Abstract
Non-state driven Transnational Initiatives for Social Sustainability (TISSs) have increasingly attempted to approach social issues like labour laws in global supply chains. The reason is that state-laws are territorially confined and thus cannot approach such issues. Attempting to fill this regulatory gap, TISSs have become more and more important to provide systems of rules for coping with transboundary issues. But can TISSs, which by definition provide rules to be followed exclusively on a voluntary basis, contribute to effective solutions of issues on which they are focused? This examination presents a theoretical framework explaining the effectiveness of TISSs. For the empirical case study, the Business Social Compliance Initiative (BSCI) and the Fair Wear Foundation (FWF) were selected. Data was collected from expert interviews and documents as audit reports and regulatory documents of BSCI and FWF. The results lead to the conclusion that stakeholder-involving approaches are adequate to support social sustainability in the future.
This chapter is a reprint of “Supply Chains in the Apparel Industry: Do Transnational Initiatives for Social Sustainability Improve Workers’ Situation?”, published in International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning (IJMKL; 2015 Vol. 4, Issue 1, p. 27-40).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2009. The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In The politics of global regulation, 44–88. Princeton: University Press.
BSCI. 2009a. Code of conduct. http://www.bsci-intl.org/resources/code-of-conduct. Accessed 9 Mar 2015.
———. 2009b. Rules and functioning. http://www.bsci-intl.org/resources/rules-functioning. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
———. 2009c. Implementation guidelines. Brussels.
———. 2009d. Management manual. Brussels.
———. 2009e. Position on wages. http://www.bsci-intl.org/resources/bsci-positions. Accessed 12 Mar 2015.
———. 2009f. Social audit guidelines. Brussels.
———. 2012. Annual report 2011. http://www.bsci-intl.org/resources/annual-report-bsci. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
Calton, Jerry M., and Steven L. Payne. 2003. Coping with paradox: Multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business & Society 42: 7–42.
Camillus, John C. 2008. Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review 86: 99–106.
Delmas, Magali. 2001. Stakeholders and competitive advantage. Production and Operations Management 10: 343–358.
Dingwerth, Klaus, and Philipp Pattberg. 2006. Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance 12: 185–203.
Fair Wear Foundation (FWF). 2009a. Charter including code of labour practices. http://www.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/companies/FWFdocs/fwfcharterjanuary2011.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2015.
———. 2009b. Manual for companies affiliated to Fair Wear Foundation. http://www.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/companies/ManualsReports/manualaffiliatesoctober2009.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2015.
———. 2010. Living wage: FWF policy and practice. http://www.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/policydocs/fwflivingwagepolicynov2010.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.
———. 2012a. Fair Wear Foundation annual report 2011. http://www.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/fwfpublications_reports/FWFAnnualReport2011.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2015.
———. 2012b. FWF audit manual. http://www.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/policydocs/FWFauditmanual-march2012.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2015.
———. 2012c. Terms for audits by FWF audit teams. http://www.fairwear.org/ul/cms/fck-uploaded/documents/policydocs/termsforFWFauditsjan2012.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2015.
Fama, Eugene F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307.
Fama, Eugene F., and Michael C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301–325.
Fransen, Luc W. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and global labor standards: firms and activists in the making of private regulation. New York: Routledge.
Friese, Susanne. 2012. Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences, BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gibbs, Graham R. 2007. Analyzing qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gläser, Jochen, and Grit Laudel. 2010. Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse – als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Vol. 2., durchg. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Held, David. 2004. Global covenant: the social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hill, Charles W.L., and Thomas M. Jones. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies 29: 131–154.
ILO. 2012. ILOLEX: Database of international labour standards. http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/convdisp1.htm. Accessed 9 Mar 2015.
Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.
Levy, David L., and Rami Kaplan. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and theories of global governance: strategic contestation in global issue arenas. In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, ed. Adrew Crane, Dirk Matten, Abagail McWilliams, Jeremy Moon, and Donald S. Siegen, 432–451. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review 65: 682–693.
Mayring, Philipp. 2010. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken. Beltz Verlag: Weinheim.
Meier, Claude. 2014. The effectiveness of transnational standards initiatives (TSI) in the apparel industry: An empirical examination of two cases. Bern: Haupt Verlag.
Mena, Sébastien, Marieke de Leede, Dorothée Baumann, Nicky Black, Sara Lindeman, and Lindsay McShane. 2010. Advancing the business and human rights agenda: Dialogue, empowerment, and constructive engagement. Journal of Business Ethics 93: 161–188.
Miles, Edward L., Steinar Andresen, Elaine M. Carlin, Jon B. Skiaerseth, Arild Underdal, and Jørgen Wetterstad. 2002. Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Prahalad, Coimbatore K., and Gary Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68: 79–91.
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
Rieth, Lothar. 2009. Global governance und corporate social responsibility. Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
Rondinelli, Dennis A. 2002. Transnational corporations: International citizens or New Sovereigns? Business and Society Review 107: 391–413.
Rosenau, James N., and Ernst-Otto Czempiel. 1992. Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, Sybille, and Edwin RĂĽhli. 2011. Stakeholders matter: A new paradigm for strategy in society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shankman, Neil A. 1999. Reframing the debate between agency and stakeholder theories of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics 19: 319–334.
Strand, Robert. 2010. The stakeholder dashboard. Greenter Management Journal 54: 23–36.
Van Tulder, Rob, and Ans Kolk. 2001. Multinationality and corporate ethics: codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies 32: 267–283.
Willke, Helmut. 2014. Demokratie in Zeiten der Konfusion. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Zadek, Simon. 2004. The path to corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 82: 125–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meier, C. (2017). Supply Chains in the Apparel Industry: Do Transnational Initiatives for Social Sustainability Improve Workers’ Situation?. In: Freeman, R., Kujala, J., Sachs, S. (eds) Stakeholder Engagement: Clinical Research Cases. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62785-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62784-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62785-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)