Abstract
Too often, human rights are treated as an unconditional good and thus beyond politics. Yet human rights have always existed within an identified political context. Today, this context is neoliberalism. However, while criminologists often allude to various shortcomings of international human rights and humanitarian law, little consideration has been given to the neoliberal undercurrents of contemporary human rights discourse and practice. This article argues that neoliberalism and the human rights movement exist in a symbiotic, co-constitutive relationship. Against the neoliberal hold on human rights, the article points to an alternative political foundation, Action-Based Human Rights. The action-based model aims to be a platform for resistance and to root human rights in action and opportunities for agency and self-representation. The article suggests a preliminary path to how criminologists can begin to advance this alternative.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Cohen has noted that during the 1980s he gradually moved “from ‘doing’ criminology to ‘doing’ human rights” (1993: 97). See also Garland’s remark that “an engagement with human rights is essential for twenty first century criminology that aspires to depth and relevance” (Murphy and Whitty 2013 [abstract]).
For a review of these studies, see Ross (2015a: 495).
The book focuses of victims and victimology of state crime.
The book provides a comprehensive review of state crime literature and in addition addresses the connection between neoliberalism and state crimes: 3–17; 65–74.
Some scholars have proposed a new field of study dedicated to social harm, zemiology, derived from the Greek word zemia (harm or damage).
Kauzlarich et al. suggest that international law should serve as the epistemological framework for the study of state crimes (1998: 51).
For a good review of human rights in criminology, see Murphy and Whitty (2013).
As Bassiouni writes, international human rights law and humanitarian law, in their current form, are incomplete, meaning that they do not guarantee all necessary protections for human rights (2011: 1).
Jameson, in his analysis of the cultural logic of late capitalism (what he sees as the essence of postmodernism), asserts that this era is ruled by the superficial, the image and the symptom (1991: 9).
For a good review see Zachary (2017): 164.
This argument builds on human capital theory.
For a good review see Alston (2013).
Ronald Reagan v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (Patco).
See also Rancière (2004: 297–298).
In fact, defining human rights as an unconditional good is something of a tautology: the reason they are valid and just is that they are valid and just (De Sousa 2015).
Of course the balance of power in the world has had great impact on the establishment and framing of international law.
“Sovereignty is, at the same time, the authority to decide at any given moment what is the governing law” (Ophir 2003: 360).
Ross offers a heuristic model for controlling crimes of the powerful and not just state crimes.
I thank the anonymous reviewer for this observation.
I.e., actions that restrict access to social benefits: food, shelter, health, education, etc.
References
Agnew, R. (2011). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people and society. New York: NYU Press.
Alston, P. (2013). Does the past matter? On the origins of human rights. Harvard Law Review, 126, 2043–2081.
Arendt, H. (2017). Hannah Arendt on what freedom and revolution really mean: Thoughts on poverty, misery, and the great revolutions of history.
Aristotle. (1962). Politics of Aristotle (E. Barker, Ed., Trans.). NY: Anchor.
Barak, G. (1990). Crime, criminology and human rights: Towards an understanding of state criminality. The Journal of Human Justice, 2(1), 11–28.
Barak, G. (Ed.). (1991). Crimes by the capitalist state: An introduction to state criminality. NY: SUNY Press.
Barak, G. (2007). Doing newsmaking criminology from within the academy. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 191–207.
Barak, G. (Ed.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful. London: Routledge.
Bassiouni, C. M. (2011). Crimes of state and other forms of collective group violence by nonstate actors. In D. L. Rothe & C. W. Mullins (Eds.), State crime: Current perspectives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Work, consumption and the new poor. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Beitz, C. R. (2013). Human dignity in the theory of human rights: Nothing but a phrase? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(3), 259–290.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3–4), 161–188.
Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burawoy, M. (2005a). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.
Burawoy, M. (2005b). Response: Public sociology: populist fad or path to renewal? The British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 417–432.
Chambliss, W. J., & Zatz, M. S. (Eds.). (1993). Making law: The state, the law, and structural contradictions (Vol. 834). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Cohen, S. (1993). Human rights and crimes of the state: The culture of denial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 26(2), 97–115.
Cohen, S. (2001). State of denial. London: Policy Press.
Cushion, S. (2009). Discouraging citizenship? Young people’s reactions to news media coverage of anti-Iraq war protesting in the UK. Young, 17(2), 123–143.
Davis, W. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Washington, DC: Sage.
De Sousa, S. B. (2015). If God were a human rights activist. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Douzinas, C. (2003). Humanity, military humanism and the new moral order. Economy and Society, 32(2), 159–183.
Eisenstein, H. (2010). Feminism seduced: How global elites use women’s labor and ideas to exploit the world. New York: Routledge.
Estévez, A. (2011). Human rights in contemporary political sociology: The primacy of social subjects. Human Rights Quarterly, 33(4), 1142–1162.
Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.
Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, capitalism, and the cunning of history. New Left Review, 56(2), 97–117.
Fraser, N. (2017). From progressive neoliberalism to Trump—and beyond, American Affairs, November 20.
Friedrichs, D. (1996). Governmental crime, Hitler and white collar crime: A problematic relationship. Caribbean Journal of Criminology and Social Psychology, 1, 44–63.
Friedrichs, D. (1998). State crime (Vol. I & II). Farnham: Ashgate Dartmouth.
Friedrichs, D. (2009). On resisting state crime: Conceptual and contextual issues. Social Justice, 36(3), 4–27.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Green, P., & Ward, T. (2000). State crime, human rights, and the limits of criminology. Social Justice, 27(1), 101–115.
Green, P., & Ward, T. (2004). State crime: Governments, violence and corruption. London: Pluto Press.
Greenfield, V. A., & Paoli, L. (2013). A framework to assess the harms of crimes. British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 864–885.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hil, R., & Robertson, R. (2003). What sort of future for critical criminology? Crime, Law and Social Change, 39(1), 91–115.
Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Acts of citizenship. London & New York: Zed Books.
Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 5–17.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kaplan, D., & Levi, G. (2017). The Arab Spring in Israeli media and emergent conceptions of citizenship. Arab Media & Society, 24, 1–17.
Kauzlarich, D. (1995). A criminology of the nuclear state. Humanity and Society, 19, 37–57.
Kauzlarich, D., & Friedrichs, D. (2003). Crimes of the state. In M. D. Schwartz & S. Hatty (Eds.), Controversial issues in criminology: Critical criminology. Anderson: Cincinnati.
Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. (1998). Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home and abroad. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Kauzlarich, D., Mullins, C., & Matthews, R. (2003). A complicity continuum of state crime. Contemporary Justice Review, 6, 241–254.
Kauzlarich, D., Roland, C. K., & Smith, B. 1998 [1992]. Toward the study of governmental crime: Nuclear weapons, foreign intervention, and international law. In D. Friedrichs (Ed.), State crime (Vol. I, pp. 49–69). Farnham: Ashgate Dartmouth.
Kennedy, D. (2004). The dark side of virtue: International humanitarianism reassessed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.
Konczal, M. (2017). “Neoliberalism” isn’t an empty epithet. It’s a real, powerful set of ideas. https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/7/18/15992226/neoliberalism-chait-austerity-democratic-party-sanders-clinton. Accessed on August 13, 2017.
Kramer, R. C. (1985). Defining the concept of crime: A humanistic perspective. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 12, 469–487.
Kramer, R. C. (2009). Resisting the bombing of civilians: Challenges from a public criminology of state crime. Social Justice, 36(3), 78–97.
Kramer, R., & Michalowski, R. (1990). Toward an integrated theory of state-corporate crime. Baltimore, MD: American Society of Criminology.
Lazzarato, M. (2006). From biopower to biopolitics. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 2(2), 11–20.
Lynch, M., Stretesky, P., & Long, M. (2016). Defining crime: A critique of the concept and its implication. Berlin: Springer.
Mann, I. (2016). Humanity at sea: Maritime migration and the foundations of international law (Vol. 127). Cambridge University Press.
Marks, S. (2011a). Human rights and root causes. The Modern Law Review, 74(1), 57–78.
Marks, S. (2011b). Four human rights myths. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 10/2012.
Mehozay, Y. (2018). From offender rehabilitation to the aesthetic of the victim. Journal of Social & Legal Studies, 27(1), 97–113.
Michalowski, R. (1985). Order, law and crime. New York: Random House.
Molina, F. L. (1995). Can states commit crimes? The limits of formal international law. In J. I. Ross (Ed.), Controlling state crime: An introduction (pp. 35–52). New York: Garland.
Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moyn, S. (2013). Torture and taboo: On Elaine Scarry. The Nation.
Moyn, S. (2014). A powerless companion: Human rights in the age of neoliberalism. Law & Contemporary Problems, 77, 147–169.
Mullins, C. W., Kauzlarich, D., & Rothe, D. (2004). The International Criminal Court and the control of state crime: Prospects and problems. Critical Criminology, 12(3), 285–308.
Murphy, T., & Whitty, N. (2013). Making history: Academic criminology and human rights. British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 568–587.
Ophir, A. (2003). Between the sanctification of life and its abandonment: Instead of an introduction to Homo Sacer. In S. Lavi (Ed.), Technologies of justice: Law, science and society. Ramot: Tel Aviv University. (Hebrew).
Perugini, N., & Gordon, N. (2015). The human right to dominate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon.
Presser, L. (2013). Why we harm. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Quinney, R. (1979). Criminology (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
Rancière, J. (2004). Who is the subject of the rights of man? The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3), 297–310.
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ross, J. I. (Ed.). (1995). Controlling state crime. New York: Garland.
Ross, J. I. (2000a). Controlling state crime (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
Ross, J. I. (2000b). Varieties of state crime and its control. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Ross, J. I. (2002). Stumbling into state crime. ACJS Today, 22(2), 8–10.
Ross, J. I. (2012). An introduction to political crime. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Ross, J. I. (2015a). Controlling state crimes and alternative reactions. In G. Barak (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful. London: Routledge.
Ross, J. I. (2015b). The cartography of responses to state crime: Understanding the linkages among state abuses/crimes/deviance/harms/illegalities/wrongs, resistance/control, and state organizational reactions. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(4), 357–377.
Ross, J. I. (2017). Protecting democracy: A parsimonious, dynamic and heuristic model of controlling crimes by the powerful. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(3), 289–306.
Ross, J. I., & Rothe, D. L. (2008). Ironies of controlling state crime. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 36(3), 196–210.
Rothe, D. L. (2009). State criminality: The crime of all crimes. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Rothe, D. L. (2009–2010). Resisting state criminality. Social Justice, 36(1), 1–3.
Rothe, D. L., & Collins, V. E. (2017). The illusion of resistance: Commodification and reification of neoliberalism and the state. Critical Criminology, 25(4), 609–618.
Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2006). The state of the criminology of crimes of the state. Social Justice, 33(1), 147–161.
Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2015). Crimes of globalization: New directions in critical criminology. London: Routledge.
Rothe, D. L., & Kauzlarich, D. (Eds.). (2014). Towards a victimology of state crime. London: Routledge.
Rothe, D. L., & Kauzlarich, D. (2016). Crimes of the powerful: An introduction (Vol. 5). London: Routledge.
Rothe, D. L., & Mullins, C. W. (Eds.). (2011). State crime: Current perspectives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Saskia, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Savelsberg, J. (2010). Crime and human rights: Criminology of genocide and atrocities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. (1970). Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? Issues in Criminology, 5, 123–157.
Shenhav, Y. (2006). Sovereignty gaps, the exception and state of exception. Theory and Criticism, 29, 205–218. (Hebrew).
Sparrow, M. (2008). The character of harms. Operational challenges in control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tunnell, K. (1993). Political crime in contemporary America. New York: Garland.
Wacquant, L. (2008). Ordering insecurity: Social polarization and the punitive upsurge. Radical Philosophy Review, 11(1), 9–27.
Zachary, M. (2017). An unlikely resonance? Subjects of human rights and subjects of human capital reconsidered. In B. Golder & M. Daniel (Eds.), The politics of legality in a neoliberal age (pp. 161–183). London: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
The author wish to thank Itamar Mann for all his helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehozay, Y. Critical Criminology as a Guardian of Human Rights: An Action-Based Model. Crit Crim 26, 149–168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9392-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9392-0