Abstract
An agent-based model is employed to simulate an organization as a complex adaptive system which reveals how organization creates value through evolutionary knowledge management by autonomous agents from the bottom up. One of the surprising findings indicates that organizational performance is non-monotonically improved by either knowledge creation or diffusion. Meanwhile, a gaming experiment is conducted to verify the model and collect empirical evidence for model enhancement. Various causal relations among agents’ behavior, the turbulence of environment, the emergent social structure, and the organizational performance are elucidated. This study demonstrates the integration of multi-agent simulation and human experiment as a novel, robust, and scientific approach on tackling complexity and uncertainty involved in the field of knowledge management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addicott, R., McGivern, G., & Ferlie, E. (2006). Networks, organizational learning and knowledge management: NHS cancer networks. Public Money & Management, 26(2), 87–94.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
Camerer, C., & Ho, T. H. (1999). Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica, 67, 827–8754.
Chang, M. H. (2005). Discovery and diffusion of knowledge in an endogenous social network. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 937–976.
Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154.
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501.
Demsetz, H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 141–161.
Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. London: Butterworth Heinemann.
Foss, N. J. (1996a). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science, 7(5), 470–476.
Foss, N. J. (1996b). More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organization Science, 7(5), 519–523.
Gilbert, N. (2008). Researching social life. London: Sage.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.
Gustafsson, L., & Sternad, M. (2010). Consistent micro, macro and state-based population modelling. Mathematical Biosciences, 225(2), 94–107.
Kakabadse, N. K., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reviewing the knowledge management literature: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 75–91.
Kane, H., Ragsdell, G., & Oppenheim, C. (2005). Knowledge management methodologies. In 2nd international conference on intellectual capital, knowledge management and organisational learning (pp. 253–266). Dubai: Academic Conferences Limited.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.
Liao, S. H. (2003). Knowledge management technologies and applications—literature review from 1995 to 2002. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(2), 155–164.
Madhok, A. (1996). Crossroads–The organization of economic activity: Transaction costs, firm capabilities, and the nature of governance. Organization Science, 7(5), 577–590.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Nemani, R. R. (2009). Research methodologies used in knowledge management: A literature review. MWAIS 2009 Proceedings, 13.
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.
Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69, 96–104.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.
Taber, C. S., & Timpone, R. J. (1996). Computational modeling (No. 7–113). London: Sage.
Toffler, A. (1990). Powershift: Knowledge, wealth and violence at the edge of the 21st century. New York: Bantam Books.
Xu, J., Sankaran, G., Sankaran, S., & Clarke, D. (2008). Knowledge management in twenty-first century: Literature review and future research directions. The International Technology Management Review, 1(2), 16–24.
Acknowledgment
The research work was funded by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (#15J07801) of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the great support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gu, J., Wang, H., Xu, F., Chen, Y. (2016). Simulation of an Organization as a Complex System: Agent-Based Modeling and a Gaming Experiment for Evolutionary Knowledge Management. In: Kaneda, T., Kanegae, H., Toyoda, Y., Rizzi, P. (eds) Simulation and Gaming in the Network Society. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0575-6_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0575-6_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0574-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0575-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)