Skip to main content

Organization Characteristics in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation
  • 4901 Accesses

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is the principal technology that justifies admission of critically ill patients in intensive care units (children (www.picanet.org.uk) as well as adults (Metnitz et al. 2009)). In a recent survey conducted in France in 2002 by the French Ministry of Health that included 40 intensive care units for children (30 caring for neonates and children (N-PICUs), 10 caring only for children older than 1 month (PICUs)), and 24 units completed the item “mechanical ventilation” for a total of 14,147 admissions. In total, 47 % of patients were mechanically ventilated (30 % with a duration of more than 48 h) (Table 1.1. data not published). This percentage is close to the 40–45 % reported in the Netherlands (Dahlem et al. 2003; Kneyber et al. 2008) and 49 % in Italy (Wolfler et al. 2010) and higher than that recently reported in 16 US pediatric ICUs (30 %; range 20–64 %) (Khemani et al. 2009), but lower than the 73 % reported in the UK for 2008 (www.picanet.org.uk). Also, respiratory diseases or dysfunction represent the most frequent cause of ICU admission either for neonates (Janota et al. 2008) or children (Johnston et al. 2004; Leteurtre et al. 2003). In a recent report of 51,386 children with organ dysfunction, respiratory dysfunction was the strongest predictor of death and was associated with a greater than 5-fold increase in length of stay and a 25-fold increase in total charges (Johnston et al. 2004). Finally, number of ventilation-free days is utilized as an outcome measure in clinical trials assuming that the decrease in duration of ventilation benefits the patient and reduces treatment costs (Curley and Zimmerman 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albuali WH, Singh RN, Fraser DD, Seabrook JA, Kavanagh BP et al (2007) Have changes in ventilation practice improved outcome in children with acute lung injury? Pediatr Crit Care Med 8:324–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman TE, Marks NE, Rimensberger PC (2008) Factors effecting adoption of new neonatal and pediatric respiratory technologies. Intensive Care Med 34:174–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bigham MT, Amato R, Bondurrant P, Fridriksson J, Krawczeski CD et al (2009) Ventilator-associated pneumonia in the pediatric intensive care unit: characterizing the problem and implementing a sustainable solution. J Pediatr 154(582–7):e2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B et al (2007) Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 29:1033–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calderini E, Chidini G, Pelosi P (2010) What are the current indications for noninvasive ventilation in children? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 23:368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curley MA, Zimmerman JJ (2005) Alternative outcome measures for pediatric clinical sepsis trials. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6 (Suppl): S150–S156

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlem P, van Aalderen WM, Hamaker ME, Dijkgraaf MG, Bos AP (2003) Incidence and short-term outcome of acute lung injury in mechanically ventilated children. Eur Respir J 22:980–985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dauger S, Durand P, Javouhey E (2005) Particularités pédiatriques de la prise en charge ventilatoire du syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë de l’enfant (nouveau-né exclu). Réanimation 14:400–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange S, Van Aken H, Burchardi H (2002) European Society of Intensive Care Medicine statement: intensive care medicine in Europe–structure, organisation and training guidelines of the Multidisciplinary Joint Committee of Intensive Care Medicine (MJCICM) of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Intensive Care Med 28:1505–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubos F, Vanderborght M, Puybasset-Joncquez AL, Grandbastien B, Leclerc F (2007) Can we apply the European surveillance program of nosocomial infections (HELICS) to pediatric intensive care units? Intensive Care Med 33:1972–1977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand P, Devictor D (2001) Particularités du sevrage de la ventilation mécanique chez l’enfant (nouveau-nés exclus). Réanimation 10:757–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essouri S, Chevret L, Durand P, Haas V, Fauroux B, Devictor D (2006) Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: five years of experience in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 7:329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farias JA, Frutos F, Esteban A, Flores JC, Retta A et al (2004) What is the daily practice of mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units? A multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 30:918–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harel Y, Niranjan V, Evans BJ (1998) The current practice patterns of mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure in pediatric patients. Heart Lung 27:238–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janota J, Simak J, Stranak Z, Matthews T, Clarke T, Corcoran D (2008) Critically ill newborns with multiple organ dysfunction: assessment by NEOMOD score in a tertiary NICU. Ir J Med Sci 177:11–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JA, Yi MS, Britto MT, Mrus JM (2004) Importance of organ dysfunction in determining hospital outcomes in children. J Pediatr 144:595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khemani RG, Markovitz BP, Curley MA (2009) Characteristics of intubated and mechanically ventilated children in 16 pediatric ICUs. Chest 136(3):765–771

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kissoon N, Rimensberger PC, Bohn D (2008) Ventilation strategies and adjunctive therapy in severe lung disease. Pediatr Clin North Am 55:709–733, xii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kneyber MC, Brouwers AG, Caris JA, Chedamni S, Plotz FB (2008) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: is it underrecognized in the pediatric intensive care unit? Intensive Care Med 34:751–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc F (2000) Monitorage et alarmes ventilatoires des nourrissons ventilés artificiellement pour une bronchiolite aiguë. Réanimation Urgences 9:471–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc F, Nève V (2000) Analyse des données graphiques chez l’enfant en ventilation mécanique. Réanimation Urgences 9:473–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc F, Noizet O, Botte A, Binoche A, Chaari W et al (2010) Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation in pediatric patients (excluding premature neonates). Arch Pediatr 17:399–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leteurtre S, Martinot A, Duhamel A, Proulx F, Grandbastien B et al (2003) Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet 362:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marraro GA (2005) Protective lung strategies during artificial ventilation in children. Paediatr Anaesth 15:630–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayordomo-Colunga J, Medina A, Rey C, Diaz JJ, Concha A et al (2009) Predictive factors of non invasive ventilation failure in critically ill children: a prospective epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med 35:527–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayordomo-Colunga J, Medina A, Rey C, Concha A, Menendez S et al (2010) Non invasive ventilation after extubation in paediatric patients: a preliminary study. BMC Pediatr 10:29

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metnitz PG, Metnitz B, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Del Sorbo L et al (2009) Epidemiology of mechanical ventilation: analysis of the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med 35:816–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Bonet JI, Flor-Macian EM, Brines J, Rosello-Millet PM, Cruz Llopis M et al (2010) Predictive factors for the outcome of noninvasive ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11:675–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noizet-Yverneau O, Leclerc F, Bednarek N, Santerne B, Akhavi A et al (2010) Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in paediatric intensive care units: which indications in 2010? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 29:227–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piastra M, De Luca D, Pietrini D, Pulitano S, D’Arrigo S et al (2009) Noninvasive pressure-support ventilation in immunocompromised children with ARDS: a feasibility study. Intensive Care Med 35:1420–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richard JCM, Girault C, Leteurtre S, Leclerc F (2005) Prise en charge ventilatoire du syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë de l’adulte et de l’enfant (nouveau-né exclu) – recommandations d’experts de la Société de réanimation de langue française. Réanimation 14:IN2–IN12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salyer JW, Chatburn RL (1990) Patterns of practice in neonatal and pediatric respiratory care. Respir Care 35:879–888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santschi M, Jouvet P, Leclerc F, Gauvin F, Newth CJ et al (2010) Acute lung injury in children: therapeutic practice and feasibility of international clinical trials. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11:681–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz MJ (2008) Lung-protective mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes in patients not suffering from acute lung injury: a review of clinical studies. Med Sci Monit 14:RA22–RA26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrani FT, Roum JH (2008) Intelligent decision support systems for mechanical ventilation. Artif Intell Med 44:171–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfler A, Calderini E, Ottonello G, Conti G, Baroncini S et al (2011) Daily practice of mechanical ventilation in Italian pediatric intensive care units: a prospective survey. Pediatr Crit Care Med 12(2):141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormald R, Naude A, Rowley H (2009) Non-invasive ventilation in children with upper airway obstruction. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 73:551–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Leclerc MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leclerc, F. (2015). Organization Characteristics in Europe. In: Rimensberger, P. (eds) Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01218-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01219-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics