Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wirkung innovativer Onlinewerbung

Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Befunde

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Werbeforschung

Abstract

Für diesen Beitrag wurden 27 Werbewirkungsstudien der vergangenen Jahre zu suchwortrelevanter Werbung, viraler Werbung, User Generated Ads und electronic Word of Mouth gesichtet, um einen Einblick in die aktuelle Theoriebildung und zentrale empirische Befunde zu diesen Online-Werbeformen geben zu können. Die theoretische Anbindung der Studien erscheint auf den ersten Blick gering. Insgesamt leiten gerade einmal fünf Studien ihre Hypothesen dezidiert aus Werbewirkungsmodellen ab. Bei näherer Betrachtung finden sich immerhin implizit theoretische Konzepte, die die Grundlage für die jeweilige Wirkungsstudie legen. Hierzu gehören zum großen Teil die »üblichen Verdächtigen« wie das ELM mit allen Spielarten des Involvements sowie allgemeine psychologische Theorien zu Informationsverarbeitungsprozessen. Dieser Teil der Forschung überträgt oft recht mechanisch traditionelle Werbewirkungsmodelle auf die Onlinewelt. Sozialpsychologische und soziologische Grundlegungen, die die Besonderheiten moderner vernetzter Online(werbe)kommunikation ergänzend beschreiben und erklären können, tauchen erst in jüngster Zeit in der Forschung auf und warten noch auf empirische Überprüfung. Ein anderer Teil der Forschung formuliert gerne eigene Totalmodelle und »neue« Theorien, die von der Forschungsgemeinschaft dann aber weitgehend ignoriert werden. Diese geringe gegenseitige Bezugnahme der Forschung zu neuen Werbephänomenen ist erstaunlich und trägt zu einer eher schleppenden Theorieentwicklung in der Werbewirkungsforschung bei.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • 360i (2009). The State of Search. A 360i White Paper. http://www.360i.com/pdf/360i-State-Of-Search-White-Paper.pdf

  • Allsop, D. T., Bassett, B. R., & Hoskins, J. A. (2007). Word-Of-Mouth Research: Principles and Applications. Journal of Advertising Research 47(4), 398–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettlof, L., & Costopulos, N. (2006). Consumers Like Companies That Let Them Create Ads, But Young Adults Still Not Buying It. o.O: American Marketing Associaton.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARD-ZDF-Onlinestudie (2011). Online abgerufen am 20. 05. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1967). Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. Journal of Marketing Research 4 (3), 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (2011). Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information. Psychological Science 22(7) , 891–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral ? Journal of Marketing Research 49(2), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthon P., Pitt, L., & Campbell, C. (2008). Ad Lib: When Customers Create the Ad. California Management Review 50(4), 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binggeser, E., Hammon, L., Hampel, S., & Hippner, H. (2011). Welche Emotionen beeinflussen Konsumenten bei der Weiterleitung viraler Videospots ? In Deutscher Dialogmarketing Verband e. V. (Hrsg.), Dialogmarketing Perspektiven 2010/2011 (S. 71–86). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. (2007). Customer-Generated Advertisements. Social Media Marketing Symposium. Kellogg School of Management: Media Management Center. http://www.mediamanagementcenter.org/social/whitepapers/BISHOP.pdf

  • Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving: An Introduction and Cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. R., Bhadury, R. K., & Pope, N. K. Ll., (2010). The Impact of Comedic Violence on Viral Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 39(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., Pitt, L. E., Parent, M. & Berthon, P. R. (2011). Understanding Consumer Conversations Around Ads in a Web 2.0 World. Journal of Advertising 40(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness, Journal of Marketing 64, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, H. J., & Morrison, M. A. (2008). Consumer’s Reliance on Product Information and Recommendations Found in UGC. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8(2), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. K. M., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research 18(3), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, H. C., Hsieh, Y. C., Kao, Y. H., & Lee, M. (2007). The Determinants of Email Receivers’ Disseminating Behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research 47(4), 524–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., & Cheon, H. J. (2004). Why Do People Avoid Advertising on the Internet ? Journal of Advertising 33(4), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., & Khang, H. K. (2006). The State of Internet-Related Research in Communications, Marketing, and Advertising: 1994–2003. Journal of Advertising 35(3), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulides, G., Jevons, C., & Bonhomme, J. (2012). Memo to Marketers : Quantitative Evidence for Change. How User-Created Content Really Affects Brands. Journal of Advertising Research 52(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. C. (2011). Viral Advertising in Social Media: Participation in Facebook Groups and Responses among College-Aged Users. Journal of Interactive Advertising 12(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Hrsg.), Handbook of Creativity (S. 313–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, T., Eastin, M. S., & L. Bright (2008). Exploring Consumer Motivations for Creating User-Generated-Content. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8(2), 16‐25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2009). How Consumers Evaluate eWOM (Electronic Word-of-Mouth) Messages. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 12(2), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckler, P., & Bolls, P. (2011). Spreading the Virus: Emotional Tone of Viral Advertising and its Effects on Forwarding Intentions and Attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising 11(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertimur, B., & Gilly, M. C. (2012). So Whaddya Think ? Consumers Create Ads and Other Consumers Critique Them. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26(3), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, M. T. (2009). Integrated Marketing Communications Measurement and Evaluation. Journal of Marketing Communications 15(2/3), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, G. J., & Zaidner, L. (2008). Creative Strategies in Viral Advertising: An Application of Taylor’s Six-Segment Message Strategy Wheel. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 959–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, L. (2008). Online Advertising Research in Advertising Journals: A Review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 30(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic Word-of Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Plattforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. Y. C., & Dempsey, M. (2010). Viral Marketing: Motivations for Forward Online Content. Journal of Business Research 63(9-10), 1000–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, K. H., & Li, S. Y. (2007). The Influence of eWOM on Virtual Consumer Communities: Social Capital, Consumer Learning, and Behavioral Outcomes. Journal of Advertising Research 47(4), 485–495,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, J., & Holdgaard Skov, P. (2009). User Created Ads in Viral Marketing. http://pure.au.dk/portal-asb-student/files/8617/MASTER_THESIS_USER_CREATED_ADS_IN_VIRAL_MARKETING.PDF

  • Jansen B. J., Hudson, K., Hunter, L., Liu, F., & Murphy J. (2008). The Google Online Marketing Challenge: Classroom Learning with Real Clients, Real Money, and Real Advertising Campaigns. Journal of Interactive Advertising 9(1), 49‐55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J., & Resnick, M. (2006). An Examination of Searcher’s Perceptions of Nonsponsored and Sponsored Links During Ecommerce Web Searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(14), 1949–1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurvetson, S. & Draper, T. (1997). Viral Marketing: Viral Marketing phenomenon explained. Draper Fisher Jurvetson. http://www.dfj.com/news/article_26.shtml

  • Kalyanaraman, S., & Ivory, J. D. (2009). Enhanced Information Scent, Selective Discounting, or Consummate Breakdown: The Psychological Effects of Web-Based Search Results. Media Psychology 12(3), 295–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaumanns, R., & Siegenheim, V. (2008). Googles Ambitionen für ein crossmediales Werbenetzwerk. Von der Suchmaschine zum Werbekonzern. Media Perspektiven 1, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & McMillan, S. J. (2008). Evaluation of Internet Advertising Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Citations from Key Sources. Journal of Advertising 37(1), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2010). Relevance to the Rescue: Can » Smart Ads « Reduce Negative Response to Online Ad Clutter ? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 87(2), 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppelmann, U., & Groeger, L. (2009). Virale Informationsverarbeitung – Mit System den Faktor Zufall minimieren. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 26(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, S., & Dou, W. (2008). Note From Special Issue Editors: Advertising with User-Generated Content: A Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising 8(2), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2000). The Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing, Journal of Communication 50(1), 46–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B., Founier, S., & Brunel, F. (2010). Consuming the Consumer-Generated Ad (Arbeitspapier 2009-9). Boston University School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Rodgers, S., & Kim, M. (2009). Effects of Valence and Extremity of eWOM on Attitude toward the Brand and Website. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 31(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Zhang, L. (2011). Online Persuasion: How the Written Word Drives WOM. Evidence from Consumer-Generated Product Reviews. Journal of Advertising Research 51(1), 239–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F. H., & Hung, Y. F. (2009). The Value of an Attitude Towards Sponsored Links for Internet Information Searchers. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 10(4), 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, G., Schulz, S., & Silberer, G. (2008). Determinanten des Weiterempfehlens im viralen Marketing. Transfer Werbeforschung & Praxis. 53(2), 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meißner, S. (2008). Personalisierter Massenkonsum und das Internet. In D. Schrage & R. M. Friederici (Hrsg.), Methodenpluralismus und Datenhandel. Zur Soziologie der kommerziellen Konsumforschung. (S. 143–166), Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K., & Döring, K. (2008). Modelle und Evaluation der Werbewirkung. In B. Batinic & M. Appel (Hrsg.), Medienpsychologie (S. 241–268). Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz, A. M. J., & Schau, H. J. (2007). Vigilante Marketing and Consumer-Created Communications. Journal of Advertising 36(3), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, C. (2008). Internet und Journalismusforschung. Theoretische Neujustierung und Forschungsagenda. In T. Quandt & W. Schweiger (Hrsg.), Journalismus online: Partizipation oder Profession ? (S. 17–42). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, C. (2009). Internet, Journalismus und Öffentlichkeit. Analyse des Medienumbruchs. In C. Neuberger, C. Nuernbergk & M. Rischke (Hrsg.), Journalismus im Internet (S. 19–105), Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen Company (2011). Handel – Verbraucher – Werbung. Deutschland 2011. http://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/de/Deutsch/downloads/2011/Nielsen-D2011-internet.pdf

  • Online-Vermarkterkreis (2012). OVK Online-Report 2012/01. Zahlen und Trends im Überblick. http://www.ovk.de/fileadmin/downloads/ovk/ovk-report/OVK_Report2012_1_Web.pdf

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). Participative Web: User Generated Content (Working Party on the Information Economy). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/38393115.pdf

  • Palka, W; Pousttchi, K., & Wiedemann, D.G (2009). Mobile Word-Of-Mouth – A Grounded Theory of Mobile Viral Marketing. Journal of Information Technology 24, 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral Marketing or Electronic Word-of-Mouth Advertising: Examining Consumer Responses and Motivations to Pass Along Email. Journal of Advertising Research 44, 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. T. (2007). Word of Mouth – A New Advertising Discipline ? Journal of Advertising Research 47 (4), 385–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L., & Golan, G. J. (2006). From Subservient Chickens to Brawny Men: A Comparison of Viral Advertising to Television Advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising 6, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, G., & Ko, D. (2010). Online Word of Mouth and Consumer Purchase Intentions. International Journal of Advertising 29(5), 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, S. D. (2007). Lessons from Online Practice: New Advertising Models. Journal of Advertising Research 47(2), 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegner, C. (2007). Word of Mouth on the Web: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Consumer Purchase Decisions. Journal of Advertising Research 47(4), 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romaniuk, J. (2012). The Various Words of Mouth. Moving Beyond the » Road-to-Damascus « Conversion. Journal of Advertising Research 52(1),12–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, G. (2010). Online-Kommunikation und Werbung. In W. Schweiger & K. Beck (Hrsg.), Handbuch Online-Kommunikation (S. 434–460). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. (2008). User Generated Conent: Five Benefits of Getting Feedback form Your Customer Community. AIIM E-Doc Magazine, 22(4). http://www.aiim.org/Resources/Archive/Magazine/2008-Jul-Aug/34886

  • Shin, B. (2011, 29. August). Top 10 Viral Video Advertisements of All Time. adage.com. http://adage.com/article/the-viral-video-chart/top-10-viral-video-advertisements-time/229504/

  • Southgate, D., Westboy, N., & Page, G. (2010). Creative Determinants of Viral Video Viewing. International Journal of Advertising 29(3), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, L., Cole, S., & Fayer, A. (2009). How Rich-Media Video Technology Boosts Branding Goals: Different Online Advertising Formats Drive Different Brand-Performance Metrics. Journal of Advertising Research 49(3), 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, D. (2012). Virale Markenkommunikation. Einstellungs- und Verhaltenswirkungen viraler Videos. In F. R. Esch, R. Decker, A. Herrmann, H. Sattler, & H. Woratschek (Hrsg.), Marken und Produktmanagement. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirn, A. (2008, 6. September). Ich google, also bin ich. sueddeutsche.de. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/optimierte-suchmaschinen-ich-google-also-bin-ich-1.689909

  • Sun, Q., & Spears, N. (2011). Frustration Theory: toward an understanding of keyword search effectiveness and consumer responses. Journal of Customer Behaviour 10(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors Influencing Word of Mouth Effectiveness: Receiver Perspectives. European Journal of Marketing 42(3/4), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D., & Malaviya, P. (2011). When Co-Creation Backfires: The Effect of Disclosing Consumer Source on Advertising Persuasiveness. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1817897

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzunoglu, E. (2010) Consumer As Advertiser: A Conceptual Perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference of New Media and Interactivity, 138–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eimeren, B., & Frees, B. (2011). Drei von vier Deutschen im Netz – ein Ende des digitalen Grabens in Sicht ? Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2011. Media Perspektiven, 7-8, 334–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Matt, J. R. (2011, 15. Mai). Brief an junge Werber. Jean-Remy von Matt vermisst das Bauchgefühl spiegel.de. http://www.spiegel.de/karriere/berufsstart/brief-an-junge-werber-jean-remyvon-matt-vermisst-das-bauchgefuehl-a-762494.html

  • Voorveld, H. A. M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2009). Consumers’ responses to brand websites: An interdisciplinary review. Internet Research 19(5), 335‐365. http://dare.uva.nl/document/175858

  • Weber, P., & Fahr, A. (2013). Werbekommunikation. Werbewirkungsforschung als angewandte Persuasionsforschung. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Eds.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 333–352). Wiesbaden: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-18967-3_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, C. (2010). Adwords, Skyscraper und Eselsohren: Erscheinungsformen der Online-Werbung. In S. Reimann & M. Sauerland (Hrsg.), Wissenschaf(f)t Werbung (S. 198–215). Regensburg: Universitätsverlag. http://epub.uni-regensburg.de/6816/1/090819WolffAdwordsEselohrenSkyscraperOnline-Werbung_final.pdf

  • Wolling, J. (2002). Suchmaschinen – Gatekeeper im Internet. Medienwissenschaft Schweiz (2), 1–9. http://wolling.de/pdfs/wolling_suchmaschinen.pdf

  • Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008). Word of Mouse: The Role of Cognitive Personalization in Online Consumer Reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising 9(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C. Y. (2009). The Effects of Persuasion Knowledge on Click-Through of Keyword Search Ads: Moderating Role of Search Task and Perceived Fairness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(2), 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, C. Y. (2011). Interplay of Message Framing, Keyword Insertion and Levels of Product Involvement in Click-Through of Keyword Search Ads. International Journal of Advertising 30(3), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Freiburg, DCM - Departemt für Kommunikationswissenschaft und Medienforschung, Boulevard de Pérolles 90, 1700, Freiburg, Schweiz

    Prof. Dr. Andreas Fahr & Marina Bell MA

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Andreas Fahr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Bell MA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Fahr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IPMZ, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Gabriele Siegert

  2. IPMZ, Univeristät Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Werner Wirth

  3. Fachgebiet Kommunikationswiss., Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Switzerland

    Patrick Weber

  4. Inst. f. Publizistik u. Medienforschung, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Juliane A. Lischka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fahr, A., Bell, M. (2016). Wirkung innovativer Onlinewerbung. In: Siegert, G., Wirth, W., Weber, P., Lischka, J. (eds) Handbuch Werbeforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18916-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18916-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17426-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18916-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation