Abstract
Workshops are increasingly being used in various fields of research as a qualitative research method where researchers can work with participant to gather a rich collection of data about participants and their co-creation on an innovation or a shared topic for investigation. Workshops are based on a creative setting for the interaction that allows the participants both to discuss current situations as well as create concepts for how this could change through generative design tools. During the workshop, the researcher will get the opportunity to observe (chapter) the participants as they interact and negotiate. The data collected through the workshop can contain both field notes based upon the researcher’s observations, video and audio recordings of the interacting group’s dialog and discussions, pictures of the group interacting, and last but not least the products of their workshop process in the form of models, sketches and prototypes. This gives the researcher an opportunity to collect a rich variation of data. As a research method workshops can validate data already collected through interviews (Chap. 6) or enhance focus group interviews by making the participants co- create new solutions. In this chapter we will explain how the researcher can organize a workshop through the phases diagnose, plan, facilitate and analyze. We will also discuss the interaction between the roles as participants, researcher and facilitator as they are played out in the workshop. The chapter will further discuss the process and some of the challenges in order to create and facilitate a workshop.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrosini, Veronique, and Cliff Bowman. 2001. Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies 38 (6): 811–829.
Bens, Ingrid. 2007. The ten essential processes of facilitative leaders. Global Business and Organizational Excellence 26 (5): 38–56.
Bens, Ingrid. 2008. Facilitation at a glance! Your pocket guide to facilitation. Salem, NH: GOAL/QPC.
Brandt, Eva. 2004. Action research in user-centred product development. AI & SOCIETY 18 (2): 113–133.
Buur, Jacob and Henry Larsen. 2010. ‘The quality of conversations in participatory innovation’. CoDesign. 6 (3): 121–138.
Carlile, Paul R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13 (4): 442–455.
Carson, David, Audrey Gilmore, Chad Perry, and Kjell Gronhaug. 2001. Qualitative marketing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Christiansen, John K., Morten Wellendorf, and Hanne Vesth. 2004. Samspil mellem virksomheder og forskning gennem aktionsforskning—videnproduktion i mode 2. Ledelse & Erhvervsøkonomi 3: 193–205.
Clausen, Christian, and Yutaka Yoshinaka. 2007. Staging socio-technical spaces: Translating across boundaries in design. Journal of Design Research 6 (1–2): 61–78.
Coghlan, David, and Teresa Brannick. 2015. Doing action research in your own organization, 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Ehn, Pelle. 1993. Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In Participatory design: Principles and practices, ed. Douglas Schuler, and Aki Namioka, 41–77. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Elias, A.A., R.Y. Cavana, and L.S. Jackson. 2002. Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management 32 (4): 301–310.
Goldman, Alfred E. 1962. The group depth interview. The Journal of Marketing 26 (3): 61–68.
Griyer, Peter H. 1992. A cognitive approach to facilitating group strategic decision taking: Analysis of practice and a theoretical interpretation. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 5 (3): 26–49.
Guba, E.G. 1978. Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Los Angeles: Centre for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.
Gummesson, Evert. 2001. ‘Are current research approaches in marketing leading us astray?’ Marketing Theory 1 (1): 27–48.
Hayne, S.C. 1999. The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for group support systems design. Database for Advances in Information Systems 30 (3/4): 72–90.
Holter, Inger M., and Donna Schwartz-Barcott. 1993. Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing 18 (2): 298–304.
Hutt, Margareta, and Sven-Åke Lenning. 1980. Towards a definition of action research. Journal of Management Studies 17 (2): 241–250.
Inns, Tom. 2013. ‘Theaters for design thinking’, Design Management Review, 24 (2), 40–47.
Kolfschoten, Gwendolyn L., Mariëlle den Hengst-Bruggeling, and Gert-Jan De Vreede. 2007. Issues in the design of facilitated collaboration processes. Group Decision and Negotiation 16 (4): 347–361.
Kousholt, Bjarne. 2011. Projektlederens værktøj. Valby: Nyt Tekniske Forlag.
Lewin, Kurt. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46.
Marsick, Victoria, and Judy O’Neil. 1999. The many faces of action learning. Management Learning 7 (5): 43–53.
Morgan, David L. 1996. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology 22 (1): 129–152.
Morgan, David L and Margaret T. Spanish. 1984. ‘Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research’. Qualitative Sociology, 7 (3): 253–270.
Mumford, Alan. 1995. ‘Learning in action: Industrial and commercial training’ 27 (8): 36–49.
Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pauleen, David J., Brian Corbitt, and Pak Yoong. 2007. Discovering and articulating what is not yet known: Using action learning and grounded theory as a knowledge management strategy. The Learning Organization 14 (3): 222–240.
Perry, Mark, and Duncan Sanderson. 1998. Coordinating joint design work: The role of communication and artefacts. Design Studies 19 (3): 273–288.
Revans, Reginald W. 1982. The origins and growth of action learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
Pruitt, John., and Jonathan Grudin. 2003. ‘Personas: Practice and theory’, paper presented at the 2003 Conference on Designing the User Experience, San Francisco, (June 5–7).
Rimanoczy, Isabel. 2007. ‘Action learning and action reflection learning: Are they different?’ Industrial and Commercial Training 39 (5): 246–256.
Sanoff, Henry. 2007. Editorial. Special issue on participatory design, design studies 28 (3): 213–215.
Spinuzzi, Clay. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication 52 (2): 163–174.
Standfield, R.Brian. 2002. The workshop book, from individual creativity to group action. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Storvang, Pia, and Ann H. Clarke. 2014. How to create a space for stakeholders’ involvement in construction. Construction Management and Economics 32 (12): 1166–1182.
Thyssen, Mikael H., Stephen Emmitt, Sten Bonke, and Anders Kirk-Christoffersen. 2010. Facilitating client value creation in the conceptual design phase of construction projects: A workshop approach. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 6 (1): 18–30.
Westley, Frances, and James A. Waters. 1988. Group facilitation skills for managers. Management Education and Development 19 (2): 134–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Storvang, P., Mortensen, B., Clarke, A.H. (2018). Using Workshops in Business Research: A Framework to Diagnose, Plan, Facilitate and Analyze Workshops. In: Freytag, P., Young, L. (eds) Collaborative Research Design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5008-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5008-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5006-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5008-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)