Abstract
Bruce E. Drushel opens our eyes to the possibility of a growing complexity in the representation of queer characters in media by examining Mitch and Cam from the popular sitcom Modern Family. Even before commercial television series began regularly to feature openly gay and lesbian characters in the 1970s, writers suggested them through character behaviors that were violations of conventional gender norms. The current ABC situation comedy Modern Family distinguishes itself through its willingness to develop characters, most notably the gay male couple Mitch and Cam, that freely depart from these binaries. While a surface-level view of the pair suggests the continuation of at least an approximation of traditional couple gender roles—Mitch as the masculine breadwinner, complete with beard and conventional masculine appearance and background, and Cam as the feminine stay-at-home nurturer and domestic problem-solver—episodes reveal more sophisticated and multidimensional types. Drushel analyzes the gender behaviors of the Mitch and Cam characters, contrasting theirs with those of characters represented as lesbian or gay among both recent and past US television sitcoms. Among the questions Drushel addresses is whether the Mitch and Cam characters are part of a revolution in representations of gender and sexuality, a pioneering example of gender parody, or merely encouraging anomalies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Bagdikian, Ben H. 1987. The Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon. Print.
Barcus, F. Earle. 1983. Images of Life on Children’s Television. New York: Praeger. Print.
Bathrick, Serafina. 1984. The Mary Tyler Moore Show: Women at Home and at Work. In MTM: “Quality Television,” ed. Jane Feuer, Paul Kerr, and Tise Vahimagi, 99–131. London: British Film Institute. Print.
Brown, Jane Delano, Kim Walsh-Childers, Karl E. Bauman, and Gary G. Koch. 1990. The Influence of New Media and Family Structure on Young Adolescents’ Television and Radio Use. Communication Research 17 (1): 65–82. Print.
Buerkel-Rothfuss, Nancy L., and Sandra Mayes. 1981. Soap Opera Viewing: The Cultivation Effect. Journal of Communication 31 (3): 108–115. Print.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge. Print.
Butsch, Richard. 1992. Class and Gender in Four Decades of Television Situation Comedy: Plusça Change…. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 9: 387–399. Print.
Byars, Jackie. 1987. Reading Feminine Discourse: Prime-Time Television in the U.S. Communication 9: 289–303. Print.
Collins, Claudia. 1997. Viewer Letters as Audience Research: The Case of Murphy Brown. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 41 (1): 109–131. Print.
Corrigan, Paul, and Brad Walsh, writers, and Jason Winer, dir. Fizbo. 2010. Modern Family. Twentieth Century Fox, Hollywood. November 25, 2010. Television.
Courtney, Alice E., and Thomas W. Whipple. 1983. Sex Stereotyping in Advertising. Lexington: Lexington Books. Print.
Dow, Bonnie J. 1990. Hegemony, Feminist Criticism and the Mary Tyler Moore Show. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7: 261–274. Print.
———. 1992. Femininity and Feminism in Murphy Brown. Southern Communication Journal 57: 143–155. Print.
Fouts, Gregory, and Kimberley Burggraf. 2000. Television Situation Comedies: Female Weight, Male Negative Comments, and Audience Reactions. Sex Roles 42 (9/10): 925–932. Print.
Frueh, Terry, and Paul E. McGhee. 1975. Traditional Sex Role Development and Amount of Time Spent Watching Television. Developmental Psychology 11 (1): 109–114. Print.
Fry, William F., Jr. 1987. Humor and Paradox. American Behavioral Scientist 30 (1): 42–71. Print.
Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press. Print.
Gray, Frances. 1994. Women and Laughter. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Print.
Guider, Elizabeth. 2010. ‘Modern Family’ Actors Practicing Gay Kiss. Entertainment Weekly, August 28, 2010. Web. 21 Jan 2016.
Haimoff, Michelle. 2012. Not So Modern Family: Top Sitcoms Make for Sexist, Inaccurate Television. Christian Science Monitor, January 27, 2012. Web. 21 Jan 2016.
Hanke, Robert. 1998. The ‘Mock-Macho’ Situation Comedy: Hegemonic Masculinity and Its Reiteration. Western Journal of Communication 62 (1): 74–93. Print.
Liebert, Robert M., and Joyce Sprafkin. 1988. The Early Window: Effects of Television on Children and Youth. 3rd ed. Elmsford: Pergamon. Print.
Meadowcroft, Jeanne M., and Mary Anne Fitzpatrick. 1988. Theories of Family Communication: Toward a Merger of Intersubjectivity and Mutual Influences Processes. In Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, ed. Robert P. Hawkins, John M. Wiemann, and Suzanne Pingree, 253–275. Newbury Park: Sage. Print.
Moore, Marvin L. 1992. The Family as Portrayed on Prime-Time Television, 1947–1990: Structure and Characteristics. Sex Roles 26 (1–2): 41–61. Print.
Olson, Beth, and William Douglas. 1997. The Family on Television: Evaluation of Gender Roles in Situation Comedy. Sex Roles 36 (5/6): 409–427. Print.
Palmer, Jerry. 1987. The Logic of the Absurd: On Film and Television Comedy. London: British Film Institute. Print.
———. 1994. Taking Humor Seriously. New York: Routledge. Print.
Poniewozik, James. 2010. Modern Family Watch: Lips Service. Time, September 30, 2010. Web. 21 Jan 2016.
Press, Andrea L. 1991. Women Watching Television: Gender, Class, and Generation in the American Television Experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Print.
Reeves, Byron, and Mark M. Miller. 1978. A Multidimensional Measure of Children’s Identification with Television Characters. Journal of Broadcasting 22 (1): 71–86. Print.
Richman, Jeffrey, writer, and Michael Spiller, dir. 2010. “Halloween.” Modern Family. Twentieth Century Fox. Hollywood, October 26, 2010. Television.
Rowe, Kathleen. 1995. The Unruly Woman: Gender and the Genres of Laughter. Austin: University of Texas Press. Print.
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press. Print.
Skill, Thomas, and James D. Robinson. 1994. Trend: Four Decades of Families on Television: A Demographic Profile, 1950–1989. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 38 (4): 449–464. Print.
Toro, Josep, Manual Salamero, and Esteve Martinez. 1994. Assessment of Sociocultural Influences on the Aesthetic Body Shape Model in Anorexia Nervosa. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 89: 147–151. Print.
Villarreal, Yvonne. 2011. ‘Modern Family’: Savior of the Sitcom. Los Angeles Times, October 30, 2011. Web. 21 Jan 2016.
Zuker, Danny, writer, and Fred Savage, dir. 2011. After the Fire. Modern Family. Twentieth Century Fox. Hollywood, November 15, 2011. Television.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drushel, B.E. (2018). “Modern” Is as Modern Does: Modern Family and the Disruption of Gender Binaries. In: McNeil, E., Wermers, J., Lunn, J. (eds) Mapping Queer Space(s) of Praxis and Pedagogy. Queer Studies and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64623-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64623-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64622-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64623-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)