Skip to main content

Workplace Stress Assessment of Software Employees Using Multi-grade Fuzzy and Importance Performance Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics

Abstract

The current research focuses on the study of stress in software employees using multi-grade fuzzy (MGF) approach and importance-performance analysis (IPA). Stress is a common factor in most of the IT sector employees. A model for assessing the stress was developed by applying MGF. A software company has been selected as a model to perform employee stress assessment by applying MGF to obtain the stress index. The result of the application had indicated significant employee stress in the case study. The areas which need immediate attention to alleviate employee stress had been identified and suggested using the IPA analysis. The current framework developed would help to measure the stress in other software organizations and help them to provide attention to their weaker attributes to overcome employee stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mucci N, Giorgi G, Cupelli V, Gioffrè PA, Rosati MV, Tomei G, Breso-Esteve E, Arcangeli G (2015) Work-related stress assessment in a population of Italian workers. The stress questionnaire. Sci Total Environ 502:673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Palmer S, Cooper C, Thomas K (2004) A model of work stress. Counselling at work. Winter, 5, 25

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thayer JF, Verkuil B, Brosschotj JF, Kevin K, West A, Sterling C et al (2010) Effects of the physical work environment on physiological measures of stress. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab 17(4):431–439

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams S, Cooper CL (1998) Measuring occupational stress: development of the pressure management indicator. J Occup Health Psychol 3(4):306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert VA, Lambert CE (2001) Literature review of role stress/strain on nurses: an international perspective. Nurs Health Sci 3(3):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar V, Kumar S (2014) Workplace spirituality as a moderator in relation between stress and health: an exploratory empirical assessment. Int Rev Psychiatry 26(3):344–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shukla A, Srivastava R (2016) Development of short questionnaire to measure an extended set of role expectation conflict, coworker support and work-life balance: the new job stress scale. Cogent Bus Manage 3(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen JG, Jung HS, Peacock BJ (1994) A fuzzy sets modelling approach for ergonomic workload stress analysis. Int J Ind Ergon 13(3):189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fahlen G, Peter R, Knutsson A (2004) The effort-reward imbalance model of psychosocial stress at the workplace—a comparison of ERI exposure assessment using two estimation methods. Work Stress 18(1):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nübling M, Stößel U, Hasselhorn HM, Michaelis M, Hofmann F (2006) Measuring psychological stress and strain at work—evaluation of the COPSOQ questionnaire in Germany. GMS Psycho-Soc Med 3

    Google Scholar 

  11. Padma V, Anand NN, Gurukul SS, Javid SSM, Prasad A, Arun S (2015) Health problems and stress in information technology and business process outsourcing employees. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 7(Suppl 1):S9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vinodh S, Chintha SK (2011) Leanness assessment using multi-grade fuzzy approach. Int J Prod Res 49(2):431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinodh S (2011) Assessment of sustainability using multi-grade fuzzy approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(3):509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganesh J, Suresh M (2016, Dec) Safety practice level assessment using multigrade fuzzy approach: a case of Indian manufacturing company. In: 2016 IEEE International conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC). IEEE, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sridharan V, Suresh M (2016, Dec) Environmental sustainability assessment using multigrade fuzzy—a case of two Indian colleges. In: 2016 IEEE International conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ormanovic S, Ciric A, Talovic M, Alic H, Jeleskovic E, Causevic D (2017) Importance-performance analysis: different approaches. Acta Kinesiol 11:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dickson D, Ford R, Deng WJ (2008) Fuzzy importance-performance analysis for determining critical service attributes. Int J Serv Ind Manage

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sreedharshini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sreedharshini, S., Suresh, M., Lakshmi Priyadarsini, S. (2021). Workplace Stress Assessment of Software Employees Using Multi-grade Fuzzy and Importance Performance Analysis. In: Jeena Jacob, I., Kolandapalayam Shanmugam, S., Piramuthu, S., Falkowski-Gilski, P. (eds) Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8530-2_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics