Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gemeinschaft und Sozialstaat? Transformationschancen in unterschiedlichen Wohlfahrtsregimen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sozialstaat unter Zugzwang?

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag behandelt die Frage, welche Spielräume für Reformen und für Verlagerungen zu individuell, gemeinwohlorientiertem Handeln in den heutigen Wohlfahrtsstaaten bestehen. Dabei stützt er sich einerseits auf Esping-Andersens Regimeansatz und andererseits auf die neo-institutionalistische Literatur. Wandel ist pfadabhängig und resultiert primär aus dem Einbezug neuer Ideen in bestehende Politiken und der Überlagerung der alten Politikinstrumente mit neuen. Die durch neue Paradigmen und Ziele eingeführten Änderungen, wie die Aktivierungspolitik oder Sozialinvestitionspolitiken führen zu einer gewissen Konvergenz der staatlichen Interventionen über die Wohlfahrtsregime hinweg. Auch bieten diese im Prinzip neue Chancen für lokal basiertes gemeinschaftliches Handeln. Gleichzeitig besteht aber auch eine gemeinsame Tendenz, Aktivierungspolitik mittels staatlichen Zwangs- und Anreizsystemen sowie mit eng definierten staatlichen Steuerungsinstrumenten durchzusetzen. Damit wird aber individuelles, gemeinwohlorientiertes Engagement eher zurückgebunden, da dieses Autonomie und Entscheidungsfreiheit der unterstützten Individuen wie auch der unterstützenden Personen und Organisationen bedingt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bannink, Duco, und Marcel Hoogenboom. 2007. Hidden change: disaggregation of welfare state regimes for greater insight into welfare state change. Journal of European Social Policy 17 (1): 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyeler, Michelle. 2014. The welfare mix, care, and equality: Switzerland in comparative perspective. In Care in context: Transnational gender perspectives, Hrsg. V. Reddy, S. Meyer, T. Shefer, und T. Meyiwa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertozzi, Fabio, Giuliano Bonoli, und Friso Ross. 2008. The swiss road to activation: Legal aspects, implementation and outcomes. In Bringing the jobless into work?, Hrsg. Werner Eichhorst, Otto Kaufmann, und Regina Konle-Seidl, 121–159. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, Giuliano. 2007. Time matters. Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 495–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, Giuliano, und David Natali, Hrsg. 2012. The politics of the new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, Jean-Michel. 2008. Activation policies, new modes of governance and the issue of responsibility. Social Policy and Society 7 (3): 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, Jean-Michel, und Eric Moachon. 2007. The impact of contractualism in social policies. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 27 (9/10): 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, Cyrielle, und Giuliano Bonoli. 2011. Institutional fragmentation and coordination initiatives in western European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 21 (4): 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccia, Rosella. 2017. A two-step approach for the analysis of hybrids in comparative social policy analysis: A nuanced typology of childcare between policies and regimes. Quality & Quantity 51 (6): 2761–2780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, Jochen, und Daniel Clegg, Hrsg. 2011. Regulating the risk of unemployment: National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary, und Jane Lewis. 2000. The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology 51 (2): 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edeling, Thomas. 1998. Economic and sociological institutionalism in organizational theory – Two sides of the same coin? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154:728–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst, Werner, Otto Kaufmann, und Regina Konle-Seidl, Hrsg. 2008. Bringing the jobless into work?. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmenegger, Patrick, Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, und Martin Seeleib-Kaiser, Hrsg. 2012. The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2009. The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2013. Social investment package. Key facts and figures. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. The ‘Southern Model’of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Del Roy, und Sharon Wright. 2018. A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising benefit claimants in Britain via strategies of surveillance, sanctions and deterrence. Critical Social Policy 38 (2): 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelissen, Wil Arts John. 2001. Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? Acta Sociologica 44 (4): 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, Janet C., und Marcia K. Meyers. 2003. Welfare regimes in relation to paid work and care. Advances in Life Course Research 8:45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, Jacob S., Paul Pierson, und Kathleen Thelen. 2015. Drift and conversion: Hidden faces of institutional change. In Advances in comparative-historical analysis, Hrsg. James Mahoney und Kathleen Thelen, 180–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter. 1986. Governing the economy. The politics of state intervention in Britain and France. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, Silja. 2010. The politics of welfare state reform in continental Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, Martin, und Patrizia Aurich-Beerheide. 2014. European worlds of inclusive activation: The organisational challenges of coordinated service provision. International Journal of Social Welfare 23:6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, Anton, Hrsg. 2017. The uses of social investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Karl. 2000. Elephants on the move. Patterns of public pension reform in OECD Countries. European Review 8 (3): 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollertz, Katarina. 2016. Integrated and individualized services: Paradoxes in the implementation of labour market policies in Sweden. In Integrating social and employment policies in Europe, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich und Deborah Rice, 51–71. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasza, Gregory. 2002. The illusion of welfare ‘Regimes’. Journal of Social Policy 31 (2): 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver. 1997. Herausforderungen des Sozialstaates. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumlin, Staffan, und Bo Rothstein. 2005. Making and breaking social capital. Comparative Political Studies 38 (4): 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Christian Albrekt. 2007. How welfare regimes generate and erode social capital: The impact of underclass phenomena. Comparative Politics 40 (1): 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, Sigrid. 2003. Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies 5 (4): 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, Ruth. 2005. The incusive society? Social exclusion and new labour. Basingstoke: Parlgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., und Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, Steffen. 2004. Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange. Current Sociology 52 (1): 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Kimberly J. 2013. Path shifting of the welfare state: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in Western Europe. World Politics 65 (1): 73–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paskov, Marii. 2016. Is solidarity less important and less functional in egalitarian contexts? Acta Sociologica 59 (1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Bo. 2017. Solidarity, diversity, and the quality of Government. In The Strains of Commitment, Hrsg. Keith Banting und Will Kymlicka, 300–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Arnaud, Sébastien, und Paul Bernard. 2003. Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology 51 (5): 499–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle. 2011. Social volunteering in welfare states: Where crowding out should occur. Political Studies 59 (1): 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, John D. 2015. Revisiting Pierson’s work on the politics of welfare state reform in the era of retrenchment twenty years later. PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (2): 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, und Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Beyond Continuity, Hrsg. W. Streeck und K. Thelen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen, und Sven Steinmo. 1992. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis, Hrsg. Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, und Frank Longstreth, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel, Rik, und Vando Borghi. 2007. New modes of governance in activation policies. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 27 (7/8): 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kersbergen, Kees, und Jonas Kraf. 2017. De-universalization and selective investment in Scandinavia. In The uses of social investment, Hrsg. A. Hemerijck, 216–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc J.D. 2009. Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Beth, und Suzanne Fitzpatrick. 2018. Welfare conditionality. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berner Fachhochschule, Bern, Schweiz

    Michelle Beyeler

Authors
  1. Michelle Beyeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Beyeler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Zürich, Switzerland

    A. Doris Baumgartner

  2. FB Politikwissenschaft und Soziologie, Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Beat Fux

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beyeler, M. (2019). Gemeinschaft und Sozialstaat? Transformationschancen in unterschiedlichen Wohlfahrtsregimen. In: Baumgartner, A., Fux, B. (eds) Sozialstaat unter Zugzwang?. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22444-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22444-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22443-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22444-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation