Skip to main content

Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model: A Case Study of India

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Operations Management Applications

Abstract

Energy consumption is on the increase as a result of the growing population of India. Current conventional energy sources do not have an appropriate amount to meet energy demand. Economical and renewable energy alternative solutions must also be considered to satisfy this need. Renewable energies can be seen as a solution to this rising need for electricity. Although the selection of alternative renewable energy sources is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue, and it is important to consider many competing factors. The main aim of this study is to develop an analytical hierarchy for the prioritization of three potential renewable energy resources such as solar, wind, and hydro energy in the context of India. The factors were recognized from the available literature studies and also through interactions with ten experts from academics and several industries. Then, nine factors were selected and categorized into three groups: economic factors, technical factors, and environmental factors. The analytical hierarchical method (AHP) is used to calculate the relative weights of the evaluation factors and to identify the alternatives. The final result showed that hydro energy with a priority weight percentage of (39.91%) had the highest rank followed by solar energy (34.9%) and wind energy (25.18%). So, hydro energy is India's best alternative to renewable energy sources, supported by solar and wind energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shihan M (2019) Investigation E. Selection of renewable energy sources using analytic hierarchy process

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kamalapur GD, Udaykumar RY (2012) Electrical power and energy systems rural electrification in India and feasibility of photovoltaic solar home systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33:594–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mainali B, Silveira S (2012) Energy for sustainable development renewable energy markets in rural electrification: country case Nepal. Energy Sustain Dev 16:168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sindhu S, Nehra V, Luthra S (2017) Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: case study of India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:496–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tasri A, Susilawati A (2014) Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Indonesia. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 7:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2014.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luthra S, Kumar S, Garg D, Haleem A (2015) Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:762–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Büyüközkan, Gülçin SG (2017) Accepted Manuscript. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.137.

  8. Çolak M, Kaya İ (2017) Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model : a real case application for Turkey 80:840–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.194

  9. Bazar B (2003) Selection of renewable energy sources using analytic hierarchy process 267–276

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nautiyal H, Varun (2012) Progress in renewable energy under clean development mechanism in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev16:2913–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.008

  11. Kumar A, Kaushik N, Sharma S, Mishra S (2010) Renewable energy in India: current status and future potentials.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.003

  12. Mahtta R, Joshi PK, Kumar A (2014) Solar power potential mapping in India using remote sensing inputs and environmental parameters. Renew Energy 71:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhattacharya SC, Jana C (2009) Renewable energy in India: historical developments and prospects. Energy 34:981–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishizaka A, Labib A (2011) Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process 38:14336–14345

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process 1

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pressures S, Resources W, Interests V, Values C. The Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) for decision making by Thomas Saaty decision making involves setting priorities and the AHP is the methodology for doing most decision problems are multicriteria maximize profits satisfy customer demands Maximize emp n.d.: 1–69

    Google Scholar 

  17. Punia Sindhu S, Nehra V, Luthra S (2016) Recognition and prioritization of challenges in growth of solar energy using analytical hierarchy process: Indian outlook. Energy 100:332–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ikram M, Sroufe R, Zhang Q (2020) Prioritizing and overcoming barriers to integrated management system (IMS) implementation using AHP and G-TOPSIS. J Clean Prod 254:120–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kahraman C, Cebi S (2009) A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34:1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rapal BKAL, Sumabat AKR, Lopez NSA (2017) Analytic hierarchy process for multi-criteria site selection of utility-scale solar and wind projects. Chem Eng Trans 61:1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1761207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ligus M, Peternek P (2018) Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Energy Proc 153:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ayağ Z (2017) Evaluating solar power plant location alternatives through a multiple-criteria decision making method 878–84. https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2017.029.005

  23. Ghimire LP, Kim Y (2018) An analysis on barriers to renewable energy development in. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Algarín CR, Llanos AP, Castro AO (2017) An analytic hierarchy process based approach for evaluating renewable energy sources 7:38–47

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yusoff S, Kardooni R (2012) Barriers and challenges for developing RE policy in Malaysia 28:6–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pathak, S.K., Sharma, V., Chougule, S.S. (2022). Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives by Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model: A Case Study of India. In: Sachdeva, A., Kumar, P., Yadav, O.P., Tyagi, M. (eds) Recent Advances in Operations Management Applications. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7059-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7059-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7058-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7059-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics