Skip to main content

For Pragmatism and Politics: Crime, Social Harm and Zemiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zemiology

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

Abstract

What does it mean to go ‘beyond criminology’? This chapter seeks to tease out some of the issues at stake in the relationships between critical criminology, social harm and zemiology. In so doing, I engage in both personal reflection as well as critical considerations of some of the responses to Beyond Criminology, and on these bases suggest that there are a number of theoretical differences between critical criminology, social harm, and zemiology. These, in turn, pertain to the question of whether zemiology should be considered as a separate discipline or simply a branch of critical criminology, perhaps with a social-harm-approach twist. In conclusion, I argue that whether one embraces a rights or needs-based approach to addressing social harm it is ultimately a political commitment—albeit one about which we need to be clear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Including much of my own work; though, see Alvesalo and Tombs (2002).

  2. 2.

    http://www.hazardscampaign.org.uk/fack/about/index.htm.

  3. 3.

    The ‘strapline’ of INQUEST; see http://www.inquest.org.uk/.

References

  • Alvesalo, Anne, and Steve Tombs. 2002. Working for Criminalisation of Economic Offending: Contradictions for Critical Criminology? Critical Criminology: An International Journal 11: 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittle, Steven, and Laureen Snider. 2013. Examining the Ruggie Report: Can Voluntary Guidelines Tame Global Capitalism? Critical Criminology 21: 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copson, Lynne. 2011. Archaeologies of Harm: Criminology, Critical Criminology, Zemiology. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, School of Sociology, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Zemiology: At the Edge of Criminology or Beyond Its Borders? Paper presented at the British Society of Criminology Annual Conference, University of Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corteen, Karen, Sharon Morley, Paul Taylor, and Joanne Turner (eds.). 2016. A Companion to Crime, Harm and Victimisation. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Pamela, Peter Francis, and Tanya Wyatt (eds.). 2014. Invisible Crimes and Social Harms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, Len. 1993. Thinking About Human Need. New Left Review I/201 (September–October): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, Len, and Ian Gough. 1991. A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellefsen, Rune, Ragnhild Sollund, and Guri Larsen (eds.). 2012. Eco-global Crimes: Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, Nicholas. 2014. Lethal but Legal: Corporations, Consumption, and Protecting Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, Judy, and Harry Glasbeek. 1992. The Politics of Rights: A Politics with Little Class. Social & Legal Studies 1: 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garside, Richard. 2013. Addressing Social Harm: Better Regulation Versus Social Transformation. Revista Crítica Penal y Poder 5: 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooch, Graham, and Michael Williams. 2007. A Dictionary of Law Enforcement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hil, Richard, and Rob Robertson. 2003. What Sort of Future for Critical Criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change 39: 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, Stuart L. (ed.). 1987. Corporate Violence: Injury and Death for Profit. New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, Paddy, and Steve Tombs. 2004. Beyond Criminology? In Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously, ed. Paddy Hillyard, Christina Pantazis, Steve Tombs, and Dave Gordon, 10–29. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Social Harm and Zemiology. In The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 6th ed., ed. Alison Liebling, Shadd Maruna, and Lesley McAra, 284–305. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, Paddy, Christina Pantazis, Steve Tombs, and Dave Gordon (eds.). 2004. Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins Burke, Roger. 2005. An Introduction to Criminological Theory. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Gordon. 2007. The Politics of Crime and Community. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, Valerie, and Ryken Grattet. 2004. Making Hate a Crime: From Social Movement to Law Enforcement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Ronald C. 2013. Expanding the Core: Blameworthy Harms, International Law and State-Corporate Crimes. Paper presented at the Presidential Panel, “Reconsidering the Legal Definition of Crime,” at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, November 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasslett, Kristian. 2010. Crime or Social Harm? A Dialectical Perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change 54: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, Ian, and Richard Sparks. 2011. Public Criminology? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Eugene, and John Muncie (eds.). 2001. The SAGE Dictionary of Criminology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The SAGE Dictionary of Criminology, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The SAGE Dictionary of Criminology, 3rd ed. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, Mark, and Simon Prideaux. 2016. State Crime and Immorality: The Corrupting Influence of the Powerful. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncie, John. 2005. Book Review of Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. Crime, Law and Social Change 43: 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Social Harm. In The Sage Dictionary of Criminology, 3rd ed., ed. Eugene McLaughlin and John Muncie, 430–432. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, Tim. 2007. Criminology. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. 2015. Excess Winter Mortality in England and Wales 2014/15 (Provisional) and 2013/14 (Final). London: Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, Christina, and Simon Pemberton. 2009. Nation States and the Production of Social Harm: Resisting the Hegemony of ‘TINA’. In State, Crime, Power, ed. Roy Coleman, Joe Sim, Steve Tombs, and David Whyte, 214–233. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Passas, Nikos, and Neva Goodwin (eds.). 2004. It’s Legal but It Ain’t Right: Harmful Social Consequences of Legal Industries. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Frank, and Steve Tombs. 1998. Toxic Capitalism: Corporate Crime and the Chemical Industry. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Bhopal: Flowers at the Altar of Profit and Power. North Somercotes: CrimeTalk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, Simon. 2007. Social Harm Future(s): Exploring the Potential of the Social Harm Approach. Crime, Law and Social Change 48: 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Harmful Societies. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency. 2014. Subject Benchmark Statement, Criminology. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/SBS-criminology-14.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.

  • Reiman, Jeffrey. 2006. Book Review of Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. British Journal of Criminology 46: 362–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, Vincenzo. 2015. Social Harm and the Vagaries of Financial Regulation in the UK. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 4: 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, Herman, and Julia Schwendinger. 1970. Defenders of Order or Guardians of Human Rights? Issues in Criminology 5: 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, Katy, and Steve Tombs. 2011. ‘How Do You Get Your Voice Heard When No-One Will Let You?’ Victimisation at Work. Criminology & Criminal Justice 11: 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper, Kate. 1993. A Theory of Human Need. New Left Review 1 (197): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tifft, Larry L., and Dennis C. Sullivan. 2001. A Needs-Based, Social Harms Definition of Crime. In What is Crime? Controversies over the Nature of Crime and What to Do About It, ed. Stuart Henry and Mark M. Lanier, 179–203. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, Steve. 1999. Health and Safety Crimes: (In)visibility and the Problems of ‘Knowing’. In Invisible Crimes: Their Victims and Their Regulation, ed. Pamela Davies, Peter Francis, and Victor Jupp, 77–104. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Workplace Injury and Death: Social Harm and the Illusions of Law. In Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously, ed. Paddy Hillyard, Christina Pantazis, Steve Tombs, and Dave Gordon, 156–177. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. ‘Violence’, Safety Crimes and Criminology. British Journal of Criminology 47: 531–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Harmful Societies. Criminal Justice Matters 101: 36–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, Steve, and Paddy Hillyard. 2004. Towards a Political Economy of Harm: States, Corporations and the Production of Inequality. In Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously, ed. Paddy Hillyard, Christina Pantazis, Steve Tombs, and Dave Gordon, 30–54. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, Steve, and David Whyte. 2009. Crime, Harm and Corporate Power. In Crime: Local and Global, ed. John Muncie, Deborah Talbot, and Reece Walters, 137–172. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Corporate Criminal: Why Corporations Must Be Abolished. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weait, Matthew. 2005. Harm, Consent and the Limits of Privacy. Feminist Legal Studies 13: 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yar, Majid. 2012. Critical Criminology, Critical Theory and Social Harm. In New Directions in Criminological Theory, ed. Steve Hall, and Simon Winlow, 52–65. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Tombs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tombs, S. (2018). For Pragmatism and Politics: Crime, Social Harm and Zemiology. In: Boukli, A., Kotzé, J. (eds) Zemiology. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76312-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76312-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76311-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76312-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics