Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feministische Filmtheorie und Genderforschung

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Filmtheorie

Zusammenfassung

Feministische Filmtheorie hat grundsätzlich eine kritische und politische Ausrichtung. Untersuchte sie zunächst filmische Gender-Repräsentationen auf ihren ideologischen Gehalt hin, so werden diese in der Folge sowohl historisch wie auch theoretisch relativiert. Feministische Filmtheorie und Genderforschung erschließen repressive Strukturen, ebenso aber auch emanzipatorische Möglichkeiten und Hoffnungen in Film und Kino.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    „Postfeminist fictions frequently set aside both evident economic disparities and the fact that the majority of women approach paid labor as an economic necessity rather than a ,choice.‘ As this suggests, postfeminism is white and middle class by default […]“ (Tasker und Negra 2007, S. 2).

  2. 2.

    Im ersten Band (Nichols 1976) sind feministische Filmanalysen, z. B. Claire Johnstons Artikel „Women’s Cinema as Counter Cinema“, noch in das Kap. Genre Criticism eingeordnet.

  3. 3.

    „[…] we must still account for the pleasure and fascination […]. These problems cannot be made to vanish merely by subsuming aesthetics under ideology, […] as Laura Mulvey does in ‚Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,‘ where she argues that all Hollywood narrative conforms to the general requirement of providing viewing pleasure for men“ (Nichols 1985, S. 7, vgl. auch S. 12–13).

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Bergstrom, Janet. 1989. Beitrag zur „Spectatrix“. Sonderheft Camera Obscura 20/21:94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernold, Monika, Andrea B. Braidt, und Claudia Preschl, Hrsg. 2004. Screenwise. Film. Fernsehen. Feminismus. Marburg: Schüren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Marcelline, Hrsg. 2008. Situating the feminist gaze and spectatorship in postwar cinema. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauerhoch, Annette. 2015. Suddenly, One Summer: Frauen und Film since 1974. In Feminisms, Hrsg. Laura Mulvey und Anna Backman Rogers, 161–168. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, Giuliana. 1993. Streetwalking on a ruined map. Cultural theory and the city films of Elvira Notari. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1990/1991. Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. London/New York: Routledge. Deutsch: 1991. Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1993/1995. Bodies that matter. London/New York: Routledge. Deutsch: 1995. Körper von Gewicht. Die diskursiven Grenzen des Geschlechts. Berlin: Berlin Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Vicki, Hrsg. 2010. Reclaiming the archive. feminism and film history. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, Carol. 1992. Men, women, and chain saws. Gender in the modern horror film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columpar, Corinn, und Sophie Mayer, Hrsg. 2009. There she goes. Feminist filmmaking and beyond. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, Catherine. 2005. Thinking in images. Film theory, feminist philosophy and Marlene Dietrich. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copjec, Joan. 1989. Beitrag zur „Spectatrix“. Sonderheft Camera Obscura 20/21:121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, Barbara. 1993a. The monstrous-feminine. Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, Barbara. 1993b. Dark Desires. Male Masochism in the Horror Film. In Screening the male. Exploring masculinities in Hollywood cinema, Hrsg. Steven Cohan und Ina Rae Hark, 118–133. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Nick. 2013. The desiring-image. Gilles Deleuze and contemporary queer cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Teresa. 1984. Alice doesn’t. Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Teresa. 1987/1996. The technology of gender. In Technologies of gender. essays on theory, film, and fiction, Hrsg. Teresa De Lauretis, 1–30. Houndsmills: Macmillan 1987. Deutsch: 1996. Die Technologie des Geschlechts. In Vermittelte Weiblichkeit. Feministische Wissenschafts- und Gesellschaftstheorie, Hrsg. Elvira Schleich, 57–93. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Teresa. 1990. Ödipus Interruptus. Frauen und Film 48:5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lauretis, Teresa. 1994. The practice of love. Lesbian sexuality and perverse desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Rio, Elena. 2008. Deleuze and the cinemas of performance. Powers of affection. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary Ann. 1985. Film und Maskerade. Zur Theorie des weiblichen Zuschauers. Frauen und Film 38:4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary Ann. 1987. The desire to desire. The woman’s film of the 1940s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary Ann. 1989. Beitragzur „Spectatrix“. Sonderheft Camera Obscura 20/21:142–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary Ann, Patricia Mellencamp, und Linda Williams, Hrsg. 1984. Re-vision. Essays in feminist film criticism. Los Angeles: The American Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard. 1986. Heavenly bodies. Film stars and society. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard. 1995. Das Licht der Welt – Weiße Menschen und das Film-Bild. In The body of gender. Körper. Geschlechter. Identitäten, Hrsg. Marie-Luise Angerer, 151–170. Wien: Passagen Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard. 1997. White. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill, Christine, Hrsg. 2012. Gender meets genre in postwar cinemas. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, Kristyn. 2008. Theorising desire. From Freud to feminism to film. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Barry Keith. 2011. Shadows of doubt. Negotiations of masculinity in American genre films. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne, Joel, und Nadine Muller, Hrsg. 2013. Postfeminism and contemporary Hollywood cinema. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Miriam. 1982. S.M. Rodolfo. Frauen und Film 33:19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Miriam. 1991. Babel and Babylon. Spectatorship in American silent film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, Amelie, Lynne Joyrich, Patricia White, und Sharon Willis. 2015. (Re)Inventing Camera Obscura. In Feminisms, Hrsg. Laura Mulvey und Anna Backman Rogers, 169–183. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, Bell. 1992. Black looks. Race and representation. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Claire. 1973/1977. Women’s cinema as counter cinema. In Notes on women’s cinema, Hrsg. Claire Johnston, 24–32. London: Screen Pamphlet Nr. 2. Deutsch (in Auszügen): 1977. Frauenfilm als Gegenfilm. Frauen und Film 11:10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. Ann. 1983/1984. Is the gaze male? In Women and film. Both sides of the camera, Hrsg. E. Ann Kaplan, 23–35. London/New York: Routledge. Deutsch: 1984. Ist der Blick männlich? Frauen und Film 36:45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. Ann. 1996. Looking for the other. Feminism, film, and the imperial gaze. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. Ann. 2012. Troubling genre/reconstructing gender. In Gender meets genre in postwar cinemas, Hrsg. Christine Gledhill, 71–83. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Barbara M. 2000. Deleuze and cinema. The aesthetics of sensation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippel, Heike. 2009. Zeit ohne Ende. Essays über Zeit, Frauen und Kino. Frankfurt/Basel: Stroemfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, Alexander. 1965. Die Utopie Film. Film 2:11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Julia, und Christine Gledhill, Hrsg. 2015. Doing women’s film history. Reframing cinemas, past and future. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Gertrud. 1984. Psychoanalyse des Vorsprachlichen. Das anthropologische Konzept der Psychoanalyse in der Kritischen Theorie. Frauen und Film 36:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Gertrud. 1989. „Was ich erbeute, sind Bilder“. Zum Diskurs der Geschlechter im Film. Frankfurt a. M./Basel: Stroemfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivunen, Anu. 2015. The promise of touch. Turns to affect in feminst film theory. In Feminisms. Diversity, difference, and multiplicity in contemporary film cultures, Hrsg. Laura Mulvey und Anna Backman Rogers, 97–110. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Peter. 1993. ‚Don’t Blame This on a Girl‘. Female Rape-Revenge-Films. In Screening the male. Exploring masculinities in Hollywood cinema, Hrsg. Steven Cohan und Ina Rae Hark, 103–117. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura. 1975/1980. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen 16(3): 6–18. Deutsch 1980: Visuelle Lust und narratives Kino. In Frauen in der Kunst. Band 1, Hrsg. Gislind Nabakowski, Helke Sander und Peter Gorsen, 30–46. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Laura, und Anna Backman Rogers, Hrsg. 2015. Feminisms. Diversity, difference, and multiplicity in contemporary film cultures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Bill, Hrsg. 1976. Movies and methods I. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Bill, Hrsg. 1985. Movies and methods II. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Kelly. 2012. Knock me up, knock me down. Images of pregnancy in Hollywood film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penley, Constance. 1989. The future of an illusion. Film, feminism, and psychoanalysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, Deidre, Hrsg. 1988. Female spectators. Looking at film and television. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, Hilary. 2011. Neo-feminist cinema. Girly films, chick flicks, and consumer culture. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, Hilary, und Rebecca Stringer, Hrsg. 2011. Feminism at the movies. Understanding gender in contemporary popular cinema. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, Geetha. 2006. Feminist auteurs. Reading women’s film. London: Wallflower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, Teresa. 2012. Deleuze and film. A feminist introduction. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodowick, David N. 1991. The difficulty of difference. Psychoanalysis, sexual difference, and film theory. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüpmann, Heide. 1990. Unheimlichkeit des Blicks. Das Drama des frühen deutschen Kinos. Frankfurt a. M./Basel: Stroemfeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seier, Andrea. 2007. Remediatisierung. Die performative Konstitution von Gender und Medien. Münster: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. 1992. Male subjectivity at the margins. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, Gaylyn. 1985. Schaulust und masochistische Ästhetik. Frauen und Film 39:15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, Gaylyn. 1988. In the realm of pleasure. Von Sternberg, Dietrich, and the masochistic aesthetic. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Yvonne, und Diane Negra, Hrsg. 2007. Interrogating postfeminism. Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, Sharon Lin. 2009. Women on the edge. Twelve political film practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, Melanie, Hrsg. 2011. Women on screen. Feminism and femininity in visual culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Linda. 1984/1990.When the woman looks. In Re-vision. Essays in feminist film criticism, Hrsg. Mary Ann Doane, Patricia Mellencamp und Linda Williams, 83–99. Los Angeles: The American Film Institute. Deutsch: 1990. Wenn sie hinschaut. Frauen und Film 49:3–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig (HBK), Institut für Medienforschung (IMF), 38015, Braunschweig, Deutschland

    Heike Klippel

Authors
  1. Heike Klippel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heike Klippel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Medienwissenschaft, Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Bernhard Groß

  2. Institut für Theaterwissenschaft, FU Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Thomas Morsch

Section Editor information

  1. Seminar für Filmwissenschaft, Freie Universität Berlin, Grunewaldstr. 35, 12165, Berlin, Deutschland

    Bernhard Groß

  2. Seminar für Filmwissenschaft, Freie Universität Berlin, Grunewaldstr. 35, 12165, Berlin, Deutschland

    Thomas Morsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this entry

Cite this entry

Klippel, H. (2016). Feministische Filmtheorie und Genderforschung. In: Groß, B., Morsch, T. (eds) Handbuch Filmtheorie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09514-7_5-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09514-7_5-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-09514-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation