Abstract
The term “restoration” in legal parlance means to restore someone to its original position. The theory of restorative justice was developed mainly after realizing that the obligation of the state was not merely to punish the wrongdoer and to deter wrongful acts, but it also had an obligation to understand the needs of the society and to see as to who is at the receiving end of these punishments while awarding just compensation to victims. Restorative justice is a method of responding to criminal behaviour by taking into account various aspects like the needs of the community, the victims, and the offenders, and this is often associated with the Gandhi’s three teachings, i.e. ahimsa, often translated as “non-violence”; Swaraj, i.e. the concept of self-rule which encourages both individuals and communities to call upon their best self; and, satyagrah, i.e. striving towards truth-telling and truth-seeking. In modern India, one can see the inclusion of restorative justice in the administration of criminal justice system. Restorative justice offers the society an opportunity to deal with crimes in a grown-up manner in which it had never been addressed before. The concept of restorative justice is expanding wide enough to deal with varied crimes, ages, and situations, and as it starts to make some sense at the international, national, and also regional level, the responsibilities of restorative justice practitioners along with academicians too are increasing. Therefore, the need of the hour is building of bridges in order to remove the gap between the theoretical and practical development of restorative justice in India and which precisely is the endeavour of this paper, i.e. to first analyse the principle of restorative justice towards strengthening of crime prevention while throwing light on the gap that appears to exist between the theoretical and practical development and then attempting to provide remedies for removing the gaps with reference to the Gandhian principles and his teachings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Ross London, Crime, Punishment, and Restorative Justice (2011).
- 2.
1997 1 SCC 416.
- 3.
1983 KLT 512.
- 4.
Available at https://censusindia.gov.in/ (last visited on 28 June 2020).
- 5.
1980 2 SCC 321.
- 6.
Law Commission of India (1996), Report no. 154, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974).
- 7.
Law Commission of India (2015), Report no. 262, The Death Penalty.
- 8.
(2009) 6 SCC 498.
- 9.
(2013) 5 SCC 546.
- 10.
Law Commission of India, Report no. 268, Amendments to Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Provisions Relating to Bail (2017).
- 11.
Available at https://nhrc.nic.in/press-release/7418-cent-prison-population-are-undertrials (last visited on 28 June 2020).
- 12.
1979 AIR 1369, 1979 SCR (3) 532.
- 13.
Law Commission of India (2018), Report no. 277, Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies.
- 14.
247 (2018) DLT 31.
- 15.
Chintalapuribeena, https://www.vice.com/en_in/article/vbjn9j/beena-chintalapuri-uses-cognitive-psychology-to-help-prisoners (last Visited, June 28,2020).
- 16.
Available at https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/Executive-Summary-2018.pdf (last visited on 28 June 2020).
References
Chintalapuribeena, https://www.vice.com/en_in/article/vbjn9j/beena-chintalapuri-uses-cognitive-psychology-to-help-prisoners. Last visited 28 June 2020
https://censusindia.gov.in/. Last visited on 28 June 2020
https://nhrc.nic.in/press-release/7418-cent-prison-population-are-undertrials. Last visited on 28 June 2020
Law Commission of India (1996) Report no. 154, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act 2 of 1974)
Law Commission of India (2015) Report no. 262, The Death Penalty
Law Commission of India (2017) Report no. 268, Amendments to Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Provisions Relating to Bail
Law Commission of India (2018) Report no. 277, Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies
Ross London (2011) Crime, Punishment, and Restorative Justice
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaur, H., Sharma, A. (2022). The Principle of Restorative Justice Towards the Strengthening of Crime Prevention as Viewed from the Pragmatic Gandhian Lens. In: Mittal, R., Singh, K.K. (eds) Relevance of Duties in the Contemporary World. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1836-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1836-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1835-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1836-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)