Skip to main content

In Situ Approaches to Studying Occupants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Occupant Behavior in Buildings

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of in situ methods to study occupant behavior and presence. The aim of the chapter is to provide new and established researchers with a systematic approach to in situ occupant monitoring studies, while also providing illustrative examples to demonstrate the complexities and solutions for navigating this method. The chapter begins with a recommended systematic procedure for designing, conducting, and publishing in situ occupant studies. Following that, in situ-specific sensor technologies and sensing strategies are discussed in detail, with numerous real examples. This chapter devotes considerable discussion on nuances and practical issues that are frequently encountered during in situ studies, including: sensor placement, validation, access to studied spaces, monitoring spaces with multiple occupants, biases such as the Hawthorne effect, participant recruitment, and ethical considerations. Next, recommendations are provided for the level of documentation that should be provided when publishing in situ studies, with particular attention to the contextual factors that could influence the results. Finally, the use of surveys to complement in situ sensor-based methods is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen R (2013) Erfaringer fra projekt Dynamisk varmeregnskab (trans: Energi CfIo). Danmarks Tekniske Universitet

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Fabi V, Toftum J, Corgnati SP, Olesen BW (2013) Window opening behaviour modelled from measurements in Danish dwellings. Build Environ 69:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2010) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Standard 55. Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaji B, Xu J, Nwokafor A, Gupta R, Agarwal Y (2013) Sentinel: occupancy based HVAC actuation using existing WiFi infrastructure within commercial buildings. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. Roma, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Benezeth Y, Laurent H, Emile B, Rosenberger C (2011) Towards a sensor for detecting human presence and characterizing activity. Energ Build 43(2):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet I, O’Brien W (2017) Field study of thermal comfort and occupant satisfaction in Canadian condominiums. Architectural Sci Rev 60(1):27–39. doi:10.1080/00038628.2016.1205179

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce PR, Veitch JA, Newsham GR, Jones C, Heerwagen J, Myer M, Hunter C (2006) Lighting quality and office work: two field simulation experiments. Lighting Res Technol 38(3):191–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell GM, Smith JA, Wright DB (2012) Research methods in psychology. SAGE Publications, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Freas B, Goldstein N, Kallai P, Tischler M, Valiquette L (2016) Printable and flexible electronics enabled intelligent buildings. Canadian Printed Electronics Industry Association/Continental Automated Buildings Association (CPEIA/CABA) White Paper. https://www.navigant.com/-/media/www/site/insights/energy/2016/energycpeiawpib.pdf

  • Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR (2012) Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(1 Suppl 1):S5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong H (2016) Temperature dataloggers in single family homes in winter. http://www.dataloggerproject.com/

  • Coen MH (1998) Design principles for intelligent environments. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp 547–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JA III, Nutter DW (2010) Occupancy diversity factors for common university building types. Energ Build 42(9):1543–1551. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Theodorson J, Van Den Wymelenberg K (2012) Understanding controls, behaviors and satisfaction in the daylit perimeter office: a daylight design case study. J Inter Des 37(1):17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Andrews B (2009) Sensor-based occupancy behavioral pattern recognition for energy and comfort management in intelligent buildings. In: Proceedings of International IBPSA Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Andrews B, Lam KP, Höynck M, Zhang R, Chiou Y-S, Benitez D (2010) An information technology enabled sustainability test-bed (ITEST) for occupancy detection through an environmental sensing network. Energ Build 42(7):1038–1046. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Li Z, McFadden G (2015) An investigation on energy-related occupancy behavior for low-income residential buildings. Sci Technol Built Environ 21(6):892–901. doi:10.1080/23744731.2015.1040321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ecobee (2017) Donate your data. https://www.ecobee.com/donateyourdata/

  • Elmes DG, Kantowitz BH, Roediger III HL (2011) Research methods in psychology. Nelson Education, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson VL, Lin Y, Kamthe A, Brahme R, Surana A, Cerpa AE, Sohn MD, Narayanan S (2009) Energy efficient building environment control strategies using real-time occupancy measurements. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings. ACM, pp 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • George JF (1996) Computer-based monitoring: common perceptions and empirical results. Mis Q 459–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilani S, O’Brien W (2016) Review of current methods, opportunities, and challenges for in-situ monitoring to support occupant modelling in office spaces. J Build Perform Simul 1–27. doi:10.1080/19401493.2016.1255258

  • Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Leech NL (2011) Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey A, Conway R, Meagher D, ÓLaighin G (2008) Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry. Med Eng Phys 30(10):1364–1386. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.005

  • Gunay HB, Fuller A, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2016) Detecting occupants’ presence in office spaces: a case study. Paper presented at the eSim 2016. Hamilton, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta M, Intille SS, Larson K (2009) Adding gps-control to traditional thermostats: an exploration of potential energy savings and design challenges. In: Pervasive Computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldi F, Robinson D (2008) On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants. Build Environ 43(12):2163–2177. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldi F, Robinson D (2010) Adaptive actions on shading devices in response to local visual stimuli. J Build Performan Simul 3(2):135–153. doi:10.1080/19401490903580759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen J (2000) Green buildings, organizational success and occupant productivity. Build Res Inf 28(5–6):353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalal A, Uddin MZ, Kim JT, Kim T-S (2012) Recognition of human home activities via depth silhouettes and ℜ transformation for Smart Homes. Indoor Built Environ 21(1):184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapsis K, O’Brien W, Athienitis AK (2013) Time-lapse photography and image recognition to monitor occupant-controlled shade patterns: analysis and results. Paper presented at Building Simulation, Chambery, France, 25–28 Aug 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Konis K (2013) Evaluating daylighting effectiveness and occupant visual comfort in a side-lit open-plan office building in San Francisco, California. Build Environ 59:662–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovatsch M, Lanter M, Duquennoy S (2012) Actinium: A RESTful runtime container for scriptable internet of things applications. In: Internet of Things (IOT), 2012 3rd International Conference on the Internet of Things, 2012. IEEE, pp 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Labeodan T, Zeiler W, Boxem G, Zhao Y (2015) Occupancy measurement in commercial office buildings for demand-driven control applications—a survey and detection system evaluation. Energ Build 93:303–314. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam KP, Höynck M, Dong B, Andrews B, Chiou Y-S, Zhang R, Benitez D, Choi J (2009) Occupancy detection through an extensive environmental sensor network in an open-plan office building. IBPSA Build Simul 1452–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi A (2011) The human dimension of building performance simulation. In: Building Simulation-12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau ML, Zmeureanu R (2000) Nonintrusive load disaggregation computer program to estimate the energy consumption of major end uses in residential buildings. Energ Convers Manag 41(13):1389–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathie M, Celler BG, Lovell NH, Coster A (2004) Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Biol Eng Compu 42(5):679–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCambridge J, Kypri K, Elbourne D (2014) Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboard. J Clin Epidemiol 67(8):845–849. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meerbeek B, te Kulve M, Gritti T, Aarts M, van Loenen E, Aarts E (2014) Building automation and perceived control: a field study on motorized exterior blinds in Dutch offices. Build Environ 79:66–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan C, de Dear R (2003) Weather, clothing and thermal adaptation to indoor climate. Clim Res 24(3):267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestor PG, Schutt RK (2014) Research methods in psychology: investigating human behavior. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien W, Gunay HB (2014) The contextual factors contributing to occupants’ adaptive comfort behaviors in offices—a review and proposed modeling framework. Build Environ 77:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien W, Kapsis K, Athienitis AK, Kesik T (2010) Methodology for quantifying the performance implications of intelligent shade control in existing buildings in an urban context. Paper presented at the SimBuild 2010, New York City, 11–13 Aug 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffer T, Pritoni M, Meier A, Aragon C, Perry D (2011) How people use thermostats in homes: a review. Build Environ 46(12):2529–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea MS (1984) Window blind occlusion: a pilot study. Build Environ 19(2):133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CF, Voss K (2003) Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. Lighting Res Technol 35(3):243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiker M, Wagner A (2016) The effect of occupancy on perceived control, neutral temperature, and behavioral patterns. Energ Build 117(1):246–259. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.10.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih H-C (2014) A robust occupancy detection and tracking algorithm for the automatic monitoring and commissioning of a building. Energ Build 77:270–280. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter Y, Dumortier D, Fontoynont M (2006) The use of shading systems in VDU task offices: a pilot study. Energ Build 38(7):780–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi F, Mahdavi A (2012) Optimization-based simulation model calibration using sensitivity analysis. Paper presented at the 7th conference of IBPSA-CZ, Brno, Czech Republic

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiefenbeck V (2016) On the magnitude and persistence of the Hawthorne effect—evidence from four field studies. In: 4th European Conference on Behaviour and Energy Efficiency, Coimbra, Portugal, 8–9 Sept 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam S, Bakker C, Van Hal J (2010) Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term. Build Res Inf 38(5):458–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassileva I, Wallin F, Dahlquist E (2012) Analytical comparison between electricity consumption and behavioral characteristics of Swedish households in rented apartments. Appl Energ 90(1):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch JA, Mancini S, Galasiu AD, Laouadi A (2013) Survey on Canadian households’ control of indoor climate. Research Report RR-344. National Research Council (NRC) Construction. http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrccnrc.gc.ca/eng/view/fulltext/?id=e13b92f0-4044-4643-9bd3-2728e06c3aaa

  • Webster T, Bauman F, Shi M, Reese J (2002) Thermal stratification performance of underfloor air distribution (UFAD) systems. Paper presented at the Indoor Air, Monterey, CA, June 30–July 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Wienold J, Christoffersen J (2006) Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energ Build 38(7):743–757. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood G, Newborough M (2003) Dynamic energy-consumption indicators for domestic appliances: environment, behaviour and design. Energ Build 35(8):821–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C-C, Hsu Y-L (2010) A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors 10(8):7772–7788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Barrett P (2012) Factors influencing occupants’ blind-control behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Build Environ 54:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Zeiler W, Boxem G, Labeodan T (2015) Virtual occupancy sensors for real-time occupancy information in buildings. Build Environ 93(Part 2):9–20. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zibin N, Zmeureanu R, Love J (2016) Automatic assisted calibration tool for coupling building automation system trend data with commissioning. Automation in Construction 61:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoha A, Gluhak A, Imran MA, Rajasegarar S (2012) Non-intrusive load monitoring approaches for disaggregated energy sensing: a survey. Sensors 12(12):16838–16866

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William O’Brien .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Brien, W., Gilani, S., Burak Gunay, H. (2018). In Situ Approaches to Studying Occupants. In: Wagner, A., O’Brien, W., Dong, B. (eds) Exploring Occupant Behavior in Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61464-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61464-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61463-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61464-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics