Abstract
Power demands across the globe have been on rise for quite a time, and they will continue so in the years ahead. Most of the present day, energy requirements are met by non-renewable energy sources, i.e., burning fossil fuels which are not only expensive and polluting our environment but also depleting quite rapidly. A considerable portion of Pakistan import bills consists of petroleum products according to Pakistan Economic Survey 2015–2016. Renewable energy alternatives, i.e., wind, hydel, solar, and biomass, can be considered cheap, reliable, safe, and supply sustainable energy for the ever-increasing population. Renewable energy is getting more and more attention not only abroad but also in Pakistan as well. In order to decide the best renewable energy alternative for investment to meet rising energy demands of Pakistan, several factors such as economic, technological, and environmental have to be taken in consideration by the decision makers. Therefore, the paper discusses three important multiple criteria decision-making techniques, i.e., Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method in selection of the best renewable energy source that Pakistan should invest into. The results indicate that hydel power generation is the optimum source for meeting energy requirements followed by wind, biomass, and solar power-generating plants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali Y, Rasheed Z, Muhammad N, Yousaf S (2017a) Energy optimization in the wake of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). J Control Decis, pp.1–19
Ali Y, Butt M, Sabir M, Mumtaz U, Salman A (2017b) Selection of suitable site in Pakistan for wind power plant installation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). J Control Decis, pp 1–12
Ali Y, Asghar A, Muhammad N, Salman A (2017c) Selection of a fighter aircraft to improve the effectiveness of air combat in war on terror: Pakistan Air Force—a case in point. Int J Anal Hierarc Process IJAHP Volume 9 Issue 2. (https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i2.489)
Ali Y, Iftikhar N, Edwin AC (2017d) Assessment of career selection problems in developing countries: a MCDM approach. Int J Anal Hierarc Process IJAHP Volume 9 Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i2.488
Afgan NH, Carvalho MG (2002) Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. Energy 27(8):739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00019-1
Alfares HK (2007) Combining criteria ranks for calculating their weights in group MCDM. King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran
Alfares HK, Duffuaa SO (2008) Assigning cardinal weights in multi-criteria decision making based on ordinal ranking. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 15(5-6):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.420
Amer M, Daim TU (2011) Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: a case of Pakistan. Energ Sustain Dev 15(4):420–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.001
Chen LY, Wang T-C (2009) Optimizing partners’ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: the strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.022
Cobuloglu HI, Büyüktahtakın İE (2015) A stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable biomass crop selection. Expert Syst Appl 42:6065–6074
Datta A, Saha D, Ray A, Das P (2014) Anti-islanding selection for grid-connected solar photovoltaic system applications: a MCDM based distance approach. Sol Energy 110:519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.042
Doukas H, Karakosta C, Psarras J (2010) Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5491–5497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.061
Huang J-J, Tzeng G-H & Liu H-H (2009) A revised VIKOR model for multiple criteria decision making—the perspective of regret theory. Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer
Kabak M, Dağdeviren M (2014) Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Energy Convers Manag 79:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.036
Kahraman C, Kaya İ (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6270–6281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.095
Keeney RL, Raiffa H, Rajala DW (1979) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(7):403–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310245
Köksalan MM, Wallenius J, Zionts S (2011) Multiple criteria decision making: from early history to the 21st century, World Scientific, https://doi.org/10.1142/8042
Kolios A, Rodriguez-Tsouroukdissian A, Salonitis K (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis of offshore wind turbines support structures under stochastic inputs. Ships Offshore Struct 11:38–49
Liao H, Xu Z (2013) A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 12(4):373–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-013-9162-0
Lozano-Minguez E, Kolios AJ, Brennan FP (2011) Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures. Renew Energy 36(11):2831–2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.04.020
Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas EK, Cavallaro F, Khalifah Z (2015) Sustainable and renewable energy: an overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability 7(10):13947–13984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013947
Martin H, Spano G, Küster J, Collu M, Kolios A (2013) Application and extension of the TOPSIS method for the assessment of floating offshore wind turbine support structures. Ships Offshore Struct 8(5):477–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2012.718957
Opricovic S (2007) A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst 15(03):363–380. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004728
Opricovic S (2009) A compromise solution in water resources planning. Water Resour Manag 23(8):1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9340-y
Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2003) Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst 11(05):635–652. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488503002387
Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Opricovic S, Tzeng G-H (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178(2):514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Pohekar S, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 8(4):365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
Saaty T (1980) The analytical hierarchical process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: USA
Saelee S, Paweewan B, Tongpool R, Witoon T, Takada J, Manusboonpurmpool K (2014) Biomass type selection for boilers using TOPSIS multi-criteria model. Int J Environ Sci Dev 5:181
San Cristóbal J (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energy 36(2):498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031
Shafiee M, Kolios A (2014) A multi-criteria decision model to mitigate the operational risks of offshore wind infrastructures. Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications, 539–547
Tzeng G-H, Lin C-W, Opricovic S (2005) Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energ Policy 33(11):1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
Usmana M, Ahmadb U, Mehmoodc N (2015) A review on optimization of Pakistan’s alternative energy resources at domestic level. Power, 2
Yousaf S, Ali Y, Sabir M and Masood MT (2017) Production planning of Pakistan Tobacco Company (PTC) using quantitative and multiple-criteria decision analysis—a case in-point. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ishfaq, S., Ali, S. & Ali, Y. Selection of Optimum Renewable Energy Source for Energy Sector in Pakistan by Using MCDM Approach. Process Integr Optim Sustain 2, 61–71 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0032-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0032-z