Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prinzipien der Methodik empirischer Forschung in der Psychiatrie

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik, Psychotherapie

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Medizin ((SRM))

  • 656 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Durch den Bezug der Medizin auf moderne Naturwissenschaften einerseits und andererseits die Schwierigkeit, Geistig-Seelisches objektiv zu beobachten, quantitativ zu messen und experimentell zu beeinflussen, befindet sich die Psychiatrie im Spannungsfeld zwischen Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften. Diese Spannung spiegelt sich in der Diskussion um angemessene Methoden wieder. Insbesondere die polaren Gegensätze von empirischer (realwissenschaftlicher) und geisteswissenschaftlicher (hermeneutischer) Methodik stehen dabei im Zentrum. Realwissenschaften versuchen, allgemeine Gesetzesaussagen über die erfahrbare Realität zu formulieren. In der Psychiatrie werden realwissenschaftliche Methoden v. a. in der biologischen Psychiatrie, der klinischen Psychopharmakologie, der sonstigen Therapieforschung wie auch in anderen Bereichen zu Hypothesenfindung und Hypothesenprüfung, wie z. B. im Bereich der psychiatrischen Diagnostik und der Verlaufsforschung, angewandt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adam D, Kasper S, Möller HJ, Singer EA (2005) Placebo-controlled trials in major depression are necessary and ethically justifiable: how to improve the communication between researchers and ethical committees. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 255:258–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ambuhl H, Grawe K (1988) The effects of psychotherapy as a result of the relation of therapeutic availability and acceptance by the client. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 36:308–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ambuhl H, Grawe K (1989) Psychotherapeutic activity as a realization of therapeutic heuristics. A process comparison of 3 therapy forms from a new perspective. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 39:1–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold E, Grawe K (1989) Deskriptive Einzelfallanalysen – Eine Strategie zur Untersuchung von Wirkungszusammenhängen in der Psychotherapie. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 37:262–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin D, Broich K, Fritze J et al (2003) Placebo-controlled studies in depression: necessary, ethical and feasible. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 253:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H et al (2013) Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 10:e1001454

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman A, Fonagy P (1999) Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 156:1563–1569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann U, Stieglitz RD (1983) Test-Manual zum AMDP-System. Empirische Studien zur Psychopathologie. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokio

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinlich P, Müller-Berghaus J, Sudhop T, Vieths S, Broich K (2015) Zusammenspiel zwischen Zulassung und Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 58:227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger M, Klein HE (1984) Der Dexamethason-Suppressions-Test: Ein biologischer Marker der endogenen Depression? Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 234:137–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergin AE, Strupp HH (1972) Changing frontiers in the science of psychotherapy. Aldine, Chicago/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin CR, Bradly C (1989) Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. BMJ 299:313–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Broich K (2005) Klinische Prüfungen mit Antidepressiva und Antipsychotika. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 48:541–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In: Gage NL (Hrsg) Handbook of research on teaching. Rand McNally, Chicago, S 117–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R (1966) Philosphical foundations of physics. Nymphenburger Verlagsbuchhandlung. Dt. Übers. Hoering W, München/New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi A, Moffit TE (2006) Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:583–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook TH, Campbell DT (1976) The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In: Dunnette MD (Hrsg) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, S 223–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L et al (2009) Psychotherapy versus the combination of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 26:279–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G et al (2013) A metaanalysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry 58:376–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flint J, Cuijpers P, Horder J et al (2015) Is there an excess of significant findings in published studies of psychotherapy of depression. Psychol Med 45:439–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fountoulakis KN, Veroniki AA, Siamouli M et al (2013) No role for initial severity on the efficacy of antidepressants: results of a multi-meta-analysis. Ann Gen Psychiatry 12:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frey S, von Zerssen D, Hansen W, Harders S (1979) Probleme der Verhaltensmessung in Einzelfalluntersuchungen. In: Petermann F, Hehl FJ (Hrsg) Einzelfall-Analyse. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München/Wien/Baltimore, S 159–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritze J, Möller HJ (2001) Design of clinical trials of antidepressants. Should a placebo control arm be included? CNS Drugs 16:755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield SL (1973) Basic ingredients or common factors in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 14:9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman JM, Markman HJ (1978) Experimental designs in psychotherapy research. In: Garfield SL, Bergin AE (Hrsg) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 2. Aufl. Wiley, New York, S 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Grawe K (1998) Psychologische Therapie. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Grawe K, Bernauer F, Donati R (1990) Psychotherapie im Vergleich: Haben wirklich alle einen Preis verdient? Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 40:102–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grawe K, Donati R, Bernauer F (1994) Psychotherapie im Wandel. Von der Konfession zur Profession. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Greden JF, Gardner R, Kind D et al (1983) Dexamethasone suppression tests in antidepressant treatment of melancholia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:493–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH (2004) MOVE over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hegerl U, Mergl R (2010) The clinical significance of antidepressant treatment effects cannot be derived from placebo-verum response differences. J Psychopharmacol 24:445–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hegerl U, Hautzinger M, Mergl R et al (2010) Effects of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in depressed primary-care patients: a randomized, controlled trial including a patients’ choice arm. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13:31–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helmchen H (2001) Therapeutische Wirksamkeit. Nervenarzt 72:56–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann SO, Gebhardt R (1973) Möglichkeiten der Kontrolle von psychotherapeutischen Ergebnissen. Prax Psychother 18:241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber G (1976) Zur Problematik quantitativer Verlaufsbeobachtungen bei Schizophrenen. Psychopathometrie 2:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzarik W (1989) Menschenkundliche Anmerkungen zu Wissenschaft und Wissenschaftsbetrieb. Nervenarzt 60:612–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PB, Barnes TR, Davies L et al (2006) Randomized controlled trial of the effect on quality of life of second- vs. first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1). Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1079–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn A, Leventhal RM, Khan SR, Brown WA (2002) Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database. J Clin Psychopharmacol 22:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallert TW (2005) Braucht psychiatrische Versorgungsforschung randomisierte kontrollierte Studien? Psychiatr Prax 32:375–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katschnig H, Simhandl C (1987) Neuere Ansätze in der Klassifikation und Diagnostik psychischer Krankheiten. In: Simhandl C, Berner P, Luccioni H, Alf C (Hrsg) Moderne Psychiatrie, Klassifikationsprobleme in der Psychiatrie. Medizinisch-Pharmazeutische Verlagsgesellschaft, Purkersdorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Faucett J, Lichtenberg P et al (2012) A systematic review of comparative efficacy of treatments and controls for depression. PLoS One 7:e41778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler DJ (1977) Experimentelle Untersuchungspläne in der Psychotherapie-Forschung. In: Petermann F, Schmook C (Hrsg) Grundlagentexte der Klinischen Psychologie I. Huber, Bern/Stuttgart/Wien, S 106–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch I (2002) The emperor’s new drug: an analysis of antidepressant medication data submitted to the U.S. food and drug administration. Prev Treat 5, No Pagination Specified, Article 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Enlarged. 2. Aufl. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff JP, Vaughn CE (1980) The interaction of life events and relatives expressed emotion in schizophrenia and depressive neurosis. Br J Psychiatry 136:146–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leichsenring F, Rabung S, Leibing E (2004) The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:1208–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D et al (2009a) Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Lancet 373:31–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leucht S, Komossa K, Rummel-Kluge C et al (2009b) A meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 166:152–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP et al (2005) Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 352:1209–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM et al (2006) Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behaviour therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviours and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:757–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky L, Chandler M, Auerbach A et al (1971) Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: a review of quantitative research. Psychol Bull 75:145–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maier W, Möller H-J (2010) Meta-analyses: a method to maximise the evidence from clinical studies? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260:17–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinckrodt CH, Raskin J, Wohlreich MM et al (2004) The efficacy of duloxetine: a comprehensive summary of results from MMRM and LOCF_ANCOVA in eight clinical trials. BMC Psychiatry 4:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meisenzahl EM, Scheuerecker J, Zipse M et al (2006) Effects of treatment with the atypical neuroleptic quetiapine on working memory function: a functional MRI follow-up investigation. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 256:522–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meisenzahl EM, Schmitt G, Gründer G et al (2008) Striatal D2/D3 receptor occupancy, clinical response and side effects with amisulpride: an iodine-123-iodobenzamide SPECT study. Pharmacopsychiatry 41:169–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (1976) Methodische Grundprobleme der Psychiatrie. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (1978) Psychoanalyse – erklärende Wissenschaft oder Deutungskunst? Zur Grundlagendiskussion in der Psychowissenschaft. Fink, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (1989) Standardisierte psychiatrische Befunderhebung. In: Kisker KP, Lauter H, Meyer JE et al (Hrsg) Psychiatrie der Gegenwart, Bd 9, 3. Aufl., Brennpunkte der Psychiatrie. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokio, S 13–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (1991) Outcome criteria in antidepressant drug trials: self-rating versus observer-rating scales. Pharmacopsychiatry 24:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (1998) Probleme der Klassifkation und Diagnostik. In: Reinecker H (Hrsg) Lehrbuch der Klinischen Psychologie, Modelle psychischer Störungen, 3. Aufl., Hogrefe, Göttingen/Toronto/Zürich, S 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (2001) Methodological issues in psychiatry as an empirical science. World J Biol Psychiatry 2:38–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (2005) Problems associated with the classification and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry 6:45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (2008a) Isn’t the efficacy of antidepressants clinically relevant? A critical comment on the results of the metaanalysis by Kirsch et al 2008. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258:451–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (2008b) Do effectiveness („real world“) studies on antipsychotics tell us the real truth? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258:257–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ (2009) Development of DSM-V and ICD-11: tendencies and potential of new classifications in psychiatry at the current state of knowledge. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 63:595–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Benkert O (1980) Methoden und Probleme der Beurteilung der Effektivität psychopharmakologischer und psychologischer Therapieverfahren. In: Biefang S (Hrsg) Evaluationsforschung in der Psychiatrie. Fragestellungen und Methoden. Enke, Stuttgart, S 54–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Broich K (2010) Principle standards and problems regarding proof of efficacy in clinical psychopharmacology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260:3–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller H-J, Maier W (2010) Evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: possibilities, problems and limitations. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Kissling W, Bottermann P (1986) The dexamethasone suppression test in depressive and schizophrenic patients under controlled treatment conditions. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 235:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Blank R, Steinmeyer EM (1989) Single-case evaluation of sleep-deprivation effects by means of nonparametric time-series analysis (according to the HTAKA model). Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 239:133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Langer S, Schmauss M (2007) Escitalopram in clinical practice: results of an open-label trial in outpatients with depression in a naturalistic setting in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 40:53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Bandelow B, Bauer M et al (2015a) DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences – part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 265:5–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möller HJ, Bandelow B, Bauer M et al (2015b) DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences – part 2: bipolar disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, personality disorders, substance-related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 265:87–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mombour W (1972) Verfahren zur Standardisierung des psychopathologischen Befundes. Psychiatr Clin 5:73–120, /137–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muche R, Imhof A, SARAH-Studiengruppe (2003) Das Comprehensive Cohort Design als Alternative zur randomisierten kontrollierten Studie in der Rehabilitationsforschung: Vor- und Nachteile sowie Anwendungen in der SARAH-Studie. Rehabilitation 42:343–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GE, Carney RM, Kneserich MA et al (1995) Cognitive behavior therapy, relaxation training, and tricyclic antidepressant medication in the treatment of depression. Psychol Rep 77:403–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palm U, Möller H-J (2011) Reception of Kraepelins idea’s 1900–1960. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 65:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paykel ES (2003) Life events and affective disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 418:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann F (1977) Methodische Ansätze der Einzelfall-Analyse in der Psychotherapie-Forschung. In: Verhaltenstherapie. Kongreß-Bericht 1976. Herausgegeben von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie. Sonderheft I der „Mitteilungen der DGVT“

    Google Scholar 

  • Petermann F, Hehl FJ, Schneider W (1977) Veränderungsmessungen im Rahmen der klassischen Test-Theorie. In: Petermann F (Hrsg) Methodische Grundlagen klinischer Psychologie. Beltz, Weinheim/Basel, S 129–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogarell O, Juckel G, Norra C et al (2007) Prediction of clinical response to antidepressants in patients with depression: neurophysiology in clinical practice. Clin EEG Neurosci 38:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1969) Logik der Forschung, 3. Aufl. Mohr, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin AM (1977) Effective psychotherapy. A handbook of research. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg W, Donald A (1995) Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem solving. BMJ 310:1122–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR et al (2006) Acute and long-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 163:1905–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Gray JA et al (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt G-JE, Meisenzahl EM, Dresel S et al (2002) Striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding of risperidone in schizophrenic patients as assessed by 123-iodobenzamide SPECT: a comparative study with olanzapine. J Psychopharmacol 16:200–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seemüller F, Riedel M, Obermeier M et al (2010) Outcomes of 1014 naturalistically treated inpatients with major depressive disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 20:346–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seemüller F, Meier S, Obermeier M et al (2014) Three-year long-term outcome of 458 naturalistically treated inpatients with major depressive episode: severe relapse rates and risk factors. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 264:567–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenstücker G, Baumann U (1978) Multimethodale Diagnostik. In: Baumann U, Berbalk H, Seidenstücker G (Hrsg) Klinische Psychologie. Trends in Forschung und Praxis I. Huber, Bern/Stuttgart/Wien, S 134–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Stille G, Hippius H (1971) Kritische Stellungnahme zum Begriff der Neuroleptika (anhand von pharmakologischen und klinischen Befunden mit Clozapin). Pharmacopsychiatry 4:182–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taves DR (1974) Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther 15:443–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E et al (2008) Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 358:252–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Überla K (1973) Versuchsplanung und Statistik in Phase II und III. Arzneimittelforschung (Drug Research) 23:1192–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zerssen D (1979) Klinisch-psychiatrische Selbstbeurteilungs-Fragebögen. In: Baumann U, Berbalk H, Seidenstücker G (Hrsg) Klinische Psychologie. Trends in Forschung und Praxis. Huber, Bern, S 130–159

    Google Scholar 

  • von Zerssen D (1986) Clinical self-rating-scales (CSRF) of the Munich Psychiatric Information System (PSYHIS München). In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (Hrsg) Assessment of depression. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokio, S 270–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • von Zerssen D, Möller HJ (1980) Psychopathometrische Verfahren in der psychiatrischen Therapieforschung. In: Biefang S (Hrsg) Evaluationsforschung in der Psychiatrie: Fragestellungen und Methoden. Enke, Stuttgart, S 129–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf SH (1999) The need for perspective in evidence-based medicine. JAMA 282:2358–2365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann M, Mattia JI, Posternak MA (2002) Are subjects in pharmacological treatment trials of depression representative of patients in routine clinical practice? Am J Psychiatry 2002(159):469–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatrischen Universitätsklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Nußbaumstr. 7, 80336, München, Deutschland

    Hans-Jürgen Möller

  2. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland

    K. Broich

Authors
  1. Hans-Jürgen Möller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Broich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Jürgen Möller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum München Campus Innenstadt, München, Germany

    Hans-Jürgen Möller

  2. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatische Medizin und Neurologie, Inn-Salzach-Klinikum GmbH Fachkrankenhaus für Psychiatrie, Wasserburg, Germany

    Gerd Laux

  3. Universitätsklinikum Graz Universitätsklink für Psychiatrie, Graz, Austria

    Hans-Peter Kapfhammer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Möller, HJ., Broich, K. (2015). Prinzipien der Methodik empirischer Forschung in der Psychiatrie. In: Möller, HJ., Laux, G., Kapfhammer, HP. (eds) Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik, Psychotherapie. Springer Reference Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45028-0_18-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45028-0_18-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45028-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Medizin

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation