Skip to main content

Separating the Helix from the Antihelix: A New Concept in Prominent Ear Correction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty

Abstract

Surgery to correct protruding ears began in 1845, and to date hundreds of techniques and ideas have been published. Each one has qualities and faults that sometimes do not allow a perfect or excellent result. The author has developed a technique that uses the qualities and eliminates the defects of the modified Mustardé and Converse techniques. The techniques entirely eliminates the need to weaken the cartilage in the various ways already described, recently including the laser. The incision position is exactly where it should be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valente ASC. Separating the helix from the antihelix. A new concept in prominent ear correction. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(2):139–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dieffenbach JE. Die operative Chirurgie. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhause; 1845.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ely ET. An operation for prominent auricles. Arch Otolaryngol. 1881;10:97–9 (reprinted Rogers BO. Ely’s 1881 operation for correction of protruding ears. A medical “first”. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(6):582–6).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morestin MH. De la reposition et du plissement cosmetiques du pavillon de l’oreille. Rev Orthop. 1903;4:289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luckett WH. A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1910;10:635–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker OJ. Correction of protruding deformed ear. Br J Plast Surg. 1952;5(3):187–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Converse JM, Nigro A, Wilson FA, Johnson NA. Technique for surgical correction of lop ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1955;15(5):411–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;31:118–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibson T, Davis W. The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg. 1958;10:257–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mustardé JC. The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:170–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stenstrom SJ. A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;32:509–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chongchet V. A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:268–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crikelair GF, Cosman B. Another solution for the problem of the prominent ear. Ann Surg. 1964;160:314–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordzell B. Open otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(7):1466–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caouette-Laberge L, Guay N, Bortoluzzi P, Belleville C. Otoplasty: anterior scoring technique and results in 500 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(2):504–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brent B. Hydrodissection as key to a natural-appearing otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(4):1055–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Webster GV. The tail of the helix as a key to otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;44(5):455–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beernink JH, Blocksma R, Moore D. The role of the helical tail in cosmetic otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64(1):115–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):189–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McDowell AJ. Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41(1):17–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. LaTrenta GS. Otoplasty. In: Rees TD, LaTrenta GS, editors. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994. p. 891–921.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA. Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(4):60e–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augusto Sette Câmara Valente M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valente, A.S.C. (2013). Separating the Helix from the Antihelix: A New Concept in Prominent Ear Correction. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35430-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35431-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics