Abstract
Today urban areas are growing fast, in this process it remains a challenge to include the opinions of the public. This holds especially true for young people. From the 1960’s, the rights of the children started to be recognized through the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article 12 of the convention states that children should have the opportunity to express their views in matters that affect them, like urban planning. Our work started analysing the literature and providing an overview of participatory methods used to include children in land-use projects. We then reviewed existing mobile apps targeting participation in public life. Based on the findings from the literature a list of high level requirements was created to guide the design and implementation of the mobile app DELTA. The DELTA app support situated participation encouraging users to explore the urban environment, promoting awareness and critical thinking. Several user evaluations are performed during the development cycles, including expert evaluations, usability and field tests of the final prototype. Based on collected data and lessons learned, results are discussed in relation to participation and learning outcomes for children.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“delta” is the Norwegian word for “participation”.
- 2.
References
Allen M, Regenbrecht H, Abbott M (2011) Smart-Phone Augmented Reality for Public Participation in Urban Planning, pp 11–20
Bartlett S (2002) Building Better Cities with Children and Youth
Bohøj M, Borchorst NG, Bødker S, Korn M, Zander, P-O (2011) Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on communities and technologies, pp 88–97. ACM
Breitbart MM (1995) Banners for the street: reclaiming space and designing change with urban youth. J Plann Educ Res 15(1):35–49
Castells M, Fernandez-Ardevol M, LinchuanQiu J, Sey A (2009) Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge
Chawla L, Heft H (2002) Children’s competence and the ecology of communities: a functional approach to the evaluation of participation. J Environ. Psychol. 22(1–2):201–216
Clark BY, Brudney JL, Jang S-G (2013) Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: investigating the distributional biases. Public Adm Rev 73(5):687–701
Corsi M (2002) The child friendly cities initiative in Italy. Environ Urbanization 14(2):169–179
Cunningham CJ, Jones MA, Dillon R (2003) Children and urban regional planning: participation in the public consultation process through story writing. Children’s Geographies 1(2):201–221
Dennis SF (2006) Prospects for qualitative GIS at the intersection of youth development and participatory urban planning. Environ Plan A 38(11):2039–2054
Francis M (1988) Negotiating between children and adult design values in open space projects. Des Stud 9(2):67–75
Frank KI (2006) The potential of youth participation in planning. J Plan Lit 20(4):351–371
Gleeson B, Sipe N (2006) Creating Child Friendly Cities: New Perspectives and Prospects. Routledge
Gordon E, Schirra S, Hollander J (2011) Immersive planning: a conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies. Environ Plan B Plan Des 38(3):505–519
Haider J (2007) Inclusive design: planning public urban spaces for children. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-municipal engineer, pp 160:83–88. Thomas Telford Ltd
Halprin L, Hester Jr RT, Mullen D (1999) Lawrence Halprin [Interview]. Places 12 (2)
Hart, RA (1992) Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship, vol 4. Innocenti Essays. ERIC
Hirsch AB (2011) Scoring the participatory city: lawrence (& Anna) halprin’s take part process. J Architectural Educ 64(2):127–140
Horelli L (1997) A methodological approach to children’s participation in urban planning. Scand Hous Plan Res 14(3):105–115
Innes JE, Booher DE (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Plan Theory Pract 5(4):419–436
Irvin RA, Stansbury J (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm Rev 64(1):55–65
Kangas A, Rasinmäki J, Eyvindson K, Chambers P (2015) A mobile phone application for the collection of opinion data for forest planning purposes. Environ Manage 55(4):961–971. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0438-0
Keele S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: Technical Report, Ver. 2.3, EBSE Technical Report. EBSE.sn
Korn M (2013) Situating Engagement: Ubiquitous Infrastructures for in-Situ Civic Engagement. Ph.D. thesis, Aarhus UniversitetAarhus University, Science and TechnologyScience and Technology, Institut for Datalogi Department of Computer Science
Lansdown, G (2010) The realisation of children’s participation rights: critical reflections. In: A handbook of children and young people’s participation: perspectives from theory and practice
Laughlin DL, Johnson LC (2011) Defining and exploring public space: perspectives of young people from regent park, Toronto. Children’s Geographies 9(3–4):439–456
Lehner U, Reitberger, W, Baldauf M, Fröhlich P, Eranti V (2014) Civic engagement meets pervasive gaming: towards long-term mobile participation. pp 1483–1488. doi:10.1145/2559206.2581270
Mallan K, Greenaway R (2011) Radiant with possibility: involving young people in creating a vision for the future of their community. Futures 43(4):374–386
Malone K (2013) The future lies in our hands’: children as researchers and environmental change agents in designing a child-friendly neighbourhood. Local Environ 18(3):372–395
Norwegian Government (2008) Planning and Building Act, June
O’Hara, K (2008) Understanding geocaching practices and motivations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1177–1186. ACM
Oksman V, Väätänen A, Ylikauppila M (2014) Co-creation of sustainable smart cities: users, participation and service design. pp 189–95
Passon C, Levi D, del Rio V (2008) Implications of adolescents’ perceptions and values for planning and design. J Plan Educ Res
Reiersølmoen M (2016) Facilitating children and youth’s participation in urban planning
Roberts N (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. Am Rev Public Adm 34(4):315–353
Schröder C (2014) A mobile app for citizen participation. November 2014, pp 75–78. doi:10.1145/2729104.2729137
Spier, JJ (2013) A walk in the park: an experiential approach to youth participation. Youth Studies Australia 32 (3)
Torres J (2012) Participation as a pedagogy of complexity: lessons from two design projects with children. Urban Des Int 17(1):62–75
Tullis TS, Jacqueline NS (2004) A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In: Usability Professional Association Conference, pp 1–12
Wilks J, Rudner J (2013) A Voice for Children and Young People in the City. Aust J Environ Educ 29(1):1–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reiersølmoen, M., Gianni, F., Divitini, M. (2018). DELTA: Promoting Young People Participation in Urban Planning. In: Mealha, Ó., Divitini, M., Rehm, M. (eds) Citizen, Territory and Technologies: Smart Learning Contexts and Practices. SLERD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61321-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61322-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)