Skip to main content

Impacts of Sodium on Alumina Quality and Consequences for Current Efficiency

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2018 (TMS 2018)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 157 Accesses

Abstract

Current and energy efficiency during primary aluminium production are negatively impacted by incomplete fluoride return and high levels of α-Al2O3. We propose that residual sodium within smelter grade aluminas can have indirect but potentially profound impacts on efficiency by influencing both fluoride return and α-Al2O3 content. We demonstrate that sodium originally intercalated in gibbsite becomes incorporated in the bulk alumina structure on calcination, segregating in the internal porosity as it moves toward the grain exterior. First, this segregation can partially block some of the narrower porosity, consequently lowering specific surface area. This is demonstrated to lower the HF scrubbing capacity and consequently fluoride return, thereby negatively impacting process efficiency. On the other hand, sodium incorporated in the bulk inhibits conversion to α-Al2O3, having a potentially significant positive impact on current efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dorreen MMR (2000) Cell Performance and Anodic Processes in Aluminium Smelting Studied by Product Gas Analysis. PhD. Thesis, The University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whitfield D, Skyllas-Kazacos M, Welch B, McFadden FS (2004) Aspects of Alumina Control in Aluminium Reduction. Light Metals:249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alcorn TR, McMinn CJ, Tabereaux AT (1988) Current Efficiency in Aluminium Electrolysis by Anode Gas Analysis. Light Metals:683–395.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dewing EW (1991) Loss of Current Efficiency in Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Metallurgical Transactions B 22B:177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevens FJ, Zhang W, Taylor MP, Chen JJJ (1992) The Interaction Between Current Efficiency and Energy Balance in Aluminium Reduction Cells. Light Metals:541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tarcy GP, Tøklep K (2005) Current Efficiency in Prebake and Søderberg Cells. Light Metals:319–324.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McIntosh GJ, Metson JB, Lavoie P, Niesenhaus T, Reek T, Perander L (2016) The Impact of Alumina Quality on Current Efficiency and Energy Efficiency in Aluminum Reduction. In: Light Metals 2016. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119274780.ch68.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McIntosh GJ, Agbenyegah GEK, Hyland MM, Metson JB (2016) The Pivotal Role of Alumina Pore Structure in HF Capture and Fluoride Return in Aluminum Reduction. JOM 68 (9):2463–2471.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2004-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McIntosh GJ, Metson JB, Niesenhaus T, Reek T, Perander LM (2014) Smelter Fluoride Balances: The Interplay Between Alumina Phases, Pore Size Distributions, and the Impacts of Weather. JOM 66 (11):2272–2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-1189-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perander LM, Zujovic ZD, Kemp TF, Smith ME, Metson JB (2009) The Nature and Impacts of Fines in Smelter-Grade Alumina. JOM 61 (11):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-009-0164-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perander LM (2010) Evolution of Nano- and Microstructure During the Calcination of Bayer Gibbsite to Produce Alumina. PhD Thesis, The University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hyland M, Patterson E, Welch B (2013) Alumina Structural Hydroxyl as a Continuous Source of HF. In: Essential Readings in Light Metals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 936–941.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118647851.ch138.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cowie BCC, Tadich A, Thomsen L (2010) The Current Performance of the Wide Range (90–2500 eV) Soft X-ray Beamline at the Australian Synchrotron. AIP Conf Proc 1234 (1):307–310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3463197.

  14. Gann E, McNeill CR, Tadich A, Cowie BCC, Thomsen L (2016) Quick AS NEXAFS Tool (QANT): a Program for NEXAFS Loading and Analysis Developed at the Australian Synchrotron. Journal of Synchrotron Radiat 23 (1):374–380. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577515018688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J Am Chem Soc 60 (2):309–319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73 (1):373–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Park YY, Lee SO, Tran T, Kim SJ, Kim MJ (2006) A study on the preparation of fine and low soda alumina. Int J Miner Process 80 (2–4):126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2006.03.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McIntosh GJ, Wijayaratne H, Hyland M, Perander L, Chan A, Metson JB (2017) Probing Cation Vacancies in Transition Aluminas By Modelling Sodium Migration. Manuscript in Preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu C, Osherov A, Panzer MJ (2013) Surface chemistry of electrodeposited Cu2O films studied by XPS. Electrochim Acta 111:771–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Digne M, Raybaud P, Sautet P, Guillaume D, Toulhoat H (2007) Quantum chemical and vibrational investigation of sodium exchanged [gamma]-alumina surfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9 (20):2577–2582. https://doi.org/10.1039/b700541e.

  21. McIntosh GJ, Agbenyegah GEK, Hyland MM, Metson JB (2015) Adsorptive Capacity and Evolution of the Pore Structure of Alumina on Reaction with Gaseous Hydrogen Fluoride. Langmuir 31 (19):5387–5397. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Agbenyegah GEK, McIntosh GJ, Hyland MH, Metson JB (2016) Assessing The Role of Smelter Grade Alumina Porosity in The HF Scrubbing Mechanism. In: Light Metals 2016. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119274780.ch86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Rieck T, Iffert M, White P, Rodrigo R, Kelchtermans R (2013) Increased Current Efficiency and Reduced Energy Consumption at the TRIMET Smelter Essen Using 9 Box Matrix Control. In: Essential Readings in Light Metals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118647851.ch122.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wefers K, Misra C (1987) Oxides and Hydroxides of Aluminum. Alcoa Technical Paper No. 19, Revised.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wong DS, Fraser P, Lavoie P, Kim J (2015) PFC Emissions from Detected Versus Nondetected Anode Effects in the Aluminum Industry. JOM 67 (2):342–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-1265-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant J. McIntosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

McIntosh, G.J., Wijayaratne, H., Agbenyegah, G.E.K., Hyland, M.M., Metson, J.B. (2018). Impacts of Sodium on Alumina Quality and Consequences for Current Efficiency. In: Martin, O. (eds) Light Metals 2018. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72284-9_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics