Skip to main content

Farmer Responses to Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture Volume 2

Abstract

Climate change is a major issue for agricultural sustainability, and changes in farming practices will be necessary both to reduce emissions and to adapt to a changing climate and to new social expectations. A complicating factor is that the processes of behaviour change are complex and can be slow to occur. Discourse analysis is useful in understanding how the discourses farmers are embedded in contribute to resistance to change. Discourses are particular ways of using language in particular situations. They have wide ranging effects on beliefs, values and behaviours. Interviews were conducted in 2008 with 63 respondents, including 22 apple growers, 29 dairy farmers and 12 agricultural consultants in Tasmania, Australia. In undertaking a discourse analysis of the transcripts of these interviews utilising N-Vivo, four specific discourses were identified as being important in shaping farmers’ perspectives of climate change and sustainability: Money, Earth, Human responsibility and Questioning. Each discourse contributes to resistance to changing behaviour in particular ways. An understanding of these discourses offers a new approach to facilitating behaviour change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABARE (2007) Statistical tables, Australian Commodities March quarter, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 227–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K., Lövbrand E. (2007) Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Competing Discourses of Green Governmentality, Ecological Modernization and Civic Environmentalism, in: Pettenger M. (Ed.), The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knowledge, Norms, Discourses, Ashgate, Hampshire, pp. 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bord R., O’Connor R., Fisher A. (2000) In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science 9, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom A., Lashof D. (2007) Weather it’s climate change? in: Moser S., Dilling L. (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 31–43.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff M. (2008) Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change from 1995–2004, Climatic Change 86, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley H. (2000) Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia, Public Understanding of Science 9, 313–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan M. (2006) Social change and the adoption and adaptation of knowledge claims. Whose truth do you trust in regard to sustainable agriculture? Agric. Human Values 23, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho A. (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change, Public Understanding of Science 7, 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, SAGE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover D. (2003) Environmental Adult Education: Critique and Creativity in a Globalising World, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 99, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2008) An overview of climate change adaptation in the Australian agricultural sector – impacts, options and priorities, Australian Government Department of Land and Water, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darier E. (1999) Discourses of the Environment, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt D. (1998) Science, social constructivism and nature, in: Braun B., Castree N. (Eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the millennium, Routledge, London, pp. 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doulton H., Brown K. (2009) Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press, Global Environ. Chang. 19, 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek J. (1997) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery T. (2005) The Weather Makers: The History and Future Impact of Climate Change, Text Publishing, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A., Vanclay F. (2009a) Discourses of Climate Change: Understanding Farmer Resistance, in: Martin J., Winter C. (Eds.), Climate Change Responses across Regional Australia: Social Learning and Adaptation, Latrobe University, Bendigo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A., Vanclay F. (2009b) Using discourse analysis to better inform the practice of extension, Extension Farming Systems Journal (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge: And The Discourse on Language, trans. A Sheridan Smith, Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut R. (2008) Issue paper 1 Climate change: Land use – Agriculture and Forestry, Retrieved 12 June, 2008, from http://www.garnautreview.org.au/CA25734E0016A131/pages/reports-and-papers.

  • Griskevicius V., Cialidini R., Goldstein N. (2008) Social Norms an underestimated and underemployed lever for managing climate change, Int. J. Sustain. Commun. 3, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison C.M., Burgess J., Filius P. (1996) Rationalising environmental responsibilities: A comparison of lay publics in the UK and the Netherlands, Global Environ. Chang. 6, 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howden M., Nelson R., Crimp S., Park S. (2009) Adapting farming to climate change in the Asia-Pacific region, Greenhouse 2009 conference, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin A. (2001) Sociology and the environment, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S. (2004) States of knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A., Agyeman J. (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environ. Educ. Res. 8, 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz T., Donaghue N., Rapley M., Walker I. (2005) The ways that people talk about natural resources: discursive strategies as barriers to environmentally sustainable practices, Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 44, 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A. (2007) Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities, in: Moser S., Dilling L. (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 44–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke J. (1995) Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics, Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin K. (1994) Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation, Colombia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I., Nicholson-Cole S., Whitmarsh L. (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications, Global Environ. Chang. 17, 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe T., Brown K., Suraje D., De Franca Doria M., Haynes K., Vincent K. (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change, Public Understanding of Science 15, 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D., Smith W. (1999) Fostering Sustainable Behaviour: An introduction to community-based social marketing, New Society Publishers, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne M., Stenekes N., Russell J. (2008) Climate Risk and Industry Adaptation, Australian Government Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser S., Dilling L. (2004) Making Climate Hot, Environment 46, 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser S., Dilling L. (2007) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell D., Marshall G., Barr N., Curtis A., Vanclay F., Wilkinson R. (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders, Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 46, 1407–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettenger M. (2007) The Social Construction of Climate Change: Power, Knoweldge, Norms, Discourses, Ashgate, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips L., Jorgensen M. (2002) Discourse Analysis: as theory and method, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter E., Oster C. (2008) Communicating climate change: public responsiveness and matters of concern, Media International Australia 127, 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen T., Maniates M., Conca K. (2002) Confronting Consumption, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed., Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D. (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse, Environ. Sci. Policy 7, 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamm K., Clarke E., Reynolds E. (2000) Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming, Public Understanding of Science 9, 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleeman S., O’Riordan T., Jaeger C. (2001) The Psychology of Denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups, Global Environ. Chang. 11, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A., Corbin J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Sage publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgis P., Allum N. (2004), Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes, Public Understanding of Science 13, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribbia J. (2007) Stuck in the slow lane of behaviour change? A not-so-superhuman perspective on getting out of our cars, in: Moser S., Dilling L. (Eds.), Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 237–250.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo C., Shanahan J. (2000) Social research on climate change: where we have been, where we are and where we might go, Public Understanding of Science 9, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar S. (1992) The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem, The Sociological Quarterly 33, 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F. (1992) Barriers to adoption: a general overview of the issues, Rural Society 2, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F. (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management, Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 44, 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F., Lawrence G. (1994) Farmer Rationality and the adoption of environmentally sound practices: a critique of the assumptions of traditional agricultural extension, Eur. J. Agric. Education and Extension 1, 59–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F., Lawrence G. (1995) The Environmental Imperative: Ecosocial Concerns for Australian Agriculture, Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay F., Leith P., Fleming A. (2009) Understanding farming community concerns about adapting to a changed climate, in: Filho W., Mannke F. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Aspects of Climate Change, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main: Germany, pp. 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell M., Taylor S., Yates S. (2001) Discourse as data: a guide for analysis, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Aysha Fleming is supported by a Top-Up Scholarship from CSIRO’s Climate Adaptation Flagship and from the Climate Futures for Tasmania project. Ethics approval for the project was granted by Tasmanian Social Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee (H10168). Sincere thanks to the many farmers and agricultural industry spokespersons who agreed to be interviewed, to Claire Hiller for help with the analysis and to Shaun Lisson for commenting on drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysha Fleming .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fleming, A., Vanclay, F. (2011). Farmer Responses to Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture. In: Lichtfouse, E., Hamelin, M., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Volume 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics