Skip to main content

Social Costs: The Career-Family Tradeoff

  • Chapter
Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women

Abstract

Are there career costs for family life? Are there social costs to career success? This chapter explores these two interrelated questions with an attention to gender issues. Women continue to find themselves before the unfair choice between family life and career success. In the first part of this chapter, there will be an emphasis on the prevalence of this problem. In the second part of the chapter, we discuss the roots of the problem, which we argue, rests in both the public and the private domains. Lastly, the chapter recommends a set of organizational, policy, and societal remedies to correct this imbalance between career and family, in hopes of improving the ability of US families to not “have-it-all”, but at least have the opportunity for more flexible choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alkadry, M., & Nyhan, R. (2005). The impact of rational organizations on public administrators: A structural equation model. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 8(2), 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkadry, M. G., & Tower, L. E. (2006). Unequal pay: The role of gender. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 888–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkadry, M. G., & Tower, L. E. (2011). Covert pay discrimination: How authority predicts pay differences between women and men. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 740–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkadry, M. G., & Tower, L. E. (2013). Women and public service: Barriers, challenges, and opportunities. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bounds, E. (1996). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Feminism, family values, and the division between public and private. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 12(1), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M. J. (2006). Intersections on the road to self-employment: Gender, family and occupational class. Social Forces, 84(4), 2223–2239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, Y. (2010). Reinforcing separate spheres the effect of spousal overwork on men’s and women’s employment in dual-earner households. American Sociological Review, 75(2), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. L. (2010). Shortchanged: Why women have less wealth and what can be done about it. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, T. J. (1994). Characteristics of self-employed women in the United States. Monthly Labor Review, 117, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. E. (1985). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauchat, G., Kelly, M., & Wallace, M. (2012). Occupational gender segregation, globalization, and gender earnings inequality in US metropolitan areas. Gender & Society, 26(5), 718–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavison, R. (1992). Feminism and the private-public distinction. Stanford Law Review, 45, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2011). The cost of workplace flexibility for high-powered professionals. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, M. E., Newman, M. A., & Mastracci, S. H. (2008). Emotional labor: Putting the service in public service. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. (1999). Postmodernism, philosophy and management: Concepts and controversies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(2), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, S. A., & Luce, C. B. (2005). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Business Review, 83(3), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, J., Earle, A., & Hayes, J. (2007). The work, family, and equity index: How does the United States measure up? Montreal: Project on Global Working Families. http://www.mcgill.ca/files/ihsp/WFEI2007FINAL.pdf

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). Time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (2012). Do labor market opportunities affect young women’s work and family decisions? Experimental evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 753–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, K. (1992). The postmodern epoch of organization theory. International Studies of Management and Organization, 22(2), 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63(11–12), 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legault, M. J., & Chasserio, S. (2013). Family obligations or cultural constraints? Obstacles in the path of professional women. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 4(3), 108–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, M., & Stone, P. (2012). Opting back in: The influence of time at home on professional women’s career redirection after opting out. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(6), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. R. (2011). The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 1071–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Partnership for Women and Families. (2009). State family and medical leave laws that are more expansive than the federal FMLA. Washington, DC. http://www.nationalpartnership.org/site/DocServer/StatesandunpaidFMLLaws.pdf?docID=968/

  • Pateman, C. (1983). Feminist critiques of the public/private Dichotomy. In S. Benn & G. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 281–303). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percheski, C. (2008). Opting out? Cohort differences in professional women’s employment rates from 1960 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 73(3), 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugl, E. (2004). International institutions and feminist politics. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J. (2004). Dollars, dependency, and divorce: Four perspectives on the role of wives’ income. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm, C. J. (2011). Policies to assist parents with young children. The Future of children/Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 21(2), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile transformations of public and private life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (2005). Do the determinants of promotion differ for white men versus women and minorities? American Behavioral Scientist, 48(9), 1157–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., & Mandel, H. (2009). Inequality in the family: The institutional aspects of women’s earning contribution. Social Science Research, 38(3), 594–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P., & Lovejoy, M. (2004). Fast-track women and the “choice” to stay home. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596(1), 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, H. (2002). Determinants of women’s entry into self–employment. Social Science Quarterly, 83(3), 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite, L. (2004). Working time and work-family balance: A review of employees’ preferences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42(2), 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tower, L. E., & Alkadry, M. G. (2008). The social costs of career success for women. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 144–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J. (2010). Why study sousework? In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic. Men, women and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 3–19). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics. (2009). Measuring time spent in unpaid household work: Results from the American time survey. Retrieved from U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics website: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2009/07/art3full.pdf

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Women in the labor force: A databook (Report No. 1040). Retrieved from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics website: http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2012.pdf

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Marital status: 2000. Retrieved from U.S. Census Bureau website: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-30.pdf

  • U.S. Department of Labor. (2011). Women’s employment during the recovery. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Labor website: http://www.dol.gov/_sec/media/reports/FemaleLaborForce/FemaleLaborForce.pdf

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Federal work/life programs agencies generally satisfied with opm assistance, but more tracking and information sharing needed. Retrieved from United States Government Accountability Office website: http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/314088.pdf

  • Wang, T. W. (2004). From general system theory to total quality management. Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1/2), 394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, G., & Williams, C. (2008). Part-time work and the gender division of labor. Qualitative Sociology, 31(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H., Jr. (1956). The organization man. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1787). Thoughts on education of daughters: With reflections on female conduct in the more important duties of life. London: Joseph Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Mother. (2011). Working mother best 100 companies: Executive summary. Retrieved from website: http://www.wmmsurveys.com/2011Working_Mother_100Best_Executive_Summary.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridgette Cram .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cram, B., Alkadry, M.G., Tower, L.E. (2016). Social Costs: The Career-Family Tradeoff. In: Connerley, M., Wu, J. (eds) Handbook on Well-Being of Working Women. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9896-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9897-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics