Skip to main content

Pros and Cons of Abdominal Drain in Digestive Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery

Abstract

The Consensus Guideline advocated by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Study Group does not recommend routine drain insertion. However, no well-established evidence of the need for abdominal drainage in gastrointestinal surgeries is available. In this article, the currently available evidence of the need for abdominal drains in gastrointestinal surgeries is reviewed. In fact, indwelling drains are not needed in all surgical cases. Since the publication of an overseas report that denied the preventive effects of abdominal drains and the need for indwelling drains, several studies on the appropriate use of drains have been performed in Japan. Although it is unclear whether sufficient discussions have been conducted regarding the selection of drains in other countries, the use of a selected drain for its maximum benefits, and appropriate withdrawal timing, it is necessary to first identify the optimal use of drains regardless of whether drains should be continued to be used in the future. Thus, we suggest that decisions regarding indwelling drains should be appropriately made by respective surgeons based on surgical findings. Finally, it should be noted again that a prophylactic drain should be promptly removed once it is no longer needed because an extended period of indwelling drainage may lead to retrograde infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999 infection control and hospital epidemiology. April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drinkwater CJ, Neil MJ. Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1995;10(2):185–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A, et al. Drainage after elective hepatic resection: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1993;218:748–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, et al. Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg. 1996;171:158–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burt BM, Brown K, Jarnagin W, et al. An audit of results of a no-drainage practice policy after hepatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:441–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg. 2004;239:194–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Niinami H, Tabata M, Takeuchi Y, et al. Experimental assessment of the drainage capacity of small silastic chest drains. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2006;14(3):223–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikura H, Kimura S. The use of flexible silastic drains after chest surgery: novel thoracic drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:331–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang H-Y, Zhao C-L, Xie J, Ye Y-W, Sun J-F, Ding Z-H, Hua-Nan X, Li D. To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31:951–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1999;229:174–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, Balzarotti R, Avenia N, Mariani E, Agnelli G, Becattini C. To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis. 2014;16(2):O35–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD006232.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, Iida H, Yoshii K, Asano H, Kon M. Effects of implementing an “enhanced recovery after surgery” program on patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today. 2017;47(1):42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gavriilidis P, Hidalgo E, de’Angelis N, Lodge P, Azoulay D. Re-appraisal of prophylactic drainage in uncomplicated liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.010. [Epub ahead of print].

  15. Shwaartz C, Fields AC, Aalberg JJ, Divino CM. Role of drain placement in major hepatectomy: a NSQIP analysis of procedure-targeted hepatectomy cases. World J Surg. 2017;41(4):1110–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Mullerat P, et al. Routine abdominal drainage for incomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD006004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR. Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD006004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim J, Lee J, Hyung WJ, et al. Gastric cancer surgery without drains: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:727–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. kumar M, Yang SB, Jaiswal VK, et al. Is prophylactic placement of drains necessary after subtotal gastrectomy? World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3738–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu HP, Zhang YC, Zhang YL, et al. Drain versus no-drain after gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: systemic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:178–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Chen J, Su K, Dong Z. Abdominal drainage versus no drainage post-gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5:CD008788.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diener MK, Mehr K-T, Wente MN, et al. Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current of evidence. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2011;396:41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng Y, Xia J, Lai M, Cheng N, He S. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD010583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, et al. Evidence based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg. 2004;240:1074–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morihiko Ishizaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ishizaki, M., Matsui, K., Kaibori, M. (2018). Pros and Cons of Abdominal Drain in Digestive Surgery. In: Fukushima, R., Kaibori, M. (eds) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6796-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6796-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6795-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6796-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics