Skip to main content

Overview of Surgical Techniques and Implants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Manual of Spine Surgery
  • 3986 Accesses

Abstract

Posterior lumbar spine surgery uses various access routes (midline, lateral, far-lateral paracoccygeal) and can employ classic open, mini-open (microscopic or video assisted) or percutaneous access techniques. Decompression operations can be performed by using these access methods, and there are various possibilities of instrumentation as can various forms of instrumentation. The implants are divided into the following groups: rigid systems (internal fixator systems such as rod-screw or screw-plate systems, screws, pedicle screw-hook systems, cages and spacers for interbody fusion); different dynamic or semirigid systems; and so-called nonfusion systems (pedicle-based systems, interspinous spacers, facet replacements). The following are types of posterior stabilisation systems available: tulip screw–type systems, side-loading systems and plate systems. For the interbody fusion, there are cages in titanium as well as in PEEK on the market. Also, there are implants for the motion preservation available. The spectrum of those implants rises from dynamic pedicle screw systems, interspinous spacers and facet replacement implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

TFSR:

Translaminar facet screw

TLPF:

Translaminar Pin Fixation

References

  1. Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ et al (2008) Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiological experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:225–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:432–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cui Y, Lewis G, Qi G (2002) Numerical analysis of models of standard TSRH spinal instrumentation: effect of rod cross-sectional shape. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 5:75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dick W (1989) Intercorporelle spondylodese L4/L5 und L5/S1. Oper Orthop Traumatol 1:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. J Neurosurg 3:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gillet P, Petit M (1999) Direct repair of spondylolisis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine 24:1252–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grevitt MP, Gardner AD, Spilsbury J et al (1995) The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients. Eur Spine J 4:169–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A et al (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine. Surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kluger P (1989) Das Fixateurprinzip an der Wirbelsäule. In: Stuhler T (ed) Fixateur externe – Fixateur interne. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S et al (2009) Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segmental degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J 18:830–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P et al (2003) The effect of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine 28:2192–2197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morscher E, Gerber B, Fasel J (1984) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:175–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray CD (2002) The PDN prosthetic disc-nucleus device. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S137–S142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roh SW, Kim DH, Cardoso AC et al (2000) Endoscopic foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens. Spine 25:260–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (1999) The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170–S178

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vialle R, Harding I, Charosky D et al (2007) The paraspinal splitting approach: a possible approach to perform multiple intercosto-lumbar neurotisations: an anatomic study. Spine 32:631–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Newman EW (2007) Lateral intramuscular planar approach to the lumbar spine and sacrum. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 7:270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Whitesides TE Jr (2003) The effect of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine 28:1906–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilke HJ, Magerl F, Nelter S, et al. (2000) Biomechanical in vitro comparison of translaminar pins versus translaminar screws for instrumentation of spinal segments. Poster, Eurospine

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH et al (1968) The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:919–926

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Vieweg M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vieweg, U. (2012). Overview of Surgical Techniques and Implants. In: Vieweg, U., Grochulla, F. (eds) Manual of Spine Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22682-3_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22682-3_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22681-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22682-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics