Skip to main content

Co-Creating Knowledge

Students and Teachers together in a Field of Emergence

  • Chapter
Co-Creation in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Creative Education Book Series ((CREA))

Abstract

The modern school, at its best, is a satisfying extension of the unreality of societal perception. As we enter the conclusion of an industrializing age, I recognize that, within its walls, lectures are concerned with an abstract dream of future usefulness, while life is happening between classes. Half of the time, and half asleep, teachers and students keep each other caught in a fiction of relevance: Relevance of knowledge to our lives, relevance of the relationships to each other, and relevance to the questions of our time and to the society in which we live.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, N. J., & Hansen, H. (2012). Daring to care: Scholarship that supports of our convictions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(2), 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (2002). How to kill creativity. The Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87. Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, NJ: Chandler Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belling, L. (2010). Fortællinger fra U’et: Dansk psykologisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bens, I. (2006). Facilitating to lead!: Leadership strategies for a networked world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besselink, T. (2014). Learning choreography. In J. W. Moravec (Ed.), Knowmad society. San Bernardino, CA: Education Futures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities- of- practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The world cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darsø, L. (2004). Artful creation: Learning-tales of arts-in business. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darsø, L. (2011). Innovationspædagogik: Kunsten at fremelske innovationskompetence. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degnegaard, R. (2014). Co-creation, prevailing streams and future design trajectories. CoDesign, 10(2), 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1999). Managing oneself. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghais, S. (2005). Extreme facilitation: Guiding groups through controversy and complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Z. (2014). The social labs revolution: A new approach to solving our most complex challenges.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, A., Stavnskær, A., Krogh, L., & Aarup Jensen, A. (2015). Learning, leading and letting go of control: Learner-led approaches in education. Sage Open, 5(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, A. (2012). Transformative scenario planning: Working together to change the future. San Francisco, CA. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. (2016, May 6). Jeg lærte mere af en måned på højskole end to år på universitetet. Politiken. Retrieved from: http://politiken.dk/debat/art5637856/Jeg-l%C3%A6rte-mere-af-en-m%C3%A5nedp%C3%A5-h%C3%B8jskole-end-af-to-%C3%A5r-p%C3%A5-universitetet

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and continuing Education, 74, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, J. W. (2008). Towards society 3.0: A new paradigm for 21st century education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, J. W. (Ed.). (2014). Knowmad society. San Bernardino, CA: Education Futures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowles, C., Stacey, R., & Griffin, D. (2008). What contribution can insights from the complexity sciences make to the theory and practice of development management? Journal of International Development, 20(6), 804–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn, I. (2007). The learning conferences. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(3), 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1983) Freedom to learn. Oledo: Bell & Howell Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E. B., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O. C. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges: The social technology of presencing. Published for SOL (The Society for Organizational Learning), San Francisco,CA & London: Berrett-Koehler McGraw-Hill distributor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O. C., & Käufer, K. (2000). Universities as the birthplace for the entrepreneuring human beings: MIT sloan school of management. Retrieved from http://www.ottoscharmer.com/sites/default/files/2000_Uni21us.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O. C., & Kaüfer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (2002). Changing conversations in organizations: A complexity approach to change. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (2005). Conversational inquiry as an approach to organisation development. Journal of Innovative Management, 19–22. Retrieved from http://www.dacapo.as/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Pshaw_Conversational_Inquiry_as_an_Approach_to_Organisation_Development21.pdf

  • Stacey, R. D. (2003). Learning as an activity of interdependent people. The learning organization, 10(6), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavnskær, A. (2014). Human (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Laics Master, CBS (Copenhagen Business School), Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T. A., & Purdy, J. M. (2009). When a good idea isn’t enough: Curricular innovation as a political process. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(2), 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iversen, AM., Pedersen, A.S. (2017). Co-Creating Knowledge. In: Chemi, T., Krogh, L. (eds) Co-Creation in Higher Education. Creative Education Book Series. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-119-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-119-3_2

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-119-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics