Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interventionsforschung im Kontext Schule

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Schulforschung

Zusammenfassung

Interventionsforschung in der Schule befasst sich mit der systematischen Evaluation förderlicher Maßnahmen. Damit ist die Chance verbunden, substanzielle Verbesserungen unterrichtlicher Angebote zu erreichen. Eine Voraussetzung dafür ist ein hoher methodischer Standard, um die Verlässlichkeit von Befunden zu sichern. Zur Optimierung der Passung zwischen Lernvoraussetzungen und Programmen sind differentielle Analysen erforderlich. Schließlich muss Interventionsforschung sich mit Bedingungen des Transfers und der Implementation innovativer Maßnahmen in die schulische Praxis befassen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2012). Naturally-Occurring Comprehension Strategies Instruction in 9th-Grade Language Arts Classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(6), 591–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Century, J., & Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation research: Finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 354–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45, 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. M. (2019). Using technology and assessment to personalize instruction: Preventing reading problems. Prevention Science, 20, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(7), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdfelder, E., & Ulrich, R. (2018). Zur Methodologie von Replikationsstudien. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, N., Kawohl, E., & Souvignier, E. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2019). On the importance of moderator analysis in intervention research: An introduction to the special issue. Exceptional Children, 85, 126–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer – Assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geel, M. van, Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J.-P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school- wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 360–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science: the Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 16(7), 893–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gräsel, C. (2010). Stichwort: Transfer und Transferforschung im Bildungsbereich. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 13, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, A. G. (2015). Serious challenges require serious scholarship: Integrating implementation science into the scholarly discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions to concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42, 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hascher, T., & Schmitz, B. (Hrsg.). (2010). Pädagogische Interventionsforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirisches Handlungswissen. Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebbecker, K., & Souvignier, E. (2018). Formatives Assessments im Leseunterricht der Grundschule – Implementation und Wirksamkeit eines modularen, materialgestützten Konzepts. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21, 735–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, C., & Grosche, M. (2012). Das response-to-intervention Modell als Grundlage für einen inklusiven Paradigmenwechsel in der Sonderpädagogik. Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 63, 312–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N., Lendrum, A., Ashworth, E., Frearson, K., Buck, R., & Kerr, K. (2016). Implementation and process evaluation (IPE) for interventions in education settings: A synthesis of the literature. Education Endowment Foundation website: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Evaluation/Setting_up_an_Evaluation/IPE_Review_Final.pdf. Zugegriffen am 07.12.2020.

  • Inns, A. J., Lake, C., Pellegrini, M., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). A quantitative synthesis of research on programs for struggling readers in elementary schools. Best evidence encyclopedia. www.bestevidence.org. Zugegriffen am 07.12.2020.

  • Karageorgos, P., Müller, B., & Richter, T. (2019). Modelling the relationship of accurate and fluent word recognition in primary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101779.

  • Keuning, T., van Geel, M., & Visscher, A. (2017). Why a data-based decision-making intervention works in some schools and not in others. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuning, T., van Geel, M., Visscher, A., & Fox, J.-P. (2019, online first). Assessing and validating effects of a data-based decision-making intervention on student growth for mathematics and spelling. Journal of Educational Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12236.

  • Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. J. (2014). Training des induktiven Denkens – Fortschreibung der Metaanlyse von 2008. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 28, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and the metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. K., & Schildkamp, K. (2013). Data-based decision making: An overview. In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai & L. Earl (Hrsg.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (S. 9–21). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Landesinstitute und Qualitätseinrichtungen der Länder. (2018). Positionspapier der Landesinstitute und Qualitätseinrichtungen der Länder zum Transfer von Forschungswissen. https://www.bildungsserver.de/onlineressource.html?onlineressourcen_id=60021. Zugegriffen am 07.12.2020.

  • Langfeldt, H.-P., & Büttner, G. (Hrsg.). (2008). Trainingsprogramme zur Förderung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Kompendium für die Praxis (2. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutner, D. (2010). Perspektiven pädagogischer Interventionsforschung. In T. Hascher & B. Schmitz (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Interventionsforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirisches Handlungswissen (S. 63–72). Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., & Grund, S. (2017). Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel designs: A comparison of different strategies. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, J. W., Flower, A., & Ciullo, S. (2014). Measuring fidelity to improve intervention effectiveness. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meudt, S.-I., Souvignier, E., Hardy, I., Labudde, P., Leuchter, M., Steffensky, M., & Möller, K. (2017). Bildungsprozesse über Stufenübergänge hinweg kontinuierlich fördern – durch abgestimmte Materialien und Anregung von stufenübergreifenden Kooperationen. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung, 10, 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, B., Richter, T., Križan, A., Hecht, T., & Ennemoser, M. (2015). Word recognition skills moderate the effectiveness of reading strategy training in Grade 2. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, A., Hochweber, J., & Hartig, J. (2014). Modeling instructional sensitivity using a longitudinal multilevel differential item functioning approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielen, T. M., Smith, G. G., Sikkema-de Jong, M. T., Drobisz, J., van Horne, B., & Bus, A. G. (2017). Digital guidance for susceptible readers: Effects on fifth graders’ reading motivation and incidental vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56, 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, M. (2014). Leseunterricht in der Grundschule – vom Ist-Zustand und vom Soll-Zustand. In R. Valtin & I. Tarelli (Hrsg.), Lesekompetenz nachhaltig stärken. Evidenzbasierte Maßnahmen und Programme (S. 122–165). Berlin: dgls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzel, M. (2010). Geheimnisvoller Transfer? Wie Forschung der Bildungspraxis nützen kann. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 13, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., & Chambers, D. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., Souvignier, E., Hertel, S., Heyder, A., & Kunina-Habenicht, O. (2019). Positionspapier zur Lage der Pädagogischen Psychologie in Forschung und Lehre. Psychologische Rundschau, 70, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach, L. A. (2014). Design of prevention interventions. In Z. Sloboda & H. Petras (Hrsg.), Defining prevention science (S. 275–292). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (2019). Programme zur Förderung kognitiver Fähigkeiten in Vorschule und Schule: Wie effektiv sind sie, und wie gut sind die Verfahren praktisch implementiert? Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 33, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, B., Souvignier, E., & Hasselhorn, M. (2018). Stichwort – Formatives Assessment. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21, 697–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, N., Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2018). The importance of process evaluation for randomised control trials in education. Educational Research, 60, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effective programmes in reading and mathematics: Lessons from the best evidence encyclopaedia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(4), 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 290–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009a). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Chambers, B., & Haxby, B. (2009b). Two million children: Success for all. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on curriculum (S. 402–435). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souvignier, E. (2016). Das Lesen trainieren: Konzepte von Leseunterricht und Leseübung und deren Effekte. In A. Bertschi-Kaufmann & T. Graber (Hrsg.), Lesekompetenz – Leseleistung – Leseförderung. Grundlagen, Modelle und Materialien (S. 182–197). Seelze: Kallmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souvignier, E. (2018). Computerbasierte Lernverlaufsdiagnostik. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 7, 219–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souvignier, E., & Philipp, M. (2016). Implementation – Begrifflichkeiten, Befunde und Herausforderungen. In M. Philipp & E. Souvignier (Hrsg.), Implementation von Lesefördermaßnahmen. Perspektiven auf Gelingensbedingungen und Hindernisse (S. 9–22). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., Pollack, C., Durkin, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., Lynch, K., Newton, K., & Gogolen, C. (2015). Learning from comparison in algebra. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 41–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership and Management, 33, 486–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoren, K., Hannover, B., & Brunner, M. (2019). Welche Schulen machen mit beim jahrgangsübergreifenden Lernen? Demografische und leistungsbezogene Merkmale unterschiedlich reformbereiter Grundschulen in Berlin. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 66, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Comparing two teacher development programs for innovating reading comprehension instruction with regard to teachers’ experiences and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voß, S., Blumenthal, Y., Mahlau, K., Marten, K., Diehl, K., Sikora, S., & Hartke, B. (2016). Der Response-to-Intervention-Ansatz in der Praxis. Evaluationsergebnisse zum Rügener Inklusionsmodell. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Hrsg.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (S. 53–82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuch, N., Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2017). Assessing teachers‘ competencies to read and interpret graphs from learning progress assessment. Results from tests and interviews. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie in Bildung und Erziehung, Münster, Deutschland

    Elmar Souvignier

Authors
  1. Elmar Souvignier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elmar Souvignier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Tina Hascher

  2. Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Till-Sebastian Idel

  3. Universität Halle-Witternberg, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Werner Helsper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Souvignier, E. (2021). Interventionsforschung im Kontext Schule. In: Hascher, T., Idel, TS., Helsper, W. (eds) Handbuch Schulforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24734-8_9-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24734-8_9-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24734-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-24734-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Erziehungswissenschaft und Soziale Arbeit

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation