Skip to main content

Efficient Quantification of Aerodynamic Uncertainties Using Gradient-Employing Surrogate Methods

  • Chapter
Management and Minimisation of Uncertainties and Errors in Numerical Aerodynamics

Part of the book series: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design ((NNFM,volume 122))

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in aerodynamic simulations is hindered by the high computational cost of CFD models.With gradient information obtained efficiently by using an adjoint solver, gradient-employing surrogate methods are promising in speeding up the UQ process. To investigate the efficiency of UQ methods we apply gradient-enhanced radial basis functions, gradient-enhanced point-collocation polynomial chaos, gradient-enhanced Kriging and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) quadrature to a test case where the geometry of an RAE2822 airfoil is perturbed by a Gaussian random field parameterized by 10 independent variables. The four methods are compared in their efficiency in estimating some statistics and the probability distribution of the uncertain lift and drag coefficients. The results show that with the same computational effort the gradient-employing surrogate methods achieve better accuracy than the QMC does.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler, R.J., Taylor, J.E.: Random Fields and Geometry. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Babuška, I., Nobile, F., Tempone, R.: A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45, 1005–1034 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bompard, M., Peter, J., Désidéri, J.A.: Surrogate models based on function and derivative values for aerodynamic global optimization. In: V European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Lisbon, Portugal (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bratley, P., Fox, B.L., Niederreiter, H.: Programs to generate Niederreiter’s low-discrepancy sequences. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 20(4), 494–495 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brezillon, J., Dwight, R.: Discrete adjoint of the navier-stokes equations for aerodynamic shape optimization. In: EUROGEN 2005 - Sixth Conference on Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial and Societal Problems, Munich, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buhmann, M.D.: Radial basis functions. Acta Numerica 9, 1–38 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Caflisch, R.E.: Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Acta Numerica 7, 1–49 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, H.S., Alonso, J.J.: Using gradients to construct cokriging approximation models for high-dimensional design optimization problems. AIAA paper 2002–0317 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cressie, N.: Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerhold, T., Friedrich, O., Evans, J., Galle, M.: Calculation of complex three-dimensional configurations employing the DLR-TAU-Code. AIAA paper 97-0167 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giannakoglou, K.C., Papadimitriou, D.I., Kampolis, I.C.: Aerodynamic shape design using evolutionary algorithms and new gradient-assisted metamodels. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 195(44-47), 6312–6329 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Giunta, A.A., Eldred, M.S., Castro, J.P.: Uncertainty quantification using response surface approximation. In: 9th ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabolistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Han, Z.H., Görtz, S., Zimmermann, R.: Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function. Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heinrich, R., Kroll, N., Neumann, J., Nagel, B.: Fluid-structure coupling for aerodynamic analysis and design: a DLR perspective. AIAA paper 2008–561 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hosder, S., Walters, R.W., Balch, M.: Efficient sampling for non-intrusive polynomial chaos applications with multiple uncertain input variables. AIAA paper 2007–1939 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Litvinenko, A., Matthies, H.G.: Sparse data formats and efficient numerical methods for uncertainties quantification in numerical aerodynamics. In: ECCM IV: Solids, Structures and Coupled Problems in Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, D.S.: A Best Practice Guide: Efficient Quantification of Aerodynamic Uncertainties. Tech. rep., DLR, IB 124-2012/2 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matthies, H.G.: Uncertainty quantification with stochastic finite elements. In: Stein, E., de Borst, R., Hughes, T.R.J. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niederreiter, H.: Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia (1992)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ong, Y., Lum, K., Nair, P.: Hybrid evolutionary algorithm with hermite radial basis function interpolants for computationally expensive adjoint solvers. Computational Optimization and Applications 39, 97–119 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Schillings, C., Schulz, V.: On the influence of robustness measures on shape optimization with stochastic uncertainties. Tech. rep., Trierer Forschungsbericht 12-2, Universität Trier (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wiener, N.: The homogeneous chaos. Amer. J. Math. 60, 897–936 (1938)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, D., Xue, D.: A comparative study of metamodeling methods considering sample quality merits. Struc. Multidisc. Optim. (42), 923–938 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmermann, R.: Asymptotic behavior of the likelyhood function of covariance matrices of spatial gaussian processes. J. App. Math., Article ID 494070 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dishi Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, D. (2013). Efficient Quantification of Aerodynamic Uncertainties Using Gradient-Employing Surrogate Methods. In: Eisfeld, B., Barnewitz, H., Fritz, W., Thiele, F. (eds) Management and Minimisation of Uncertainties and Errors in Numerical Aerodynamics. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 122. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36185-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36185-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36184-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36185-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics