Skip to main content

School Choice and the Urban Neighbourhood: Segregation Processes in the German Primary Sector with Special Reference to Private Schools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education

Abstract

Segregation in schools and educational inequality can be caused by various issues: stratification of the school system, gender, ethnicity and social status related with personal resources like social networks, time, money, information, cultural preferences and their influence in decision making and school choice. But segregation in schools is deeply connected with neighbourhoods and the place of residence as well. Segregation practices and school choice decisions especially by middle class parents are linked to neighbourhood effects, the housing market, or spatial and socio-spatial opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Middle class’ in this article refers first of all to the parents’ level of education. These include families with at least one parent holding a higher education entrance qualification (Abitur) or a university degree. Additionally, the parents’ occupational prestige as well as the net equivalent income was used to classify them as middle class.

  2. 2.

    Like Blokland et al. (2016, p. 7) I prefer to speak of ‘marginalisation’ or ‘marginalised neighbourhoods’ instead of ‘disadvantage’ or ‘disadvantaged neighbourhoods’ because ‘disadvantage’ has a too static connotation and a too strong relation with assets and not resources as a whole.

  3. 3.

    The study is part of the joint research project ‘Choice—school choice and socio-cultural matching’ at Humboldt University Berlin and the University of Münster led by Sabine Gruehn and Thomas Koinzer that focusses on school choice, school quality and school types within the German primary school system with special reference to private schools.

  4. 4.

    Mean = 8076 inhabitants per planning area.

  5. 5.

    Child poverty is defined by the proportion of children aged under 15 who live in families living on social or unemployment benefits, and fits very well to our researched group: parents of children who were enrolled at school in summer 2015. The analysis was implemented with other indicators as well, and got nearly the same dissemination and results with only very small, negligible differences.

  6. 6.

    Starting with 30 €/month resp. normally 3.9% of the income for the protestant primary schools (EKBO 2016) and 55 €/month for catholic primary schools (Erzbistum Berlin 2016)—in both school types parents can apply for reductions or waiver of the fee.

  7. 7.

    In detail: one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Post Hoc analysis, Turkey’s honest significant difference test (HSD).

  8. 8.

    The information about the schools was taken from their homepages. Due to anonymization the sources cannot be mentioned.

  9. 9.

    Net equivalent income is an OECD-index to describe the financial situation of a family depending on the number of members of the household. Every household member receives a different weighting due to his or her age (0.3–1.0). Total household income is then divided by the sum of the weightings to yield a representative income.

  10. 10.

    Waldorf or Rudolf Steiner Schools are progressive educational schools with an anthroposophical, holistic approach.

  11. 11.

    All direct quotes of parents are translated from German into English.

  12. 12.

    Due to reasons of anonymization the names of the neighbourhoods were rephrased.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Mayer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayer, T. (2017). School Choice and the Urban Neighbourhood: Segregation Processes in the German Primary Sector with Special Reference to Private Schools. In: Koinzer, T., Nikolai, R., Waldow, F. (eds) Private Schools and School Choice in Compulsory Education. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17104-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17104-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17103-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17104-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics