Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Roboterassistierte Leberresektionen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roboterassistierte Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie

  • 1429 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Leber ist das zentrale Stoffwechselorgan des menschlichen Organismus. Essenzielle Aufgaben im Glukosestoffwechsel, der Proteinbiosynthese, Blutgerinnung, Immunabwehr und Entgiftung machen es unersetzlich. Die Leber ist aber auch das Ziel vieler sekundärer und auch primärer Lebermalignome. Die enorme Regenerationsfähigkeit der Leber und der damit verbundene Erhalt vital notwendiger Stoffwechselfunktionen macht Lebertumoren einem breiten Spektrum therapeutischer Strategien zugänglich. Neben Chemotherapien und interventionellen Verfahren bildet die Chirurgie eine wesentliche Grundlage zur kurativen Therapie intrahepatischer Malignome. Ziel bei den operativen Verfahren ist es, möglichst wenig gesundes Lebergewebe zu entfernen und dabei die Prinzipien der onkologischen Radikalität mit möglichst ausreichendem Sicherheitsabstand zum Tumor einzuhalten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Abu Hilal M et al (2018) The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268(1):11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki T et al (2008) Image-guided liver mapping using fluorescence navigation system with indocyanine green for anatomical hepatic resection. World J Surg 32(8):1763–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker KJ (1966) Binding of sulfobromophthalein (BSP) sodium and indocyanine green (ICG) by plasma alpha-1 lipoproteins. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 122(4):957–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ban D et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):745–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boogerd LSF et al (2017) The best approach for laparoscopic fluorescence cholangiography: overview of the literature and optimization of dose and dosing time. Surg Innov 24(4):386–396

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buell JF et al (2013) Evaluation of stapler hepatectomy during a laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 15(11):845–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PD et al (2016) Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: a pure, minimally invasive approach. Liver Transpl 22(11):1509–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PD, Wu CY, Wu YM (2017) Use of robotics in liver donor right hepatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 6(5):292–296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrick GR et al (1960) Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest 39:592–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ciria R et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho FF et al (2018) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open and pure laparoscopic approach for liver resection and living donor hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 20(8):687–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad C et al (2012) Laparoscopic portal vein ligation with in situ liver split for failed portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 256(3):e14–e15; author reply e16-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croner R et al (2016a) Robotic-assisted liver surgery. Zentralbl Chir 141(2):154–159

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croner RS et al (2015) Pioneering robotic liver surgery in Germany: first experiences with liver malignancies. Front Surg 2:18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Croner RS et al (2016b) Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 401(5):707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croner R, et al (2020) Zentralbl Chir. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1157-9754. Online ahead of print.

  • Daskalaki D et al (2014) Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography during robotic cholecystectomy: results of 184 consecutive cases in a single institution. Surg Innov 21(6):615–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich Trendelenburg (1844–1924) Trendelenburg’s position. JAMA, 1969 207(6):1143–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulianotti PC et al (2012) Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy. Transpl Int 25(1):e5–e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf W et al (2011) Transporters involved in the hepatic uptake of (99m)Tc-mebrofenin and indocyanine green. J Hepatol 54(4):738–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus open simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a meta-analysis. Am Surg 84(2):192–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallet J et al (2018) The impact of perioperative blood transfusions on short-term outcomes following hepatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hibi T et al (2014) International survey on technical aspects of laparoscopic liver resection: a web-based study on the global diffusion of laparoscopic liver surgery prior to the 2nd international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection in Iwate, Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):737–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L et al (2018) Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Asian J Surg 41(5):401–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SW, Ou JJ, Wong HP (2018) The use of indocyanine green imaging technique in patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ishizawa T et al (2009) Real-time identification of liver cancers by using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging. Cancer 115(11):2491–2504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishizawa T et al (2012a) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256(6):959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishizawa T et al (2012b) Positive and negative staining of hepatic segments by use of fluorescent imaging techniques during laparoscopic hepatectomy. Arch Surg 147(4):393–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jara M et al (2015) Reliable assessment of liver function using LiMAx. J Surg Res 193(1):184–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguchi Y, Lillemoe HA, Vauthey JN (2019) Dealing with an insufficient future liver remnant: portal vein embolization and two-stage hepatectomy. J Surg Oncol 119(5):594–603

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S et al (2018) Long-term oncologic outcomes following robotic liver resections for primary hepatobiliary malignancies: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 25(9):2652–2660

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kono Y et al (2015) Techniques of fluorescence cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for better delineation of the bile duct anatomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(25):e1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205(6):697–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latchana N et al (2019) Red blood cell transfusion in liver resection. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 404(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH et al (2016) Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach for anatomic liver resection in the right liver: techniques and perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc 30(9):3882–3888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, et al (2020) Comparison of the learning curves for robotic left and right hemihepatectomy: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 81:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu R et al (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 25(12):1432–1444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lock JF et al (2013) Predicting the prognosis in acute liver failure: results from a retrospective pilot study using the LiMAx test. Ann Hepatol 12(4):556–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lock JF et al (2017) LiMAx test improves diagnosis of chemotherapy-associated liver injury before resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 24(9):2447–2455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Machairas N et al (2019) Comparison between robotic and open liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Updat Surg 71(1):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino MV, Builes Ramirez S, Gomez Ruiz M (2019) The Application of Indocyanine Green (ICG) staining technique during robotic-assisted right hepatectomy: with video. J Gastrointest Surg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuhashi N et al (2008) Usefulness of intraoperative fluorescence imaging to evaluate local anatomy in hepatobiliary surgery. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 15(5):508–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakaseko Y, Ishizawa T, Saiura A (2018) Fluorescence-guided surgery for liver tumors. J Surg Oncol 118(2):324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009a) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen KT et al (2009b) Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg 250(5):842–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi G et al (2018) Fluorescence guided surgery in liver tumors: applications and advantages. Acta Biomed 89(9-S):135–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman SC et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of 610 patients. Surgery 157(2):211–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzbauer AA et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255(3):405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schols RM et al (2013) Fluorescence cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a feasibility study on early biliary tract delineation. Surg Endosc 27(5):1530–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sham JG et al (2016) Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive? J Robot Surg 10(4):307–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockmann M et al (2010) The LiMAx test: a new liver function test for predicting postoperative outcome in liver surgery. HPB (Oxford) 12(2):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troisi RI et al (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi G et al (2014) Laparoscopic hepatectomy is theoretically better than open hepatectomy: preparing for the 2nd international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(10):723–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi G et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WH et al (2018) Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery. Surg Endosc 32(9):3918–3924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong DJ et al (2019) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy. ANZ J Surg 89(3):165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CY et al (2019) Robotic-assisted right posterior segmentectomies for liver lesions: single-center experience of an evolutional method in left semi-lateral position. J Robot Surg 13(2):231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu YD et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study from a single center. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 399(8):1039–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B et al (2017) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open hepatectomy for live liver donor: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017:2.956.749

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Deutschland

    Roland S. Croner

Authors
  1. Roland S. Croner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland S. Croner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Thilo Hackert

  2. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Deutschland

    Roland S. Croner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Croner, R.S. (2021). Roboterassistierte Leberresektionen. In: Hackert, T., Croner, R.S. (eds) Roboterassistierte Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60457-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60457-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-60456-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-60457-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation