Skip to main content

The Commercialisation of Space: An Overview of Legal Risks and Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Management in Outer Space Activities

Part of the book series: Space Law and Policy ((SLP))

  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

Since the early years of space exploration and development, space has primarily been the domain of sovereign state actors. Governments have funded and facilitated space activities for specific state purposes, including telecommunications, research and development, and defence. Concurrently, a network of international space law treaties and principles was created to regulate the activities of sovereign state actors in space. However, in recent years, there has been an increase in the number of private commercial entities undertaking space activities. A viable and competitive space economy has emerged, much in part to rapid technological advancements and the reduction of financial barriers to entry. As these commercial entities navigate a new domain, they will face new complex risks – both technical and legal. This chapter specifically identifies those legal risks relevant to commercial ventures into space, including regulatory risk and contractual risk with a focus on the laws applicable in Australia and New Zealand.

The views of the authors are the authors’ alone and are intended to provide commentary and general information, and do not represent the views of any organisation. This chapter should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal advice or for any other purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    STS-135 (ISS assembly flight ULF7) was the 135th and final mission of the American Space Shuttle program.

  2. 2.

    Since the final Space Shuttle flight in 2011, NASA has purchased access to the Russian Soyuz spacecraft for American crew transportation. In May 2020, NASA announced that negotiations had been finalised with the Russian state space corporation Roscosmos for one seat on a Soyuz mission scheduled for launch in late 2020 at a cost of USD90.25 million. It is expected that this will be the last time NASA purchases access to space as commercial crew launches enter into regular service.

  3. 3.

    As Project Gemini progressed, the NASA budget grew rapidly. NASA’s budget was $966.7 million in 1961, $1.825 billion in 1962, $3.674 billion in 1963, $5.1 billion in 1964, and $5.25 billion in 1965, representing some 5% of the federal budget. NASA’s full-time employees increased from 10,000 in 1960 to more than 34,000 in 1965. Similarly, the number of employees working for NASA contractors increased from 36,500 in 1960 to more than 370,000 in 1965 (Solomon, 2008, p. 17).

  4. 4.

    SpaceX successfully completed the first demonstration in 2012, and the second demonstration in 2020. SpaceX has also provided critical resupply services under a separate ‘Commercial Resupply Services’ contract with NASA.

  5. 5.

    As of December 2020, Rocket Labs had launched 55 satellites into low Earth orbit.

  6. 6.

    The Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, opened for signature Jan. 27, 1967; The Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space, opened for signature Apr. 22, 1968; The Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, opened for signature Mar. 29, 1972; The Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space, opened for signature Jan. 14, 1975; and The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, opened for signature Dec. 18, 1979.

  7. 7.

    These nation states are: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands, Norway, Philippines, Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

  8. 8.

    The terminology for such approvals varies across jurisdictions, but are generally referred to as “approvals”, “licences”, “permits” or “authorisations”.

  9. 9.

    The Space Activities Act 1998 is no longer in force.

  10. 10.

    For further examination of the risks associated with space debris, see Chap. 5.

  11. 11.

    Multiple federal agencies regulate the commercial space industry in the United States. The Federal Aviation Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Federal Communications Commission, the Department of Commerce and the Department of State all have particular responsibilities with respect to commercial space activities in the United States.

  12. 12.

    The particular requirements and treatment of contractual indemnities at law will differ between jurisdictions.

References

  • ACIL Allen Consulting. (2017). Australian space industry capability. https://acilallen.com.au/uploads/files/projects/217/ACILAllen_SpaceIndustryCapability_2017-1530069389.pdf

  • Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (Moon Agreement) 1979, 1363 UNTS 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (Rescue Agreement) 1968, 672 UNTS 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. (2017). Terms of reference for a review of space industry capability. https://www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/terms_of_reference_for_a_review_of_space_industry_capability_0.pdf

  • Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. (2018). Budget 2018 - New opportunities and jobs for Australian industry. https://www.minister.industry.gov.au/ministers/cash/media-releases/budget-2018-new-opportunities-and-jobs-australian-industry

  • Australian Government Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. (2019). Advancing space: Australian civil space strategy 2019–2028. https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australian-civil-space-strategy-2019-2028

  • Avveduto, R. (2019). Past, present and future of intellectual property in space: Old answers to new questions. Washing International Law Journal, 29(1), 203–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, I. (2016). The use of service level agreements in space projects. In I. Bauman & L. J. Smith (Eds.), Contracting for space: Contract practice in the European space sector (pp. 303–318). Taylor & Francis Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, I., & Smith, L. J. (Eds.). (2016). Contracting for space: Contract practice in the European space sector. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilstein, R. E. (1989). Orders of magnitude: A history of the NACA and NASA, 1915–1900. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2011). The American and Soviet Cold War space programs. Comparative Strategy, 30(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2011.561736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G. W. (2004). Executive order: President’s commission on implementation of United States space exploration policy. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040130-7.html

  • Carminati, G. (2014). French national space legislation. Houston Journal of International Law, 36(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. (1997). Studies in international space law. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (Liability Convention) 1972, 961 UNTS 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Access Economics. (2019). New Zealand space economy: Its value, scope and structure. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2019-11/Deloitte%20NZ%20Space%20Economy%20Report.pdf

  • Dempsey, P. S. (2016). National laws governing commercial space activities: Legislation, regulation and enforcement. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 36(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Zwart, M. (2019). South Australia’s role in the space race: Then and now. Adelaide Law Review, 40, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederiks-Verschoor, I. H. P., & Kopal, V. (2008). An introduction to space law. Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, C. (2020, May 19). NASA’s Commercial Crew Program is a fantastic deal. The Planetary Society. https://www.planetary.org/articles/nasas-commercial-crew-is-a-great-deal-for-the-agency

  • Evans, W. M. (2004). The Canadian space program – Past, present, and future (a history of the development of space policy in Canada). Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, 50(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, S. (2004). The Australian regulatory regime for space launch activities: Out to launch. In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Colloquium on The Law of Outer Space, 4–8 October 2004, Vancouver, Canada. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrynowicz, J. I. (2004). Space law: Its Cold War origins and challenges in the era of globalization. Suffolk University Law Review, 37, 1041–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, J. R., Devezas, T. C., Belderrain, M. C., Vilela Salgado, M. C., & Lourenco de Melo, F. C. (2013, September 23–27). The road to privatization of space exploration: What is missing? [Conference presentation]. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, N. (2020). India’s space program, ambitions, and activities. Asia Policy, 15(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2020.0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., Mackenzie, P., Sherborne, A., Sit, H., & Jackson, L. (2019). The law of rules: The use of rules for the advancement of debris mitigation strategies in space activities. In Air Power Development Centre and Australia New Zealand Space Law Interest Group, Project Asteria 2019: Space debris, space traffic management and space sustainability (pp. 75–92). Air Power Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. (2005). NASA and the Business of Space [speech made at the 52nd annual conference of the American Astronautical Society, November 2005] in Leadership in space: Selected speeches of NASA Administrator Michael Griffin, May 2005–October 2008, NASA. http://history.nasa.gov/leadership.pdf

  • Hawkins, N., Pavis, M., Macak, K., & Nasu, H. (2019). Finding Polaris in the future regulation of the UK space industry. The Centre for Science, Culture and the Law at the University of Exeter. http://sculecentre.ex.ac.uk/finding-polaris-in-the-future-regulation-of-the-uk-space-industry/

  • Hermida, J. (1996). Transponder agreements. Journal of Space Law, 24(1), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzfeld, H. R., & von der Dunk, F. G. (2005). Bringing space law into the commercial world: Property rights without sovereignty. Chicago Journal of International Law, 6(1), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, O., & Roelandt, R. (2016). Specific aspects and characteristics of satellite capacity agreements in the satellite communications business. In I. Bauman & L. J. Smith (Eds.), Contracting for space: Contract practice in the European space sector (pp. 393–400). Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBIS World. (2018). Satellite communications and astronauts in Australia. https://www.ibisworld.com/au/industry/satellite-communications-astronautics/5545/

  • International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization. (2004). Intellectual property and space activities. https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/patent-law/en/developments/pdf/ip_space.pdf

  • Jones, T., & Macken, T. (2019). Australia. In J. Wheeler (Ed.), The space law review (pp. 21–35). Law Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenigsmann, H. (2018). Statement of Dr. Hans Koenigsmann Vice President, Build and Flight Reliability Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) before the Committee on Science, Space, & Technology Subcommittee on Space, United States House of Representatives, January 17, 2018. https://science.house.gov/hearings/an-update-on-nasa-commercial-crew-systems-development

  • Koman, R. G. (1994). Man on the Moon: The U.S. space program as a Cold War manoeuvre. OAH Magazine of History, 8(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/8.2.42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2020, May). 30 voices on 2030: The future of space. https://home.kpmg/au/en/home/insights/2020/05/30-voices-on-2030-future-of-space.html

  • Laisne, M. R. (2013). Space entrepreneurs: Business strategy, risk, law and policy in the final frontier. John Marshall Law Review, 46(4), 1039–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launius, R. D. (1994). NASA: A history of the U.S. civil space program. Krieger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (Ed.). (2018). A dictionary of law. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, D. (2020). Commercial space law: Launch and operation of spacecraft. Bulletin (Law Society of South Australia), 42(2), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisk, J., & de Zwart, M. (2019). Watch this space: The development of commercial space law in Australia and New Zealand. Federal Law Review, 47(3), 444–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. (Ed.). (2017). Australian law dictionary. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, G. (2006). Intellectual property resources in and for space: The practitioner’s experience. The Journal of Space Law, 32, 385–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, D. (2005). An overview of United Kingdom space activity 1957–1987. ESA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (2018). Into the final frontier: The expanse of space commercialization. Missouri Law Review, 83(2), 429–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montpert, P. (2016). Space insurance. In I. Bauman & L. J. Smith (Eds.), Contracting for space: Contract practice in the European space sector (pp. 283–290). Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Stanley Research. (2020, July 24). Space: Investing the final frontier. https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/investing-in-space

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2011). Falcon 9 launch vehicle NAFCOM cost estimates. https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/586023main_8-3-11_NAFCOM.pdf

  • Nicholson, G. (2002). The common heritage of mankind and mining: An analysis of the law as to the high seas, outer space, the Antarctic and world heritage. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, 6, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, R. M. (1970). Statement about the Future of the United States Space Program, 7 March 1970. In Public papers of Richard M. Nixon 1970. U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). OECD handbook on measuring the space economy. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). The space economy in figures: How space contributes to the global economy. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, H. V., & Gopalaswamy, B. (2008). India’s emerging profile in space. Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, 153(5), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071840802521952

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy. (2004). A journey to inspire, innovate, and discovery. https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/60736main_M2M_report_small.pdf

  • Piantadosi, C. (2013). Mankind beyond earth: The history, science, and future of human space exploration. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ravillon, L. (2016). Typology of contracts in the space sector. In I. Bauman & L. J. Smith (Eds.), Contracting for space: Contract practice in the European space sector (pp. 161–168). Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, R. (1984). Statement on signing the Commercial Space Launch Act. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/statement-signing-commercial-space-launch-act

  • Rodriguez, R. M. (2015). The space program of the People’s Republic of China. Lulu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satellite Industry Association (SIA). (2020, June) State of the satellite industry report. https://sia.org/news-resources/state-of-the-satellite-industry-report

  • Scharlach, I. (2016). Performance and warranty articles in space industry contracts. In I. Bauman & L. J. Smith (Eds.), Contracting for space: Contract practice in the European space sector (pp. 257–266). Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, E. (2017). Commercialization of space activities: The laws and implications. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 82(1), 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, L. D. (2008). The privatisation of space exploration: Business, technology, law and policy. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • SpaceX. (2011). Why the US can beat China: The facts about SpaceX costs. https://web.archive.org/web/20130328121051/http:/www.spacex.com/usa.php

  • Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (Outer Space Treaty) 1967, 610 UNTS 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS). (2012, April 10). Report of the Legal Subcommittee on its fifty-first session, held in Vienna from 19 to 30 March 2012. UN Doc. A/AC.105/1003/.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2004, December 10). Application of the concept of the “launching State”. A/RES/59/115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valnia, A., Burt, J., Pham, T., & Ganel, O. (2019, April 14–18). The role of smallsats in scientific exploration and commercialization of space [Conference presentation paper]. Micro- and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications XI, Maryland, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Dunk, F.G., (1994). Commercial space activities: An inventory of liability – an inventory of problems. In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Dunk, F. G. (2018). Billion-dollar questions? Legal aspects of commercial space activities. Uniform Law Review, 23, 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/uny022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Dunk, F. G., & Tronchetti, F. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of space law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. (Ed.). (2019). The space law review. Law Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wtize, A. (2020, May 26). SpaceX to launch astronauts — And a new era of private human spaceflight. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01554-8

  • Yotsumoto, H., & Ishikawa, D. (2019). Japan. In J. Wheeler (Ed.), The space law review (pp. 47–56). Law Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, E. (2017, September 12–14). An assessment of cost improvements in the NASA COTS - CRS program and implications for future NASA missions. [Conference presentation paper]. AIAA Space 2017 Conference, Orlando, Florida, United States. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170008895

  • Zhao, Y. (2017). Intellectual property protection in outer space: Reconciling territoriality of intellectual property with non-territoriality in outer space. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 7(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2017.02.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas K. E. Sherborne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sherborne, A.K.E. (2022). The Commercialisation of Space: An Overview of Legal Risks and Considerations. In: Pozza, M.A., Dennerley, J.A. (eds) Risk Management in Outer Space Activities. Space Law and Policy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4756-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4756-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4755-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4756-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics