Skip to main content

Wealth and Income Inequality in the Long Run of History

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cliometrics

Abstract

This article provides an overview of current knowledge about economic inequality, of both income and wealth, in the very long run of history focusing on Western Europe and North America. While most of the data provided by recent research cover the period from the late Middle Ages until today, some insights are also possible into even earlier epochs. Based on these recent findings, economic inequality seems to have been growing over centuries, with phases of clear and marked inequality reduction being relatively rare and usually associated with catastrophic events, such as the Black Death during the fifteenth century or the World Wars in the twentieth. Traditional explanations of long-term inequality growth are found to be unsatisfying, and a range of other possible causal factors are explored (demographic, social-economic, and institutional). Placing today’s situation in a very long-run perspective not only leads us to question old assumptions about the future of inequality (think of current criticism of Kuznets’s hypotheses) but also changes how we perceive inequality in the modern world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I would like to thank Peter Lindert for many helpful comments.

  2. 2.

    www.dondena.unibocconi.it/EINITE

  3. 3.

    Other recent research focused on single years when exceptional sources were available for specific areas, for example, Spain in 1759 (Nicolini and Ramos Palencia 2016) or Poland in 1578 (Malinowski and Van Zanden 2017).

  4. 4.

    For example, in the city of Bergamo in the Republic of Venice, possibly the Italian community for which we have the most complete information about the prevalence of the propertyless over time, from 1537 to 1702, the distortion to the level of the Gini index varied from a minimum of 0.006 Gini points in 1640 (from 0.715 excluding the propertyless to 0.721 including them) to a maximum of 0.03 Gini points in 1610 (from 0.723 to 0.753) (Alfani and Di Tullio 2019).

  5. 5.

    The estimate for Canada refers to the Ontario area only. Davis and Di Matteo 2018, p. 34.

  6. 6.

    For example, there is archaeological proof that among the Chumash tribe living on the shores of California, the introduction of large oceangoing plank canoes able to venture relatively far from the coast, which occurred around 500–700 CE, led to the transition from an egalitarian society of foragers to one dominated by polygamous chiefs who controlled the canoes and organized economic, as well as military and religious activities (Scheidel 2017, pp. 34–35).

  7. 7.

    This is also confirmed by comparing the available estimates of per capita GDP with the estimates of economic inequality in time: Alfani and Ryckbosch 2016; Alfani and Di Tullio 2019.

  8. 8.

    Note that until now, the only European area for which we have evidence of a correlation between early modern economic stagnation and income inequality decline is Portugal (Reis 2017).

  9. 9.

    Admittedly, Milanovic’s “optimism” only goes as far as hypothesizing that the current bout of inequality growth will one day peak, at a level lower than that reached in the early twentieth century due to the presence of “inequality stabilizers” like state pensions and unemployment benefits and will subsequently go down. That day, though, might be a long way off.

  10. 10.

    http://wid.world/data/

  11. 11.

    The number of income “brackets” used by national personal income taxes has declined dramatically since 1975: in the case of the USA, for example, from 10 in 1975 to just 3 in 2000. Messere (2003), p. 23.

  12. 12.

    Fiscal systems turned from being overall regressive and inequality enhancing to being progressive and inequality reducing at some point between the second half of the nineteenth century and the first decades of the twentieth. The exact timing is unclear because we lack specific studies of this fundamental transition.

References

  • Alfani G (2010) The effects of plague on the distribution of property: Ivrea, Northern Italy 1630. Popul Stud 64:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfani G (2015) Economic inequality in northwestern Italy: a long-term view (fourteenth to eighteenth centuries). J Econ Hist 75(4):1058–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfani G (2017) The rich in historical perspective. Evidence for preindustrial Europe (ca. 1300–1800). Cliometrica 11(3):321–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfani G, Ammannati F (2017) Long-term trends in economic inequality: the case of the Florentine State, ca. 1300–1800. Econ Hist Rev 70(4):1072–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfani G, Di Tullio M (2019) The Lion’s share. Inequality and the rise of the fiscal state in preindustrial Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfani G, Murphy T (2017) Plague and lethal epidemics in the pre-industrial world. J Econ Hist 77(1):314–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfani G, Ryckbosch W (2016) Growing apart in early modern Europe? A comparison of inequality trends in Italy and the Low Countries, 1500–1800. Explor Econ Hist 62:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvaredo F, Atkinson AB, Picketty T, Saez E (2013) The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective. J Econ Perspect 27(3):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (2004) Income tax and top incomes over the twentieth century. Hacienda Pública Española/Rev Econ Pública 168:123–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB, Piketty T, Saez E (2011) Top incomes in the long run of history. J Econ Lit 49(1):3–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson E, Missiaia A, Olsson M, Svensson P (2018) Wealth inequality in Sweden, 1750–1900. Econ Hist Rev 71(3):772–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum LE, Durlauf SN (2015) Capital in the twenty-first century: a review essay. J Polit Econ 123(4):749–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder M, Bowles S, Hertz T et al (2009) Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science 326:682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Smith EA, Borgerhoff Mulder M (2010) The emergence and persistence of inequality in premodern societies. Curr Anthropol 51(1):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner YS, Kaelble H, Thomas M (eds) (1991) Income distribution in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Canbakal J. Wealth and inequality in Ottoman Bursa, 1500–1840, paper given at the Economic History Society Annual Conference (York, 5–7 September 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Credit Suisse Research Institute (2017) Global wealth databook 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JB, Di Matteo L. Filling the gap: long run Canadian wealth inequality in international context. Research report n. 1/2018, Department of Economics, Western University (Canada)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton A (2013) The great escape: health, wealth and the origins of inequality. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (1997) Guns, germs, and steel: a short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years. Vintage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert PH (1986) Unequal English wealth since 1670. J Polit Econ 94(6):1127–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindert PH (1991) Toward a comparative history of income and wealth inequality. In: Brenner YS, Kaelble H, Thomas M. (eds.) Income distribution in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert PH (2000) Three centuries of inequality in Britain and America. In: Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution. Elsevier, London, pp 167–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindert PH (2014) Making the most of capital in the 21st century. NBER working paper no. 20232. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert PH, Williamson JG (2016) Unequal gains. American growth and inequality since 1700. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski M, Van Zanden JL (2017) Income and its distribution in preindustrial Poland. Cliometrica 11(3):375–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messere K (2003) Tax policy: theory and practice in OECD countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B (2013) The inequality possibility frontier. Extensions and new applications. Policy research working paper. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B (2016) Global inequality: a new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B (2017) Income level and income inequality in the Euro-Mediterranean region, c. 14-700. Rev Income Wealth. Online-first version. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12329

  • Milanovic B, Williamson JG, Lindert PH (2007) Measuring ancient inequality. World Bank policy research working paper no. 4412. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini EA, Ramos Palencia F (2016) Decomposing income inequality in a backward pre-industrial economy: old castile (Spain) in the middle of the 18th century. Econ Hist Rev 69(3):747–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) OECD Income inequality data update: Sweden. http://www.oecd.org/sweden/OECD-Income-Inequality-Sweden.pdf

  • Piketty T (2006) The Kuznet’s curve, yesterday, and tomorrow. In: Banerjee A, Benabou R, Mookerhee D (eds) Understanding poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 63–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T, Zucman G (2014) Capital is Back: wealth-income ratios in rich countries, 1700–2010. Q J Econ 109(3):1255–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T, Postel-Vinay G, Rosenthal JL (2006) Wealth concentration in a developing economy: Paris and France, 1807–1994. Am Econ Rev 96(1):236–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T, Postel-Vinay G, Rosenthal JL (2014) Inherited vs self-made wealth: theory and evidence from a rentier society (Paris 1872–1937). Explor Econ Hist 51:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis J (2017) Deviant behaviour? Inequality in Portugal 1565–1770. Cliometrica 11(3):297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roine J, Waldenström D (2015) Long run trends in the distribution of income and wealth. In: Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution, vol 2A. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryckbosch W (2016) Economic inequality and growth before the industrial revolution: the case of the Low Countries (fourteenth to nineteenth centuries). Eur Rev Econ Hist 20:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito O (2015) Growth and inequality in the great and little divergence debate: a Japanese perspective. Econ Hist Rev 68(2):399–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago-Caballero C (2011) Income inequality in central Spain, 1690–1800. Explor Econ Hist 48(1):83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel W (2017) The great leveller: violence and the global history of inequality from the stone age to the present. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel W, Friesen SJ (2009) The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman empire. J Roman Stud 99:61–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltow L, Van Zanden J (1998) Income and wealth inequality in the Netherlands, 16th–20th centuries. Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutch R (2016) The accumulation, inheritance, and concentration of wealth during the gilded age: an exception to Thomas Piketty’s analysis. Paper presented at the UCR Emeriti/ae Association, Orbach Science Library, University of California Riverside, February 4, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly C (1984) Demographic origins of the European proletariat. In: Levine D (ed) Proletarianization and family history. Academic, Orlando, pp 1–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel B (2016) The invisible hand? How market economies have emerged and declined since AD 500. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zanden JL (1995) Tracing the beginning of the Kuznets curve: Western Europe during the early modern period. Econ Hist Rev 48(4):643–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldenström D (2009) Lifting all boats? The evolution of income and wealth inequality over the path of development. Lund Studies in Economic History no 51, Lund University

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JG (1985) Did British capitalism breed inequality? Allen & Unwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JG, Lindert PH (1980) American inequality: a macro economic history. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wealth and Income Database (WID). https://wid.world/data/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Alfani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Alfani, G. (2019). Wealth and Income Inequality in the Long Run of History. In: Diebolt, C., Haupert, M. (eds) Handbook of Cliometrics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_29-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_29-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40458-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40458-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics