Skip to main content

Supporting Ambitious Instruction by Beginning Teachers with Specialized Tools and Practices

  • Chapter
Newly Hired Teachers of Science

Abstract

One challenge facing science teacher preparation is the lack of consensus about what constitutes instructional excellence. We propose that a growing movement to characterize rigorous and equitable teaching as “ambitious instruction” in other subject matter areas, such as mathematics and literacy education, can serve as a guide for the science education community to develop a vision of effective pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach, and connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17–21, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (2011). Discussant remarks. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Dean, C. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: A reflection from the field, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. (2002). Resources, instruction, and research. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 80–119). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Science Education, 32, 268–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). How can Vygotsky and his legacy help us understand and develop teacher education? In V. Ellis, A. Edwards, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Cultural-historical perspectives on teacher education and development (pp. 63–77). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2000b). Making expansive decisions: An activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. In K. M. Allwood & M. Selart (Eds.), Creative decision making in the social world (pp. 281–301). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensor, P. (2001). From pre-service mathematics teacher education to beginning teaching: A study in recontextualizing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 296–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainsburg, J. (2012). Why new mathematics teachers do or don’t use practices emphasized in their credential program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009a). Teaching practice: A cross-professional study. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009b). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australiasia (Vol. 1, pp. 11–21). Palmerston North, New Zealand: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., Boerst, T. A., & Graziani, F. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross cutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework of New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers students, and science in linguistic minority classrooms, In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian, (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 289–328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stroupe, D., Windschitl, M. (2015). Supporting Ambitious Instruction by Beginning Teachers with Specialized Tools and Practices. In: Luft, J.A., Dubois, S.L. (eds) Newly Hired Teachers of Science. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-283-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics