Skip to main content

Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Joint Prosthesis Infections

  • Chapter
Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation
  • 1672 Accesses

Abstract

Replacement of diseased or injured joints with artificial prosthetic components is commonly employed to reduce the pain and disability associated with many orthopedic conditions including arthritis, congenital deformities, trauma and other diseases of bone and joint tissues. The most successful type of joint replacement procedure is the replacement of both sides of a diseased joint (total joint arthroplasty). Other types of joint replacement include hemi-arthroplasty and surface arthroplasty, where the surface of the joint is covered by a foreign material which provides a smooth articulating surface. The most commonly replaced joints are hips and knees: the results are now excellent with 10-year survival rates of 91.5% for hips and 96.5% for knees [1]. The materials used (stainless steel, cobalt-chrome, molybdenum alloy, titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy, and ceramics) in prosthetic implants are considered biocompatible, nevertheless they represent a foreign body. These components usually articulate with plastic components (often composed of ultra-high molecular polyethylene) which may have a metal backing. Joint replacement failure may be due to the failure of structural materials, such as fatigue fracture of a metal prosthetic stem or the rapid destruction of a polyethylene cup. But a more common cause of arthroplasty failure is aseptic loosening of the implant. This complication is usually associated with late implant failure, occurring several years after the implant has been in situ and functioning reasonably. Both mechanical and biological factors contribute to the pathogenesis of aseptic loosening. Although relatively uncommon, another important cause of orthopedic implant failure and loosening of implant components is infection (septic loosening) [2, 3]. Distinguishing clinically between aseptic and septic loosening is often difficult. An accurate diagnosis is important, however, as both the surgical management and outcome may differ depending on whether the arthroplasty loosening is infective or mechanical in origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Register of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (RIPO) of the Region Emilia-Romagna Italy (2010) Annual report. https://ripo.cineca.it/

  2. Antti-Poika I, Josefsson G, Konttinen Y et al (1990) Hip arthroplasty infection. Current concepts. Acta Orthop Scand 61:163–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Athanasou NA (2002) The pathology of joint replacement. Curr Diagn Path 8:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Concia E, Prandini N et al (2006) Osteomyelitis: clinical update for practical guidelines. Nucl Med Commun 27:645–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brause BD (1989) Infected orthopedic prostheses. In: Bisno AL, Waldvogel FA (eds). Infections associated with indwelling medical devices. American Society for Microbiology Washington DC, pp 111–127

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR (2000) Prosthetic joint infections. In: Bisno AL, Waldvogel FA (eds). Infections associated with indwelling medical devices. 3rd edn. American Society for Microbiology Washington DC, pp 173–209

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drago L (2009) Infezioni impianto correlate e biofilm batterico. Lo Scalpello 23:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA (2000) Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:570–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Toms AD, Davidson D, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2006) The management of peri-prosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:149–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barberán J (2006) Management of infections of osteoarticular prosthesis. Clin Microbiol Infect 12 (Suppl 3):93–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmerli W, Waldvogel FA, Vaudaux P, Nydegger UE (1982) Pathogenesis of foreign body infection: description and characteristics of an animal model. J Infect Dis 146:487–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnik D, Niwayama G (1981) Osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and soft tissue infection: the mechanism and situation. In: Resnick D, Niwayama G (eds) Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2524–2618

    Google Scholar 

  13. Love C, Palestro CJ (2004) Radionuclide imaging of infection. J Nucl Med Technol 32:47–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duus BR, Boeckstyns M, Kjaer L, Stadeager C (1987) Radionuclide scanning after total knee replacement: correlation with pain and radiolucent lines. A prospective study. Invest Radiol 22:891–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kraemer WJ et al (1993) Bone scan, gallium scan, and hip aspiration in the diagnosis of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:611–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer AJ, Capozzi JD, Solomon RW, Goldsmith SJ (1990) Total-hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic indium-111-labeled leukocyte activity and complementary technetium-99m-sulfur colloid imaging in suspected infection. J Nucl Med 31:1950–1955

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palestro CJ, Swyer AJ, Kim CK, Goldsmith SJ (1991) Infected knee prostheses: diagnosis with In-111 leukocyte, Tc-99m sulfur colloid, and Tc-99m MDP imaging. Radiology 179:645–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Prandini N, Feggi LM, Massari L (1996) 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC three phases scintigraphy in secondary osteomyelitis. Q J Nucl Med 40(suppl 1): 55

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prandini N et al (2006) Nuclear medicine imaging of bone infections. Nucl Med Commun 27:633–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prandini N et al (1999) Leukocyte scintigraphy with 99mTc-HM-PAO a ten years experience. Nucl Med Commun 20:970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pakos E et al (2007) Diagnosis after total joint arthroplasty with antigranulocyte scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled monoclonal antibodies—a meta-analysis. Radiology 242:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sousa R et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of combined 99mTc-sulesomab and 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow imaging in detecting prosthetic joint infection. Nucl Med Commun 32:834–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Bruggen W et al (2010) PET and SPECT in osteomyelitis and prosthetic bone and joint infections: a systematic review. Semin Nucl Med 40:3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Delank KS et al (2006) The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Napoleone Prandini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prandini, N., Caruso, G. (2013). Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Joint Prosthesis Infections. In: Radionuclide Imaging of Infection and Inflammation. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2763-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2763-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2762-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2763-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics