Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Destruction and Diversity: Effects of Habitat Loss on Ecological Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dispersal, Individual Movement and Spatial Ecology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNMBIOS,volume 2071))

  • 3159 Accesses

Abstract

In many parts of the world habitat is being destroyed at an alarming rate. Many major ecosystems have lost more than half of their original area, and some much more than this [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (2005); World Wildlife Fund, Insight into Europe’s Forest Protection (2001)]. At the same time biodiversity is fast declining [Butchart et al., Science 328:1164–1168, 2010]. Habitat loss is a major threat to biodiversity [Brooks et al., Conserv. Biol. 16:909–923, 2002; Baillie et al., 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: A Global Assessment (2004)], but the effects of the destruction are sometimes difficult to predict [Debinski and Holt, Conserv. Biol. 14:342–355, 2000; Prugh et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:20770–20775, 2008; Hanski, AMBIO 40:248–255, 2011], and the effect of habitat loss and fragmentation on predator–prey interactions in particular is unclear [Ryall and Fahrig, Ecology 87:1086–1093, 2006]. One reason for the lack of clarity may be that the species-occupancy patterns that underlie diversity patterns in fragmented landscapes have often been overlooked [Prugh et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:20770–20775, 2008; Ovaskainen and Hanski, Ecol. Lett. 6:903–909, 2003]. The patch-occupancy metapopulation paradigm, despite its simplicity, has proved successful in developing some understanding of how habitat destruction affects the local flora and fauna. We shall review and derive some results arising from this approach for single species, for competitive and mutualistic communities, for predator-prey systems and food chains, and finally for a simple food web, a predator interacting with two competing prey. We show that although the outcome of habitat destruction in terms of species extinctions may be straightforward for the simplest models and communities, it may be subtly parameter-dependent and counter-intuitive with even a small increase in complexity. Progress towards a theory for more complex food webs [Leibold et al., Ecol. Lett. 7:601–613, 2004; Leibold and Miller, From metapopulations to metacommunities (2004); Pillai et al., Theor. Ecol. 3:223–237, 2010] will be difficult until we have a thorough understanding of these basic building blocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. W.C. Allee, Animal Aggregations: A Study in General Sociology (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1931)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Amarasekare, Spatial dynamics of foodwebs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 479–500 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Baillie, C. Hilton-Taylor, S.N. Stuart, 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: A Global Assessment (International Union for Conservation of Nature, Cambridge, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bascompte, R.V. Solé, Effects of habitat destruction in a prey–predator metapopulation model. J. Theor. Biol. 195, 383–393 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N.F. Britton, N.R. Franks, G.P. Boswell, Dispersal and conservation in heterogeneous landscapes, in Insect Movement: Mechanisms and Consequences, ed. by I.P. Woiwod, D.R. Reynolds, C.D. Thomas (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 2001), pp. 299–320

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.M. Brooks et al., Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 16, 909–923 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.H.M. Butchart et al., Global biodiversity: indicators of recent decline. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Calcagno, N. Mouquet, P. Jarne, P. David, Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition–colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecol. Lett. 9, 897–907 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Calcagno, F. Massol, N. Mouquet, P. Jarne, P. David, Constraints on food chain length arising from regional metacommunity dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3042–3049 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L.-L. Chen, Z.-S. Lin, The effect of habitat destruction on metapopulations with an Allee-like effect: a study case of Yancheng in Jiangsu Province, China. Ecol. Model. 213, 356–364 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.H. Connell, Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.L. DeAngelis, Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs (Chapman and Hall, London, 1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. D.M. Debinski, R.D. Holt, A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol. 14, 342–355 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F.A.S. Dos Santos, M.I.S. Costa, A correct formulation for a spatially implicit predator–prey metacommunity model. Math. Biosci. 223, 79–82 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M.A. Fortuna, J. Bascompte, Habitat loss and the structure of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Ecol. Lett. 9, 281–286 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Gravel, N. Mouquet, M. Loreau, F. Guichard, Patch dynamics, persistence, and species coexistence in metaecosystems. Am. Nat. 176, 289–302 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Gravel, E. Canard, F. Guichard, N. Mouquet, Persistence increases with diversity and connectance in trophic metacommunities. PLoS ONE 6(5), e19374 (2011). doi:10:1371/journal.pone.0019374

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Hanski, Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology 64, 493–500 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. I. Hanski, Metapopulation Ecology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Hanski, Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. AMBIO 40, 248–255 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (eds.), Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations (Elsevier Academic, San Diego, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin, Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution (Academic, San Diego, 1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Hansson, L. Fahrig, G. Merriam (eds.), Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes (Springer, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Hastings, Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18, 363–373 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Hastings, Population dynamics in patchy environments, in Modeling and Differential Equations in Biology, ed. by T.A. Burton (Dekker, New York, 1980), pp. 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.D. Holt, Consequences of spatial heterogeneity, in Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, ed. by I. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin (Academic, San Diego, 1997), pp. 149–164

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Holyoak, M.A. Leibold, R.D. Holt (eds.), Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. C.B. Huffaker, Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Kareiva, V. Wennergren, Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population process. Nature 373, 299–302 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C.A. Klausmeier, Extinction in multispecies and spatially explicit models of habitat destruction. Am. Nat. 152, 303–310 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C.A. Klausmeier, Habitat destruction and extinction in competitive and mutualistic communities. Ecol. Lett. 4, 57–63 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M.J. Labrum, Allee effects and extinction debt. Ecol. Model. 222, 1205–1207 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Lande, Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. Am. Nat. 130, 624–635 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M.A. Leibold, T.E. Miller, From metapopulations to metacommunities, in Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations, ed. by I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (Elsevier Academic, San Diego, 2004), pp. 133–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. M.A. Leibold et al., The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601–613 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. R. Levins, Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237–240 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Levins, D. Culver, Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68, 1246–1248 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Loreau, Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104, 606–611 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R.H. MacArthur, E.O. Wilson, The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  40. A.E. Magurran, Ecological Diversity and its Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. R.M. May, The effects of spatial scale on ecological questions and answers, in Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology, ed. by P.J. Edwards, R.M. May, N.R. Webb (Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford, 1994), pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  42. C.J. Melian, J. Bascompte, Food web structure and habitat loss. Ecol. Lett. 5, 37–46 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Morozov, B.-L. Li, Abundance patterns in multi-species communities exposed to habitat destruction. J. Theor. Biol. 251, 593–605 (2008); 253, 628 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. N. Mouquet, M. Loreau, Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat. 159, 420–426 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. N. Mouquet, B. Matthiessen, T. Miller, A. Gonzalez, Extinction debt in source–sink metacommunities. PLoS One 6(3), e17567 (2011). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017567

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Nee, R.M. May, Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Nee, R.M. May, M.P. Hassell, Two-species metapopulation models, in Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, ed. by I. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin (Academic, San Diego, 1997), pp. 123–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. R.M. Nisbet, W.S.C. Gurney, Modelling Fluctuating Populations (Wiley, Chichester, 1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski, The species–area relationship derived from species-specific incidence functions. Ecol. Lett. 6, 903–909 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski, Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented habitats, in Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations, ed. by I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (Elsevier Academic, San Diego, 2004), pp. 73–103

    Google Scholar 

  52. R.T. Paine, S.A. Levin, Intertidal landscapes: disturbances and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 51, 145–178 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. E.C. Pielou, Ecological Diversity (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. Pillai, M. Loreau, A. Gonzalez, A patch-dynamic framework for food web metacommunities. Theor. Ecol. 3, 223–237 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. S. Prakash, A.M. de Roos, Habitat destruction in a simple predator–prey patch model: how predators enhance prey persistence and abundance. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 153–163 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. S. Prakash, A.M. de Roos, Habitat destruction in mutualistic metacommunities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 153–163 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. L.R. Prugh, K.E. Hodges, A.R.E. Sinclair, J.S. Brashares, Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20770–20775 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. K.L. Ryall, L. Fahrig, Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87, 1086–1093 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. M. Slatkin, Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology 55, 128–134 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. R.K. Swihart, Z. Feng, N.A. Slade, D.M. Mason, T.M. Gehring, Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator–prey metapopulation model. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 287–303 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. D. Tilman, Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75, 2–16 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. D. Tilman, R.M. May, C.L. Lehman, M.A. Nowak, Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. D.S. Wilson, Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology 73, 1984–2000 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. World Wildlife Fund, Insight into Europe’s Forest Protection (WWF, Gland, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  65. D.W. Yu, H.B. Wilson, The competition–colonization trade-off is dead: long live the competition–colonization trade-off. Am. Nat. 158, 49–63 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. S.-R. Zhou, C.-Z. Liu, G. Wang, The competitive dynamics of metapopulations subject to the Allee-like effect. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 29–37 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematical Sciences and Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK

    Nick F. Britton

Authors
  1. Nick F. Britton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick F. Britton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Mathematical & Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Central Academic Building 632, Edmonton, T6G 2G1, Alberta, Canada

    Mark A. Lewis

  2. Mathematical Institute, Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Oxford, St. Giles Street 24-29, Oxford, OX1 3LB, United Kingdom

    Philip K. Maini

  3. Department of Mathematics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom

    Sergei V. Petrovskii

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Britton, N.F. (2013). Destruction and Diversity: Effects of Habitat Loss on Ecological Communities. In: Lewis, M., Maini, P., Petrovskii, S. (eds) Dispersal, Individual Movement and Spatial Ecology. Lecture Notes in Mathematics(), vol 2071. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35497-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation