Abstract
There are a lot of histone modifications other than methylation, many of which are known to be dysregulated in cancer cells. This chapter briefly introduces typical histone modifications associated with cancer, and then provides an overview of the current understanding of histone acetylation. Histone acetylation, which occurs at the α-amino group of the most N-terminal amino acid residue, and at the ε-amino groups of internal lysine residues in histone molecules, is catalyzed by various kinds of histone acetyltransferases. This modification causes alterations in the electrostatic property of the target residue, and thereby contributes to the dynamic regulation of the state of chromatin. N-terminal acetylation of histones is considered to occur constitutively, whereas the internal lysine acetylation is reversible, being recognized by trans-acting bromodomain-containing proteins and removed by histone deacetylases. This chapter focuses on outlining representative histone acetyltransferases and their molecular mechanisms, to provide a picture of how their substrate-specificity is ensured. Next, how bromodomains recognize their target residues is presented. Finally, the molecular mechanisms of histone deacetylation and its inhibition are briefly summarized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kleff S, Andrulis ED, Anderson CW, Sternglanz R (1995) Identification of a gene encoding a yeast histone H4 acetyltransferase. J Biol Chem 270(42):24674–24677
Parthun MR, Widom J, Gottschling DE (1996) The major cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase in yeast: links to chromatin replication and histone metabolism. Cell 87(1):85–94
Brownell JE, Zhou J, Ranalli T, Kobayashi R, Edmondson DG et al (1996) Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84(6):843–851
Taunton J, Hassig CA, Schreiber SL (1996) A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 272(5260):408–411
Rundlett SE, Carmen AA, Kobayashi R, Bavykin S, Turner BM et al (1996) HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(25):14503–14508
Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O'Carroll D, Strahl BD, Sun ZW et al (2000) Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature 406(6796):593–599
Shi Y, Lan F, Matson C, Mulligan P, Whetstine JR et al (2004) Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119(7):941–953
Suka N, Suka Y, Carmen AA, Wu J, Grunstein M (2001) Highly specific antibodies determine histone acetylation site usage in yeast heterochromatin and euchromatin. Mol Cell 8(2):473–479
Turner BM, Fellows G (1989) Specific antibodies reveal ordered and cell-cycle-related use of histone-H4 acetylation sites in mammalian cells. Eur J Biochem 179(1):131–139
Turner BM, O'Neill LP, Allan IM (1989) Histone H4 acetylation in human cells. Frequency of acetylation at different sites defined by immunolabeling with site-specific antibodies. FEBS Lett 253(1–2):141–145
Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Villar-Garea A, Boix-Chornet M, Espada J et al (2005) Loss of acetylation at Lys16 and trimethylation at Lys20 of histone H4 is a common hallmark of human cancer. Nat Genet 37(4):391–400
Seligson DB, Horvath S, Shi T, Yu H, Tze S et al (2005) Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Nature 435(7046):1262–1266
Elsheikh SE, Green AR, Rakha EA, Powe DG, Ahmed RA et al (2009) Global histone modifications in breast cancer correlate with tumor phenotypes, prognostic factors, and patient outcome. Cancer Res 69(9):3802–3809
Chadee DN, Hendzel MJ, Tylipski CP, Allis CD, Bazett-Jones DP et al (1999) Increased Ser-10 phosphorylation of histone H3 in mitogen-stimulated and oncogene-transformed mouse fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 274(35):24914–24920
Choi HS, Choi BY, Cho YY, Mizuno H, Kang BS et al (2005) Phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 is indispensable for neoplastic cell transformation. Cancer Res 65(13):5818–5827
Kim HG, Lee KW, Cho YY, Kang NJ, Oh SM et al (2008) Mitogen- and stress-activated kinase 1-mediated histone H3 phosphorylation is crucial for cell transformation. Cancer Res 68(7):2538–2547
Tange S, Ito S, Senga T, Hamaguchi M (2009) Phosphorylation of histone H3 at Ser10: its role in cell transformation by v-Src. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 386(4):588–592
Li B, Huang G, Zhang X, Li R, Wang J et al (2013) Increased phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 is involved in Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1-induced carcinogenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 13:124
Prenzel T, Begus-Nahrmann Y, Kramer F, Hennion M, Hsu C et al (2011) Estrogen-dependent gene transcription in human breast cancer cells relies upon proteasome-dependent monoubiquitination of histone H2B. Cancer Res 71(17):5739–5753
Sterner DE, Berger SL (2000) Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64(2):435–459
Yuan H, Marmorstein R (2013) Histone acetyltransferases: rising ancient counterparts to protein kinases. Biopolymers 99(2):98–111
McCullough CE, Marmorstein R (2016) Molecular basis for histone acetyltransferase regulation by binding partners, associated domains, and autoacetylation. ACS Chem Biol 11(3):632–642
Lee DY, Hayes JJ, Pruss D, Wolffe AP (1993) A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA. Cell 72(1):73–84
Vettese-Dadey M, Grant PA, Hebbes TR, Crane- Robinson C, Allis CD et al (1996) Acetylation of histone H4 plays a primary role in enhancing transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA in vitro. EMBO J 15(10):2508–2518
Shogren-Knaak M, Ishii H, Sun JM, Pazin MJ, Davie JR et al (2006) Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311(5762):844–847
Turner BM, Birley AJ, Lavender J (1992) Histone H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei. Cell 69(2):375–384
Bone JR, Lavender J, Richman R, Palmer MJ, Turner BM et al (1994) Acetylated histone H4 on the male X chromosome is associated with dosage compensation in Drosophila. Genes Dev 8(1):96–104
Liu X, Bushnell DA, Kornberg RD (2013) RNA polymerase II transcription: structure and mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829(1):2–8
Lorch Y, Kornberg RD (2015) Chromatin-remodeling and the initiation of transcription. Q Rev Biophys 48(4):465–470
Sainsbury S, Bernecky C, Cramer P (2015) Structural basis of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16(3):129–143
Venkatesh S, Workman JL (2015) Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16(3):178–189
Kulaeva OI, Hsieh FK, Chang HW, Luse DS, Studitsky VM (2013) Mechanism of transcription through a nucleosome by RNA polymerase II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829(1):76–83
Song OK, Wang X, Waterborg JH, Sternglanz R (2003) An Nalpha-acetyltransferase responsible for acetylation of the N-terminal residues of histones H4 and H2A. J Biol Chem 278(40):38109–38112
Polevoda B, Hoskins J, Sherman F (2009) Properties of Nat4, an N(alpha)-acetyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that modifies N termini of histones H2A and H4. Mol Cell Biol 29(11):2913–2924
Hole K, Van Damme P, Dalva M, Aksnes H, Glomnes N et al (2011) The human N-alpha-acetyltransferase 40 (hNaa40p/hNatD) is conserved from yeast and N-terminally acetylates histones H2A and H4. PLoS One 6(9):e24713
Schiza V, Molina-Serrano D, Kyriakou D, Hadjiantoniou A, Kirmizis A (2013) N-alpha-terminal acetylation of histone H4 regulates arginine methylation and ribosomal DNA silencing. PLoS Genet 9(9):e1003805
Pavlou D, Kirmizis A (2016) Depletion of histone N-terminal-acetyltransferase Naa40 induces p53-independent apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells via the mitochondrial pathway. Apoptosis 21(3):298–311
Liu Z, Liu Y, Wang H, Ge X, Jin Q et al (2009) Patt1, a novel protein acetyltransferase that is highly expressed in liver and downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, enhances apoptosis of hepatoma cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41(12):2528–2537
Polevoda B, Norbeck J, Takakura H, Blomberg A, Sherman F (1999) Identification and specificities of N-terminal acetyltransferases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 18(21):6155–6168
Arnesen T, Van Damme P, Polevoda B, Helsens K, Evjenth R et al (2009) Proteomics analyses reveal the evolutionary conservation and divergence of N-terminal acetyltransferases from yeast and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(20):8157–8162
Varland S, Osberg C, Arnesen T (2015) N-terminal modifications of cellular proteins: the enzymes involved, their substrate specificities and biological effects. Proteomics 15(14):2385–2401
Magin RS, Liszczak GP, Marmorstein R (2015) The molecular basis for histone H4- and H2A-specific amino-terminal acetylation by NatD. Structure 23(2):332–341
Hilfiker A, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Pannuti A, Lucchesi JC (1997) mof, a putative acetyl transferase gene related to the Tip60 and MOZ human genes and to the SAS genes of yeast, is required for dosage compensation in Drosophila. EMBO J 16(8):2054–2060
Kuo MH, Allis CD (1998) Roles of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in gene regulation. BioEssays 20(8):615–626
Bordoli L, Netsch M, Luthi U, Lutz W, Eckner R (2001) Plant orthologs of p300/CBP: conservation of a core domain in metazoan p300/CBP acetyltransferase-related proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 29(3):589–597
Pandey R, Muller A, Napoli CA, Selinger DA, Pikaard CS et al (2002) Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin modification among multicellular eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 30(23):5036–5055
Dancy BM, Cole PA (2015) Protein lysine acetylation by p300/CBP. Chem Rev 115(6):2419–2452
Allis CD, Berger SL, Cote J, Dent S, Jenuwien T et al (2007) New nomenclature for chromatin-modifying enzymes. Cell 131(4):633–636
Huang S, Lee WH, Lee EY (1991) A cellular protein that competes with SV40 T antigen for binding to the retinoblastoma gene product. Nature 350(6314):160–162
Parthun MR (2012) Histone acetyltransferase 1: more than just an enzyme? Biochim Biophys Acta 1819(3–4):256–263
Keck KM, Pemberton LF (2013) Histone chaperones link histone nuclear import and chromatin assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819(3–4):277–289
Eberharter A, Lechner T, Goralik-Schramel M, Loidl P (1996) Purification and characterization of the cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase B of maize embryos. FEBS Lett 386(1):75–81
Verreault A, Kaufman PD, Kobayashi R, Stillman B (1998) Nucleosomal DNA regulates the core-histone-binding subunit of the human Hat1 acetyltransferase. Curr Biol 8(2):96–108
Kolle D, Sarg B, Lindner H, Loidl P (1998) Substrate and sequential site specificity of cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferases of maize and rat liver. FEBS Lett 421(2):109–114
Nagarajan P, Ge Z, Sirbu B, Doughty C, Agudelo Garcia PA et al (2013) Histone acetyl transferase 1 is essential for mammalian development, genome stability, and the processing of newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. PLoS Genet 9(6):e1003518
Poveda A, Pamblanco M, Tafrov S, Tordera V, Sternglanz R et al (2004) Hif1 is a component of yeast histone acetyltransferase B, a complex mainly localized in the nucleus. J Biol Chem 279(16):16033–16043
Campos EI, Fillingham J, Li G, Zheng H, Voigt P et al (2010) The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(11):1343–1351
Li Y, Zhang L, Liu T, Chai C, Fang Q et al (2014) Hat2p recognizes the histone H3 tail to specify the acetylation of the newly synthesized H3/H4 heterodimer by the Hat1p/Hat2p complex. Genes Dev 28(11):1217–1227
Wu H, Moshkina N, Min J, Zeng H, Joshua J et al (2012) Structural basis for substrate specificity and catalysis of human histone acetyltransferase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(23):8925–8930
Zheng Y, Thomas PM, Kelleher NL (2013) Measurement of acetylation turnover at distinct lysines in human histones identifies long-lived acetylation sites. Nat Commun 4:2203
Kaimori JY, Maehara K, Hayashi-Takanaka Y, Harada A, Fukuda M et al (2016) Histone H4 lysine 20 acetylation is associated with gene repression in human cells. Sci Rep 6:24318
Murzina NV, Pei XY, Zhang W, Sparkes M, Vicente-Garcia J et al (2008) Structural basis for the recognition of histone H4 by the histone-chaperone RbAp46. Structure 16(7):1077–1085
Georgakopoulos T, Thireos G (1992) Two distinct yeast transcriptional activators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J 11(11):4145–4152
Candau R, Moore PA, Wang L, Barlev N, Ying CY et al (1996) Identification of human proteins functionally conserved with the yeast putative adaptors ADA2 and GCN5. Mol Cell Biol 16(2):593–602
Yang XJ, Ogryzko VV, Nishikawa J, Howard BH, Nakatani Y (1996) A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Nature 382(6589):319–324
Nagy Z, Tora L (2007) Distinct GCN5/PCAF-containing complexes function as co-activators and are involved in transcription factor and global histone acetylation. Oncogene 26(37):5341–5357
Spedale G, Timmers HT, Pijnappel WW (2012) ATAC-king the complexity of SAGA during evolution. Genes Dev 26(6):527–541
Krebs AR, Demmers J, Karmodiya K, Chang NC, Chang AC et al (2010) ATAC and Mediator coactivators form a stable complex and regulate a set of non-coding RNA genes. EMBO Rep 11(7):541–547
Nagy Z, Riss A, Fujiyama S, Krebs A, Orpinell M et al (2010) The metazoan ATAC and SAGA coactivator HAT complexes regulate different sets of inducible target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci 67(4):611–628
Marcus GA, Silverman N, Berger SL, Horiuchi J, Guarente L (1994) Functional similarity and physical association between GCN5 and ADA2: putative transcriptional adaptors. EMBO J 13(20):4807–4815
Horiuchi J, Silverman N, Marcus GA, Guarente L (1995) ADA3, a putative transcriptional adaptor, consists of two separable domains and interacts with ADA2 and GCN5 in a trimeric complex. Mol Cell Biol 15(3):1203–1209
Pollard KJ, Peterson CL (1997) Role for ADA/GCN5 products in antagonizing chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol Cell Biol 17(11):6212–6222
Lee KK, Sardiu ME, Swanson SK, Gilmore JM, Torok M et al (2011) Combinatorial depletion analysis to assemble the network architecture of the SAGA and ADA chromatin remodeling complexes. Mol Syst Biol 7:503
Bian C, Xu C, Ruan J, Lee KK, Burke TL et al (2011) Sgf29 binds histone H3K4me2/3 and is required for SAGA complex recruitment and histone H3 acetylation. EMBO J 30(14):2829–2842
Vermeulen M, Eberl HC, Matarese F, Marks H, Denissov S et al (2010) Quantitative interaction proteomics and genome-wide profiling of epigenetic histone marks and their readers. Cell 142(6):967–980
Dhalluin C, Carlson JE, Zeng L, He C, Aggarwal AK et al (1999) Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature 399(6735):491–496
Owen DJ, Ornaghi P, Yang JC, Lowe N, Evans PR et al (2000) The structural basis for the recognition of acetylated histone H4 by the bromodomain of histone acetyltransferase gcn5p. EMBO J 19(22):6141–6149
Hassan AH, Prochasson P, Neely KE, Galasinski SC, Chandy M et al (2002) Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 111(3):369–379
Riss A, Scheer E, Joint M, Trowitzsch S, Berger I et al (2015) Subunits of ADA-two-A-containing (ATAC) or Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltrasferase (SAGA) Coactivator complexes enhance the Acetyltransferase activity of GCN5. J Biol Chem 290(48):28997–29009
Rojas JR, Trievel RC, Zhou J, Mo Y, Li X et al (1999) Structure of Tetrahymena GCN5 bound to coenzyme A and a histone H3 peptide. Nature 401(6748):93–98
Clements A, Poux AN, Lo WS, Pillus L, Berger SL et al (2003) Structural basis for histone and phosphohistone binding by the GCN5 histone acetyltransferase. Mol Cell 12(2):461–473
Trievel RC, Li FY, Marmorstein R (2000) Application of a fluorescent histone acetyltransferase assay to probe the substrate specificity of the human p300/CBP-associated factor. Anal Biochem 287(2):319–328
Poux AN, Marmorstein R (2003) Molecular basis for Gcn5/PCAF histone acetyltransferase selectivity for histone and nonhistone substrates. Biochemistry 42(49):14366–14374
Clements A, Marmorstein R (2003) Insights into structure and function of GCN5/PCAF and yEsa 1 histone acetyltransferase domains. Methods Enzymol 371:545–564
Sapountzi V, Cote J (2011) MYST-family histone acetyltransferases: beyond chromatin. Cell Mol Life Sci 68(7):1147–1156
Su J, Wang F, Cai Y, Jin J (2016) The functional analysis of histone acetyltransferase MOF in tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Sci 17(1):E99
Meller VH, Rattner BP (2002) The roX genes encode redundant male-specific lethal transcripts required for targeting of the MSL complex. EMBO J 21(5):1084–1091
Deng X, Meller VH (2006) roX RNAs are required for increased expression of X-linked genes in Drosophila melanogaster males. Genetics 174(4):1859–1866
Marin I (2003) Evolution of chromatin-remodeling complexes: comparative genomics reveals the ancient origin of "novel" compensasome genes. J Mol Evol 56(5):527–539
Morales V, Straub T, Neumann MF, Mengus G, Akhtar A et al (2004) Functional integration of the histone acetyltransferase MOF into the dosage compensation complex. EMBO J 23(11):2258–2268
Morales V, Regnard C, Izzo A, Vetter I, Becker PB (2005) The MRG domain mediates the functional integration of MSL3 into the dosage compensation complex. Mol Cell Biol 25(14):5947–5954
Larschan E, Alekseyenko AA, Gortchakov AA, Peng S, Li B et al (2007) MSL complex is attracted to genes marked by H3K36 trimethylation using a sequence-independent mechanism. Mol Cell 28(1):121–133
Sural TH, Peng S, Li B, Workman JL, Park PJ et al (2008) The MSL3 chromodomain directs a key targeting step for dosage compensation of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(12):1318–1325
Ilik IA, Quinn JJ, Georgiev P, Tavares-Cadete F, Maticzka D et al (2013) Tandem stem-loops in roX RNAs act together to mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 51(2):156–173
Maenner S, Muller M, Frohlich J, Langer D, Becker PB (2013) ATP-dependent roX RNA remodeling by the helicase maleless enables specific association of MSL proteins. Mol Cell 51(2):174–184
Kelley RL, Wang J, Bell L, Kuroda MI (1997) Sex lethal controls dosage compensation in Drosophila by a non-splicing mechanism. Nature 387(6629):195–199
Beckmann K, Grskovic M, Gebauer F, Hentze MW (2005) A dual inhibitory mechanism restricts msl-2 mRNA translation for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Cell 122(4):529–540
Mendjan S, Taipale M, Kind J, Holz H, Gebhardt P et al (2006) Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 21(6):811–823
Raja SJ, Charapitsa I, Conrad T, Vaquerizas JM, Gebhardt P et al (2010) The nonspecific lethal complex is a transcriptional regulator in Drosophila. Mol Cell 38(6):827–841
Lam KC, Muhlpfordt F, Vaquerizas JM, Raja SJ, Holz H et al (2012) The NSL complex regulates housekeeping genes in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 8(6):e1002736
Gupta A, Sharma GG, Young CS, Agarwal M, Smith ER et al (2005) Involvement of human MOF in ATM function. Mol Cell Biol 25(12):5292–5305
Dou Y, Milne TA, Tackett AJ, Smith ER, Fukuda A et al (2005) Physical association and coordinate function of the H3 K4 methyltransferase MLL1 and the H4 K16 acetyltransferase MOF. Cell 121(6):873–885
Taipale M, Rea S, Richter K, Vilar A, Lichter P et al (2005) hMOF histone acetyltransferase is required for histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 25(15):6798–6810
Smith ER, Cayrou C, Huang R, Lane WS, Cote J et al (2005) A human protein complex homologous to the Drosophila MSL complex is responsible for the majority of histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16. Mol Cell Biol 25(21):9175–9188
Li X, Wu L, Corsa CA, Kunkel S, Dou Y (2009) Two mammalian MOF complexes regulate transcription activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell 36(2):290–301
Wu L, Zee BM, Wang Y, Garcia BA, Dou Y (2011) The RING finger protein MSL2 in the MOF complex is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for H2B K34 and is involved in crosstalk with H3 K4 and K79 methylation. Mol Cell 43(1):132–144
Cai Y, Jin J, Swanson SK, Cole MD, Choi SH et al (2010) Subunit composition and substrate specificity of a MOF-containing histone acetyltransferase distinct from the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex. J Biol Chem 285(7):4268–4272
Luo H, Shenoy AK, Li X, Jin Y, Jin L et al (2016) MOF acetylates the histone demethylase LSD1 to suppress epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Rep 15(12):2665–2678
Gupta A, Hunt CR, Hegde ML, Chakraborty S, Chakraborty S et al (2014) MOF phosphorylation by ATM regulates 53BP1-mediated double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Rep 8(1):177–189
Li X, Corsa CA, Pan PW, Wu L, Ferguson D et al (2010) MOF and H4 K16 acetylation play important roles in DNA damage repair by modulating recruitment of DNA damage repair protein Mdc1. Mol Cell Biol 30(22):5335–5347
Sharma GG, So S, Gupta A, Kumar R, Cayrou C et al (2010) MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 30(14):3582–3595
Gupta A, Guerin-Peyrou TG, Sharma GG, Park C, Agarwal M et al (2008) The mammalian ortholog of Drosophila MOF that acetylates histone H4 lysine 16 is essential for embryogenesis and oncogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 28(1):397–409
Thomas T, Dixon MP, Kueh AJ, Voss AK (2008) Mof (MYST1 or KAT8) is essential for progression of embryonic development past the blastocyst stage and required for normal chromatin architecture. Mol Cell Biol 28(16):5093–5105
Kumar R, Hunt CR, Gupta A, Nannepaga S, Pandita RK et al (2011) Purkinje cell-specific males absent on the first (mMof) gene deletion results in an ataxia-telangiectasia-like neurological phenotype and backward walking in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(9):3636–3641
Gupta A, Hunt CR, Pandita RK, Pae J, Komal K et al (2013) T-cell-specific deletion of Mof blocks their differentiation and results in genomic instability in mice. Mutagenesis 28(3):263–270
Horikoshi N, Hunt CR, Pandita TK (2016) More complex transcriptional regulation and stress response by MOF. Oncogene 35(21):2681–2683
Sheikh BN, Bechtel-Walz W, Lucci J, Karpiuk O, Hild I et al (2016) MOF maintains transcriptional programs regulating cellular stress response. Oncogene 35(21):2698–2710
Cao L, Zhu L, Yang J, Su J, Ni J et al (2014) Correlation of low expression of hMOF with clinicopathological features of colorectal carcinoma, gastric cancer and renal cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol 44(4):1207–1214
Liu N, Zhang R, Zhao X, Su J, Bian X et al (2013) A potential diagnostic marker for ovarian cancer: involvement of the histone acetyltransferase, human males absent on the first. Oncol Lett 6(2):393–400
Pfister S, Rea S, Taipale M, Mendrzyk F, Straub B et al (2008) The histone acetyltransferase hMOF is frequently downregulated in primary breast carcinoma and medulloblastoma and constitutes a biomarker for clinical outcome in medulloblastoma. Int J Cancer 122(6):1207–1213
Zhang J, Liu H, Pan H, Yang Y, Huang G et al (2014) The histone acetyltransferase hMOF suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 452(3):575–580
Zhao L, Wang DL, Liu Y, Chen S, Sun FL (2013) Histone acetyltransferase hMOF promotes S phase entry and tumorigenesis in lung cancer. Cell Signal 25(8):1689–1698
Lin T, Ponn A, Hu X, Law BK, Lu J (2010) Requirement of the histone demethylase LSD1 in Snai1-mediated transcriptional repression during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncogene 29(35):4896–4904
Tang M, Shen H, Jin Y, Lin T, Cai Q et al (2013) The malignant brain tumor (MBT) domain protein SFMBT1 is an integral histone reader subunit of the LSD1 demethylase complex for chromatin association and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. J Biol Chem 288(38):27680–27691
Lin Y, Wu Y, Li J, Dong C, Ye X et al (2010) The SNAG domain of Snail1 functions as a molecular hook for recruiting lysine-specific demethylase 1. EMBO J 29(11):1803–1816
Herrero J, Muffato M, Beal K, Fitzgerald S, Gordon L et al (2016) Ensembl comparative genomics resources. Database (Oxford) 2016:bav096
Gamsjaeger R, Webb SR, Lamonica JM, Billin A, Blobel GA et al (2011) Structural basis and specificity of acetylated transcription factor GATA1 recognition by BET family bromodomain protein Brd3. Mol Cell Biol 31(13):2632–2640
Shi J, Wang Y, Zeng L, Wu Y, Deng J et al (2014) Disrupting the interaction of BRD4 with diacetylated twist suppresses tumorigenesis in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Cell 25(2):210–225
Schroder S, Cho S, Zeng L, Zhang Q, Kaehlcke K et al (2012) Two-pronged binding with bromodomain-containing protein 4 liberates positive transcription elongation factor b from inactive ribonucleoprotein complexes. J Biol Chem 287(2):1090–1099
Wang CY, Filippakopoulos P (2015) Beating the odds: BETs in disease. Trends Biochem Sci 40(8):468–479
Smith SG, Zhou MM (2016) The Bromodomain: a new target in emerging epigenetic medicine. ACS Chem Biol 11(3):598–608
Jacobson RH, Ladurner AG, King DS, Tjian R (2000) Structure and function of a human TAFII250 double bromodomain module. Science 288(5470):1422–1425
Filippakopoulos P, Picaud S, Mangos M, Keates T, Lambert JP et al (2012) Histone recognition and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family. Cell 149(1):214–231
Mottamal M, Zheng S, Huang TL, Wang G (2015) Histone deacetylase inhibitors in clinical studies as templates for new anticancer agents. Molecules 20(3):3898–3941
Benedetti R, Conte M, Altucci L (2015) Targeting histone deacetylases in diseases: where are we? Antioxid Redox Signal 23(1):99–126
Yoshida M, Beppu T (1988) Reversible arrest of proliferation of rat 3Y1 fibroblasts in both the G1 and G2 phases by trichostatin A. Exp Cell Res 177(1):122–131
Yoshida H, Sugita K (1992) A novel tetracyclic peptide, trapoxin, induces phenotypic change from transformed to normal in sis-oncogene-transformed NIH3T3 cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 83(4):324–328
Kijima M, Yoshida M, Sugita K, Horinouchi S, Beppu T (1993) Trapoxin, an antitumor cyclic tetrapeptide, is an irreversible inhibitor of mammalian histone deacetylase. J Biol Chem 268(30):22429–22435
Vidal M, Gaber RF (1991) RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11(12):6317–6327
Finnin MS, Donigian JR, Cohen A, Richon VM, Rifkind RA et al (1999) Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors. Nature 401(6749):188–193
Simon RP, Robaa D, Alhalabi Z, Sippl W, Jung M (2016) KATching-up on small molecule modulators of lysine acetyltransferases. J Med Chem 59(4):1249–1270
Gil J, Ramirez-Torres A, Encarnacion-Guevara S (2017) Lysine acetylation and cancer: a proteomics perspective. J Proteome 150:297–309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kato, H. (2017). Other Histone Modifications. In: Kaneda, A., Tsukada, Yi. (eds) DNA and Histone Methylation as Cancer Targets. Cancer Drug Discovery and Development. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59786-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59786-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59784-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59786-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)