Abstract
Posterior lumbar spine surgery uses various access routes (midline, lateral, far-lateral paracoccygeal) and can employ classic open, mini-open (microscopic or video assisted) or percutaneous access techniques. Decompression operations can be performed by using these access methods, and there are various possibilities of instrumentation as can various forms of instrumentation. The implants are divided into the following groups: rigid systems (internal fixator systems such as rod-screw or screw-plate systems, screws, pedicle screw-hook systems, cages and spacers for interbody fusion); different dynamic or semirigid systems; and so-called nonfusion systems (pedicle-based systems, interspinous spacers, facet replacements). The following are types of posterior stabilisation systems available: tulip screw–type systems, side-loading systems and plate systems. For the interbody fusion, there are cages in titanium as well as in PEEK on the market. Also, there are implants for the motion preservation available. The spectrum of those implants rises from dynamic pedicle screw systems, interspinous spacers and facet replacement implants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- TFSR:
-
Translaminar facet screw
- TLPF:
-
Translaminar Pin Fixation
References
Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ et al (2008) Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiological experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:225–230
Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:432–437
Cui Y, Lewis G, Qi G (2002) Numerical analysis of models of standard TSRH spinal instrumentation: effect of rod cross-sectional shape. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5:75–80
Dick W (1989) Intercorporelle spondylodese L4/L5 und L5/S1. Oper Orthop Traumatol 1:43–47
Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. J Neurosurg 3:301–307
Gillet P, Petit M (1999) Direct repair of spondylolisis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine 24:1252–1256
Grevitt MP, Gardner AD, Spilsbury J et al (1995) The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients. Eur Spine J 4:169–175
Grob D, Benini A, Junge A et al (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine. Surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30:324–331
Kluger P (1989) Das Fixateurprinzip an der Wirbelsäule. In: Stuhler T (ed) Fixateur externe – Fixateur interne. Springer, Berlin
Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S et al (2009) Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segmental degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J 18:830–840
Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P et al (2003) The effect of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 28:2192–2197
Morscher E, Gerber B, Fasel J (1984) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:175–178
Ray CD (2002) The PDN prosthetic disc-nucleus device. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S137–S142
Roh SW, Kim DH, Cardoso AC et al (2000) Endoscopic foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens. Spine 25:260–264
Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (1999) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170–S178
Vialle R, Harding I, Charosky D et al (2007) The paraspinal splitting approach: a possible approach to perform multiple intercosto-lumbar neurotisations: an anatomic study. Spine 32:631–634
Newman EW (2007) Lateral intramuscular planar approach to the lumbar spine and sacrum. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 7:270–273
Whitesides TE Jr (2003) The effect of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine 28:1906–1907
Wilke HJ, Magerl F, Nelter S, et al. (2000) Biomechanical in vitro comparison of translaminar pins versus translaminar screws for instrumentation of spinal segments. Poster, Eurospine
Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH et al (1968) The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:919–926
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vieweg, U. (2012). Overview of Surgical Techniques and Implants. In: Vieweg, U., Grochulla, F. (eds) Manual of Spine Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22682-3_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22682-3_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22681-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22682-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)