Skip to main content
Log in

Do effectiveness (“real world”) studies on antipsychotics tell us the real truth?

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, so-called “effectiveness studies” have gained increasing importance in the context of evidence-based medicine. These studies supposedly follow less restrictive methodological standards than phase III studies in terms of patient selection, co-medication and other design issues, and their results should therefore be better generalisable than those of phase III studies. Effectiveness studies, like other types of phase IV studies, can therefore contribute to the knowledge about antipsychotics or other psychopharmaceuticals and supply relevant information in addition to that gained from phase III trials. However, the less restrictive design and inherent methodological problems of phase IV studies mean that their results cannot falsify the results of phase III studies. The greater complexity of phase IV studies, for example the greater variance caused by the different kinds of confounders, means that their results have to be interpreted with great care and especially with a high degree of awareness of problematic design issues, such as insensitive primary outcome criteria, biased randomisation, unblinded treatment conditions, inclusion of chronic refractory patients, etc. Some recently published effectiveness studies on antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia will be discussed under these methodological aspects. The main conclusions of these trials will be questioned on the basis of their severe methodological pitfalls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Adam D, Kasper S, Möller HJ, Singer EA (2005) Placebo-controlled trials in major depression are necessary and ethically justifiable: how to improve the communication between researchers and ethical committees. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 255:258–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Awad AG, Voruganti LN (2004) New antipsychotics, compliance, quality of life, and subjective tolerability—are patients better off? Can J Psychiatry 49:297–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin D, Broich K, Fritze J, Kasper S, Westenberg H, Möller HJ (2003) Placebo-controlled studies in depression: necessary, ethical and feasible. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 253:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barak Y, Shamir E, Mirecki I, Weizman R, Aizenberg D (2004) Switching elderly chronic psychotic patients to olanzapine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7:165–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bender S, Dittmann-Balcar A, Schall U, Wolstein J, Klimke A, Riedel M, Vorbach EU, Kuhn KU, Lambert M, Dittmann RW et al (2006) Influence of atypical neuroleptics on executive functioning in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind comparison of olanzapine vs. clozapine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 9:135–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckley PF (2007) Receptor-binding profiles of antipsychotics: clinical strategies when switching between agents. J Clin Psychiatry 68(suppl 6):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buckley PF, Harvey PD, Bowie CR, Loebel A (2007) The relationship between symptomatic remission and neuropsychological improvement in schizophrenia patients switched to treatment with ziprasidone. Schizophr Res 94:99–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caley CF, Weber SS (1995) Sulpride: an antipsychotic with selective dopaminergic antagonist properties. Ann Pharmacother 29:152–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cramer JA, Rosenheck R, Xu W, Thomas J, Henderson W, Charney DS (2000) Quality of life in schizophrenia: a comparison of instruments. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on clozapine in refractory schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 26:659–666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dossenbach MR, Folnegovic-Smalc V, Hotujac L, Uglesic B, Tollefson GD, Grundy SL, Friedel P, Jakovljevic MM (2004) Double-blind, randomized comparison of olanzapine versus fluphenazine in the long-term treatment of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 28:311–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Essock SM, Covell NH, Davis SM, Stroup TS, Rosenheck RA, Lieberman JA (2006) Effectiveness of switching antipsychotic medications. Am J Psychiatry 163:2090–2095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Falkai P, Wobrock T, Lieberman J, Glenthoj B, Gattaz WF, Moller HJ (2005) World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry 6:132–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Falkai P, Wobrock T, Lieberman J, Glenthoj B, Gattaz WF, Moller HJ (2006) World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry 7:5–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Franz M, Lis S, Pluddemann K, Gallhofer B (1997) Conventional versus atypical neuroleptics: subjective quality of life in schizophrenic patients. Br J Psychiatry 170:422–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Glick ID (2006) Understanding the results of CATIE in the context of the field. CNS Spectr 11:40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hegerl U, Juckel G, Muller-Schubert A, Pietzcker A, Gaebel W (1995) Schizophrenics with small P300: a subgroup with a neurodevelopmental disturbance and a high risk for tardive dyskinesia? Acta Psychiatr Scand 91:120–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinrichs DW, Hanlon TE, Carpenter WT Jr (1984) The Quality of life scale: an instrument for rating the schizophrenic deficit syndrome. Schizophr Bull 10:388–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heres S, Davis J, Maino K, Jetzinger E, Kissling W, Leucht S (2006) Why olanzapine beats risperidone, risperidone beats quetiapine, and quetiapine beats olanzapine: an exploratory analysis of head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics. Am J Psychiatry 163:185–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hofer A, Hummer M, Huber R, Kurz M, Walch T, Fleischhacker WW (2000) Selection bias in clinical trials with antipsychotics. J Clin Psychopharmacol 20:699–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hogarty GE, Goldberg SC (1973) Drug and sociotherapy in the aftercare of schizophrenic patients. One-year relapse rates. Arch Gen Psychiatry 28:54–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hugenholtz GW, Heerdink ER, Stolker JJ, Meijer WE, Egberts AC, Nolen WA (2006) Haloperidol dose when used as active comparator in randomized controlled trials with atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia: comparison with officially recommended doses. J Clin Psychiatry 67:897–903

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones PB, Barnes TR, Davies L, Dunn G, Lloyd H, Hayhurst KP, Murray RM, Markwick A, Lewis SW (2006) Randomized controlled trial of the effect on quality of life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: cost utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1). Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1079–1087

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kane JM (2006) Commentary on the clinical antipsychotic trials of intervention effectiveness (CATIE). J Clin Psychiatry 67:831–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karow A, Naber D (2002) Subjective well-being and quality of life under atypical antipsychotic treatment. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 162:3–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kasper S, Winkler D (2006) Addressing the limitations of the CATIE study. World J Biol Psychiatry 7:126–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kupfer DJ, Sartorius N (2003) The usefulness and use of second-generation antipsychotic medication—an update. Curr Opin Psychiatry 16(suppl 1):S1–S44

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lambert M, Naber D (2004) Current issues in schizophrenia: overview of patient acceptability, functioning capacity and quality of life. CNS Drugs 18(suppl 2):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lavin MR, Rifkin A (1991) Prophylactic antiparkinson drug use: II. Withdrawal after long-term maintenance therapy. J Clin Pharmacol 31:769–777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lehman AF, Kreyenbuhl J, Buchanan RW, Dickerson FB, Dixon LB, Goldberg R, Green-Paden LD, Tenhula WN, Boerescu D, Tek C et al (2004) The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): updated treatment recommendations 2003. Schizophr Bull 30:193–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lehman AF, Lieberman JA, Dixon LB, McGlashan TH, Miller AL, Perkins DO, Kreyenbuhl J (2004) Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, 2nd edn. Am J Psychiatry 161:1–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leucht S, Pitschel-Walz G, Abraham D, Kissling W (1999) Efficacy and extrapyramidal side-effects of the new antipsychotics olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole compared to conventional antipsychotics and placebo. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Schizophr Res 35:51–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis SW, Barnes TR, Davies L, Murray RM, Dunn G, Hayhurst KP, Markwick A, Lloyd H, Jones PB (2006) Randomized controlled trial of effect of prescription of clozapine versus other second-generation antipsychotic drugs in resistant schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 32:715–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lieberman JA (2006) Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs. A commentary on: Cost Utility Of The Latest Antipsychotic Drugs In Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1) and Clinical Antipsychotic Trials Of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1069–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lieberman JA, Alvir J, Geisler S, Ramos-Lorenzi J, Woerner M, Novacenko H, Cooper T, Kane JM (1994) Methylphenidate response, psychopathology and tardive dyskinesia as predictors of relapse in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 11:107–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD et al (2005) Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 353:1209–1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lieberman JA, Tollefson G, Tohen M, Green AI, Gur RE, Kahn R, McEvoy J, Perkins D, Sharma T, Zipursky R et al (2003) Comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol. Am J Psychiatry 160:1396–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maier W, Moller HJ (2007) Meta-analyses: a tool for maximizing therapy study evidence?. Nervenarzt 78:1028–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Manos N, Lavrentiadis G, Gkiouzepas J (1986) Evaluation of the need for prophylactic antiparkinsonian medication in psychotic patients treated with neuroleptics. J Clin Psychiatry 47:114–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McCue RE, Waheed R, Urcuyo L, Orendain G, Joseph MD, Charles R, Hasan SM (2006) Comparative effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol in acute schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 189: 433–440

    Google Scholar 

  40. McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, Davis SM, Meltzer HY, Rosenheck RA, Swartz MS, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis CE et al (2006) Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment. Am J Psychiatry 163:600–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Meltzer HY, Bobo WV (2006) Interpreting the efficacy findings in the CATIE study: what clinicians should know. CNS Spectr 11:14–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller DD, McEvoy JP, Davis SM, Caroff SN, Saltz BL, Chakos MH, Swartz MS, Keefe RS, Rosenheck RA, Stroup TS et al (2005) Clinical correlates of tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia: baseline data from the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Schizophr Res 80:33–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Möller HJ (2000) Rating depressed patients: observer- vs self-assessment. Eur Psychiatry 15:160–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Möller HJ (2003) Amisulpride: limbic specificity and the mechanism of antipsychotic atypicality. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27:1101–1111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Möller HJ (2003) Plazebo-kontrollierte Studien zum Wirkungsnachweis von Antidepressiva sind notwendig! Psychopharmakotherapie 10:85–86

    Google Scholar 

  46. Möller HJ (2004) Sind placebokontrollierte Studien zum Wirksamkeitsbeweis von Antidepressiva notwendig? Nervenarzt 5:421–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Möller HJ (2005) Are the new antipsychotics no better than the classical neuroleptics? The problematic answer from the CATIE study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 255:371–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Möller HJ (2007) “Effectiveness”-Studien: methodische Mängel und negative Konsequenzen für die Versorgung. Psychopharmakotherapie 14:45–46

    Google Scholar 

  49. Möller HJ (2008) Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, possibilities, limitations and descriptions of important rating scales. World J Biol Psychiatry (in press)

  50. Moller HJ, Maier W (2007) Problems of evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: problems of evidence grading and of the evidence basis for complex clinical decision making. Nervenarzt 78:1014–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mudge MAC, Davey PJ, Coleman KA, Montgomery W, Croker VS, Mullen K, Castle DJ (2005) A comparison of olanzapine versus risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Int J Psychiatry Clin Prac 9:3–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mulert C, Juckel G, Giegling I, Pogarell O, Leicht G, Karch S, Mavrogiorgou P, Moller HJ, Hegerl U, Rujescu D (2006) A Ser9Gly polymorphism in the dopamine D3 receptor gene (DRD3) and event-related P300 potentials. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:1335–1344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Murray RM, O’Callaghan E, Castle DJ, Lewis SW (1992) A neurodevelopmental approach to the classification of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 18:319–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Murray RM, Van Os J (1998) Predictors of outcome in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 18:2S–4S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Naber D (2005) Subjective effects of antipsychotic treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 111:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Oosthuizen P, Emsley R, Jadri TH, Keyter N (2004) A randomized, controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of low and high doses of haloperidol in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7:125–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Oosthuizen PP, Emsley RA, Maritz JS, Turner JA, Keyter N (2003) Incidence of tardive dyskinesia in first-episode psychosis patients treated with low-dose haloperidol. J Clin Psychiatry 64:1075–1080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Paykel ES, Norton KRW (1986) Self-report and clinical interview in the assessment of depression. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds) Assessment of depression. Springer, New York, pp 356–366

    Google Scholar 

  59. Phillips GA, Van Brunt DL, Roychowdhury SM, Xu W, Naber D (2006) The relationship between quality of life and clinical efficacy from a randomized trial comparing olanzapine and ziprasidone. J Clin Psychiatry 67:1397–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pukrop R, Möller HJ, Steinmeyer EM (2000) Quality of life in psychiatry: a systematic contribution to construct validation and the development of the integrative assessment tool “modular system for quality of life”. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 250:120–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pukrop R, Schlaak V, Möller-Leimkühler AM, Albus M, Czernik A, Klosterkötter J, Möller HJ (2003) Reliability and validity of quality of life assessed by the Short-Form 36 and the modular system of quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and patients with depression. Psych Res 119:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Pyne JM, Sullivan G, Kaplan R, Williams DK (2003) Comparing the sensitivity of generic effectiveness measures with symptom improvement in persons with schizophrenia. Med Care 41:208–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ragins M (2005) Should the CATIE study be a wake-up call? Psychiatr Serv 56:1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rosenheck R, Perlick D, Bingham S, Liu-Mares W, Collins J, Warren S, Leslie D, Allan E, Campbell EC, Caroff S et al (2003) Effectiveness and cost of olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2693–2702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rosenheck RA (2006) Outcomes, costs, and policy caution. A commentary on: the Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1). Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:1074–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Schatzberg AF, Nemeroff CB (2000) The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychopharmacology, 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  67. Soares BG, Fenton M, Chue P (2000) Sulpiride for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD001162

  68. Soares KV, McGrath JJ (2000) Anticholinergic medication for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD000204

  69. Sramek JJ, Simpson GM, Morrison RL, Heiser JF (1986) Anticholinergic agents for prophylaxis of neuroleptic-induced dystonic reactions: a prospective study. J Clin Psychiatry 47:305–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Stern TA, Anderson WH (1979) Benztropine prophylaxis of dystonic reactions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 61:261–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Davis SM, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis CE, Severe J et al (2006) Effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia following discontinuation of a previous atypical antipsychotic. Am J Psychiatry 163:611–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Byerly MJ, Glick ID, Canive JM, McGee MF, Simpson GM, Stevens MC, Lieberman JA (2003) The National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project: schizophrenia trial design and protocol development. Schizophr Bull 29:15–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Strous RD, Kupchik M, Roitman S, Schwartz S, Gonen N, Mester R, Weizman A, Spivak B (2006) Comparison between risperidone, olanzapine, and clozapine in the management of chronic schizophrenia: a naturalistic prospective 12-week observational study. Hum Psychopharmacol 21:235–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Tandon R, Möller HJ, Belmaker RH, Gattaz WF, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Okasha A, Burrows G, Stein DJ, Olie JP, Nutt D, et al. (2008) World Psychiatric Association Pharmacopsychiatry section statement on comparative effectiveness of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res (in press)

  75. Tiihonen J, Walhbeck K, Lonnqvist J, Klaukka T, Ioannidis JP, Volavka J, Haukka J (2006) Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in a nationwide cohort of patients in community care after first hospitalisation due to schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: observational follow-up study. BMJ 333:224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tunis SL, Johnstone BM, Gibson PJ, Loosbrock DL, Dulisse BK (1999) Changes in perceived health and functioning as a cost-effectiveness measure for olanzapine versus haloperidol treatment of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 60 (suppl 19):38–45

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM (2003) Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290:1624–1632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  80. Weiden PJ (2006) Switching antipsychotics: an updated review with a focus on quetiapine. J Psychopharmacol 20:104–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Weiden PJ (2007) Discontinuing and switching antipsychotic medications: understanding the CATIE schizophrenia trial. J Clin Psychiatry 68(suppl 1):12–9

    Google Scholar 

  82. Weiden PJ, Simpson GM, Potkin SG, O’Sullivan RL (2003) Effectiveness of switching to ziprasidone for stable but symptomatic outpatients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 64:580–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Jürgen Möller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möller, HJ. Do effectiveness (“real world”) studies on antipsychotics tell us the real truth?. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosc 258, 257–270 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-008-0812-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-008-0812-0

Keywords

Navigation