Abstract
Seismic hazard and risk assessment is a crucial issue for Georgia, a country located in the Caucasus, which is one of the most seismically active regions in Alpine-Himalayan collision belt. It has long been known that subsoil conditions may have a significant influence on the expression of earthquake motions at the surface, modifying both amplitude as well as the frequency content and duration of the seismic ground motion. In this regard, seismic microzonation studies aimed at identifying and mapping zones, in a given area, characterized by homogeneous seismic behavior, represent a worldwide-accepted tool for the mitigation of seismic risk. In this paper, we provide the preliminary results of the first site effects assessment performed in the urban area of Mtskheta (Georgia). Our main outcomes consist in: (i) a geological map focused on the study area; (ii) a distribution map of resonance frequencies (f0 and f1); (iii) an estimation of the average shear-wave velocity of the upper 30 m (VS,30) and (iv) the amplification factors from standard acceleration response spectra according to the EC8 classification. The results obtained will represent a first step toward reducing seismic risk in Georgia and providing a knowledge base of local seismic hazard, useful for effective seismic risk mitigation strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamson N, Nicholas G, Kofi A (2016) BC hydro ground motion prediction equations for subduction earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 32(1):23–44
Adamia S, Gujabidze G (2004) Geological Map of Georgia 1:500,000 (on the basis of 1:200,000 and 1:50,000 scale State Geological Maps of Georgia). Tbilisi, Georgia, Department of Geology, Noida Institute of Geophysics.. http://www.ig-geophysics.ge/Georgia_Geology_1.jpg. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
Adamia S, Mumladze N, Sadradze N et al (2008) Late Cenozoic tectonics and geodynamics of Georgia (SW Caucasus). Georgian Int J Sci Technol 1:77–107
Adamia Sh, Alania V, Chabukiani A et al (2010) Evolution of the Late Cenozoic basins of Georgia (SW Caucasus): a review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 340, 239–259, 1 January 2010., https://doi.org/10.1144/SP340.11
Akkar S, Sandikkaya MA, Bommer JJ (2014) Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 12(1):359–387
Bard P-Y (2002) Extracting information from ambient seismic noise: the SESAME project (Site EffectS assessment using AMbient excitations). European project EVG1-CT-2000-00026 SESAME
Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Deaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:501–520
Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Cornou C, Bard P-Y et al (2006) H/V ratio: a tool for site effects evaluation. Results from 1-D noise simulations. Geophys J Int 167:827–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03154.x
Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG, Karamitros D (2006) Compatibility of EC-8 GroundTypes and site effects with 1-D wave propagation theory. In: Bouckovalas (ed) Proceedings of ISSMGE ETC-12 workshop, NTUAAthens, Greece
Bradley BA (2013) A summary of the observed ground motions from the 21 July 2013 Mw 6.6 earthquake in Cook Strait, off the coast of Seddon. https://sites.google.com/site/brendonabradley/
Brambati A, Faccioli E, Carulli GB et al (1980) Studio di microzonizzazione sismica dell'area di Tarcento (Friuli).. Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia-Giulia
Cauzzi C, Faccioli E, Vanini M et al (2014) Updated predictive equations for broadband (0.01-10 s) horizontal response spectra and peak ground motions, based on a global dataset of digital acceleration records. Bull Earthq Eng 13(6):1587–1612
Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1117–1153
Collinson J, Mountney N, Thompson D (2006) Sedimentary structures, 3rd edn. Terra Publishing, Hertfordshire, England, p 292
Derras B, Bard PY, Cotton F (2017) VS30, slope, H800 and f0: performance of various site-condition proxies in reducing ground-motion aleatory variability and predicting nonlinear site response. Earth Planets Space 69:133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s4062-3-017-0718-z
Eurocode 8-EN 1998-1 (1998) General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Bruxelles
Faccioli E, Bianchini A, Villani M (2010) New ground motion prediction equations for t>1 s and their influence on seismic hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the University of Tokyo Symposium on Long-Period Ground Motion and Urban Disaster Mitigation, Tokyo, Japan, 17–18 March 2010
Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M (2009) Comparison of site classification from VS30, VS10, and HVSR in Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:340–351
Gamkrelidze P (1964) Geology of the USSR, vol. X, Georgian SSR. Nedra, Moscow, pp 1–655. (In Russian)
Gamkrelidze P, Okrostsvaridze A, Maisadze F et al (2019) Main features of geological structure and geotourism potential of Georgia, the Caucasus. Modern Environ Sci Eng 5(5):422–442
Imposa S, Panzera F, Grassi S et al (2017) Geophysical and Geologic surveys of the areas struck by the August 26th 2016 Central Italy earthquake: the study case of Pretare and Piedilama. J Appl Geophys 145:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.07.016
Koçyiğit A, Yilmaz A, Adamia S et al (2001) Neotectonics of East Anatolian plateau (Turkey) and Lesser Caucasus: implication for transition from thrusting to strike-slip faulting. Geodynamica Acta 14:177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.11432443
Kogoshvili LV (1970) Live tectonics of Georgia and its impact on the relief. Metsniereba Publ House, Tbilisi, p 220. (in Russian)
Kotha SR, Bindi D, Cotton F (2016) Partially non-ergodic region specific GMPE for Europe and Middle-East. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4):1245–1263
Lin P-S, Lee C-T (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(1):220–240. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060002
Lunedei E, Albarello D (2010) Theoretical HVSR curves from full wavefield modelling of ambient vibrations in a weakly dissipative layered Earth. Geophys J Int 181:1093–1108
Lunedei E, Malischewsky P (2015) A review and some new issues on the theory of the H/V technique for ambient vibrations. In: Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, vol 2, pp 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16964-4_15
Luzi L, Puglia R, Pacor F et al (2011) Proposal for a soil classification based on parameters alternative or complementary to Vs, 30. Bull Earthq Eng 9:1877–1898
Mauvilly J, Koiava K, Gamkrelidze I et al (2015) Tectonics in the Greater Caucasus: a north-south section along the Georgian Military Road. Presented at the 13th Swiss Geoscience Meeting, Basel, Switzerland
McGuire RK (1995) Computations of seismic hazard. Ann Geofis 36:181–200
Montalva GA, Bastías N, Rodriguez-Marek A (2017) Ground-motion prediction equation for the Chilean subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(2):901–911. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160221
Mori F, Gaudiosi I, Tarquini E et al (2019) HSM: a synthetic damage-constrained seismic hazard parameter. Bull Earthq Eng 1-24 (on line-first)
Moscatelli M, Pagliaroli A, Cavinato GP et al (2014) Seismic microzonation of Palatine hill, Roman Forum and Coliseum Archeological Area. Bull Earthq Eng 12:1269–1275
Mumladze T, Forte AM, Cowgill ES et al (2015) Subducted, detached, and torn slabs beneath the Greater Caucasus. GeoResJ 5:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grj.2014.09.004
Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. QR Railway Tech Res Inst 30:25–33
NTC (2018) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni. Decreto Ministero Infrastrutture, Italy. GU Serie Generale n 42 del 20-02-2018 - Suppl. Ordinario n 8
Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G et al (2014) OpenQuake-engine: an openhazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692–702. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130087
Panzera F, Lombardo G, Imposa S et al (2018) Correlation between earthquake damage and seismic site effects: the study case of Lentini and Carlentini, Italy. Eng Geol 240:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.014
Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64:800–808
Pasquarè F, Tormey D, Vezzoli L et al (2011) Mitigating the consequences of extreme events on strategic facilities: evaluation of volcanic and seismic risk affecting the Caspian oil and gas pipelines in the Republic of Georgia. J Environ Manag 92(7):1774–1782
Pergalani F, Pagliaroli A, Bourdeau C et al (2019) Seismic microzoning map: approaches, results and applications after the 2016-2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00640-1
Piña-Flores J, Perton M, García-Jerez A et al (2017) The inversion of spectral ratio H/V in a layered system using the diffuse field assumption (DFA). Geophys J Int 208(1):577–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw416
Sánchez-Sesma FJ (2017) Modeling and inversion of the microtremor H/V spectral ratio: physical basis behind the diffuse field approach. Earth Planets Space 69(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0667-6
Singh SK, Lermo J, Dominguez T et al (1988) The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985–a study of amplification of seismic waves in the Valley of Mexico with respect to a hill zone site. Earthquake Spectra 4:653–673
Tibaldi A, Russo E, Bonali FL et al (2017a) 3-D anatomy of an active fault-propagation fold: a multidisciplinary case study from Tsaishi, western Caucasus (Georgia). Tectonophysics 717:253–269
Tibaldi A, Alania V, Bonali FL et al (2017b) Active inversion tectonics, simple shear folding and back-thrusting at Rioni Basin, Georgia. J Struct Geol 96:35–53
Tibaldi A, Bonali FL, Russo E et al (2018) Structural development and stress evolution of an arcuate fold-and-thrust system, southwestern Greater Caucasus, Republic of Georgia. J Asian Earth Sci 156:226–245
Tsereteli N, Tibaldi A, Alania V et al (2016) Active tectonics of central-western Caucasus, Georgia. Tectonophysics 691:328–344
Tsereteli N, Danciu L, Varazanashvili O et al (2020) The 2020 National Seismic Hazard Model for Georgia (Sakartvelo). F. L. Bonali et al. (eds.), Building Knowledge for Geohazard Assessment and Management in the Caucasus and other Orogenic Regions, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, Chapter 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2046-3_8
Varazanashvili O, Tsereteli N, Tsereteli E (2011) Historical earthquakes in Georgia (up to 1900): source analysis and catalogue compilation, Monograph. Pub Hause MVP, Tbilisi, p 81
Varazanashvili O, Tsereteli N, Bonali FL et al (2018) GeoInt: the first macroseismic intensity database for the Republic of Georgia. J Seismol 22(3):625–667
Von Thun JL, Rochim LH, Scott GA et al (1988) Earthquake ground motion for design and analysis of dams. In: Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics II – recent advance in ground-motion evaluation, geotechnical special publication 20. ASCE, New York, p 463
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002
Working Group ICMS (2008) Guidelines for seismic microzonation. Conference of regions and autonomous provinces of Italy – Civil Protection Department. English version available at http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/httpdocs/cms/attach_extra/GuidelinesForSeismicMicrozonation.pdf?
Zare M, Amini H, Yazdi P et al (2014) Recent developments of the Middle East catalogue. J Seismol 18(4):749–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9444-1
Acknowledgments
Authors are grateful to the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation, for making the geophysical investigation possible. All the activities were carried out in the framework of the National Project 216758: “Evaluation of seismic hazard for Georgia and seismic risk for city Mtskheta with modern approaches”.
We are extremely thankful to the Guest Editors and the two anonymous reviewers for their precious suggestions, which have substantially improved the quality of the present paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsereteli, N. et al. (2021). Preliminary Results of Site Effects Assessment in Mtskheta (Georgia). In: Bonali, F.L., Pasquaré Mariotto, F., Tsereteli, N. (eds) Building Knowledge for Geohazard Assessment and Management in the Caucasus and other Orogenic Regions. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2046-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-2046-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-2045-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-2046-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)