Skip to main content

Multi-objective Performance-Based Design Optimization of a Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frame System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resilient Structures and Infrastructure

Abstract

This chapter seeks to determine the optimal structural design parameter values for a 6-story controlled rocking steel braced frame (CRSBF) building that minimizes the upfront (initial construction) and earthquake-induced economic and environmental impacts. The dead load on the rocking frame, initial post-tensioning force, fuse strength and frame aspect ratio are the considered parameters. Earthquake-induced economic losses are assessed using the FEMA P58 methodology and the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment is used to quantify greenhouse gas emissions associated with initial construction and repair and replacement activities following earthquake damage. Surrogate models are developed as compact representations of the statistical relationship between the structural design parameters and economic and environmental impacts. Once validated, the surrogate models are used to perform single- and multi-objective optimization using the desirability function approach. Differences in the sensitivity of the two impact categories (environmental and economic) to variations in the individual structural design parameters are also highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE. (2016). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-16, Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. W. (2015). Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 31, 579–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derringer, G., & Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12(4), 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyanati, M., Huang, Q., & Roke, D. (2017). Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centering concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(5), 537–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eads, L., Miranda, E., & Lignos, D. G. (2015). Average spectral acceleration as an intensity measure for collapse risk assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 44(12), 2057–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eatherton, M., & Hajjar, J. (2010). Large-scale cyclic and hybrid simulation testing and development of a controlled-rocking steel building system with replaceable fuses. NSEL-025, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatherton, M. R., & Hajjar, J. F. (2011). Residual drifts of self-centering systems including effects of ambient building resistance. Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 719–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eatherton, M. R., Ma, X., Krawinkler, H., Mar, D., Billington, S., Hajjar, J. F., & Deierlein, G. G. (2014). Design concepts for controlled rocking of self-centering steel braced frames. Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ST.1943-541X.0001047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695). Redwood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2012). Seismic performance assessment of buildings (FEMA P-58, Vols. 1 and 2). Redwood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. S., Eatherton, M. R., & Hajjar, J. F. (2010). Nonlinear behavior of controlled rocking steel-framed building systems with replaceable energy dissipating fuses. Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., & Lave, L. (1998). Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 32(7), 184A–191A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Y., & Ellingwood, B. R. (2015). Ethical discounting for civil infrastructure decisions extending over multiple generations. Structural Safety, 57, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Krawinkler, H., & Deierlein, G. G. (2011). Seismic design and behavior of self-centering braced frame with controlled rocking and energy dissipating fuses. John Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, TR 174, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckenna, F. T. (1999). Object-oriented finite element programming: Frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing (Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2013). Design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009). Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C., & Matthews, H. (2002). Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of US residential buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(4), 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrard, A. L., Matthews, H. S., & Ries, R. J. (2008). Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14(4), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokrabadi, M., & Burton, H. V. (2017). Ground motion intensity measures for rocking building systems. Earthquake Spectra, 33(4), 1533–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, T. C., & Wiebe, L. D. A. (2016). Dynamic and equivalent static procedures for capacity design of controlled rocking steel braced frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 45(14), 2349–2369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, T. C., & Wiebe, L. D. A. (2017). Collapse risk of controlled rocking steel braced frames with different post-tensioning and energy dissipation designs. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46(13), 2063–2082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Burton, H. V., Zhang, Y., & Wallace, J. W. (2017). Interbuilding interpolation of peak seismic response demands using spatially correlated demand parameters. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 47(5), 1168–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uriz, P., Filippou, F. C., & Mahin, S. A. (2008). Model for cyclic inelastic buckling of steel braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 134(4), 619–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C., Matthews, D., Venkatesh, A., Costello, C., & Matthews, H. (2009). The 2002 US benchmark version of the economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model. Green Design Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, L., & Christopoulos, C. (2015). Performance-based seismic design of controlled rocking steel braced frames. I: Methodological framework and design of base rocking joint. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(9), 04014226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, L., Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., & Leclerc, M. (2013). Mechanisms to limit higher mode effects in a controlled rocking steel frame: Large amplitude shake table testing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(7), 1069–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Science Foundation Award No. 1554714.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry V. Burton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burton, H.V., Lee, J.Y., Moradi, S., Dastmalchi, S. (2019). Multi-objective Performance-Based Design Optimization of a Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frame System. In: Noroozinejad Farsangi, E., Takewaki, I., Yang, T., Astaneh-Asl, A., Gardoni, P. (eds) Resilient Structures and Infrastructure. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7446-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7446-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7445-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7446-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics