Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Offene gefäßchirurgische Rekonstruktionsverfahren

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operative und interventionelle Gefäßmedizin

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Medizin ((SRM))

  • 433 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Im Folgenden werden die konventionellen gefäßchirurgischen Rekonstruktionsverfahren im Einzelnen vorgestellt. Modifikationen und Kombinationen der verschiedenen Techniken sind dabei in der Praxis keine Seltenheit und werden nach Bedarf vorgenommen. Die Wahl des operativen, endovaskulären Verfahrens oder auch der Kombination aus beiden Techniken richtet sich nach dem morphologischen Veschlussmuster. Lokalisierte Läsionen werden in der Regel primär endovaskulär, diffuse und ausgedehnte Prozesse meist primär offen-chirurgisch angegangen (Tab. 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bakal CW, Sprayregen S, Scheinbaum K, Cyanamon J, Veith FJ (1990) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the infrapopliteal arteries: results in 53 patients. AJR 154:171–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR, Rihardson JD (1993) Durability of the in situ bypass following modification of abnormal vein segment. J Surg Res 54:196–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster DC, Perler BA, Robinson JG, Darling RC (1982) Aortofemoral graft for multilevel occlusive disease. Predictors of success and need for distal bypass. Arch Surg 117:1593–1600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CAPRIE steering committee (1996) A randomized, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 348:1329–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang BB, Darling RC, Bock DE, Shah DM, Leather RP (1995) The use of spliced vein bypasses for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 21:403–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Hagino RT (1997) Autogenous aortoiliac/femoral reconstruction from superficial femoral-popliteal veins: feasibility and durability. J Vasc Surg 25:255–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Roeck A, Hendriks JM, Delrue F et al (2006) Long-term results of primary stenting for long and complex iliac artery occlusions. Acta Chir Belg 106:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debus ES, Larena A, Sailer MA, Moll R, Franke S (2002) Der dorsolaterale Fibularisbypass – Beschreibung des Zugangsweges und erste klinische Erfahrungen. Gefäßchirurgie 7:89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzeck UK, Talke P, Bernstein EF, Golbranson FL, Fronek A (1982) Transcutaneous pO2 measurements in health and peripheral arterial disease. Surgery 91:156–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IL, Conroy RM, Arefi M, Tobis JM, Stemmer EA, Wilson SE (2001) Three-year outcome of endovascular treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusion. Arch Surg 136:221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross-Fengels W, Mückner K, Imig H, Schröder A, Wagenhofer KU, Siemens P (1998) Möglichkeiten und Risiken der ambulanten PTA bei Patienten mit peripherer arterieller Verschlusserkrankung. RöFo 168:175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holzenbein TJ, Pomposelli FB, Miller A et al (1996) Results of a policy with arm veins used as first alternative to an unavailable ipsilaterale greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 23:130–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karacagil S, Lofberg AM, Granbo A, Lorelius LE, Bergqvist D (1996) Value of duplex scanning in evaluation of crural and foot arteries in limbs with severe lower limb ischemia: a prospective comparison with angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12:300–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kram HB, Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Wengerter KR, Panetta TF, Nwosis C (1991) Late results of twohundredseventeen femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments. J Vasc Surg 14:386–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS (2005) The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a 10-year experience. J Vasc Surg 41:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta T (1995) Noninvasive technique using thallium-201 for predicting ischemic ulcer healing of the foot. Br J Surg 72:892–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reifsnyder T, Grossman JP, Leers SA (1997) Limb loss after lower extremity bypass. Am J Surg 174:149–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler A, Rieger H (1992) Spontaneous oscillations of laser Doppler skin blood flux in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 11:249–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JR, Walsh DB, McDaniel MD, Zwolak RM, Besso SR, Cronenenwett JL (1993) Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: a comparison outcome and hemodynamic results. J Vasc Surg 17:1029–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder A, Mückner K, Riepe G, Siemens P, Gross-Fengels W, Imig H (1998) Semiclosed iliac recanalisation by an inguinal approach-modified surgical interventional procedures. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 16:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann K, Mahnken A, Meyer J, Haage P, Chalabi K, Peters I, Günther RW, Vorwerk D (2002) Long-term results 10 years after iliac arterial stent placement. Radiology 224:731–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger H, Klein P, Lang W (1993) Tibial bypass grafting for limb salvage with ringed polytetrafluorethylene prostheses: results of primary and secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg 18:867–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah DM, Leather RP, Darling RC, Chang BB, Paty PSK, Lloyd WB (1996) Long term results of using in situ saphenus vein bypass. Adv Surg 30:123–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stonebridge PA, Prescott RJ, Ruckley CV (1997) Randomized trial comparing infrainguinal polytetrafluorethylene bypass grafting with and without vein interposition cuff at the distal anastomosis. J Vasc Surg 26:543–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surowiec SM, Davies MG, Eberly SW et al (2005) Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg 41:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transatlantic inter-society consensus (TASC) (2000) Management of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 31:178–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch GR, Dimick JB, Wainess RM et al (2004) Diffusion of new technology in health care: the case of aorto-iliac occlusive disease. Surgery 136:812–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varty K, Nydahl S, Butterworth P, Errington M, Bolia A, Bell PR, London NJ (1996) Changes in the management of critical limb ischaemia. Br J Surg 83:953–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E et al (1986) Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluorethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 3:104–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vorwerk D, Günther RW (2001) Percutaneous interventions for treatment of iliaca artery stenoses and occlusions. World J Surg 25:319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HJ (2002) Current Status of endovascular therapy in the femoropopliteal segment in chronic peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Vasa 31:153–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe JH, Wyatt MG (1997) Critical and subcritical ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 13:578–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Deutschland

    Eike Sebastian Debus

  2. Abt. Diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, GefäßCentrum Hamburg (GCH), Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Walter Gross-Fengels

Authors
  1. Eike Sebastian Debus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Walter Gross-Fengels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eike Sebastian Debus or Walter Gross-Fengels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin Gefäßchirurgie – Angiologie – endovaskuläre Therapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum, Hamburg, Germany

    Eike Sebastian Debus

  2. Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Asklepios Klinikum Harburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Gross-Fengels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Debus, E.S., Gross-Fengels, W. (2020). Offene gefäßchirurgische Rekonstruktionsverfahren. In: Debus, E., Gross-Fengels, W. (eds) Operative und interventionelle Gefäßmedizin. Springer Reference Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53380-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53380-2_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53378-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53380-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation