Abstract
In this chapter, attrition among first-year students, especially those students who have not been groomed for university, also known as equity students, is addressed. Recommendations for focusing on what they can already do when they start their studies are made. Ways to enhance the transition process are recommended, including mandatory collaboration between academic advisers and academic subject teachers who tend to function separately. Case study research is presented that shows that new students, including equity students, already have some academic literacy skills such as higher order thinking skills, academic writing skills, and academic discourse skills when they commence. These skills are contained in their virtual uni bags – a construct used to suggest that all students have skills as well as life experience when they start their studies. This chapter discusses existing skills and missing skills and suggests ways in which they can be developed and enhanced in co-curricular activities, created in collaboration between academic advisors and academic subject teachers. This process is explored by using the constructs of the virtual uni bag and pedagogy for transition. The emphasis is on ways in which academic advisers can collaborate with academic subject teachers to embed development of the missing skills in the first-year curriculum in the classroom (which includes face-to-face and online teaching) and in co-curricular activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, A.L., and B.H. Huang. 2011. Do current English language development/proficiency standards reflect the English needed for success in school? Language Testing 28 (3): 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211404187.
Bizzell, P. 1992. Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh/London: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Buzan, T. 1998. The Mindmap Book. Reprinted paperback ed. London: BBC Books.
Coates, H., and A.C. McCormick. 2014. Introduction: Student engagement – A window into undergraduate education. In Engaging university students, ed. H. Coates and A.C. McCormick, 1–12. Singapore: Springer.
Collier, P.J., and D.L. Morgan. 2007. “Is that paper really due today?”: differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations: Higher Education, 55 (4): 425–446
Coxhead, A. 2000a. The Academic Word List. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist
Coxhead, A. 2000b. A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34 (2): 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951.
Coxhead, A., and P. Byrd. 2007. Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (3): 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002.
Croucher, G. 2017, May 9. University fees and cuts, Opinion piece. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/federal-budget-2017-whats-changing-in-education-77177
Daniels, H. 2001. Vygotsky and Pedagogy. USA/Canada: Routledge.
Davies, M. 2013. Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research and Development 32 (4): 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.697878.
Donesch-Jezo, E. 2010. Teaching academic discourse writing in ESP courses for medical students and professionals. US-China Foreign Language 8 (1): 32–39.
Faragher, L. 2012. Building Pathways to Academic Success - Transitions. Poster presented at the Community Engaged Research Evening. University of Southern Queensland.
Faragher, L. 2018. Exploring transition pedagogy at the tertiary level: a case study of newly enrolled first year education students’ experience in writing and thinking within the genre of the persuasive essay in a comparative analysis of literacy pedagogy. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba.
Gelder, T.v. 2005. Teaching critical thinking: Some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching 53 (1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48.
Gibson, L. 2011. Student-directed learning: An exercise in student engagement. College Teaching 59 (3): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.550957.
Green, W. J., S. Hammer, and R. Stephens. 2005. Locating learning advisers in the new university: What should be our role? Paper presented at the Language and Academic Skills in Higher Education Conference.
Haggis, T. 2006. Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education 31 (5): 521–535.
Hare, J. 2015. First-year uni dropouts: Swinburne, UTAS led spike in 2013. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/first-year-uni-dropouts-swinburne-utas-led-spike-in-2013/story-e6frgcjx-1227470038183
Heagney, M., and R. Benson. 2017. How mature-age students succeed in higher education: Implications for institutional support. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 39 (3): 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1300986.
Hyland, K. 2003. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (1): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.
Jackson, C. 2016. Let’s be guided by the facts on attrition [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/Media-and-Events/media-releases/Let-s-be-guided-by-the-facts-on-attrition%2D%2D-Catriona-Jackson-oped#.WMMBxDuGPcs
James, R., K.-L. Krause, and C. Jennings. 2010. The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from 1994–2009. Retrieved from Melbourne and Brisbane: http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/experience/docs/FYE_Report_1994_to_2009.pdf
Johnson, R.B., and A.J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
Kahn, P., L. Everington, K. Kelm, I. Reid, and F. Watkins. 2017. Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development 65 (1): 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z.
Kahu, E.R. 2011. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.
Kahu, E.R., and K. Nelson. 2018. Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development 37 (1): 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197.
Kahu, E.R., C. Stephens, L. Leach, and N. Zepke. 2013. The engagement of mature distance students. Higher Education Research and Development 32 (5): 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777036.
Kift, S., K. Nelson, and J. Clarke. 2010. Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE – A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal Of The First Year In Higher Education 1 (1): 1–20. Retrieved from https://fyhejournal.com/article/view/13. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13.
Kincheloe, J.L. 2001. Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700601.
Kincheloe, J.L. 2005. On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry 11 (3): 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056.
Knoch, U. 2008. The assessment of academic style in EAP writing: The case of the rating scale. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing (MPLT) 13 (1): 34.
Krause, K. 2006. Accommodating diverse approaches to student engagement. Paper presented at the New Zealand Quality Enhancement Meeting 11, Wellington, New Zealand.
López, M., H. Ponce, and R. Quezada. 2010. Use of interactive graphic organisers for dveloping cognitive skills in higher education. International Journal of Digital Societ 1 (2): 67–75.
Martin, S., and S.F. Koob. 2017, January 18. Third of university students failing to complete course. The Australian.
Marzano. 2001. Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Marzano, and J.S. Kendall. 2007. The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Marzano, and J.S. Kendall. 2008. Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
McIntyre, J., and N. Todd. 2012, 26–29 June. Building pathways to higher education success: a longitudinal case study. Paper presented at the 15th International First Year in Higher Education Conference: New Horizon (FYHE 2012), Brisbane.
McIntyre, J., N. Todd, H. Huijser, and G. Tehan. 2012. Building pathways to academic success. A Practice Report. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 3 (1): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v3i1.110.
McLaren, P. 2001. Bricklayers and Bricoleurs: A Marxist Addendum. Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 700–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700604.
McMillan, J., and J. Western. 2000. Measurement of the socio-economic status of Australian higher education students. Higher Education 39 (2): 223–247.
Nation, P., and A. Coxhead. 2014. Vocabulary size research at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Language Teaching 47 (03): 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000111.
Nelson, K., C. Quinn, A. Marrington, and J. Clarke. 2012. Good practice for enhancing the engagement and success of commencing students. Higher Education 63 (1): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9426-y.
Norman, E., and E. Newham. 2018. The role of learning advisors and support staff within an increasingly differentiated student community. Journal of Academic Language & Learning 12 (1): A128–A140.
Norton, A. 2019a, May 2. Labor wants to restore ‘demand driven’ funding to universities: what does this mean? Explainer. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/more-students-are-going-to-university-than-before-but-those-at-risk-of-dropping-out-need-more-help-118764
Norton, A. 2019b, June 17. More students are going to university than before, but those at risk of dropping out need more help, Research. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/more-students-are-going-to-university-than-before-but-those-at-risk-of-dropping-out-need-more-help-118764
Norton, A., and B. Cakitaki. 2016. Mapping Australian higher education 2016, Grattan Institute Report.
O’Donnell, V.L., and J. Tobbell. 2007. The transition of adult students to higher education: Legitimate peripheral participation in a community of practice? Adult Education Quarterly 57 (4): 312–328.
O’Keeffe, P. 2013. A sense of belonging: Improving student retention. College Student Journal 47 (4): 605–613.
Oliver, R. 2008. Engaging first year students using a Web-supported inquiry-based learning setting. Higher Education 55 (3): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9055-7.
Priest, A.-M. 2009. “I have understanding as well as you”: Supporting the language and learning needs of students from low socio-economic status backgrounds. Journal of Academic Language and Learning 3 (2): A1–A12.
Pugh, S.L., J.W. Hicks, and M. Davis. 1997. Metaphorical ways of knowing. Urbana Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
Rionosia, P.K., and P.L. Kutotto. 2017. Determinants of academic performance in public secondary schools in Kapenguria Division-Kenya: Assessing the effect of participation in selected co-curricular activities. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology 4 (2): 164–174.
Thomson, P., and C. Hall. 2008. Opportunities missed and/or thwarted? ‘Funds of knowledge’ meet the English national curriculum. Curriculum Journal 19 (2): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170802079488.
Tinto, V. 2005. Student Retention: What Next?*. Paper presented at the National Conference on Student Recruitment, Marketing, and Retention. Washington, DC. http://hr.fhda.edu/_downloads/Student-Retention-What-Next_.pdf
Wallace, A., T. Schirato, and P. Bright. 1999. Beginning university: Thinking, researching and writing for success. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Zepke, N. 2013. Student engagement: A complex business supporting the first year experience in tertiary education. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 4 (2): 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Faragher, L. (2021). A View of the Contents of the Typical First-Year Virtual Uni Bag: Helping Staff and Students Develop a Pedagogy for Successful Transition. In: Huijser, H., Kek, M., Padró, F.F. (eds) Student Support Services. University Development and Administration. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3364-4_21-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3364-4_21-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3364-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3364-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education