Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal for a soil classification based on parameters alternative or complementary to Vs,30

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The selection of specific elastic response spectra according to soil categories is the easiest way to account for site effects in engineering projects and general-purpose hazard maps. Most of the international seismic codes make use of the average shear wave velocity of the upper 30 m (Vs,30) to discriminate soil categories, although some doubts arose about the capability of Vs,30 to predict actual soil amplification. In this work we propose two soil classifications in which the soil fundamental frequency (f0) becomes either an alternative or a complement to Vs,30. The performance of the derived categorizations is achieved through the estimation of the standard deviation associated to ground motion prediction equations of acceleration response spectra, considering recordings extracted from the Italian strong motion data base. The results indicate that there is a significant reduction of the standard deviation when the classification is based on the couple of variables Vs,30–f0, although a classification based of the single f0 also leads to satisfactory results, comparable with those obtained assuming a classification scheme based on Vs,30.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Atik L, Abrahamson N, Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Kuehn N (2010) The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components. Seismol Res Lett 81(5): 794–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindi D, Parolai S, Cara F, Di Giulio G, Ferretti G, Luzi L, Monachesi G, Pacor F, Rovelli A (2009) Site amplification observed in the Gubbio basin, central Italy: hints for lateral propagation effects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(2A): 741–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bindi D, Pacor F, Luzi L, Puglia R, Massa M, Ameri G, Paolucci R (2011) Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion data base. Submitted to Bull Earthquake Eng (this issue)

  • Boore DM (2004) Estimating Vs(30) (or NEHRP site classes) from shallow velocity models (depths <30 m). Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(2): 591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectr 24(1): 99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectr 10: 617–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD, Glassmoyer G (1992) On the characteristics of local geology and their influence on ground motions generated by the Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay region, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82(2): 603–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillinger DR, Preisler HK (1985) Further analysis of the Joyner–Boore attenuation data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75(2): 611–614

    Google Scholar 

  • BSSC (1998) NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for new Buildings and other Structures, FEMA 302/303, Part 1 (Provisions) and Part2 (Commentary), developed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 1997 Edition

  • Cadet H, Bard PY, Duval AM (2008) A new proposal for site classification based on ambient vibration measurements and the Kiknet strong motion data set. In: Proceeding of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, 12–17 Oct 2008

  • Castellaro S, Mulargia F, Rossi PL (2008) Vs30: proxy for seismic amplification?. Seismol Res Lett 79(4): 540–543. doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.4.540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giacomo D, Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Parolai S, Richwalski SM (2005) Analysis and modeling of HVSR in the presence of a velocity inversion: the case of Venosa, Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95: 2364–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENV (1998) EUROCODE 8, Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. Seismic Actions and General Requirements of Structures, CEN/TC 250, Draft, May 2002

  • Fukushima Y, Berge-Thierry C, Volant P, Griot-Pommera DA, Cotton F (2003) Attenuation relation for west Eurasia determined with recent near-fault records from California, Japan and Turkey. J Earthq Eng 7(3): 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima Y, Bonilla LB, Scotti O, Douglas J (2007) Site classification using horizontal-to-vertical response spectral ratios and its impact when deriving empirical ground-motion prediction equations. J Earthq Eng 11:5,712–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M (2009) Comparison of site classification from VS30, VS10, and HVSR in Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99: 340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell NA (1953) The dispersion of surface waves on multilayered media. Bull Seismol Soc Am 43: 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Road Association (1980) Specifications for Highway Bridges Part V, Seismic Design. Maruzen Co. Ltd

  • Japan Road Association (1990) Specifications for Highway Bridges Part V, Seismic Design. Maruzen Co. Ltd

  • Koller M, Chatelain J-L, Guillier B, Duval A-M, Atakan K, Bard P-Y, SESAME Team (2004) Practical user guidelines and software for the implementation of the H/V ratio technique: measuring conditions, processing method and results interpretation. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference in earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Aug 2004, paper # 3132

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee VW, Trifunac MD (2010) Should average shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of soil be used to describe seismic amplification?. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(11): 1540–1549

    Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J, Chávez-García FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83: 1574–1594

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F, Sabetta F (2008) ITACA(ITalian Accelerometric Archive): a web portal for the dissemination of Italian strong-motion data. Seismol Res Lett 79: 716–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohraz B (1976) Earthquake response spectra for different geologic conditions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66: 915–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q Rep Railw Tech Res Inst 30(1): 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • NTC (2008) Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture 14/01/2008 (Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 04/02/2008), in Italian

  • Okada H (2003) The microtremor survey method. In: Fitterman DV (ed) Geophysical Monograph Series. Society of exploration geophysicist, p 135

  • Park D, Hashash YMA (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with non linear site effects in the Mississippi embayment. In Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Paper n. 1549 (on CD-Rom)

  • Steidl JH (2000) Site response in southern California for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(6B): S149–S169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Liu AH, Choi Y (2003) Amplification factors for spectral acceleration in tectonically active regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93: 332–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson WT (1950) Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid media. J Appl Phys 21: 89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon RC (1939) Cluster analysis. Edward press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker B, King J (1984) Dependence of sediment-filled valley response on input amplitude and valley properties. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74: 153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki F, Ansary MA (1997) Horizontal-to-vertical spectrum ratio of earthquake ground motion for site characterization. Earthq Eng Struct D 26: 671–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JX, Irikura K, Zhang J, Fukushima Y, Somerville PG, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H (2006) An empirical site-classification method for strong-motion stations in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96: 914–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Luzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luzi, L., Puglia, R., Pacor, F. et al. Proposal for a soil classification based on parameters alternative or complementary to Vs,30 . Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 1877–1898 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9274-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9274-2

Keywords

Navigation