Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Imaging of Barrett’s Esophagus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in Gastroenterology

Part of the book series: Clinical Gastroenterology ((CG))

  • 1801 Accesses

Abstract

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition that can progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Recent advances in mucosal imaging have led to better detection and characterization of dysplasia and early cancer in BE. There is increasing interest in advanced imaging modalities which may enable endoscopists to detect and characterise dysplasia and early cancer. Although some of these technologies still remain investigational, others have been incorporated into the mainstream practice with variable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, Sorensen HT, Funch-Jensen P. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pohl H, Welch G. The role of over diagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rahman AA, Singh R, Sharma P. Management of Barrett’s esophagus. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2013;59:13–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans JA, Early DS, Fukami N, et al. The role of endoscopy in Barrett’s esophagus and other premalignant conditions of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:1087–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Almond LM, Barr H. Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett’s oesophagus. Int J Surg. 2012;10:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falk GW, Ours TM, Richter JE. Practice patterns for surveillance of Barrett's esophagus in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vieth M, Ell C, Gossner L, et al. Histological analysis of endoscopic resection specimens from 326 patients with Barrett’s esophagus and early neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2004;36:776–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eckardt VF, Kanzler G, Bernhard G. Life expectancy and cancer risk in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective controlled investigation. Am J Med. 2001;111:33–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhat S, Coleman HG, Yousef F, et al. Risk of malignant progression in Barrett’s esophagus patients: results from a large population- based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1049–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Curvers WL, van Vilsteren FG, Baak LC, et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging versus standard video endoscopy for detection of early Barrett’s neoplasia: a multicenter, randomized, crossover study in general practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boerwinkle D, Swager AF, Curvers WL, Bergman JJGHM. The clinical consequences of advanced imaging techniques in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:622–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma P, Savides TJ, Canto MI, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic innovations) on imaging in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:252–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta N, Gaddam S, Wani SB, et al. Longer inspection time is associated with increased detection of high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trivedi PJ, Braden B. Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy. QJM. 2013;106(2):117–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Canto MI, Setrakian S, Willis JE, et al. Methylene blue staining of dysplastic and non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus: an in vivo and ex vivo study. Endoscopy. 2001;33:391–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Canto MI, Setrakian S, Petras RE, et al. Methylene blue selectively stains intestinal metaplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiesslich R, Hahn M, Herrmann G, et al. Screening for specialized columnar epithelium with methylene blue: chromoendoscopy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and a normal control group. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:47–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kouklakis GS, Kountouras J, Dokas SM, et al. Methylene blue chromoendoscopy for the detection of Barrett’s esophagus in a Greek cohort. Endoscopy. 2003;35:383–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma P, Topalovski M, Mayo MS, et al. Methylene blue chromoendoscopy for detection of short-segment Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:289–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dave U, Shousha S, Westaby D. Methylene blue staining: is it really useful in Barrett’s esophagus? Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:333–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gangarosa LM, Halter S, Mertz H. Methylene blue staining and endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of Barrett’s esophagus with low-grade dysplasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:225–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ngamruengphong S, Sharma VK, Das A. Diagnostic yield of methylene blue chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1021–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Olliver JR, Wild CP, Sahay P, et al. Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue and associated DNA damage in Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet. 2003;362:373–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Canto MI. Acetic-acid chromoendoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus: the “pros”. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:13–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lambert R, Rey JF, Sankaranarayanan R. Magnification and chromoscopy with the acetic acid test. Endoscopy. 2003;35:437–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rey JF, Inoue H, Guelrud M. Magnification endoscopy with acetic acid for Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2005;37:583–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Costello S, Singh R. Endoscopic imaging in Barrett’s oesophagus: applications in routine clinical practice and future outlook. Clin Endosc. 2011;44:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fortun PJ, Anagnostopoulos GK, Kaye P, et al. Acetic acid-enhanced magnification endoscopy in the diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:735–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhandari P, Kandaswamy P, Cowlishaw D, et al. Acetic acid-enhanced chromoendoscopy is more cost-effective than protocol-guided biopsies in a high- risk Barrett’s population. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:386–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Longcroft-Wheaton G, Duku M, Mead R, et al. Acetic acid spray is an effective tool for the endoscopic detection of neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:843–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bhandari P, Kandaswamy P, Cowlishaw D, et al. Acetic acid-enhanced chromoendoscopy is more cost-effective than protocol-guided biopsies in a high- risk Barrett’s population. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:386–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M, et al. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:568–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma P, Bansal A, Mathur S, et al. The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma P, Bansal A, Mathur S, et al. The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kara MA, Peters FP, Rosmolen WD, et al. High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2005;37:929–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma P, Hawes RH, Bansal A, et al. Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett’s oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomized controlled trial. Gut. 2013;62:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Curvers WL, van den Broek FJ, Reitsma JB, et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of abnormalities in the esophagus and stomach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:307–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Curvers WL, Bohmer CJ, Mallant-Hent RC, et al. Mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus: inter-observer agreement and role of narrow band imaging. Endoscopy. 2008;40:799–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Herrero LA, Curvers WL, Bansal A, et al. Zooming in on Barrett oesophagus using narrow-band imaging: an international observer agreement study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:1068–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Almond LM, Barr H. Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett’s oesophagus. Int J Surg. 2012;10:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee MH, Buterbaugh K, Richards-Kortum R, et al. Advanced endoscopic imaging for Barrett’s esophagus: current options and future directions. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14:216–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Filip M, Iordache S, Saftoiu A, et al. Autofluorescence imaging and magnification endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kara MA, Peters FP, Ten Kate FJ, et al. Endoscopic video autofluorescence imaging may improve the detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:679–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kara MA, Peters FP, Fockens P, et al. Endoscopic video autofluorescence imaging followed by narrow band imaging for detecting early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:176–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Curvers WL, Herrero LA, Wallace MB, et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1106–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T, et al. Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2007;39:594–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Camus M, Coriat R, Leblanc S, et al. Helpfulness of the combination of acetic acid and FICE in the detection of Barrett’s epithelium and Barrett’s associated neoplasias. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1921–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Saxena P, Canto MI. Red flag imaging techniques in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2013;23:535–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Evans JA, Bouma BE, Bressner J, et al. Identifying intestinal metaplasia at the squamocolumnar junction by using optical coherence tomography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Isenberg G, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A, Wong RC, Willis JE, Wolf B, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic optical coherence tomography in the detection of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective, double-blinded study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:825–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bird-Lieberman EL, Neves AA, Lao-Sirieix P, O’Donovan M, Novelli M, Lovat LB, et al. Molecular imaging using fluorescent lectins permits rapid endoscopic identification of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Nat Med. 2012;18:315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu S, Wang TD. In vivo cancer biomarkers of esophageal neoplasia. Cancer Biomark. 2008;4:341–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Polglase AL, McLaren WJ, Skinner SA, Kiesslich R, Neurath MF, Delaney PM. A fluorescence confocal endomicroscope for in vivo microscopy of the upper- and the lower-GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:686–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Almadi MA, Neuman H. Probe based confocal laser endomicroscopy of the pancreatobiliary system. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(44):12696–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Goetz M, Kiesslich R. Confocal endomicroscopy: in vivo diagnosis of neoplastic lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:353–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pohl H, Rosch T, Vieth M, Koch M, Becker V, Anders M, et al. Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:1648–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Haidry R, Butt MA, Lovat LB. Advances in endoscopy. Medicine. 2011;39:279–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lovat LB, Johnson K, Mackenzie GD, Clark BR, Novelli MR, Davies S, et al. Elastic scattering spectroscopy accurately detects high grade dysplasia and cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2006;55:1078–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bergholt MS, Zheng W, Lin K, Ho KY, Teh M, Yeoh KG, et al. In vivo diagnosis of esophageal cancer using image-guided Raman endoscopy and biomolecular modeling. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2011;10:103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bergholt MS, Zheng W, Lin K, Ho KY, Teh M, Yeoh KG, et al. Characterizing variability in in-vivo Raman spectra of different anatomical locations in the upper gastrointestinal tract toward cancer detection. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16(3):037003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Qiu L, Pleskow DK, Chuttani R, et al. Multispectral scanning during endoscopy guides biopsy of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Nat Med. 2010;16:603–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajvinder Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S., Gibson, E., Uedo, N., Singh, R. (2018). Recent Advances in Imaging of Barrett’s Esophagus. In: Sridhar, S., Wu, G. (eds) Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in Gastroenterology. Clinical Gastroenterology. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62993-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62993-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62991-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62993-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics