Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis on Effect of Different SVM Kernel Functions for Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 492))

  • 380 Accesses

Abstract

Besides linear classification, Support Vector Machine (SVM) is proficient in non-linear classification by deploying kernel tricks that implicitly maps and transform input features to high dimensional feature space. Kernel-SVM, can be utilized to secure progressively complex connections on datasets with no push to do changes all alone. In this paper, 5 different SVM kernel functions are implemented on 4 datasets, viz., IRIS, Breast Cancer Wisconsin (diagnostic), Mushroom and Letter Recognition Dataset. The five kernel functions considered in this paper are: Linear kernel, Gaussian Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel, Laplacian kernel, Polynomial kernel and Sigmoid kernel. Our goal is to locate the best non-linear kernel. The outcomes show that the precision of expectation for Laplacian kernel is most extreme with a forecast scope of (max 100%, min 97.53%) and least for the sigmoid kernel with a forecast scope of (max 100%, min 47.28%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhaskar S, Singh VB, Nayak AK (2014) Managing data in SVM supervised algorithm for data mining technology. In: 2014 conference on IT in business, industry and government (CSIBIG). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang Y, Li J, Yang Y (2015) The research of the fast SVM classifier method. In: 2015 12th international computer conference on wavelet active media technology and information processing (ICCWAMTIP). IEEE, pp 121–124

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murty MN, Raghava R (2016) Kernel-based SVM. In: Support vector machines and perceptrons. Springer, Cham, pp 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dua D, Graff C (2019) UCI machine learning repository [http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml]. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA

  5. Fadel S, Ghoniemy S, Abdallah M, Sorra HA, Ashour A, Ansary A (2016) Investigating the effect of different kernel functions on the performance of SVM for recognizing Arabic characters. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 7(1):446–450

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steinwart I (2001) On the influence of the kernel on the consistency of support vector machines. J Mach Learn Res 2(Nov):67–93

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu X, Tang W, Wu X (2012) Support vector machine based on hybrid kernel function. In: Information engineering and applications. Springer, London, pp 127–133

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang Q, Chen Q, Wang X (2005) Scaling Gaussian RBF kernel width to improve SVM classification. In: 2005 international conference on neural networks and brain, vol. 1. IEEE, pp 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yue S, Li P, Hao P (2003) SVM classification: Its contents and challenges. Appl Math-A J Chin Univ 18(3):332–342

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahoo P, Behera AK, Pandia MK, Dash CSK, Dehuri S (2013) On the study of GRBF and polynomial kernel based support vector machine in web logs. In 2013 1st international conference on emerging trends and applications in computer science. IEEE, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Afifi A (2013) Improving the classification accuracy using support vector machines (SVMS) with new kernel. J Glob Res Comput Sci 4(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghanty P, Paul S, Pal NR (2009) NEUROSVM: an architecture to reduce the effect of the choice of kernel on the performance of SVM. J Mach Learn Res 10(3)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Madzarov G, Gjorgjevikj D (2009) Multi-class classification using support vector machines in decision tree architecture. In: IEEE EUROCON 2009. IEEE, pp 288–295

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ke X, Zhu Y, Wen L, Zhang W (2018) Speech emotion recognition based on SVM and ANN. Int J Mach Learn Comput 8(3):198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah RD, Anil D, Suthar C (2016) Speech emotion recognition based on SVM using MATLAB. Int J Innovative Res Comput Commun Eng 4(3)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang YP, Nashrullah M (2016) SVM-based decision tree for medical knowledge representation. In: 2016 international conference on fuzzy theory and its applications (iFuzzy). IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar MS, Kumaraswamy YS (2012) An improved support vector machine kernel for medical image retrieval system. In: International conference on pattern recognition, informatics and medical engineering (PRIME-2012). IEEE, pp 257–260

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vranjković V, Struharik R (2011) New architecture for SVM classifier and its application to telecommunication problems. In: 2011 19th telecommunications forum (TELFOR) proceedings of papers. IEEE, pp 1543–1545

    Google Scholar 

  19. Han R, Jia Z, Qin X, Chang C, Wang H (2009) Application of support vector machine to mobile communications in telephone traffic load of monthly busy hour prediction. In: 2009 fifth international conference on natural computation, vol. 3. IEEE, pp 349–353

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin HT, Lin CJ (2003) A study on sigmoid kernels for SVM and the training of non-PSD kernels by SMO-type methods. submitted to Neural Comput 3(1–32):16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepali Virmani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Virmani, D., Pandey, H. (2023). Comparative Analysis on Effect of Different SVM Kernel Functions for Classification. In: Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Hassanien, A.E., Anand, S., Jaiswal, A. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 492. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3679-1_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3679-1_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3678-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3679-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics