg P, Huan J (2020) Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12: where to start? ACM Inroads 11(1):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang L, Huang Y, Yang X, Yu S, Zhuang F (2019) An automatic short-answer grading model for semi-open-ended questions. Interact Learn Environ 1–14

    Google Scholar 

List of the Articles Reviewed

  • Abbas M, Hwang GJ, Ajayi S, Mustafa G, Bilal M (2021) Modelling and exploiting taxonomic knowledge for developing mobile learning systems to enhance children’s structural and functional categorization. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach JE, Concordel A, Kornatowski PM, Floreano D (2018) Inquiry-based learning with robogen: an open-source software and hardware platform for robotics and artificial intelligence. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 12(3):356–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RS, Gašević D, Karumbaiah S (2021) Four paradigms in learning analytics: why paradigm convergence matters. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Berendt B, Littlejohn A, Blakemore M (2020) AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights. Learn Media Technol 45(3):312–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Breines MR, Gallagher M (2020) A return to Teacherbot: rethinking the development of educational technology at the University of Edinburgh. Teach High Educ 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti AP, Diego A, Carvalho R, Freitas F, Tsai YS, Gašević D, Mello RF (2021) Automatic feedback in online learning environments: a systematic literature review. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai CS, Lin PY, Jong MSY, Dai Y, Chiu TK, Qin J (2021) Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Bhattacharjee KK (2020) Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Educ Inf Technol 25(5):3443–3463

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Hwang GH, Wang SH (2021) Gender differences in cognitive load when applying game-based learning with intelligent robots. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):102–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CM, Wang JY, Hsu LC (2021) An interactive test dashboard with diagnosis and feedback mechanisms to facilitate learning performance. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen KZ, Li SC (2021) Sequential, typological, and academic dynamics of self-regulated learners: learning analytics of an undergraduate chemistry online course. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Xie H, Hwang GJ (2020) A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Xie H, Zou D, Hwang GJ (2020) Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zou D, Xie H, Cheng G (2021) Twenty years of personalized language learning. Educ Technol Soc 24(1):205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheuk T (2021) Can AI be racist? Color‐evasiveness in the application of machine learning to science assessments. Sci Educ

    Google Scholar 

  • Chih-Ming C, Ying-You L (2020) Developing a computer-mediated communication competence forecasting model based on learning behavior features. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin DB, Dohmen IM, Cheng BH, Oppezzo MA, Chase CC, Schwartz DL (2010) Preparing students for future learning with teachable agents. Educ Technol Res Dev 58(6):649–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin DB, Dohmen IM, Schwartz DL (2013) Young children can learn scientific reasoning with teachable agents. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 6(3):248–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CK, Tseng JC (2021) A Bayesian classification network-based learning status management system in an intelligent classroom. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):256–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu TK, Chai CS (2020) Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: a self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability 12(14):5568

    Google Scholar 

  • Chocarro R, Cortiñas M, Marcos-Matás G (2021) Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educ Stud 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou CY, Chan TW, Lin CJ (2003) Redefining the learning companion: the past, present, and future of educational agents. Comput Educ 40(3):255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung JWY, So HCF, Choi MMT, Yan VCM, Wong TKS (2021) Artificial Intelligence in education: using heart rate variability (HRV) as a biomarker to assess emotions objectively. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Conijn R, Martinez-Maldonado R, Knight S, Buckingham Shum S, Van Waes L, Van Zaanen M (2020) How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools. Comput Assist Lang Learn 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope B, Kalantzis M, Searsmith D (2020) Artificial intelligence for education: knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educ Philos Theory 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox AM (2021) Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukurova M, Kent C, Luckin R (2019) Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision‐making: a case study in debate tutoring. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):3032–3046

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Y, Chai CS, Lin PY, Jong MSY, Guo Y, Qin J (2020) Promoting students’ well-being by developing their readiness for the artificial intelligence age. Sustainability 12(16)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo RC, Yaseen ZM, Al-Ansari N, Nguyen-Huy T, Langlands TAM, Galligan L (2020) Modern artificial intelligence model development for undergraduate student performance prediction: an investigation on engineering mathematics courses. IEEE Access 8:136,697–136,724

    Google Scholar 

  • Devedžić V (2004) Web intelligence and artificial intelligence in education. Educ Technol Soc, 7(4):29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Divekar RR, Drozdal J, Chabot S, Zhou Y, Su H, Chen Y, … Braasch J (2021) Foreign language acquisition via artificial intelligence and extended reality: design and evaluation. Comput Assist Lang Learn 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Román E, Nichols TP, Nyame-Mensah A (2020) The racializing forces of/in AI educational technologies. Learn Media Technol 45(3):236–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Boulay B (2019) Escape from the skinner box: the case for contemporary intelligent learning environments. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2902–2919

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards BI, Cheok AD (2018) Why not robot teachers: artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Appl Artif Intell 32(4):345–360

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Alfy ESM, Abdel-Aal RE (2008) Construction and analysis of educational tests using abductive machine learning. Comput Educ 51(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Fachada N (2021) ColorShapeLinks: a board game AI competition for educators and students. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu S, Gu H, Yang B (2020) The affordances of AI‐enabled automatic scoring applications on learners’ continuous learning intention: an empirical study in China. Br J Educ Technol 51(5):1674–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • García P, Amandi A, Schiaffino S, Campo M (2007) Evaluating Bayesian networks’ precision for detecting students’ learning styles. Comput Educ 49(3):794–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomede E, de Barros RM, de Souza Mendes L (2021) Deep auto encoders to adaptive e-learning recommender system. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Han KW, Lee E, Lee Y (2009) The impact of a peer-learning agent based on pair programming in a programming course. IEEE Trans Educ 53(2):318–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh YZ, Lin SS, Luo YC, Jeng YL, Tan SW, Chen CR, Chiang PY (2020) ARCS-assisted teaching robots based on anticipatory computing and emotional big data for improving sustainable learning efficiency and motivation. Sustainability 12(14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu TC, Abelson H, Lao N, Tseng YH, Lin YT (2021) Behavioral-pattern exploration and development of an instructional tool for young children to learn AI. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X (2021) Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China. Educ Inf Technol 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang GJ, Sung HY, Chang SC, Huang XC (2020) A fuzzy expert system-based adaptive learning approach to improving students’ learning performances by considering affective and cognitive factors. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang GJ, Xie H, Wah BW, Gašević D (2020) Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalal A, Mahmood M (2019) Students’ behavior mining in e-learning environment using cognitive processes with information technologies. Educ Inf Technol 24(5):2797–2821

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (2011) Ask systems: interrogative access to multiple ways of thinking. Educ Technol Res Dev 59(1):159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabudi T, Pappas I, Olsen DH (2021) AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: a systematic mapping of the literature. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn K, Winters N (2021) Constructionism and AI: a history and possible futures. Br J Educ Technol

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann E (2021) Algorithm appreciation or aversion? Comparing in-service and pre-service teachers’ acceptance of computerized expert models. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay J, Kummerfeld B (2019) From data to personal user models for life‐long, life‐wide learners. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2871–2884

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Kim HS, Shim J, Park JS (2021) A study in the early prediction of ICT literacy ratings using sustainability in data mining techniques. Sustainability 13(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitto K, Knight S (2019) Practical ethics for building learning analytics. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2855–2870

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox J (2020) Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learn Media Technol 45(3):298–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Koć-Januchta MM, Schönborn KJ, Tibell LA, Chaudhri VK, Heller HC (2020) Engaging with biology by asking questions: investigating students’ interaction and learning with an artificial intelligence-enriched textbook. J Educ Comput Res 58(6):1190–1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong SC, Cheung WMY, Zhang G (2021) Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai YH, Chen SY, Lai CF, Chang YC, Su YS (2021) Study on enhancing AIoT computational thinking skills by plot image-based VR. Interact Learn Environ 29(3):482–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham A, Crockett K, McLean D (2014) An adaptation algorithm for an intelligent natural language tutoring system. Comput Educ 71:97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HS, Lee J (2021) Applying artificial intelligence in physical education and future perspectives. Sustainability 13(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemay DJ, Baek C, Doleck T (2021) Comparison of learning analytics and educational data mining: a topic modeling approach. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Li F, He Y, Xue Q (2021) Progress, challenges and countermeasures of adaptive learning. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):238–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, Yu CC, Shih PK, Wu LY (2021) STEM based artificial intelligence learning in general education for non-engineering undergraduate students. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):224–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin HC, Tu YF, Hwang GJ, Huang H (2021) From precision education to precision medicine. Educ Technol Soc 24(1):123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin PY, Chai CS, Jong MSY, Dai Y, Guo Y, Qin J (2021) Modeling the structural relationship among primary students’ motivation to learn artificial intelligence. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YS, Chen SY, Tsai CW, Lai YH (2021) Exploring computational thinking skills training through augmented reality and AIoT learning. Front Psychol 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Rus V, Liu L (2016) Automatic Chinese factual question generation. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 10(2):194–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus M, Madden MG (2020) A pedagogy of data and artificial intelligence for student subjectification. Teach High Educ 25(4):456–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckin R, Cukurova M (2019) Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: a learning sciences‐driven approach. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2824–2838

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu OH, Huang AY, Tsai DC, Yang SJ (2021) Expert-authored and machine-generated short-answer questions for assessing students learning performance. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykourentzou I, Giannoukos I, Nikolopoulos V, Mpardis G, Loumos V (2009) Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Comput Educ 53(3):950–965

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren BM, DeLeeuw KE, Mayer RE (2011) Polite web-based intelligent tutors: can they improve learning in classrooms? Comput Educ 56(3):574–584

    Google Scholar 

  • McStay A (2020) Emotional AI and EdTech: serving the public good? Learn Media Technol 45(3):270–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehmood R, Alam F, Albogami NN, Katib I, Albeshri A, Altowaijri SM (2017) UTiLearn: a personalised ubiquitous teaching and learning system for smart societies. IEEE Access 5:2615–2635

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadreza E, Safabakhsh R (2021) Lecture quality assessment based on the audience reactions using machine learning and neural networks. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Moridis CN, Economides AA (2009) Prediction of student’s mood during an online test using formula-based and neural network-based method. Comput Educ 53(3):644–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota-Valtierra G, Rodríguez-Reséndiz J, Herrera-Ruiz G (2019) Constructivism-based methodology for teaching artificial intelligence topics focused on sustainable development. Sustainability 11(17):4642

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlando S, Gaudioso E, De La Paz F (2020) Supporting teachers to monitor student’s learning progress in an educational environment with robotics activities. IEEE Access 8:48620–48631

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortego RG, Sánchez IM (2019) Relevant parameters for the classification of reading books depending on the degree of textual readability in primary and compulsory secondary education (CSE) students. IEEE Access 7:79044–79055

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouherrou N, Elhammoumi O, Benmarrakchi F, El Kafi J (2019) Comparative study on emotions analysis from facial expressions in children with and without learning disabilities in virtual learning environment. Educ Inf Technol 24(2):1777–1792

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang F, Jiao P (2021) Artificial intelligence in education: the three paradigms. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Paek S, Kim N (2021) Analysis of worldwide research trends on the impact of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability 13(14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos I, Lazzarino R, Miah S, Weaver T, Thomas B, Koulouglioti C (2020) A systematic review of the literature regarding socially assistive robots in pre-tertiary education. Comput Educ 155

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira HBDB, Zebende GF, Moret MA (2010) Learning computer programming: implementing a fractal in a Turing Machine. Comput Educ 55(2):767–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrotta C, Selwyn N (2020) Deep learning goes to school: toward a relational understanding of AI in education. Learn Media Technol 45(3):251–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Polito G, Temperini M (2021) A gamified web-based system for computer programming learning. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin F, Li K, Yan J (2020) Understanding user trust in artificial intelligence‐based educational systems: evidence from China. Br J Educ Technol 51(5):1693–1710

    Google Scholar 

  • Renz A, Hilbig R (2020) Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: identification of drivers barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards D, Dignum V (2019) Supporting and challenging learners through pedagogical agents: addressing ethical issues through designing for values. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2885–2901

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Juan JR, Gallego AJ, Calvo-Zaragoza J (2019) Automatic detection of inconsistencies between numerical scores and textual feedback in peer-assessment processes with machine learning. Comput Educ 140

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Hernández CF, Musso M, Kyndt E, Cascallar E (2021) Artificial neural networks in academic performance prediction: systematic implementation and predictor evaluation. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosé CP, McLaughlin EA, Liu R, Koedinger KR (2019) Explanatory learner models: why machine learning (alone) is not the answer. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):2943–2958

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarakou M, Tsaganou G, Papadakis A (2018) An e-learning system for extracting text comprehension and learning style characteristics. J Educ Technol Soc 21(1):126–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih PK, Lin CH, Wu LYY, Yu CC (2021) Learning ethics in AI—teaching non-engineering undergraduates through situated learning. Sustainability 13(7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smutny P, Schreiberova P (2020) Chatbots for learning: a review of educational chatbots for the facebook messenger. Comput Educ 151

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Murthy H (2021) Improving reading and comprehension in K-12: evidence from a large-scale AI technology intervention in India. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Standen PJ, Brown DJ, Taheri M, Galvez Trigo MJ, Boulton H, Burton A, … Hortal E (2020) An evaluation of an adaptive learning system based on multimodal affect recognition for learners with intellectual disabilities. Br J Educ Technol 51(5):1748–1765

    Google Scholar 

  • Su JH, Liao YW, Xu JZ, Zhao YW (2021) A personality-driven recommender system for cross-domain learning based on Holland code assessments. Sustainability 13(7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Li Y (2020) Eco-environment construction of English teaching using artificial intelligence under big data environment. IEEE Access 8:193,955–193,965

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan DY, Cheah CW (2021) Developing a gamified AI-enabled online learning application to improve students’ perception to University Physics. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanveer M, Hassan S, Bhaumik A (2020) Academic policy regarding sustainability and artificial intelligence (AI) sustainability 12(22):9435

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlili A, Zhang J, Papamitsiou Z, Manske S, Huang R, Hoppe HU (2021) Towards utilising emerging technologies to address the challenges of using open educational resources: a vision of the future. Educ Technol Res Dev 69(2):515–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Topal AD, Eren CD, Geçer AK (2021) Chatbot application in a 5th grade science course. Educ Inf Technol 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SC, Chen CH, Shiao YT, Ciou JS, Wu TN (2020) Precision education with statistical learning and deep learning: a case study in Taiwan. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulloa-Cazarez RL, López-Martín C, Abran A, Yáñez-Márquez C (2018) Prediction of online students performance by means of genetic programming. Appl Artif Intell 32(9–10):858–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Cano E, Mengual-Andrés S, López-Meneses E (2021) Chatbot to improve learning punctuation in Spanish and to enhance open and flexible learning environments. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas-Ch W, Arias-Navarrete A, Palacios-Pacheco X (2020) Proposal of an architecture for the integration of a chatbot with artificial intelligence in a smart campus for the improvement of learning. Sustainability 12(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HC, Chang CY, Li TY (2008) Assessing creative problem-solving with automated text grading. Comput Educ 51(4):1450–1466

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Hwang GH, Chang CY (2021) Directions of the 100 most cited chatbot-related human behavior research: a review of academic publications. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Xie H, Wang FL, Lee LK, Au OTS (2021) Top-N personalized recommendation with graph neural networks in MOOCs. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Christensen C, Cui W, Tong R, Yarnall L, Shear L, Feng M (2020) When adaptive learning is effective learning: comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interact Learn Environ 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Yu H, Hu X, Li J (2020) Participant or spectator? Comprehending the willingness of faculty to use intelligent tutoring systems in the artificial intelligence era. Br J Educ Technol 51(5):1657–1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Park J (2021) Design and implementation of intelligent sports training system for college students’ mental health education. Front Psychol 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Liu C, Tu YF (2021) Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):116–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanichsan D, Panjaburee P, Chookaew S (2021) Enhancing knowledge integration from multiple experts to guiding personalized learning paths for testing and diagnostic systems. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb ME, Fluck A, Magenheim J, Malyn-Smith J, Waters J, Deschênes M, Zagami J (2020) Machine learning for human learners: opportunities, issues, tensions and threats. Educ Technol Res Dev 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Westera W, Dascalu M, Kurvers H, Ruseti S, Trausan-Matu S (2018) Automated essay scoring in applied games: reducing the teacher bandwidth problem in online training. Comput Educ 123:212–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong LH, Looi CK (2012) Swarm intelligence: new techniques for adaptive systems to provide learning support. Interact Learn Environ 20(1):19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JY, Hsiao YC, Nian MW (2020) Using supervised machine learning on large-scale online forums to classify course-related Facebook messages in predicting learning achievement within the personal learning environment. Interact Learn Environ 28(1):65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JY (2021) Learning analytics on structured and unstructured heterogeneous data sources: perspectives from procrastination, help-seeking, and Machine-Learning defined cognitive engagement. Comput Educ 163

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Chu HC, Hwang GJ, Wang CC (2019) Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Comput Educ 140

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Hwang GJ, Wong TL (2021) Editorial note: from conventional AI to modern AI in education: reexamining AI and analytic techniques for teaching and learning. J Educ Technol Soc 24(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie T, Zheng Q, Zhang W, Qu H (2017) Modeling and predicting the active video-viewing time in a large-scale E-learning system. IEEE Access 5:11,490–11,504

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Wang D, Collins P, Lee H, Warschauer M (2021) Same benefits, different communication patterns: comparing children's reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner. Comput Educ 161

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang AC, Chen IY, Flanagan B, Ogata H (2021) Automatic generation of cloze items for repeated testing to improve reading comprehension. Educ Technol Soc 24(3):147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang AC, Chen IY, Flanagan B, Ogata H (2021) From human grading to machine grading. Educ Technol Soc 24(1):164–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CC, Chen IY, Ogata H (2021) Toward precision education: educational data mining and learning analytics for identifying students’ learning patterns with ebook systems. Educ Technol Soc 24(1):152–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Chiang FK, Cheng Q, Ji J (2021) Machine learning-based student modeling methodology for intelligent tutoring systems. J Educ Comput Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Oh ES, Wang Y (2020) Hybrid physical education teaching and curriculum design based on a voice interactive artificial intelligence educational robot. Sustainability 12(19)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Wang M, Shen R, Han P (2007) Community-organizing agent: an artificial intelligent system for building learning communities among large numbers of learners. Comput Educ 49(2):131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SJ (2021) Guest editorial: precision education-a new challenge for AI in education. J Educ Technol Soc 24(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SJ, Ogata H, Matsui T, Chen NS (2021) Human-centered artificial intelligence in education: seeing the invisible through the visible. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Yueh HP, Lin W, Wang SC, Fu LC (2020) Reading with robot and human companions in library literacy activities: a comparison study. Br J Educ Technol 51(5):1884–1900

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SJ, Hsueh YL, Sun JC. Y, Liu HZ (2021) Developing an intelligent virtual reality interactive system based on the ADDIE model for learning pour-over coffee brewing. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Aslan AB (2021) AI technologies for education: recent research future directions. Comput Educ: Artif Intell

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu M, Liu OL, Lee HS (2020) The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Comput Educ 143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianchong Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, T., Cheng, E.C.K. (2022). Towards a Tripartite Research Agenda: A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education Research. In: Cheng, E.C.K., Koul, R.B., Wang, T., Yu, X. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Emerging Technologies, Models and Applications. AIET 2021. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 104. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7527-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7526-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7527-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics