Skip to main content

Student Engagement: Bridging Research and Practice to Improve the Quality of Undergraduate Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Abstract

This chapter traces the development of student engagement as a research-informed intervention to shift the discourse on quality in higher education to emphasize matters of teaching and learning while providing colleges and universities with diagnostic, actionable information that can inform improvement efforts. The conceptual lineage of student engagement blends a set of related theoretical propositions (quality of effort, involvement, and integration) with practice-focused prescriptions for good practice in undergraduate education. The development of survey-based approaches to measuring student engagement is reviewed, including a treatment of recent criticisms of these approaches. Next, we summarize important empirical findings, including validation research, typological research, and research on institutional improvement. Because student engagement emerged as an intervention to inform educational improvement, we also present examples of how engagement data are being used at colleges and universities. The chapter concludes with a discussion of challenges and opportunities going forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G. (1998). Research, policy, and administration in higher education: The Review at twenty. The Review of Higher Education, 21(3), 205–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). (2007). College learning for the new global century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1970). The methodology of research on college impact. Sociology of Education, 43, 223–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change, 43(1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from a half century of time use data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banta, T. W., Pike, G. R., & Hansen, M. J. (2009). The use of engagement data in institutional planning, assessment, and accreditation. In R. M. Gonyea and G. D. Kuh (Eds.), Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P., & Eaton, S. (2000). A psychological model of college student retention. In J. Braxton (Ed.), Rethinking the departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention (pp. 48–61). Memphis, TN: University of Vanderbilt Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship of student success. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaich, C. F., & Wise, K. S. (2010). Moving from assessment to institutional improvement. In T. A. Seifert, (Ed.). Longitudinal Assessment for Institutional Improvement. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(S2), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaich, C. F., & Wise, K. S. (2011a). From gathering to using assessment results: Lessons from the Wabash National Study (NILOA Occasional Paper No. 8). Urbana, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaich, C. F., & Wise, K. S. (2011b). The Wabash National Study: The impact of teaching practices and institutional conditions on student growth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, V. M. H. & Young, J. W. (2007). Measurement validity and accountability for student learning. In V. M. H. Borden and G. R. Pike (Eds.), Assessing and accounting for student learning: Beyond the Spellings Commission. New Directions for Institutional Research, Assessment Supplement 2007, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, B. K., Cambridge, B., Kuh, G. D. & Leegwater, L. H. (2005). Student engagement at minority- serving institutions: Emerging lessons from the BEAMS project. New Directions for Institutional Research, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, B. K., Kinzie, J., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D. (2008). Student engagement and success at minority serving institutions. In M. Gasman, B. Baez, & C. S. Turner (Eds.), Understanding Minority-Serving Institutions. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S., Cantwell, A. M., & Hanneman, R. A. (2008). The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement. Research in Higher Education, 49, 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., Games, R., & Malloy, E. A. (Eds.). (1999). Colleges and universities as citizens. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Cabrera, A. F. (2011). How sound is NSSE? Investigating the psychometric properties of NSSE at a public, research-extensive institution. The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, March). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. C. (2001). Good to great. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community College Survey of Student Engagement. (2010a). The Community College Student Report. Retrieved from http://www.ccsse.org/aboutsurvey/aboutsurvey.cfm

  • Community College Survey of Student Engagement. (2010b). The relationship of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Retrieved from http://www.ccsse.org/aboutccsse/relate.cfm

  • Council of Independent Colleges. (2008). Evidence of learning: Applying the Collegiate Learning Assessment to improve teaching and learning in the liberal arts college experience. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Independent Colleges. (2011). A special report on independent colleges and student engagement. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cic.edu/Research-and-Data/Making-the-Case/Documents/new_nsse_data.pdf

  • Cross, K. P. (2000). The educational role of researchers. In A. Kezar & P. Eckel (Eds.), Moving beyond the gap between research and practice in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education 110, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruce, T. M., Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2006). Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Rios, M., & Leegwater, L. (2008). Increasing student success at minority-serving institutions: Findings from the BEAMS project. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, A. C., Sawatzsky, M., & Korn, R. (2011). Theoretical foundations and a research agenda to validate measures of intercultural effort. The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 17–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R. (1997). Education white paper (unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://www.faculty.umb.edu/john_saltmarsh/resources/Edgerton%20Higher%20Education%20White%20Paper.rtf. Accessed 20 Apr 2012.

  • Ehrenberg, R. (2002). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (2010). The US National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). In D. D. Dill & M. Beerkens (Eds.), Public policy for academic quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Actions matter: The case for indirect measures in assessing higher education’s progress on the national education goals. The Journal of General Education, 42(2), 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1996). Indicators of “good practice” in undergraduate education: A handbook for development and implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T., McClenney, K., & McCormick, A. C. (2011, September 20). Measuring engagement. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from www.insidehighered.com/views/2011/09/20/essay_defending_the_value_of_surveys_of_student_engagement

  • Feldman, K., & Newcomb, T. (1969). The impact of college on students. (2 Vols.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosnacht, K. & Gonyea, R. M. (2012). The dependability of the NSSE 2012 pilot: A generalizability study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. F. (2008). Teaching underprepared students: Strategies for promoting success and retention in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2011, February 14). The order of things. The New Yorker, 87(1), 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A., & Thompson, N. (2001). Broken ranks. The Washington Monthly, 33, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, T., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. M. (2007). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African-American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (Eds.). (2009). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., & McCormick, A. C. (2012). An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 53, 738–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R., & Pace, C. R. (2003). Using NSSE to study student retention and withdrawal. Assessment Update, 15(4), 1–2, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (1985). Trees without fruit: The problem with research about higher education. Change, 17(1), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2000). Understanding the research-to-practice gap: A national study of researchers’ and practitioners’ perspectives. In A. Kezar & P. Eckel (Eds.), Moving beyond the gap between research and practice in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education 110, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, J., & Pennipede, B. S. (2009). Converting engagement results into action. In R. M. Gonyea & G. D. Kuh (Eds.), Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh G. D. (n.d.). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2010.

  • Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. M. Gonyea & G. D. Kuh (Eds.). Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J. A., Gonyea, R. M., & Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE technical and norms report. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., & Gonyea, R. M. (2007). Connecting the dots: Multi-faceted analyses of the relationships between student engagement results from the NSSE, and the institutional practices and conditions that foster student success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2011). Fostering student success in hard times. Change, 43(4), 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Pace, C. R., & Vesper, N. (1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaNasa, S. M., Cabrera, A. F., & Transgrud, H. (2009). The construct validity of student engagement: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Research in Higher Education, 50, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loes, C., Pascarella, E., & Umbach, P. (2012). Effects of diversity experiences on critical thinking skills: Who benefits? Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machung, A. (1998). Playing the rankings game. Change, 30(4), 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti, C. N. (2009). Dimensions of student engagement in American community colleges: Using the Community College Student Report in research and practice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning. I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning. II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 39–58). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. J., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Blaich, C. (2012). Going deep into mechanisms for moral reasoning growth: How deep learning approaches affect moral reasoning development for first-year students. Research in Higher Education, 53, 26–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClenney, K. M. (2007). Research update: The Community College Survey of Student Engagement. Community College Review, 35(2), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClenney, K. M., & Marti, C. N. (2006). Exploring relationships between student engagement and student outcomes in community colleges: Report on validation research. Retrieved from www.ccsse.org/publications on 6 Apr 2010.

  • McCormick, A. C. (2009). Toward reflective accountability. In R. M. Gonyea & G. D. Kuh (Eds.), Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C. (2011). It’s about time: What to make of reported declines in how much college students study. Liberal Education, 97(1), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Korkmaz, A. (2011, April). Understanding evidence-based improvement in higher education: The case of student engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C., & McClenney, K. (2012). Will these trees ever bear fruit? A response to the special issue on student engagement. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C., Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Chen, P. D. (2009). Comparing the utility of the 2000 and 2005 Carnegie classification systems in research on students’ college experiences and outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., & Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merwin, J. C. (1969). Historical review of changing concepts of evaluation. In R. L. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new methods. The sixty-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. (1994). A preliminary study of the feasibility and utility for national policy of instructional “good practice” indicators in undergraduate education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2001). Improving the college experience: National benchmarks for effective educational practice. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2003). Converting data into action:  Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2004). Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2006). Engaged learning: Fostering success of all students. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2008). Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2009a). Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time—Annual results 2009. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2009b). Using NSSE to assess and improve undergraduate education. Lessons from the field–Vol. 1. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2011). Fostering student engagement campus wide—Annual results 2011. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2012). Moving from data to action: Lessons from the field–Volume 2. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Laird, T. F., Bridges, B. K., Morelon-Quainoo, C. L., Williams, J. M., & Salinas Holmes, M. (2007). African American and Hispanic student engagement at minority serving and predominantly White institutions. Journal of College Student Development, 48(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Laird, T. F., & Niskodé-Dossett, A. S. (2010). How gender and race moderate the effect of interactions across difference on student perceptions of the campus environment. The Review of Higher Education, 33(3), 333–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D. (2006). Measuring Deep Approaches to Learning Using the National Survey of Student Engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. P. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouimet, J. A., Bunnage, J. C., Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Kennedy, J. (2004). Using focus groups, expert advice, and cognitive interviews to establish the validity of a college student survey. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouimet, J. A., & Smallwood, R. A. (2005). Assessment measures: CLASSE—The class-level survey of student engagement. Assessment Update, 17(6), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1964). The influence of academic and student subcultures in college and university environments. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1969). An evaluation of higher education: Plans and perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 40(9), 673–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1979). Measuring outcomes of college: Fifty years of findings and recommendations for the future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1982). Achievement and the quality of student effort. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. An account of the development and use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1985). The credibility of student self-reports. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1998). Recollections and reflections. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 13, pp. 1–34). New York: Agathon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, R. D., Goodman, K. M., Johnson, M. P., Saichaie, K., Umbach, P. D., & Pascarella, E. T. (2010). The impact of college student socialization, social class, and race on need for cognition. New Directions for Institutional Research, 145, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, D. (2011). Catalyst for change: The CIC/CLA consortium. Washington, DC: Council of Independent Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change, 42(1), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education, 36, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (2000). The influence of fraternity or sorority membership on students’ college experiences and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 41, 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (2006a). The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (2006b). The dependability of NSSE scalelets for college-and department-level assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (2011). Using college students’ self-reported learning outcomes in scholarly research. In S. Herzog & N. A. Bowman (Eds.), Validity and limitations of college student self-report data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 150, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., & Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 42, 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005a). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 276–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005b). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2007). Evaluating the rationale for affirmative action in college admissions: Direct and indirect relationships between campus diversity and gains in understanding diverse groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48(2), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R. (2011). Do college student surveys have any validity? The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saltmarsh, J., & Hartley, M. (Eds.). (2011). “To serve a larger purpose”: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Philadelphia, PN: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, T. A., Goodman, K. M., Lindsay, N., Jorgensen, J. D., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. (2008). The effects of liberal arts experiences on liberal arts outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American higher education. Final report of the Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T. (1996). Rediscovering roots: Public policy and higher education research. The Review of Higher Education, 20(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, L. (2008). Pulling rank. New England Journal of Higher Education, 22(4), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. (2000, September). Playing with numbers: How U.S. News mismeasures higher education and what we can do about it. The Washington Monthly, 32(9), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropouts from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of the recent literature. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 359–384). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlotkowski, E. (1997). Service learning and the process of academic renewal. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 2(1), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander C. McCormick Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCormick, A.C., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R.M. (2013). Student Engagement: Bridging Research and Practice to Improve the Quality of Undergraduate Education. In: Paulsen, M. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics