Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Critical Criminology as a Guardian of Human Rights: An Action-Based Model

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Too often, human rights are treated as an unconditional good and thus beyond politics. Yet human rights have always existed within an identified political context. Today, this context is neoliberalism. However, while criminologists often allude to various shortcomings of international human rights and humanitarian law, little consideration has been given to the neoliberal undercurrents of contemporary human rights discourse and practice. This article argues that neoliberalism and the human rights movement exist in a symbiotic, co-constitutive relationship. Against the neoliberal hold on human rights, the article points to an alternative political foundation, Action-Based Human Rights. The action-based model aims to be a platform for resistance and to root human rights in action and opportunities for agency and self-representation. The article suggests a preliminary path to how criminologists can begin to advance this alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cohen has noted that during the 1980s he gradually moved “from ‘doing’ criminology to ‘doing’ human rights” (1993: 97). See also Garland’s remark that “an engagement with human rights is essential for twenty first century criminology that aspires to depth and relevance” (Murphy and Whitty 2013 [abstract]).

  2. For a review of these studies, see Ross (2015a: 495).

  3. The book focuses of victims and victimology of state crime.

  4. The book provides a comprehensive review of state crime literature and in addition addresses the connection between neoliberalism and state crimes: 3–17; 65–74.

  5. Some scholars have proposed a new field of study dedicated to social harm, zemiology, derived from the Greek word zemia (harm or damage).

  6. Kauzlarich et al. suggest that international law should serve as the epistemological framework for the study of state crimes (1998: 51).

  7. For a good review of human rights in criminology, see Murphy and Whitty (2013).

  8. As Bassiouni writes, international human rights law and humanitarian law, in their current form, are incomplete, meaning that they do not guarantee all necessary protections for human rights (2011: 1).

  9. Public apathy also plays a role in this process. See Cohen (1993, 2001).

  10. Jameson, in his analysis of the cultural logic of late capitalism (what he sees as the essence of postmodernism), asserts that this era is ruled by the superficial, the image and the symptom (1991: 9).

  11. For a good review see Zachary (2017): 164.

  12. This argument builds on human capital theory.

  13. For a good review see Alston (2013).

  14. I use the term “late modernity” because it is a well-known idiom, particularly in the field of criminology (Garland 2001). Bauman originally spoke of “postmodernity” (Bauman 1987) and of “fluid modernity” (Bauman 2000: 23), which ultimately became “liquid modernity” (ibid.).

  15. Ronald Reagan v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (Patco).

  16. Moyn takes this position too in his later article “Torture and Taboo: On Elaine Scarry” (2013). Moreover, Amnesty International was unwilling to adopt Nelson Mandela as a political prisoner because he refused to renounce the use of violence (Perugini and Gordon 2015: 3).

  17. The junta’s regime, Klein reminds us, and not just in Argentina, was supported by leading Chicago School economists (Klein 2007: 118; Marks 2011b: 58).

  18. See also Rancière (2004: 297–298).

  19. In fact, defining human rights as an unconditional good is something of a tautology: the reason they are valid and just is that they are valid and just (De Sousa 2015).

  20. Of course the balance of power in the world has had great impact on the establishment and framing of international law.

  21. “Sovereignty is, at the same time, the authority to decide at any given moment what is the governing law” (Ophir 2003: 360).

  22. Ross offers a heuristic model for controlling crimes of the powerful and not just state crimes.

  23. For a list of studies, see Friedrichs (2009: 8). For a good review see Rothe (2009–2010).

  24. I thank the anonymous reviewer for this observation.

  25. I.e., actions that restrict access to social benefits: food, shelter, health, education, etc.

References

  • Agnew, R. (2011). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people and society. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, P. (2013). Does the past matter? On the origins of human rights. Harvard Law Review, 126, 2043–2081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2017). Hannah Arendt on what freedom and revolution really mean: Thoughts on poverty, misery, and the great revolutions of history.

  • Aristotle. (1962). Politics of Aristotle (E. Barker, Ed., Trans.). NY: Anchor.

  • Barak, G. (1990). Crime, criminology and human rights: Towards an understanding of state criminality. The Journal of Human Justice, 2(1), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (Ed.). (1991). Crimes by the capitalist state: An introduction to state criminality. NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (2007). Doing newsmaking criminology from within the academy. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (Ed.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, C. M. (2011). Crimes of state and other forms of collective group violence by nonstate actors. In D. L. Rothe & C. W. Mullins (Eds.), State crime: Current perspectives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Work, consumption and the new poor. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. R. (2013). Human dignity in the theory of human rights: Nothing but a phrase? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(3), 259–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3–4), 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005a). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005b). Response: Public sociology: populist fad or path to renewal? The British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J., & Zatz, M. S. (Eds.). (1993). Making law: The state, the law, and structural contradictions (Vol. 834). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1993). Human rights and crimes of the state: The culture of denial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 26(2), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2001). State of denial. London: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushion, S. (2009). Discouraging citizenship? Young people’s reactions to news media coverage of anti-Iraq war protesting in the UK. Young, 17(2), 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. (2014). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Washington, DC: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, S. B. (2015). If God were a human rights activist. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, C. (2003). Humanity, military humanism and the new moral order. Economy and Society, 32(2), 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, H. (2010). Feminism seduced: How global elites use women’s labor and ideas to exploit the world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estévez, A. (2011). Human rights in contemporary political sociology: The primacy of social subjects. Human Rights Quarterly, 33(4), 1142–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, capitalism, and the cunning of history. New Left Review, 56(2), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2017). From progressive neoliberalism to Trump—and beyond, American Affairs, November 20.

  • Friedrichs, D. (1996). Governmental crime, Hitler and white collar crime: A problematic relationship. Caribbean Journal of Criminology and Social Psychology, 1, 44–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. (1998). State crime (Vol. I & II). Farnham: Ashgate Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. (2009). On resisting state crime: Conceptual and contextual issues. Social Justice, 36(3), 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Ward, T. (2000). State crime, human rights, and the limits of criminology. Social Justice, 27(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Ward, T. (2004). State crime: Governments, violence and corruption. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, V. A., & Paoli, L. (2013). A framework to assess the harms of crimes. British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 864–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hil, R., & Robertson, R. (2003). What sort of future for critical criminology? Crime, Law and Social Change, 39(1), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Acts of citizenship. London & New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D., & Levi, G. (2017). The Arab Spring in Israeli media and emergent conceptions of citizenship. Arab Media & Society, 24, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D. (1995). A criminology of the nuclear state. Humanity and Society, 19, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., & Friedrichs, D. (2003). Crimes of the state. In M. D. Schwartz & S. Hatty (Eds.), Controversial issues in criminology: Critical criminology. Anderson: Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. (1998). Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home and abroad. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., Mullins, C., & Matthews, R. (2003). A complicity continuum of state crime. Contemporary Justice Review, 6, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., Roland, C. K., & Smith, B. 1998 [1992]. Toward the study of governmental crime: Nuclear weapons, foreign intervention, and international law. In D. Friedrichs (Ed.), State crime (Vol. I, pp. 49–69). Farnham: Ashgate Dartmouth.

  • Kennedy, D. (2004). The dark side of virtue: International humanitarianism reassessed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konczal, M. (2017). “Neoliberalism” isn’t an empty epithet. It’s a real, powerful set of ideas. https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/7/18/15992226/neoliberalism-chait-austerity-democratic-party-sanders-clinton. Accessed on August 13, 2017.

  • Kramer, R. C. (1985). Defining the concept of crime: A humanistic perspective. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 12, 469–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C. (2009). Resisting the bombing of civilians: Challenges from a public criminology of state crime. Social Justice, 36(3), 78–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., & Michalowski, R. (1990). Toward an integrated theory of state-corporate crime. Baltimore, MD: American Society of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (2006). From biopower to biopolitics. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 2(2), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., Stretesky, P., & Long, M. (2016). Defining crime: A critique of the concept and its implication. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, I. (2016). Humanity at sea: Maritime migration and the foundations of international law (Vol. 127). Cambridge University Press.

  • Marks, S. (2011a). Human rights and root causes. The Modern Law Review, 74(1), 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. (2011b). Four human rights myths.‏ LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 10/2012.

  • Mehozay, Y. (2018). From offender rehabilitation to the aesthetic of the victim. Journal of Social & Legal Studies, 27(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, R. (1985). Order, law and crime. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, F. L. (1995). Can states commit crimes? The limits of formal international law. In J. I. Ross (Ed.), Controlling state crime: An introduction (pp. 35–52). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, S. (2013). Torture and taboo: On Elaine Scarry. The Nation.

  • Moyn, S. (2014). A powerless companion: Human rights in the age of neoliberalism. Law & Contemporary Problems, 77, 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, C. W., Kauzlarich, D., & Rothe, D. (2004). The International Criminal Court and the control of state crime: Prospects and problems. Critical Criminology, 12(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T., & Whitty, N. (2013). Making history: Academic criminology and human rights. British Journal of Criminology, 53(4), 568–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophir, A. (2003). Between the sanctification of life and its abandonment: Instead of an introduction to Homo Sacer. In S. Lavi (Ed.), Technologies of justice: Law, science and society. Ramot: Tel Aviv University. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, N., & Gordon, N. (2015). The human right to dominate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, L. (2013). Why we harm. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinney, R. (1979). Criminology (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). Who is the subject of the rights of man? The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (Ed.). (1995). Controlling state crime. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2000a). Controlling state crime (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2000b). Varieties of state crime and its control. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2002). Stumbling into state crime. ACJS Today, 22(2), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2012). An introduction to political crime. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2015a). Controlling state crimes and alternative reactions. In G. Barak (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2015b). The cartography of responses to state crime: Understanding the linkages among state abuses/crimes/deviance/harms/illegalities/wrongs, resistance/control, and state organizational reactions. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(4), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I. (2017). Protecting democracy: A parsimonious, dynamic and heuristic model of controlling crimes by the powerful. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. I., & Rothe, D. L. (2008). Ironies of controlling state crime. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 36(3), 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L. (2009). State criminality: The crime of all crimes. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L. (2009–2010). Resisting state criminality. Social Justice, 36(1), 1–3.

  • Rothe, D. L., & Collins, V. E. (2017). The illusion of resistance: Commodification and reification of neoliberalism and the state. Critical Criminology, 25(4), 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2006). The state of the criminology of crimes of the state. Social Justice, 33(1), 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2015). Crimes of globalization: New directions in critical criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L., & Kauzlarich, D. (Eds.). (2014). Towards a victimology of state crime. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L., & Kauzlarich, D. (2016). Crimes of the powerful: An introduction (Vol. 5). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L., & Mullins, C. W. (Eds.). (2011). State crime: Current perspectives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saskia, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, J. (2010). Crime and human rights: Criminology of genocide and atrocities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. (1970). Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? Issues in Criminology, 5, 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav, Y. (2006). Sovereignty gaps, the exception and state of exception. Theory and Criticism, 29, 205–218. (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, M. (2008). The character of harms. Operational challenges in control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnell, K. (1993). Political crime in contemporary America. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2008). Ordering insecurity: Social polarization and the punitive upsurge. Radical Philosophy Review, 11(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachary, M. (2017). An unlikely resonance? Subjects of human rights and subjects of human capital reconsidered. In B. Golder & M. Daniel (Eds.), The politics of legality in a neoliberal age (pp. 161–183). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wish to thank Itamar Mann for all his helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoav Mehozay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehozay, Y. Critical Criminology as a Guardian of Human Rights: An Action-Based Model. Crit Crim 26, 149–168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9392-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9392-0

Navigation