Abstract
Practitioners of participatory communication commonly encounter episodes of conflict in their work with communities. The first type of conflict is among peers and members of the community which occurs when people with diverging priorities attempt to address shared problems. Conflict may persist due to inability of processes to resolve disagreements and competition. The second type of conflict is between the community and influential elites who possess powers which they wish to continue asserting in a top-down fashion to shape events and influence outcomes within the community. These experiences suggest a necessity for practitioners of participatory communication to build interdisciplinary linkages to the area of conflict management and theories of power in their continuing efforts to develop approaches which are capable of processing conflict involving communities they serve. This contribution explores the nexus between participatory communication and the closely related theories and realities posed by conflict and unevenly distributed power within communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benor D, Harrison JQ, Baxter M (1984) Agricultural extension: the training and visit system. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Chan LH (1997) Women on the global assembly line. In: Walters S (ed) Globalization, adult education and training: impact and issues. Zed Books, London, pp 79–86
Foucault M (2001) Power: the essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (Faubion JD [ed], trans: Hurley R), vol 3. The New Press, New York
Freire P (2007) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum, New York
Freire Institute (undated) Concepts used by Paulo Freire. Available via http://www.freire.org/component/easytagcloud/118-module/conscientization/. Accessed 18 Dec 2017
French JRP, Raven B (1959) The bases of social power. In: Cartwright D (ed) Studies in social power. Research Center for Group Dynamics/Institute for Social Research/University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp 150–165. Available via: http://web.mit.edu/.../Power/French_&_Raven_Studies_Social_Power_ch9_pp150-167.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 1017
Gaventa J (1980) Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad Manag J 44(2):238–251
Machiavelli N (1532) De Principatibus/Il Principe. Antonio Blado d’Asola
Madalina O (2016) Conflict management, a new challenge. Procedia Econ Financ 39:807–814. Available via http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212567116302556. Accessed 12 Dec 2017
Molyneux M (1985) Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Fem Stud 11(2):227–254
Moser C (1993) Gender planning and development: theory, practice and training. Routledge, London
Nemtin B, Loh C (1968) Fogo Island film and community development project. National Film Board of Canada, Ottawa. Available via http://onf-nfb.gc.ca/medias/download/.../pdf/1968-Fogo-Island-Project-Low-Nemtin.pdf Accessed 5 Dec 2017
Newhook S (2009) The Godfathers of Fogo: Donald Snowden, Fred Earle and the roots of the Fogo Island Films, 1964–1967. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies, [S.l.], June 2009. Available via https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/NFLDS/article/view/14408/15473. Accessed 7 Dec 2017
NFLD Archive (2015) Fogo Project Billy Crane Moves Away. Available via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3NKnUpj22I. Accessed 12 Dec 2017
Practical Action (2007) Wall Newspapers. Practical Action, Rugby, Warwickshire. Available via https://www.sswm.info/library/2526. Accessed 9 Dec 2017
Rappaport J (1981) Praise of paradox: a social policy of empowerment over prevention. Am J Community Psychol 9(1):1–25
Rowlands J (1997) Questioning empowerment: working with women in Honduras. Oxfam, Oxford
Sadan E (2004) Empowerment and community practice (trans: Flantz R). Available via: http://www.mpow.org. Accessed 18 Dec 2017
Salas MA et al (2010) Visualisation in participatory programmes: how to facilitate and visualise participatory group processes. Southbound, Penang
Schellenberg JA (1996) Conflict resolution: theory, research, and practice. State University of New York Press, Albany
Shariza K (2016) Gender responsive and participatory budgeting in Penang: the people-oriented model. In: Ng C (ed) Gender responsive and participatory budgeting: imperatives for equitable public expenditure. Springer/SIRD, Switzerland/Malaysia
Sharma V (2011) Decoding non-verbal communication. Available via https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283794137
Tandon R (ed) (2005) Participatory research: revisiting the roots. Mosaic Books, New Delhi
UNESCO (undated) Defining community broadcasting. UNESCO, Paris. Available via https://en.unesco.org/community-media-sustainability/policy-series/defining. Accessed 9 Dec 2017
Zimmerman M (2000) Empowerment Theory. In Rappaport J and SeidmanHandbook E (eds) Handbook of Community Psychology. Springer US
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Chin, S.Y. (2020). Participatory Communication in Practice: The Nexus to Conflict and Power. In: Servaes, J. (eds) Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2013-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2014-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities