Skip to main content

The Logical and Methodological Foundations of the Theory of Law of Leon Petrażycki in the Context of the Analytical-Phenomenological Tradition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Russian Legal Realism

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 125))

Abstract

The author reflects on the common understanding of the methodological foundations of the psychological theory of law as grounded in philosophical positivism. Furthermore, Petrażycki’s legal and methodological investigations are interpreted in the context of the analytical-phenomenological tradition associated with such thinkers as Frege, Brentano, and Meinong. Special attention is paid to the comparison of the epistemological ideas of Petrażycki and the analytical phenomenology of Husserl, as presented in his Logical Investigations. The author identifies the numerous similarities between the logical and methodological ideas of Petrażycki and the analytical-phenomenological tradition in general philosophy, especially the analytical phenomenology of Husserl (inter alia, the intensional concept of class, or the thesis of the incommensurability of theoretical and empirical knowledge). The result of this comparison is the conclusion that Petrażycki found in Husserl’s Logical Investigations the ideas, which to a great extent correspond to the ontological assumptions of his theory of law. In the last part of the chapter, the ideas of Petrażycki’s disciples—who tried to develop his theory of law in the phenomenological direction—are discussed.

Translation by Edoardo Fittipaldi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The similarity of this Petrażyckian position to Karl Popper’s hypothetical-deductive method of scientific method was pointed out by Woleński (1969, 164). Also, Edoardo Fittipaldi holds that induction for Petrażycki is exclusively a method for testing theoretical knowledge and, based on that, he seems to regard Petrażycki as a forerunner of Karl Popper’s and Hans Albert’s critical rationalism (see Fittipaldi’s essay in this compilation). More generally, according to Fittipaldi (2016), if American legal realism is more compatible with—and historically stems from—the pragmati(ci)st epistemology inaugurated by Charles S. Peirce, and legal positivism is more compatible with logical positivism and analytical philosophy, both the Hägeströmian and Petrażyckian legal realisms—that Fittipaldi refers to with the term Continental legal realism—are more compatible with Popper’s and Albert’s critical rationalism. For more detail on the similarities between Petrażycki’s conception of scientific knowledge and Popper’s evolutionary epistemology and hypothetical-deductive model of scientific knowledge, see Timoshina (2012, 20–42, 165–176).

  2. 2.

    On further similarities and arguments, see Timoshina (2012, 177–203).

References

  • Brentano F (1952 [1908]) Von den Objekten. In: Mayer-Hillebrand F (ed) Die Abkehr vom Nichtrealen. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, pp 341–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano F (1995 [1874]) Psychology from an empirical standpoint [Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt] (trans: Rancurello AC, Terrell DB, McAlister LL). Routledge, London, New York, p 322

    Google Scholar 

  • Fittipaldi E (2016) Introduction: continental legal realism. In: Pattaro E, Roversi C (eds) Legal philosophy in the twentieth century: the civil law world. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege G (1960 [1895]) A critical elucidation of some points in E. Schroeder’s Algebra der Logik. In: Geach P (ed) Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (trans: Black M). Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 86–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurvitch GD (2004 [1935]) L’expérience juridique et la philosophie pluraliste du droit. Russian translation by M. V. Antonov & L. V. Voronina. In: Poljakov AV (ed) Filosofija i sociologija prava. Izbrannye trudy [Philosophy and sociology of law. Selected works]. Izdatel’skij Dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University], St. Petersburg, pp 213–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (2001a [1900]) Logical investigations, vol I (trans: Findlay JN). Routledge, New York, p 331

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (2001b) Logical investigations, vol II (trans: Findlay JN). Routledge, New York, p 364

    Google Scholar 

  • Leśniewski S (1913) Logičeskie rassuždenija [Logical reasonings]. Tip. A. Smolinskogo, St. Petersburg, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong A (1894) Psyhologisch-ethische Untersuchungen zur Werth-Theorie [Psychological-ethical investigations in value theory]. Leuschner & Lubensky, Graz, p 231

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong A (1902) Über Annahmen [On assumptions]. Verl. von J. A. Barth, Leipzig, p 298

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong A (1904) Über Gegenstandstheorie [The theory of objects]. In: Meinong A (ed) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie [Investigations in theory of objects and psychology]. Verl. von J. A. Barth, Leipzig, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong A (1960 [1904]) The theory of objects. In: Chisholm R (ed) Realism and the background of phenomenology. Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov PE (1914) O real’nosti prava [On the reality of law]. Juridičeskij vestnik 5:5–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanejšvili GA (1987 [1930]) Dejstvitel’nost’ prava i opyt obosnovanija normativnyh faktov [The validity of law and the experience of the foundation of normative facts]. Izdatel’stvo Tblilisskogo universiteta [Publishing House of Tbilisi University], Tbilisi, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrażycki L (1902) K voprosu o “vozroždenii estestvennogo prava” i našej programme. Po povodu dissertacii P. I. Novgorodceva “Kant i Gegel v ih učenijah o prave i gosudarstve”. Dva tipičeskih postroenija v oblasti filosofii prava [On the issue of the “Resurrection of Natural Law” and our program. About the dissertation of P. I. Novgorodcev “Kant and Hegel in the Doctrines Concerning Law and State”. Two typical constructions in the field of the theory of law”]. Pravo: eženedel’naja juridičeskaja gazeta: 41–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrażycki L (1904) O motivah čelovečeskih postupkov, v osobennosti ob etičeskih motivah i ih raznovidnostyah [On the motives of people’s actions, particularly, on ethic motives and their variety]. St. Petersburg, p 75

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrażycki L (2010a [1900]) Očerki filosofii prava [Sketches of philosophy of law]. In: Timoshina E (ed) Teorija i politika prava. Izbrannye trudy [Theory and policy of law. Selected works]. Universitetskij Izdatel’skij konsorcium [University Publishing Consortium] “Juridičeskaja kniga”, St. Petersburg, pp 245–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrażycki L (2010b [1908]) Vvedenie v izučenie prava i nravstvennosti. Osnovy ėmocional’noj psihologii. [Introductions to the study of law and morality. Foundations of psychology of emotions]. In: Timoshina E (ed) Teorija i politika prava. Izbrannye trudy [Theory and policy of law. Selected works], 3rd edn. Universitetskij Izdatel’skij konsorcium [University Publishing Consortium] “Juridičeskaja kniga”, St. Petersburg, pp 380–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine WVO (1963) From а logical point of view. 9 logical-philosophical essays. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, p 184

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine WVO (1982) Things and their place in theories. In: Quine WVO (ed) Theories and things. Belknap Press, London, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1993 [1919]) Introduction to mathematical philosophy. Dover Publication, New York, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoshina EV (2012) Kak vozmožna teorija prava? Ėpistemologičeskie osnovanija teorii prava v interpretacii L.I. Petražickogo [How is theory of law possible? The epistemological foundations of the theory of law in the interpretation of Leon Petrażycki]. Izdatel’stvo “Jurlitinform”, Moscow, p 296

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubetskoj EN (1901) Filosofija prava professora L. I. Petražickogo [L. I. Petrażycki’s philosophy of law]. Voprosy filosofii I psihologii [Issues Philos Psychol] 2(57):9–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński J (1969) Metodologiczne dążenia Petrażyckiego a współczesna teoria nauki. In: Opałek K (ed) Z zagadnień teorii prawa i teorii nauki Leona Petrażyckiego. Studia opracowane dla upamię tnienia stulecia urodzin. PWN, Warsaw, pp 161–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Timoshina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Timoshina, E. (2018). The Logical and Methodological Foundations of the Theory of Law of Leon Petrażycki in the Context of the Analytical-Phenomenological Tradition. In: Brożek, B., Stanek, J., Stelmach, J. (eds) Russian Legal Realism. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98821-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98821-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98820-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98821-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics