Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methods to Study Agricultural Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture Reviews

Part of the book series: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews ((SARV,volume 25))

Abstract

Modern agriculture faces complex and ever-evolving challenges. Productive, environmental and social requirements are to be met while fulfilling the needs of numerous stakeholders across a wide array of conditions. To better meet these challenges, researchers study agricultural systems using a myriad of methods, across varied disciplines and contexts. To help connect and orientate these research efforts, an overview is required to assess and categorize the diversity of approaches and methodologies being used to study agricultural systems. Whilst a plethora of specialized studies are available, broad-scope methodological reviews are lacking. Here we review methods used in Australia and New Zealand to study farms, farmers and their broader environment. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included across a particularly wide range of publications while retaining a high level of methodological detail. An original overarching framework was produced that coherently summarized, described and categorized the diversity of methods encountered. This included defining classification criteria that can be conveniently applied to compare methods, assess their relative use, and identify linkages between approaches.

To achieve this, a new interpretative approach was employed. From a diverse pool of 400 items, 92 publications were reviewed in detail. Three overarching approaches were identified, with publications focusing on “characterizing agricultural situations” (64%), “identifying relationships” (59%), or “retracing processes” (42%). A total of 28 method groups were identified, clustered in 11 broader methodological families that ranged from simple indicators, statistics and narratives to elaborate participatory research, system modelling and mathematical programming. These categories were used to appraise Australian methodological practices. This included highlighting the connectivity between the high number of quantitative methods encountered (used by 72% of publications) and their usually clear, well-established protocols. In contrast, qualitative studies (41%) frequently suffered from inconsistent terminologies and demonstrated a lower diversity of methods in use. The review also noted that details and justifications about descriptive methods were often neglected, in spite of their impact on the entire analysis process. In addition, relatively few studies made use of long-term historical information to generate new knowledge and insights about future directions. Mixed methods were little used (only in 13% of publications), as well as some frameworks including those pertaining to social-ecological systems, agrarian systems or evolutionary economic geography.

Overall, these results show that agricultural research in Australia remains highly quantitatively oriented, favoring analytical details over data origin, and eclipsing a range of qualitative methods and emerging frameworks. Likely explanations include enduring disciplinary and topical divides (notably social/technical), lack of awareness, and lack of expertise. To remedy this, under-used methods would benefit from being pro-actively promoted and taught, and from concerted efforts to build shared, stable nomenclatures about meanings and protocols. Better documentation of data sources is also required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, Adaptive Capacity, and the “Lock-in Trap” of the Western Australian Agricultural Region. Ecol Soc 9(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston M, Whittenbury K (2012) Does climatic crisis in Australia’s food bowl create a basis for change in agricultural gender relations? Agr Human Values 30 (1):115-128. doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9382-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WK (2010) Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Res 116 (1-2):14-22. doi:DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.11.016

  • Armstrong DP, Tarrant KA, Ho CKM, Malcolm LR, Wales WJ (2010) Evaluating development options for a rain-fed dairy farm in Gippsland. Anim Prod Sci 50(5-6):363–370. doi:10.1071/An10009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S, Dray A, Perez P, Su X (2010) Rainfall–human–spatial interactions in a salinity-prone agricultural region of the Western Australian wheat-belt. Ecol Model 221(5):812–824. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier M, Bompart M, Garandel-Batifol V, Mogoutov A (2012) Textual analysis and scientometric mapping of the dynamic knowledge in and around the IFSA community. In: Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (eds) Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 73–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beilin R, Hill S, Sysak T (2011) Where is the coherent response to climate change and peak oil? An examination of policy and practice affecting agriculture in regional Australia. Int J Soc Agr Food 18(3):199–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell LW, Byrne F, Ewing MA, Wade LJ (2008) A preliminary whole-farm economic analysis of perennial wheat in an Australian dryland farming system. Agric Syst 96 (1–3):166–174. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2007.07.007

  • Biggs JS, Thorburn PJ, Crimp S, Masters B, Attard SJ (2013) Interactions between climate change and sugarcane management systems for improving water quality leaving farms in the Mackay Whitsunday region, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.005

  • Bitsch V (2005) Qualitative research: a grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of Agribusiness 23(1):75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R, Martin R (eds) (2010) The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Vinaja A, Sanz-Casado E (2008) Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica de méxico en ciencias agrícolas durante el periodo 1983–2002. Rev Fitotec Mex 31:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick S, Wright V, Kristiansen P (2011) Cross-case analysis of producer-driven marketing channels in Australia. Br Food J 113 (10–11):1217–1228. doi:10.1108/00070701111177656

  • Browne N, Kingwell R, Behrendt R, Eckard R (2013) The relative profitability of dairy, sheep, beef and grain farm enterprises in southeast Australia under selected rainfall and price scenarios. Agric Syst 117:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brym ZT, Reeve JR (2016) Agroecological principles from a bibliographic analysis of the term agroecology. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews, vol 19. Springer, Cham, pp 203–231. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual Res 6(1):97–113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cañas-Guerrero I, Mazarrón FR, Pou-Merina A, Calleja-Perucho C, Díaz-Rubio G (2013) Bibliometric analysis of research activity in the “Agronomy” category from the Web of Science, 1997–2011. Eur J Agron 50:19–28. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody P (2009) 2008 break crops survey report. Agribusiness Crop Updates 2009:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody P, Pritchard I (2009) Attitudes of Western Australian wheatbelt growers to ‘Break Crops’. Agribusiness Crop Updates 2009:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary J, Roberts A (2011) The limitations of environmental management systems in Australian agriculture. J Environ Manage 92(3):878–885. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattle N, White B (2007) Efficiency and scale economies in the Western Australian Wheatbelt. Paper presented at the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economic Society Conference, Queenstown, February 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire L, Meurk C, Woods M (2013) Decoupling farm, farming and place: recombinant attachments of globally engaged family farmers. J Rural Stud 30:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie KM, Rawnsley RP, Eckard RJ (2011) A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:653–662. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cochet H (2012) The ‘systeme agraire’ concept in francophone peasant studies. Geoforum 43(1):128–136. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. Intl J Complex Syst 1695:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Emden FH, Llewellyn RS, Burton MP (2006) Adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions: an application of duration analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(6):630–647. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Emden FH, Llewellyn RS, Burton MP (2008) Factors influencing adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 52(2):169–182. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2008.00409.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (eds) (2012) Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ, Shaw RL, Smith JA, Young B (2006a) How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res 6(1):27–44. doi:10.1177/1468794106058867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R, Sutton AJ (2006b) Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:35. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-35

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood CR, Chapman DF, Paine MS (2012) Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia. Agric Syst 108:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emtage N, Herbohn J (2012) Assessing rural landholders diversity in the Wet Tropics region of Queensland, Australia in relation to natural resource management programs: a market segmentation approach. Agric Syst 110:107–118. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A, Vanclay F (2011) Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. In: Lichtfouse E et al (eds) Sustainable agriculture volume 2, vol 2. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 283–293. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier D, Hautdidier B (2015) Connecting political ecology and French geography: on tropicality and radical thought. In: Bryant RL (ed) The international handbook of political ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 57–69

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier D, Kull CA (2015) French research traditions on peasant agricultural systems: a convergence with political ecology? In: Perreault T, Bridge G, McCarthy J (eds) The Routledge handbook of political ecology. Routledge, New York, pp 76–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill F (2011) Responsible agents: responsibility and the changing relationship between farmers and the state. Rural Soc 20(2):128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google (2015) About Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html. Accessed 9 Oct 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R (2005) Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61(2):417–430. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner R, Gregg D (2011) Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28(1):257–265. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing A-W (2012) A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. Scientometrics 94(3):1057–1075. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0777-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head L, Atchison J, Gates A, Muir P (2011) A fine-grained study of the experience of drought, risk and climate change among Australian wheat farming households. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(5):1089–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard JW, Leddin CM (2012) The impact of system changes to a dairy farm in south-west Victoria: risk and increasing profitability. Anim Prod Sci 52:557–565. doi:10.1071/AN11291

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Kleijn R, de Snoo GR (2011) Life cycle assessment of aquaculture systems—a review of methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(3):304–313. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0369-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heyvaert M, Hannes K, Maes B, Onghena P (2013) Critical appraisal of mixed methods studies. J Mix Methods Res 7(4):302–327. doi:10.1177/1558689813479449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman Z, Gobbett D, Holzworth D, McClelland T, van Rees H, Marinoni O, Garcia JN, Horan H (2012) Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: A case study of wheat in Australia. Field Crops Res 136:85–96. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman Z, Carberry PS, Robertson MJ, Gaydon DS, Bell LW, McIntosh PC (2013) Prospects for ecological intensification of Australian agriculture. Eur J Agron 44:109–123. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper S, Levantis C, Formosa T (2011) Physical and financial performance benchmarks for grain producing farms, Western Australian central agroecological zone. Report prepared for the Grains Research and Development Corporation. ABARES Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes N, Lawson K, Davidson A, Jackson T, Sheng Y (2011) Productivity pathways: climate adjusted production frontiers for the Australian broadacre cropping industry. Research report 11.5. ABARES Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam N, Quaddus M, Stanton J (2006) Driving and motivational factors for producing wool- views from WA wool producers. Bulletin 4678. Department of Agriculture Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T (2010) Harvesting productivity: ABARE-GRDC workshops on grains productivity growth. Report 10.6 to the Grains Research and Development Corporation. ABARE, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaugher E, Bornman JF, Clark A, Beukes P (2013) An integrated biophysical and socio-economic framework for analysis of climate change adaptation strategies: the case of a New Zealand dairy farming system. Environ Model Softw 39:176–187. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingwell R (2011) Managing complexity in modern farming. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 55(1):12–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00528.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingwell R, Pannell D (2005) Economic trends and drivers affecting the Wheatbelt of Western Australia to 2030. Aust J Agric Res 56(6):553. doi:10.1071/ar04196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingwell R, Pannell DJ (2008) Economists’ thoughts on WA broadacre farming towards 2020. Paper presented at the Industry Forum “2020 vision: the face of WA broadacre farming”, Perth, 2008. http://www.ceep.uwa.edu.au/publications/?a=85725. Accessed 22 May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingwell R, Anderton L, Islam N, Xayavong V, Wardell-Johnson A, Feldman D, Speijers J (2013) Broadacre farmers adapting to a changing climate. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR (2010) Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments. J Exp Bot 61(15):4129–4143. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komarek AM, MacAulay TG (2013) Farmer responses to changing risk aversion, enterprise variability and resource endowments. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 57(3):379–398. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijvanger R, Sonneveld M, Almekinders C, Veldkamp T (2014) Comparison of methods to identify crop productivity constraints in developing countries. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35(2):625–637. doi:10.1007/s13593-014-0254-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasda Bergman EM (2012) Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using web of science, scopus, or Google Scholar. J Acad Librarianship 38(6):370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawes RA, Kingwell RS (2012) A longitudinal examination of business performance indicators for drought-affected farms. Agric Syst 106(1):94–101. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawes R, Renton M (2010) The Land Use Sequence Optimiser (LUSO): a theoretical framework for analysing crop sequences in response to nitrogen, disease and weed populations. Crop Pasture Sci 61(10):835. doi:10.1071/cp10026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawes RA, Robertson MJ (2011) Whole farm implications on the application of variable rate technology to every cropped field. Field Crops Res 124(2):142–148. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gal PY, Dugué P, Faure G, Novak S (2011) How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review. Agric Syst 104(9):714–728. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leddin CM, Heard JW, Malcolm LR, Tarrant KA, Ho CKM, Wales WJ (2011) Evaluating options to increase profitability on a dairy farm in southwest Victoria, Australia. Proceedings of the 18th International Farm Management Congress Methven, Canterbury, pp 214–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviston Z, Price JC, Bates LE (2011) Key influences on the adoption of improved land management practice in rural Australia: the role of attitudes, values and situation. Rural Society 20(2):142–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P, Malcolm B, Steed G (2006) Conservation crop farming: a farm management perspective. Australian agribusiness perspectives paper no. 69. University of Melbourne, Parkville. http://www.agrifood.info/perspectives/2006/Lavis_Malcolm_Steed.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn R, Pannell DJ (2009) Managing the herbicide resource: an evaluation of extension on management of herbicide-resistant weeds. AgBioForum 12(3&4):358–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn RS, D’Emden FH, Kuehne G (2012) Extensive use of no-tillage in grain growing regions of Australia. Field Crops Res 132:204–212. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin G, Martin-Clouaire R, Duru M (2012) Farming system design to feed the changing world. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33(1):131–149. doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0075-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell G (2011) Bridging the yield gap – survey of high profit farmers. Report for the bridging the yield gap project, Department of Agriculture Western Australia. PlanFarm, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie F (2013) Farmer-driven Innovation in New South Wales, Australia. Aust Geogr 44(1):81–95. doi:10.1080/00049182.2013.765349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendham E, Gosnell H, Curtis A (2011) Agricultural land ownership change and natural resource management: comparing Australian and US case studies. In: al. GWLe (ed) Demographic change in Australia’s rural landscapes. Landscape series vol 12. Springer/CSIRO Publishing, Dordrecht/Collingwood, pp 153–187. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9654-8_7

  • Moat KA, Lavis JN, Abelson J (2013) How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: A critical interpretive synthesis. Milbank Q 91(3):604–648. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Monjardino M, Revell D, Pannell DJ (2010) The potential contribution of forage shrubs to economic returns and environmental management in Australian dryland agricultural systems. Agric Syst 103(4):187–197. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon K (2013) Conditional and resistant non-participation in market-based land management programs in Queensland, Australia. Land Use Policy 31:17–25. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison LG, Yardley L, Powell J, Michie S (2012) What design features are used in effective e-health interventions? A review using techniques from critical interpretive synthesis. Telemed J E Health 18(2):137–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nasiruddin M, Islam N, Quaddus M (2011) Determinants of supply chain competitiveness of the Western Australian Agri-food industry. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcote J, Alonso AD (2010) Factors underlying farm diversification: the case of Western Australia’s olive farmers. Agr Human Values 28(2):237–246. doi:10.1007/s10460-010-9274-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nossal K, Lim K (2011) Innovation and productivity in the Australian grains industry. Report 11.06. ABARES Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuthall P (2011a) Common methods used in the analysis of farming systems. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 6(040):1–7. doi:10.1079/pavsnnr20116040

  • Nuthall P (2011b) Farm business management: analysis of farming systems. CAB International, Oxfordshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell CJ (2010) Measuring and decomposing agricultural productivity and profitability change. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 54(4):527–560. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00512.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oro K, Pritchard B (2010) The evolution of global value chains: displacement of captive upstream investment in the Australia-Japan beef trade. J Econ Geogr 11(4):709–729. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ (2008) More reasons why farmers have so little interest in futures markets. Agr Econ 39:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson LJ, Nelsonc R, Crimp S, Langridge J (2011) Interpretive review of conceptual frameworks and research models that inform Australia’s agricultural vulnerability to climate change. Environ Model Softw 26(2):113–123. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philibert A, Loyce C, Makowski D (2012) Assessment of the quality of meta-analysis in agronomy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 148:72–82. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planfarm and Bankwest (2013) Planfarm Bankwest Benchmarks 2012–2013. Planfarm Pty Ltd/Bankwest Agribusiness Centre, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratley JE (2015) Taking stock of agronomy research in Australia – a bibliometric analysis. Paper presented at the 17th ASA conference, Hobart, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Price JC, Leviston Z (2014) Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: the social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. J Rural Stud 34:65–78. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard B, Burch D, Lawrence G (2007) Neither ‘family’ nor ‘corporate’ farming: Australian tomato growers as farm family entrepreneurs. J Rural Stud 23(1):75–87. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. www.R-project.org. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom K (2011) Farming System Development in North Central Victoria Australia. In: Tow P et al (eds) Rainfed farming systems, pp 1123-1134. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-2_46

  • Ransom K, Trapnell L (2011) Improving traditional crop-pasture farming systems with Lucerne South East Australia. In: Tow P, Cooper I, Partridge I, Birch C (eds) Rainfed farming systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 841–859. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-2_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CM, Robinson GM (2013) Factors affecting rural landholders’ adaptation to climate change: Insights from formal institutions and communities of practice. Global Environ Change 23(1):103–114. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond CM, Spoehr J (2013) The acceptability of climate change in agricultural communities: comparing responses across variability and change. J Environ Manage 115:69–77. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage 90(5):1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid R, Botterill LC (2013) The multiple meanings of ‘Resilience’: an overview of the literature. Aust J Pub Admin 72(1):31–40. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renting H, Rossing WA, Groot JC, Van der Ploeg JD, Laurent C, Perraud D, Stobbelaar DJ, Van Ittersum MK (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J Environ Manage 90(Suppl 2):S112–S123. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritman K, Kelley G, Bruce S, Walcott J, Loch A (2011) Agricultural innovation—necessity is the mother of invention. Paper presented at the ABARES Outlook Conference, Canberra, March 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MJ, Kingwell R, Measham TG, O’Connor M, Batchelor G (2009) Constraints to farmers managing dryland salinity in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. Land Degrad Dev 20(3):235–251. doi:10.1002/ldr.887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MJ, Lawes RA, Bathgate A, Byrne F, White P, Sands R (2010) Determinants of the proportion of break crops on Western Australian broadacre farms. Crop Pasture Sci 61(3):203–213. doi:10.1071/Cp09207

  • Robertson MJ, Llewellyn RS, Mandel R, Lawes R, Bramley RGV, Swift L, Metz N, O’Callaghan C (2012a) Adoption of variable rate fertiliser application in the Australian grains industry: status, issues and prospects. Precis Agric 13(2):181–199. doi:10.1007/s11119-011-9236-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MJ, Pannell DJ, Chalak M (2012b) Whole-farm model: a review of recent approaches. AFBM J 9(2):13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez D, Cox H, deVoil P, Power B (2014) A participatory whole farm modelling approach to understand impacts and increase preparedness to climate change in Australia. Agric Syst 126:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebeling PC, Webster AJ (2007) Review of current and future best-management-practices for sugarcane, horticulture, grazing and forestry industries in the Tully-Murray catchment. Report to FNQ-NRM Ltd. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Schut M, Rodenburg J, Klerkx L, van Ast A, Bastiaans L (2014) Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review. Crop Protect 56:98–108. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2013.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma DL, Anderson WK (2014) Success of diagnostic approach to rainfed, wheat-based cropping systems in Western Australia. Agric Syst 123:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Y, Zhao S, Nossal K (2011) Productivity and farm size in Australian agriculture: reinvestigating the returns to scale. Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society’s Annual Conference, February 9–11, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherren K, Yoon H-J, Clayton H, Schirmer J (2011) Do Australian graziers have an offset mindset about their farm trees? Biodivers Conserv 21(2):363–383. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-0187-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D, Schiemer F (2015) Crossing boundaries: complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 12:6–11. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart H, Race D, Curtis A (2011a) Demographic change and the implications for commercial forestry: lessons from South-East Australia. In: al. GWLe (ed) Demographic change in Australia’s rural landscapes. Landscape series vol 12. Springer/CSIRO Publishing, Dordrecht/Collingwood, pp 207–231. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9654-8_7

  • Stewart HTL, Race DH, Curtis AL, Stewart AJK (2011b) A case study of socio-economic returns from farm forestry and agriculture in south-east Australia during 1993–2007. Forest Policy Econ 13(5):390–395. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stott K, O’Brien G, Kumaran T, Vigiak O, Rees D, Shambrook D, Roberts A (2013) Development of representative livestock systems for the Moe River catchment. FFSR technical report. Department of Environment and Primary Industries Victoria, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretch T, Carter C, Kingwell R (2014) The cost of Australia’s bulk grain export supply chain – an information paper. Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri H, Clarke D (2009) Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Rev Educ Res 79(1):395–430. doi:10.3102/0034654308326349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan DKY, Brock PM, Hulugalle NR, Quigley G (2013) Life cycle assessment of cotton-corn farming systems in the Namoi Valley, Australia. Proceedings of the 8th Life Cycle Conference (ALCAS), Manly

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2010) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn P, Davis A, Attard S, Milla R, Anderson T, McShane T (2007) Best management practices to improve the quality of water leaving irrigated sugarcane farms: guidelines for the Burdekin Region. Report no. 07/36. Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research, James Cook University, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Collins K, Probert ME (2010) Using the APSIM model to estimate nitrous oxide emissions from diverse Australian sugarcane production systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136(3-4):343–350. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Attard SJ, Kemei J (2011) Environmental impacts of irrigated sugarcane production: nitrogen lost through runoff and leaching. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 144 (1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.003

  • Tonts M, Yarwood R, Jones ROY (2010) Global geographies of innovation diffusion: the case of the Australian cattle industry. Geogr J 176(1):90–104. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00331.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonts M, Argent N, Plummer P (2012) Evolutionary perspectives on rural Australia. Geogr Res 50(3):291–303. doi:10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00745.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gool D (2011) Wheat yield potential and land management constraints in the South West of Western Australia. Resource management technical report 376. Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • van Grieken M, Poggio M, East M, Page J, Star M (2010) Economic analysis of sugarcane farming systems for water quality improvement in the great barrier reef catchments. Reef rescue integrated paddock to reef monitoring, modelling and reporting program. CSIRO, Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship., Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • van Grieken ME, Thomas CR, Roebeling PC, Thorburn PJ (2013) Integrating economic drivers of social change into agricultural water quality improvement strategies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:166–175. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga AV (2011) Measuring the semantic integrity of scientific fields: a method and a study of sociology, economics and biophysics. Scientometrics 88(1):163–177. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0342-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villano R, Fleming E, Fleming P (2010) Evidence of farm-level synergies in mixed-farming systems in the Australian Wheat-Sheep Zone. Agric Syst 103(3):146–152. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson P, Watson D (2013) GRDC organisational performance research – 2013 grower survey report for the grains research & development corporation. Down To Earth Research Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster AJ, Thorburn RPC, Horan H, Biggs J (2009) The expected impact of climate change on nitrogen losses from wet tropical sugarcane production in the Great Barrier Reef region. Mar Freshw Res 60:1159–1164. doi:10.1071/MF08348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler AM, Hergesheimer C, Brisbois B, Wittman H, Yassi A, Spiegel JM (2015) Food sovereignty, food security and health equity: a meta-narrative mapping exercise. Health Policy Plann 30(8):1078–1092. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller S, Smith EF, Pritchard B (2013) Family or enterprise? What shapes the business structures of Australian farming? Aust Geogr 44(2):129–142. doi:10.1080/00049182.2013.789592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch J, Case BS, Bigsby H (2014) Trees on farms: investigating and mapping woody re-vegetation potential in an intensely-farmed agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:93–102. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler S, Bjornlund H, Zuo A, Edwards J (2012) Handing down the farm? The increasing uncertainty of irrigated farm succession in Australia. J Rural Stud 28(3):266–275. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler S, Zuo A, Bjornlund H (2013) Farmers’ climate change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Global Environ Change 23(2):537–547. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson KG (2011) A comparison of the drivers influencing adoption of on-farm anaerobic digestion in Germany and Australia. Biomass Bioenergy 35(5):1613–1622. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerger A, Warren G, Hill P, Robertson D, Weidemann A, Lawton K (2011) Multi-criteria assessment for linking regional conservation planning and farm-scale actions. Environ Model Softw 26(1):103–110. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Australian Government, Department of Education (IPRS/APA scholarship), and by the Grains Research and Development Corporation of Australia (GRDC, GRS scholarship). The authors also thank Stephen Powles for his continued support, as well as Zoe Leviston, Lindsay Bell and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Agriculture and Environment & The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Myrtille Lacoste & Ken Flower

  2. CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, WA, 6014, Australia

    Roger Lawes

  3. UFR Comparative Agriculture, UMR PRODIG, AgroParisTech, 75231, Paris Cedex 05, France

    Olivier Ducourtieux

Authors
  1. Myrtille Lacoste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger Lawes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olivier Ducourtieux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ken Flower
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myrtille Lacoste .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Europole Mediterraneen de l’Arbois, CEREGE, Aix-Marseille Université, Coll de France, CNRS, INRA, IRD, Aix en Provence Cedex 04, France

    Eric Lichtfouse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lacoste, M., Lawes, R., Ducourtieux, O., Flower, K. (2017). Methods to Study Agricultural Systems. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58679-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation